IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Lockerbie bombing , Pan Am 103

Reply
Old 16th September 2009, 01:31 AM   #41
Caustic Logic
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
Originally Posted by Ambrosia View Post
MST-13 timer is made by MEBO a Swiss company.
Quote:
Furthermore, Mr. Edwin Bollier, head of the Zurich-based company MEBO, today confirmed vis-à-vis Dr. Koechler that during a visit to the headquarters of the American FBI in Washington DC at the beginning of 1991 he was offered an amount of up to USD 4 million plus a new identity (name) in the United States if he would testify in court that the timer fragment that was allegedly found on the crash site around Lockerbie stemmed from a MST-13 timer that his company had delivered to Libya.
This is bad. Why do you need to pay someone just to show up and tell the truth? Or is he simply in on this vast disinfo conspiracy?
Quote:
this document which is apparently a summary of MEBOs official position/analysis of the recovered fragment, makes interesting reading.
Indeed, the company itself, to believe the mebocom (not mebo.com) link says
Quote:
The MEBO Inc. Partners E. Meister and E. Bollier did confirm to the forensic experts from the FBI and the Scottish police that such MST-13 timers had actually been delivered to Libya; (see official police-protocols from 1990).

Meister and Bolier had "smartly" been coached into depositing such a statement by simply being asked to identify the alleged fragment from a slightly blurred photograph. Shock and stress from being named kind of an accessory to this tragedy prevented E. Bollier and E. Meister from insisting first to actually view the alleged fragment, prior to making clear identification!
They don't seem happy with the investigation. ?? But we're talking about planting here, not forgery. It seems to be a fit style-wise.

Quote:
Then we have Ulrich Lumpert
Quote:
Ulrich Lumpert, formerly an electronics engineer with Mebo AG, Zurich, has signed an affidavit admitting he committed perjury before the Scottish Court in the Netherlands.

... stole a handmade sample of an "MST-13 Timer PC-board" ... handed it over ... to an "official person investigating the Lockerbie case." ... cut into two pieces ... presented in court
[ link ]
Whoah! That is very different from flying out of the plane on detonation. I did notice strange horizontal and vertical cut marks on the recovered sample, like sloppy razor work. That's too obvious tho, isn't it? GFaked photo! Disinfo! What I want to know is what commie conspiracy is paying all these people to create this insane Libya-is-innocent CT?

Quote:
Thomas Thurman, the FBI agent who identifies the fragment in the first place, who appears in the Maltese double cross, was criticised in this report and in this report both from 1997, for altering evidence.
Interesting. Primarily he was cited for mishandling evidence in the OKC bombing case, and at least two other cases. This pieces of work on 103 doesn't seem to play in there. If all he did was identify it, with the comparison to a Mebo board, then he did fine in this case. But there is more to it, I'm sure.

Quote:
In Gideon Levys film "Lockerbie Revisited" interviews with lab personnell reveal that the MST-13 fragment itself was never tested for explosives residue. link Dutch language but most of the interviews are in english.
Hmmm... more disinfo people. You'll note they're all European, kinda shady...

Great post, mate!
Caustic Logic is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 05:45 AM   #42
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
The provenance and chain of custody of the fragment are quite interesting.

It seems to be very unclear exactly who found it and where and when. If you watch The Maltese Double Cross, you'll notice that the film states the fragment survived in the open, in Kielder Forest in Northumberland, through two winters. There's a long sequence walking through the forest with a search worker explaining how stuff caught in the high canopy couldn't be recovered but they tried to get the stuff in the undergrowth, and then some severe winter storms brought more stuff down which could be recovered.

This would imply it was found no earlier than the spring of 1990, which is in complete contradiction to most of the rest of the evidence, and I assumed it was sloppy reporting on the part of that production. However, the provenance is confused enough that it's worth bearing this very early version in mind (the film was released in 1994).

According to de Braeckeleer
(whose wider thesis I don't necessarily accept, by the way)

Quote:
There have been different accounts concerning the discovery of the timer fragment. A police source close to the investigation reported that it had been discovered by lovers. Some have said that it was picked up by a man walking his dog. Others have claimed that it was found by a policeman "combing the ground on his hands and knees."

At the trial, the third explanation became official. "On 13 January 1989, DC Gilchrist and DC McColm were engaged together in line searches in an area near Newcastleton. A piece of charred material was found by them which was given the police number PI/995 and which subsequently became label 168."

Paul Foot (whose factual accuracy appears to be impeccable) doesn't go into so much detail. He says

Quote:
The fragment had a strange history. It was first found in the neck of a shirt collected from the luggage off the stricken plane. The material found in the shirt was first marked "cloth, charred", but this had been overwritten by a Scottish policeman with the word "debris". The policeman who found it, DC Gilchrist, was never able to give a credible explanation for this alteration.

De Braeckeleer elaborates a bit more.

Quote:
The officer had initially labelled the bag 'cloth (charred)' but had later overwritten the word 'cloth' with 'debris'.

The bag contained pieces of a shirt collar and fragments of materials said to have been extracted from it, including the tiny piece of circuit board identified as coming from an MST-13 timer made by the Swiss firm MeBo.

"The original inscription on the label, which we are satisfied, was written by DC Gilchrist, was "Cloth (charred)". The word 'cloth' has been overwritten by the word 'debris'. There was no satisfactory explanation as to why this was done."

The judges said in their judgment that Gilchrist's evidence had been "at worst evasive and at best confusing".

It's been said that this standard of "chain of custody" is uniquely poor among the Lockerbie evidence. Well, I should hope so. Relabelling exhibits like that is a strict no-no, and the policeman's evasiveness is extremely peculiar. I should hope this was an isolated instance. But it's helluva funny that it's this one single absolutely pivotal piece of evidence that was affected.

It goes on, but I'll do that in a new post.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.

Last edited by Rolfe; 16th September 2009 at 05:50 AM.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 06:09 AM   #43
Ambrosia
Good of the Fods
 
Ambrosia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
Originally Posted by Caustic Logic View Post
This is bad. Why do you need to pay someone just to show up and tell the truth? Or is he simply in on this vast disinfo conspiracy?
He reportedly declined the offer. Though there was a $4million bounty to do with the case, and it's alleged that Gauci the shop owner was paid $2million
, documents pertaining to this were requested by the defense in an October 2007 hearing prior to Megrahis 2nd appeal.

I am not calling anyone disinfo here, nor positing a vast conspiracy.

According to his own admission Bollier, who has a history of working with Libya, was more interested in the $200million offered to him by Ghadaffi for getting Megrahi freed. See the BBC Conspiracy Files program where he is interviewed for more.

*if* that's true, it calls into question much of the information collated by mebo regarding the whole timer fragment, there's bundles of it at the link I posted earlier, as well as transcripts of Bolliers original report to Scottish police on the fragment.

It cetainly makes the picture more complicated, and harder to investigate.
Ambrosia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 07:12 AM   #44
Ambrosia
Good of the Fods
 
Ambrosia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
Ludwig De Braeckeleer is nothing if not prolific. Having authored some 200 articles, mostly to do with the Lockerbie case, for OhmyNews International. OMNI being a South Korean online newspaper.

this quote is startling...

Quote:
In an interview conducted on May 16, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, the former president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, told me that Tehran, not Libya, had ordered the bombing of Pan Am 103 ... in the immediate aftermath of the Lockerbie tragedy, Mohtashami-Pur, the then minister of the interior, acknowledged in an interview that he had contracted Ahmad Jibril, the leader of a Palestinian organization, to bomb an American airliner. The interview was scheduled for publication the following day. Hours before distribution, the newspaper was shutdown.
[ link ]

Other investigoogling throws up this PDF. apparently a reproduction of the Lumpert affidavit along with Kochlers response, as well as an article by Marcello Mega in a Scottish newspaper that interviews former a police chief who admits to fabricating evidence re: the MST-13 fragment.
Ambrosia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 07:54 AM   #45
A'isha
Miss Schoolteacher
 
A'isha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 15,221
Originally Posted by Rolfe View Post

Do you decide to introduce the unaccompanied bomb into the system in Malta, on an Air Malta flight to Frankfurt, there to negotiate the baggage system to get itself on to a Pan Am flight to Heathrow, where it will be unloaded again and transferred to the actual transatlantic flight?

And then do you set the timer to so short a time that if anything delays the timetable for only an hour, the bomb will almost certainly go off on the ground somewhere?

Terrorists are not stupid, why would anyone decide on a plan like this?

First, the bag is going to have to get through not one airport security system but three, each one with its own x-ray surveillance, and each one liable to pull an apparently suspicious or even unaccompanied bag out for closer examination. And second, the bag is going to have to manage not to get lost - probably not so hard on a single leg, but with two changes of plane, what are the chances? And third, not just one but three flights are going to have to be up to time and running on schedule - in late December, in northern Europe.

And the one thing you might do to hedge against delays, which is to set the timer so that the explosion happens perhaps half an hour before the flight is scheduled to reach Newfoundland, so that even if it's two or three hours late it'll already be over the ocean - you choose not to do. You set the timer for only one hour into the on-time flight.

And yet that's what we're led to believe was the cunning plan that brought down Pam Am 103 over Lockerbie in 1988.

In fact nothing much went wrong with the plan, if that's what it was. The flight was delayed, but only by 25 minutes. The crash happened over southern Scotland, rather than the Outer Hebrides or maybe Ireland. But does it make any sense to devise a plan with so many opportunities for it to fall flat on its face?

Note that this argument is the same irrespective of the identity of the terrorists. Palestinians, Libyans, Al Qaida, IRA, doesn't matter. Why would you choose to send your carefully-placed bomb on such a chancy journey?
All of these arguments from incredulity are irrelevant, because it happened before. All of it.

In 1985, Sikh extremists attempted to destroy two Air India flights. They purchased tickets in Canada for the Canadian airline Canadian Pacific Airlines with a later transfer to separate Air India flights. The terrorists then checked bags containing bombs for the Canadian Pacific flights, asking that the bags be interlined to the Air India flights. The terrorists themselves did not board the planes.

The bags were duly transferred once the Canadian flights reached their destinations, one in Toronto to Air India Flight 181 (which made an additional stop in Montreal to have a "podded" engine added, a standard airline method of transporting unused aircraft engines to maintenance hubs) which then proceeded to London as Air India Flight 182, and the other in Tokyo to Air India Flight 301.

Air India Flight 182's bomb detonated when the airline was above the Atlantic, destroying the aircraft and killing all aboard. Air India Flight 301's bomb exploded an hour earlier, on the ground at Narita Airport as it was being transferred from the Canadian plane to the Indian plane, killing two baggage handlers and injuring four. The plotters had intended both bombs to go off simultaneously while the Air India planes were in flight, but due to a misreading of how departure and arrival times in various time zones were listed, the timer of the Air India Flight 301 bomb was mis-set, and so detonated early while the plane was still on the ground.

In other words, four years before Lockerbie, a terrorist group did exactly what you find so suspiciously unbelievable in the Pan Am Flight 103 case - send unaccompanied bags with explosives through multiple baggage-check points because of multiple aircraft transfers (on entirely separate airlines, even), and set the timer in a way that flight delays or misread schedules could cause the bomb to detonate when it wasn't planned to.

Last edited by A'isha; 16th September 2009 at 09:07 AM.
A'isha is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 08:08 AM   #46
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
[Sorry, this leads on from my last post, pls temporarily skip intervening items.]

The routine for examining debris picked up on the ground seems to have been to send the stuff to RAERDE in Kent for forensic examination, and the piece of cloth with the fragment would be sent there because of the charring, which suggested it had been in close proximity to the expolsion.

This is where the next glitch in the chain of custody comes in. Dr. Thomas Hayes was the scientist who examined it. He was the man who gave the forensic evidence that falsely convicted the Maguire Seven, and he has had a number of cases overturned on appeal. Overall, his record suggests someone over-keen to find "smoking-gun" evidence and not too particular about how he does it (I can look for the links to this later if necessary). On the face of it, he found the fragment in the cloth of the shirt in May of 1989.

He described the fragment in notes in a loose-leaf folder, with hand-numbered pages. The page in question was numbered 51. However, there were five subsequent pages in the folder, originally numbered 51 to 55, which had been re-numbered as 52 to 56. The clear implication was that the page describing the fragment had been added at a later date, and the subsequent pages renumbered to correspond. Dr. Hayes was unable to explain the renumbering in court. The fragment's notes were dated, and the date appeared to match (not hard, that), but it has been suggested that the number assigned to the fragment in the examination record indicates a much later date of examination. (The judges decided that since the date was consistent, the rest of the confusion was irrelevant.)

Nothing more seems to have happened at this juncture. However in September 1989 another employee at RAERDE, Allen Fereday, wrote to the Scottish police asking them to look at a photograph of this fragment. Oddly, the photo was a polaroid, and Fereday apologised for not having had a proper picture taken by a staff photographer, explaining that the polaroid was "the best I can do in such a short time".

Huh? The fragment was allegedly found in May and it's now September. What sort of a backlog do the RAERDE photographers have, for goodness sake?

Fereday, by the way, has been repeatedly criticised as having no scientific qualifications, and was flagged up as someone who should not be giving expert forensic evidence.

I think the implication here is that September 1989 is the earliest point where there is reasonably definite evidence of the timer fragment existing in the system. Which does knock out the version presented by The Maltese Double Cross, but I still think that's fairly emblematic of the confusion that existed.

I'm taking my next section from Paul Foot's account, as I said, it seems the most factual and based on evidence given at the trial. There seems to have then been a long and fruitless search for the manufacturer of the circuit board, carried out by DCI Williamson of the Scottish police. While it's clear that the May entry in Hayes's notes could well have been retrospective, I have seen no suggestion that Williamson is bent, or was not in possession of, at the very least, a picture of something that looked plausibly like the fragment exhibited as evidence. So Sepember 1989 seems to be the date to look at from this account.

Williamson was unsuccessful in identifying the provenance of the circuit board, and sent it to the USA. In June 1990 Tom Thurman identified it as resembling another timer the US authorities had laid their hands on from elsewhere. However, it seems as if even then they didn't know exactly what it was, and it took more trips to look at more fragments from further timers before they finally identified MeBo as the manufacturer.

It was certainly the identification of the circuit board that began the Libya connection. The first press reports naming Libya as being implicated (rather than the PFLP-GC, Syria and Iran) appeared in September 1990, apparently because the fragment resembled timers known or discovered to have been sold to Libya.

That seems to be when the Lockerbie investigation turned to Giaka, who had been feeding the CIA scraps of irrelevant and inaccurate information about Libya since August 1988, including Megrahi and Fhimah whom he believed were Libyan intelligence agents. This led in February 1991 to Gauci being shown Megrahi's picture and asked if this was the man who bought the clothes.

This latter part actually sounds quite genuine to me. Would someone arrange for the fragment to be planted in the evidence in September 1989 (backdating its discovery to May of that year), and then be content to sit and wait for a full year while various PC Plods ran round in circles with it? This is the narrative that could persuade me the item wasn't planted - if only there weren't so many strange happenings surrounding the thing.

But as they say, hold it! Dere r moar confusions.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.

Last edited by Rolfe; 16th September 2009 at 08:12 AM.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 08:53 AM   #47
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
Originally Posted by ANTPogo View Post
In other words, four years before Lockerbie, a terrorist group did exactly what you find so suspiciously unbelievable in the Pan Am Flight 103 case - send unaccompanied bags with explosives through multiple baggage-check points because of multiple aircraft transfers (on entirely separate airlines, even), and set the timer in a way that flight delays or misread schedules could cause the bomb to detonate when it wasn't planned to.

Thanks for the info about the disappearing Air India flight - I remember it happening, but not the details.

Perhaps I laid out the OP in a misleading manner. The starting point for the "plant" hypothesis isn't argument from incredulity, and I possibly put too much emphasis on that aspect. The real oddity isn't the multiple transfers alleged to have been planned. It's the time of the detonation of the bomb.

If you're going to do everything that was alleged, especially if you're relying on three separate flights and two baggage transfers four days before Christmas, why would you set the timer for 7pm rather than midnight? If everything goes perfectly, 7pm will see the plane just clearing Scotland or Ireland. Any delay of more than an hour, and it won't even be airborne. In contrast, setting the timer for midnight (at a rough guess) will get you an explosion over the Atlantic whether the plane is on time or several hours late.

Of course, if that was the sum total of the problem, even given the extraordinary coincidence with respect to the settings of the ice-cube timers, Geni's point that someone just miscalculated would probably explain it.

However, put that together with the huge questions over the provenance of the timer fragment, and it starts to look a lot more interesting.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 11:24 AM   #48
geni
Anti-homeopathy illuminati member
 
geni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 28,209
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
I wasn't being ironic.

I honestly don't see the connection here.


I mean, didn't Libya apologize? Were they in on it?
Libya wants to be allowed back into the international community. If that involves handing over a few people, makeing the odd apology and spending a few billion (they've pumped enough into the AU in the past) they will do it.
geni is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 11:33 AM   #49
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
You know, this habit of presenting stuff as video rather than text can be annoying. One of the films about the Lockerbie affair has a segment of an interview with Said Gadaffi in which he freely explains that the "apology" was simply playing with words and the whole thing was done in order to get the sanctions lifted. I wish I had a bit of text to quote. As it is, I can't even remember which film.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 11:44 AM   #50
Toke
Godless Socialist
 
Toke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by Rolfe View Post
You know, this habit of presenting stuff as video rather than text can be annoying. One of the films about the Lockerbie affair has a segment of an interview with Said Gadaffi in which he freely explains that the "apology" was simply playing with words and the whole thing was done in order to get the sanctions lifted. I wish I had a bit of text to quote. As it is, I can't even remember which film.

Rolfe.
If that is the case he got serious payback with those Bulgarian? nurses.
__________________
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. -K. Marx.

Toke is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 12:04 PM   #51
TriskettheKid
Graduate Poster
 
TriskettheKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,431
Originally Posted by geni View Post
Libya wants to be allowed back into the international community. If that involves handing over a few people, makeing the odd apology and spending a few billion (they've pumped enough into the AU in the past) they will do it.
As far as I was aware, hadn't Libya also accepted responsibility for other terrorist acts associated with Libya?

Could someone please walk me through this? I honestly am not seeing the big picture.
TriskettheKid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 01:06 PM   #52
Ambrosia
Good of the Fods
 
Ambrosia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
Originally Posted by Rolfe View Post
You know, this habit of presenting stuff as video rather than text can be annoying. One of the films about the Lockerbie affair has a segment of an interview with Said Gadaffi
BBC Conspiracy Files.

There's a transcript of that interview here.

Quote:
INTERVIEWER does Libya accept responsibility for the
attack on Lockerbie?
INTERVIEWEE
Well yes we wrote a letter to the Security Council saying
that we are responsible for the acts of our employees or
people. But it doesn't mean that we did it in fact.
INTERVIEWER
So to be very clear on this what you're saying is that you
accept responsibility, but you're not admitting that you
did it?
INTERVIEWEE
Of course.
Ambrosia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 01:53 PM   #53
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
As far as I was aware, hadn't Libya also accepted responsibility for other terrorist acts associated with Libya?

Could someone please walk me through this? I honestly am not seeing the big picture.

It's a very big picture, and it has at least two subjects that it's unclear why they should be on the same canvas (I'm talking about the drug smuggling that was apparently going on on the plane, and the CIA operatives, and the missing body and the VIPs who were pulled off the plane at the last minute, let's not go there just yet).

Here's the simple version.

In the spring of 1988, the USS Vincennes operating in the Persian Gulf with a very trigger-happy captain, shot down a scheduled airline flight full of pilgrims on their way to Mecca in mistake for an attacking fighter plane. They were edgy, because they were in Iranian waters illegally, although this was initially denied. The passenger plane was an Iranian Airbus. Initially the USA blamed the Airbus, and no apology was ever offered. Instead, the captain of the Vincennes was given a medal. (And by the way, both US vessels in the area promptly sailed away, leaving the crew of the HMS York, which was also nearby and had in fact originally been blamed for the incident, to spend the next two weeks fishing body parts out of the Persian Gulf.)

The Ayatollah promptly vowed to have his revenge, declaring that US airliners would rain from the skies as a result. He offered a fee of $10 million to any group which would carry out the revenge on Iran's behalf.

Enter the People's Front for the Liberation of Palestine General Command, a terrorist organisation based in Syria but operating a cell in Frankfurt. That cell included Ahmed Jibril, a mastermind, Marwan Khreesat, a bomb-maker, and Abu Talb, a henchman. The German police raided that cell in September of 1988, took them into custody and seized four assembled bombs made of Toshiba radio-cassette players clearly intended to be used against aircraft.

The reason they were obviously intended to hit aircraft is that they were triggered by "ice-cube" timers attached to aneroid barometers, which would be inert indefinitely at sea level, but would explode 35 to 45 minutes after taking off in an aircraft.

For reasons I'm not yet clear about but which may turn out to be very important, several members of the cell including Khreesat were released again almost immmediately. In spite of the fact that there was strong evidence of the existence of a fifth device that had not been recovered.

On 21st December the Pan Am clipper Maid of the Seas fell out of the sky above Lockerbie, en route for the USA. 38 minutes after taking off from Heathrow. A few days later, about $11 million was deposited in a Warsaw bank account controlled by the PFLP-GC, from an Iranian source.

A lot of evidence was recovered from the crash scene, and the police were initially hot in pursuit of the PFLP-GC. From January to March 1989 the press was full of it, anticipating imminent arrests. The shopkeeper who sold the clothes packed round the bomb in the suitcase, Tony Gauci of Mary's House in Sliema, Malta, identified Abu Talb as the purchaser. However, things seemed to go quiet for a while, and although stories about Palestinian involvement were still coming out, official sources seemed to have zipped their lips.

In 1990, Middle Eastern politics underwent a sea change, as Saddam Hussein started to over-step the bounds of his US masters, and prepared to invade Kuwait. By this version of the story, Syria and Iran had to be neutralised as back-door threats and it was no longer politic to pursue action against them. The dogs had to be called off.

However, there was still a crashed airliner and 270 dead people. Maybe an explanation is still needed. And maybe this can be used for more foreign policy advancement. There had been passing references to Libya early in the enquiry, but these were really irrelevant. However, after the MST-13 fragment was identified, Libya entered the frame. A batch of these timers had been sold to Libya on some sort of special order. And there were foreign policy reasons for isolating Libya at that point, including the fact that Gadaffi had been arming the IRA for years.

It was a plausible theory. Forget the Vincennes and the Airbus. In 1986, the US carried out a series of bombing raids on Tripoli and Benghazi, in which Gadaffi's infant adopted daughter was killed. It was believed the raids were an attempt to kill Gadaffi himself. Also good reason for revenge to be attempted.

A case was put together against two Libyans who were assumed to be intelligence operatives, based almost entirely on the testimony of Majid Giaka, the only double agent the USA had in Libya. He named Megrahi and Fhimah, and told more stories that were probably invention - including that Fhimah kept explosives in the drawer of his office desk at Luqa airport, and a tale about seeing Megrahi carrying a brown Samsonite suitcase at an airport (it was known that the bomb had been in a brown Samsonite suitcase).

Beyond that, Gauci was asked to re-assess his identification of the purchaser of the clothes, and (allegedly with the prospect of a $2 million reward plus other inducements) managed to say that Megrahi was sort of quite like the purchaser, and a day was found which, while not the overwhelmingly probable day the purchase took place (when Megrahi was nowhere near Malta), was a possible date when Megrahi was in the vicinity.

Also, Megrahi was in Malta again on 21st December, the day of the crash, which was quite good because one theory was that the suitcase had been put on board in Luqa. And he was travelling on that occasion on a coded intelligence services passport, not his normal one.

Also, Megrahi had close business dealings with MeBo, the firmthat sold the timer fragment.

Thus a case was built against Megrahi and Fhimah, and the case against Abu Talb and the PFLP-GC cell was abandoned. Iran didn't come in against the US in the Gulf War. Instead, sanctions were set up against Libya which was refusing to extradite Megrahi and Fhimah. In the course of this, arms supply to the IRA was completely cut off.

There was a standoff for ten years. We were all told that Fhimah and Megrahi were definitely guilty, and the evidence was overwhelming. But of course there could be no trial with no accused. Then in 2000 Nelson Mandela persuaded Gadaffi to agree to a deal. Extradite the accused, and pay damages to the victims' families, and have the sanctions removed and start moving back into the family of civilised nations. Gadaffi agreed, wanting western companies to develop Libyan oil, and not wanting to be the next Saddam Hussein.

Hence the trial at Camp Zeist, at which all the evidence linking Fhimah to the incident completely evaporated, and he was acquitted. The court however decided that Gauci's second identification of Megrahi could be believed (even though he couldn't pick him out in court), and that the bomb went on at Luqa even though the Luqa records were as tight as a duck's arse and there was no way an extra suitcase went on there. That was enough to convict Megrahi.

However, Gauci's identification of Megrahi was tentative at best, and the overwhelming weight of the evidence was that he wasn't the purchaser. Also, the court simply asserted that the case must have gone on at Luqa (because Megrahi was there that day?) even though the records showed it couldn't have. Strike those two points, and there's nothing but the MeBo timer fragment to link Libya to the incident.

Enquiring minds want to know whether the pursuit of the Libyans was done in good faith, and the appalling fit-up at Camp Zeist was simply due to the age-old problem of law enforcement really really believing it has the right guy and just sexing up the evidence in the interests of justice. Or on the other hand, was there political pressure linked to the incipient Gulf War to turn away from Syria and Iran as possible culprits, and pin it on a more politically convenient patsy.

The timer fragment is at the centre of all this. Its presence argues against PFLP-GC involvement, because their devices had ice-cube timers, although they could conceivably have acquired a timer from the Stazi. Libya did buy 20 of the things. And Megrahi was associated with MeBo.

If the fragment is real, then that has to be factored into any explanation of the incident, including the incongruous time of the explosion. If on the other hand it was planted, as many people suspect or believe, that's a whole other can of worms.

Sorry, but that really is the short version.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.

Last edited by Rolfe; 16th September 2009 at 02:00 PM.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 02:04 PM   #54
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
Originally Posted by Ambrosia View Post
BBC Conspiracy Files.

There's a transcript of that interview here.

Oh thank you, that's perfect. Though I have to say, Said Gadaffi in person is quite something.

So here we have the actual apology.

Originally Posted by Col. Gadaffi
Libya has facilitated the bringing to justice of the two suspects charged with the bombing of Pan Am 103, and accepts responsibility for the actions of its officials.

Said agrees that this was word play, and it obviously is. There's no admisison of guilt. Not if you don't believe your officials did anything.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 02:10 PM   #55
TriskettheKid
Graduate Poster
 
TriskettheKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,431
Yeah, still not getting it.

Are you telling me this whole thing was a setup of Libya because of their support of the IRA?

This whole thing was done in order to hide the real culprits so that Libya could be sanctioned?
TriskettheKid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 02:16 PM   #56
Toke
Godless Socialist
 
Toke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 8,171
Stranger things have happenden in politics.
__________________
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. -K. Marx.

Toke is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 02:20 PM   #57
geni
Anti-homeopathy illuminati member
 
geni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 28,209
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
Yeah, still not getting it.

Are you telling me this whole thing was a setup of Libya because of their support of the IRA?

This whole thing was done in order to hide the real culprits so that Libya could be sanctioned?
Libya was kinda unpopular at that point and an easy target. Could have been as simple as the need to blame someone when the other leads weren't working out.

Last edited by geni; 16th September 2009 at 02:25 PM.
geni is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 02:36 PM   #58
TriskettheKid
Graduate Poster
 
TriskettheKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,431
Originally Posted by geni View Post
Libya was kinda unpopular at that point and an easy target. Could have been as simple as the need to blame someone when the other leads weren't working out.
Ok....so who decided to blame Libya? The Brits or the Americans?

And why did the other go along?

It was all because Libya was an easy target?

I'm sorry I'm not getting this, but I'm having a hard time understanding how and why such a ruse was set up so quickly. I mean, the fragment was found, unless what I've read is completely wrong, a few weeks after the bombing, in January of 1989.

That seems awfully fast to reach the conclusion that leads weren't panning out, and that Libya was to be blamed.
TriskettheKid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 02:57 PM   #59
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
The fragment doesn't appear for sure until September 1989.

I still think it's a bit early, and the sequence of events between then and June 1990 when it resurfaces in Thurman's hands is unclear.

However, it's more complicated in any case. In mid-March 1989, less than three months after the crash but even so an awful lot had already been figured out as regards the Palestinian group, it is reliably alleged that Thatcher and Bush made some agreement to "low-key" the whole affair. The investigation didn't stop, and Libya wasn't fingered until September 1990, but calls for a public enquiry were blocked at Prime Ministerial level from that date, and parliamentarians appear to have been smothered on the subject.

This part is not clear, but it seems as if there was some political motive for not going hell-for-leather against the PFLP-GC and Iran as early as March 1989.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 03:07 PM   #60
Ambrosia
Good of the Fods
 
Ambrosia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
Ok....so who decided to blame Libya? The Brits or the Americans?

And why did the other go along?
Those are good questions. short of new whistleblowers coming forward or leaked documents or something there'll probably never be enough evidence to answer either of them.
Quote:
I'm sorry I'm not getting this, but I'm having a hard time understanding how and why such a ruse was set up so quickly. I mean, the fragment was found, unless what I've read is completely wrong, a few weeks after the bombing, in January of 1989.
Depending on who you believe a shirt is found in January 89. Inside this shirt is the tiny MST-13 MeBo fragment of circuit board, which is itself not found within the shirt until some unknown time later.

13 Jan 89 a fragment of circuit board is found from a Toshiba Cassette recorder determined to have been what the bomb was in. They figure out that it's from a Toshiba casette radio in April 1989.

It's not until June 1990 that the MST-13 fragment is IDed as being that.

The CIA seize an MST-13 type timer from Libya in Summer/Autumn 1990

In September 1990 interviews with MeBo Zurich link Libya to MST-13 timers.

August 2 1990 Saddam invades Kuwait.
Ambrosia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 03:17 PM   #61
TriskettheKid
Graduate Poster
 
TriskettheKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,431
Originally Posted by Ambrosia View Post
Those are good questions. short of new whistleblowers coming forward or leaked documents or something there'll probably never be enough evidence to answer either of them.
So...it's speculation.

Quote:
Depending on who you believe a shirt is found in January 89. Inside this shirt is the tiny MST-13 MeBo fragment of circuit board, which is itself not found within the shirt until some unknown time later.
May. From what I can tell, when the evidence was finally examined in May, they found the circuit.

The speculation is that it was planted, yes? This just brings us back to the questions I asked earlier:

Who planted it? And how did they get others to go along? And how did they know where to plant it?

I mean, why plant it in the shirt? Why not have a piece found on it's own? Or embedded in a piece of the suitcase?

Quote:
13 Jan 89 a fragment of circuit board is found from a Toshiba Cassette recorder determined to have been what the bomb was in. They figure out that it's from a Toshiba casette radio in April 1989.

It's not until June 1990 that the MST-13 fragment is IDed as being that.

The CIA seize an MST-13 type timer from Libya in Summer/Autumn 1990

In September 1990 interviews with MeBo Zurich link Libya to MST-13 timers.
Ok, and?

Quote:
August 2 1990 Saddam invades Kuwait.
What does that have to do with anything?
TriskettheKid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 03:19 PM   #62
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
I've come across more material relating to the saga of the fragment.

I don't know how far to credit de Braeckeleer. I think his assertion that the bomb was placed outside the baggage container is a bridge too far. However, he seems to have pulled together a lot of stuff about the timer fragment, much of which is corroborated by other sources.

http://english.ohmynews.com/articlev...85213&rel_no=1

This seems to me to assert that the fragment was created in June 1989 in order to be introduced into the Pan Am wreckage. It's the first time I've heard of Inspector Fluckiger, which just shows how much of the trial evidence there is to assimmilate. I'm not quite sure where this part is going or why, but it all fits with Paul Foot's account - perhaps not surprisingly because de Braeckeleer seems to be basing a lot of his account on the same material, that is the Camp Zeist evidence.

Anyway, the above link has a lot of very clear photos showing the discrepancies de Braeckeleer is reporting Ullpert as having identified.

More photos can be found on the site MeBo has put up about it all.

http://www.lockerbie.ch/

This is weird stuff, all hysterical English, big bold bright fonts, and hyperbole. I have little idea what is going on there. It's half way to the Time Cube. Nevertheless, it has pictures.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 03:26 PM   #63
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
So...it's speculation.

Uh, yes. That's what we're doing.

Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
May. From what I can tell, when the evidence was finally examined in May, they found the circuit.

You entirely discount the interpolated page 51 then? You're absolutely sure the fragment was really logged in May?

Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
The speculation is that it was planted, yes? This just brings us back to the questions I asked earlier:

Who planted it? And how did they get others to go along? And how did they know where to plant it?

I mean, why plant it in the shirt? Why not have a piece found on it's own? Or embedded in a piece of the suitcase?

Don't know. You seem to be up to speed with the rest of us. If you don't think there's anything odd about the story, anything that doesn't quite fit, then fine.

Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
Ok, and?

Well, are you quite happy with the official version? Interpolated pages and altered labels and discrepancies in statements and all?

Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
What does that have to do with anything?

Possibly, everything. Unless you just want to accept the Official Version without question.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 03:27 PM   #64
TriskettheKid
Graduate Poster
 
TriskettheKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,431
Originally Posted by Rolfe View Post
I've come across more material relating to the saga of the fragment.

I don't know how far to credit de Braeckeleer. I think his assertion that the bomb was placed outside the baggage container is a bridge too far. However, he seems to have pulled together a lot of stuff about the timer fragment, much of which is corroborated by other sources.

http://english.ohmynews.com/articlev...85213&rel_no=1

This seems to me to assert that the fragment was created in June 1989 in order to be introduced into the Pan Am wreckage. It's the first time I've heard of Inspector Fluckiger, which just shows how much of the trial evidence there is to assimmilate. I'm not quite sure where this part is going or why, but it all fits with Paul Foot's account - perhaps not surprisingly because de Braeckeleer seems to be basing a lot of his account on the same material, that is the Camp Zeist evidence.

Anyway, the above link has a lot of very clear photos showing the discrepancies de Braeckeleer is reporting Ullpert as having identified.

More photos can be found on the site MeBo has put up about it all.

http://www.lockerbie.ch/

This is weird stuff, all hysterical English, big bold bright fonts, and hyperbole. I have little idea what is going on there. It's half way to the Time Cube. Nevertheless, it has pictures.

Rolfe.

Please tell me you have a better source than that article.

I mean, did you at the end of the article? They have this:

Quote:
The author encourages the readers to sign the Petition to Release Megrahi. Ludwig De Braeckeleer has a Ph.D. in Nuclear Sciences. Ludwig teaches physics and International Humanitarian Law. Ludwig can be reached at: dr.ludwig@hotmail.com
So, he's got a doctorate in Nuclear science, and teaches physics and International Humanitarian Law?

And the best you've got is a hotmail address?

Just how much of his background makes him a qualified forensic scientist?
TriskettheKid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 03:42 PM   #65
Caustic Logic
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
Yeah, still not getting it.

Are you telling me this whole thing was a setup of Libya because of their support of the IRA?

This whole thing was done in order to hide the real culprits so that Libya could be sanctioned?
The prevailing theory is re Iran and Iraq, whose war had just ended. Iran was set to be implicated in the bombing but for some reason they were de-blamed, perhaps to get their support or non-interference for the coming conflict with Iraq. The scope of the investigation didn't shift for a while - 1989 or 90. Al Megrahi and Fhimah weren't officially names as suspects until late 1991. The one was sentenced in January 2001. Thus the whole time of the blame Libya phase was roughly the same time Iraq was being targetted. The phase may be ending now. Check the timeline there. Some belated blame for Iran may be coming available soon.

Now exact positive reasons why Libya would be a good scapegoat I don't know, other than past behavior, or future potential if not put under leverage and sanctions. AFAIK Libya is guilty of everything else they're accused of, like the disco bombing in Germany, shooting a lady cop, what have you. But in this case, the big one, it's really looking like politics.

Originally Posted by Ambrosia
He reportedly declined the offer. Though there was a $4million bounty to do with the case, and it's alleged that Gauci the shop owner was paid $2million
Idiot! Millions just to show up and tell the truth and he turns it down?

Quote:
I am not calling anyone disinfo here, nor positing a vast conspiracy.
Oh I know, it was a sarcastic spin on an imagined denialist stance. When you see one person say al Megrahi was blamed you suspect they're naive or paranoid or anti-British. But when almost everyone who knows anything but has little vested interest comes out saying it, you need to get silly to deny.

Quote:
According to his own admission Bollier, who has a history of working with Libya, was more interested in the $200million offered to him by Ghadaffi for getting Megrahi freed. See the BBC Conspiracy Files program where he is interviewed for more.
Oh. Scratch above point then. Cheapskates. This in fact casts a pall over his subsequent musings. It's possible to be motivated by money and truth of course, but...

Quote:
*if* that's true, it calls into question much of the information collated by mebo regarding the whole timer fragment, there's bundles of it at the link I posted earlier, as well as transcripts of Bolliers original report to Scottish police on the fragment.
They do behave strangely for a company.

Quote:
It cetainly makes the picture more complicated, and harder to investigate.
Yah, and my sarcastic point has more forward meaning than I anticipated. Hmmm... This includes doubt on Lumpert, right?

Last edited by Caustic Logic; 16th September 2009 at 03:57 PM.
Caustic Logic is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 03:58 PM   #66
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
Please tell me you have a better source than that article.

I mean, did you at the end of the article? They have this:

So, he's got a doctorate in Nuclear science, and teaches physics and International Humanitarian Law?

And the best you've got is a hotmail address?

Just how much of his background makes him a qualified forensic scientist?

It's possible you may have lost the will to live before you reached the end of my OP. I would recommend Foot, Kochler and Black. In addition, Kochler's home page is a link-mine.

Originally Posted by Rolfe View Post
Paul Foot's 2001 Private Eye investigation is a good place to start - Flight from Justice. It's behind a £5 paywall, but worth the money.

There are a number of documentary films covering the issues, all taking rather different lines. And none of them are made by Dylan Avery.
The Maltese Double Cross (2hrs 30min, and actually quite hard to follow despite having won a film festival prize)
Lockerbie and the CIA (Aspect ratio problem, but interesting and watchable)
The Conspirady Files: Lockerbie (This BBC production seems a bit too trusting of the Official Version in one or two places.)
Flight into Darkness Part 1
Flight into Darkness Part 2
The Lockerbie Cover-up (shortened version of "Flight into Darkness", but with extra material at the end)

And for a lot more information and links, the best source is probably the web site of the official UN observer at the trial of the "Lockerbie Bomber" in 2000-2001.
Dr. Hans Kochler

The senior academic lawyer who was responsible for getting the trial at Camp Zeist organised has a blog on the subject with a collection of relevant articles.
Professor Robert Black

I had assumed you would realise these were the sources I was putting most emphasis on, not a couple of questionable-but-interesting pages I only ran across a couple of hours ago, which I mainly linked to because of their high-quality photos of the timer fragment.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.

Last edited by Rolfe; 16th September 2009 at 04:02 PM.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 04:46 PM   #67
Ambrosia
Good of the Fods
 
Ambrosia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
May. From what I can tell, when the evidence was finally examined in May, they found the circuit.
Depending on what source you believe yes. 12th May 1989

Quote:
The speculation is that it was planted, yes? This just brings us back to the questions I asked earlier:

Who planted it? And how did they get others to go along? And how did they know where to plant it?

I mean, why plant it in the shirt? Why not have a piece found on it's own? Or embedded in a piece of the suitcase?
Does it matter where they planted it?

According to Black
Quote:
The original trial heard the fragment was found in a piece of recovered clothing in a wood 25 miles from Lockerbie, six months after the bombing in December 1988.
Robert Black was at the trial, he ought to know.

Then again according to the official verdict it was found in a storage facility after being picked up in January and not looked at by forensic scientists until May 12th 1989. Though the official verdict does talk about "overwritten labels" and that "DC Gilchrist’s attempts to explain it [mislabelling] were at worst evasive and at best confusing" [ source - official verdict PDF ]

Or according to Ulrich Lumpert it was stolen by him from MeBo and handed to a person investigating the "Lockerbie Case"

Quote:
I confirm today on 18th July 2007 that I stole the third hand manufactured MST13 Timer PCBoard consisting of 8 layers of fiberglass
from MEBO Ltd. and gave it without permission on 22nd June 1989 to a person officially investigated in the "Lockerbie case".
[ source ]

Quote:
Ok, and?
You posted that you'd read the MST-13 was found in Jan 89 - it wasn't, it was found later than that, I was outlining timeline of it's discovery as per the official verdict.

Quote:
What does that have to do with anything?
Thats the political sea change Rolfe mentionned.

Could have notihng to do with it at all, but thats the Genesis of the CT along with the authorities "hot pursuit" of the Iranians, before dropping them completely after Libya comes up.
Ambrosia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 05:21 PM   #68
Caustic Logic
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
Originally Posted by Ambrosia View Post
You posted that you'd read the MST-13 was found in Jan 89 - it wasn't, it was found later than that, I was outlining timeline of it's discovery as per the official verdict.
That was me, speaking ahead of my knowledge. It was however based on this (and closer). ?? 1 89. What does that mean? When the shirt was discovered, I suppose. Link to page (Mebocom).

Quote:
Thats the political sea change Rolfe mentionned.

Could have notihng to do with it at all, but thats the Genesis of the CT along with the authorities "hot pursuit" of the Iranians, before dropping them completely after Libya comes up.
For the record there are other possibilities, and perhaps two or more main reasons. I won't speculate in detail, but maybe there was even some problem with the original case helping them decide on the awkward course-change. Hard to say.
Caustic Logic is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 05:34 PM   #69
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
Do you think Black made a typo? Six months for six weeks? Six weeks would be consistent with the January 1989 date which became official at the trial I think.

In 1994, The Maltese Double Cross made a big deal about the fragment not being discovered until the spring of 1990, in the Kielder Forest.

There seems to have been quite a bit of confusion about how and when the fragment was retreived. I'm not maintaining that The Maltese Double Cross is right, but it does demonstrate that the January 1989 version was a relatively late addition to the narrative.

I'm trying to relate this timeline to the political one.

Until March 1989, it was all go on the Iranian connection. But in mid-March, the silencer and the brakes went on. For some reason, over a year before there seems to have been any question of implicating Libya, Thatcher and Bush decided to play down the whole thing, and prevent a public inquiry.

Nobody is very sure of the reason for this. Jack Anderson, who reported the telephone conversation in which this was agreed, thought it was "because they could not do anything to avenge themselves and the Lockerbie relatives on Iran." This sounds very weak to me, and to Paul Foot also, because he suggested that "the Lockerbie bombing had exposed a gaping hole in their intelligence services which would, if the matter was fully aired, be proved to have been incompetent to stop a murderous plot they knew about."

I suspect the latter is more likely. There are so many reports of prior warnings of this one. The Helsinki warning seems genuinely to have been a hoax, but there's more to it than that. The entire Iran-Syria-PFLP-GC operation was discovered so quickly, the question arises, why wasn't it busted before a plane crashed.

Oh wait, it was. By the German police, in September 1988.

But then they let them go again. Almost at once. Allegedly after Khreesat had made a phone call to someone. That's Khreesat, who was a double agent, and said he was making dummy bombs. Except one of the "dummy" bombs killed a German bomb disposal operative. And maybe Khreesat was a triple agent.

I've only read fragments of this, but I've a feeling it's related to the damping down of the pursuit, the emerging desire not to get to the bottom of the story. Even if it doesn't turn into a species of LIHOP, in which Khreesat was released because the security forces couldn't afford to have their contacts revealed, even if that did risk a successful attack. And of course this one can go right on to suggest that through the capture and release of Khreesat, the security forces knew what was planned, and even which plane was being targeted.

Which could tie in with the VIPs being pulled off the plane at the last moment. It's another rabbit hole, but it's worth a glance.

It was a full year before it began to be clear that Saddam Hussein was going to invade Kuwait, and the middle eastern allegiances had to be rearranged to accommodate Desert Storm. The March 1989 backpedalling really doesn't seem to have anything to do with blaming Libya.

The fragment seems surely to have been present in the system in September 1989. de Braeckeleer implies a date in June for the acquisition of the timer the planted fragment was derived from. Even though the logging of the fragment at RAERDE in May seems to have been retrospectively inserted, the idea of planting the timer seems to me to be implicit in the timeline in the summer of 1989. Even though nobody seems to have thought of blaming Libya until September 1990.

This is the part of the story that seems to me to support the Official Verson best. Yes, my hunch says that timer is an anomlaly, but the sequence of discovery in September that there was something interesting there, running around until June 1990 trying to identify it, then in June 1990 realising that it seemed to be a part of a timer board like one the CIA already had from another source, then looking for the manufacturer and finding MeBo in November, seems plausible.

In the middle of that, it became clear that wherever the source, Libya was the country these timers were connected to. Which is when attention turned to that country, and the CIA started asking Giaka to make some stuff up provide intelligence.

That actually rings reasonably true. Except that a lot of people think it was a lot more complicated than that, even just based on the evidence at the trial. And then we have Bollier's semi-coherent rantings, which are either total invention, or suggest something totally other was going on, if only one could figure out what his purple prose is trying to say.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 06:11 PM   #70
TriskettheKid
Graduate Poster
 
TriskettheKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,431
Originally Posted by Ambrosia View Post
Does it matter where they planted it?
Yes. Very much so.

Quote:
According to Black

Robert Black was at the trial, he ought to know.

Then again according to the official verdict it was found in a storage facility after being picked up in January and not looked at by forensic scientists until May 12th 1989. Though the official verdict does talk about "overwritten labels" and that "DC Gilchrist’s attempts to explain it [mislabelling] were at worst evasive and at best confusing" [ source - official verdict PDF ]
There is nothing inconsistent with that timing.

Bombing took place in December, 1988. Shirt was found about 1 month later, January 1989. And then the piece was found in May, 1989, which would have been about 5-6 months after the bombing.

The two arguments you presented above are not contradictory.


Quote:
Or according to Ulrich Lumpert it was stolen by him from MeBo and handed to a person investigating the "Lockerbie Case"

[ source ]



You posted that you'd read the MST-13 was found in Jan 89 - it wasn't, it was found later than that, I was outlining timeline of it's discovery as per the official verdict.
Which would have been 1 month AFTER it was found in the shirt.

Of course, if we go with your version, you'd have to explain all the backtracking (I'd be interested to know who lied, and for how much).

Quote:
Thats the political sea change Rolfe mentionned.

Could have notihng to do with it at all, but thats the Genesis of the CT along with the authorities "hot pursuit" of the Iranians, before dropping them completely after Libya comes up.
So they wanted Iran, before going after Libya....

Because Libya was an easy target due to political messes?

How does this not seem convoluted to anyone else?

Last edited by TriskettheKid; 16th September 2009 at 06:19 PM.
TriskettheKid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 06:32 PM   #71
Tippit
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,038
Originally Posted by Rolfe View Post
Oh dear, sorry. I thought I was being clear.

It makes no sense at all to set a timer with a range of about 6 weeks to go off only 1 hour into an 8-hour flight. Even if you don't want the plane to drop into the Atlantic and so render the evidence unrecoverable, the risk that the plane might be delayed by an hour or so, leading to the device detonating relatively harmlessly on the ground, is simply not worth taking. Not when you have the means to set the timer for, say, six hours into the flight.

And yet, a tiny fragment of just such a timer was allegedly found on the ground after the crash of Pan Am 103.

The provenance of the fragment is extremely peculiar, involving alteration of evidence records, a witness changing his sworn testimony, and forensic "scientists" with very dubious pedigrees. It has been suggested, alleged and downright asserted that the fragment was planted, probably by the CIA. Is this a tenable position?

Rolfe.
What would the CIA's motive have been, and what was the political outcome of the attack?

I can understand your point that the timer went off earlier than necessary, failing to incorporate the risk of flight delays. Are you speculating that the plane was destroyed some other way, and this timer was planted? If so how, and why would the CIA plant such a timer when it would introduce this very dilemma?

Isn't it possible that the timer detonated a bomb, and it was simply set to a sub-optimal time to detonate? If this was the case, it was mission accomplished anyway.
Tippit is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 08:10 PM   #72
Ambrosia
Good of the Fods
 
Ambrosia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
If the official line on the fragment is correct it was discovered May 12th 1989 in evidence originally collected January 1989.

If Lumperts correct it wasn't around until 22nd June 1989.

Both of those dates offer plenty of leeway for it to surface as part of the evidence in September 1989.

The odd evasion by Gilchrist noted by the trial verdict, the renumbering of pages & mislabelling of the evidence fits Lumperts claim, but whats so important about May 89?
Is it detailed anywhere on what date such cataloging stopped being done on debris from 103?
Was the Grey shirt and all it contained one of the last pieces of debris known to have been examined that was in close proximity to the bomb?
If the renumbering was an honest mistake, why the confusing/evasive explanation?
What motive does Lumpert have to perjure himself at the original trial? If he didn't then why admit to it in 2007?

Leaving that aside for a moment.




There are other "odd" coincidences about this fragment.

Thurman claims to have identified the MST fragment June 1990.

19th Sep Flight UTA 772 a DC-10 explodes in middair thanks to a bomb on board.

According to Pierre Péan (see Blacks blog here, and the comments) the only *physical* evidence linking the eventually convicted in absentia 6 Libyans (for which the Libyan Govt has paid compensation and "admitted responsibility") to the bombing was... a fragment of a circuit board identified as coming from the controlling device used to detonate the bomb ... identified by Thurman.

Anyway if you look at the link in Blacks blog entry it gets to a piece about MST timers.

Quote:
According to David Leppard the key exhibit in the Lockerbie case (a fragment of MST-13 timer) was recovered by Allen Feraday of RARDE on the 18th June 1989 melted into the remains of a suitcase belonging to passenger Karen Noonan which had been positioned directly on top of the bomb bag. ( 26 ) Leppard refers to a memo written by Detective Inspector Williamson dated the 19th December 1989 entitled “Items of Interest at RARDE – Circuit Board” outlining this discovery by Feraday in June from “part of severely explosive-damaged American Tourister.”

The memo continued that “a description of the item together with a photograph were supplied to the Productions/Property team to search for any similar material.”(27) On the 14th September 1989 Allen Feraday visited Dexstar in Lockerbie, where exhibits were stored, to examine a number of items of circuitry, none of which was a match. ( 28 ).


This is quite at odds with the version of events presented at Camp Zeist ...
the footnotes all refer to "David Leppard On the Trail of Terror" pp 207.

David Leppard is the journalist that Paul Foot writes about who was on the Sunday Times Investigative team, who wrote a series of articles in 89 "based on information pieced together by Western intelligence sources"

Lepppards book "shows how the bombing was planned at a secret meeting at the head quarters of the Libyan intelligence agency. Based on Scottish police and FBI files and interviews with over 100 of the key witnesses..." it's published July 1991 - but is at huge odds over the MST-13 fragments origin with the evidence presented at the trial.

Outside of Leppards book I can't find any other sources that back up his version of the origin of the MST-13 fragment.
Ambrosia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 08:24 PM   #73
Ambrosia
Good of the Fods
 
Ambrosia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
Originally Posted by TriskettheKid View Post
Yes. Very much so.
why?

Quote:
There is nothing inconsistent with that timing.

Bombing took place in December, 1988. Shirt was found about 1 month later, January 1989. And then the piece was found in May, 1989, which would have been about 5-6 months after the bombing.
No there isn't. I am not suggesting there is.

Quote:
Which would have been 1 month AFTER it was found in the shirt.
Yes. so.... One of those accounts (or both) must be incorrect.

Quote:
Of course, if we go with your version, you'd have to explain all the backtracking (I'd be interested to know who lied, and for how much).
? I don't *have* a version. I am just pointing out that there are conflicting versions.

Quote:
So they wanted Iran, before going after Libya....

Because Libya was an easy target due to political messes?
As I understand it, America had long wanted to go after Libya, were much more likely to get compensation eventually from Libya than Iran, and that potentially Iran was completely off the table given recent political events (i.e. declaring war on Iraq)
Ambrosia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 11:00 PM   #74
Caustic Logic
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
Originally Posted by Ambrosia
One of those accounts (or both) must be incorrect.
Quote:
According to Black
Quote:
The original trial heard the fragment was found in a piece of recovered clothing in a wood 25 miles from Lockerbie, six months after the bombing in December 1988.
Robert Black was at the trial, he ought to know.

Then again according to the official verdict it was found in a storage facility after being picked up in January and not looked at by forensic scientists until May 12th 1989. Though the official verdict does talk about "overwritten labels" and that "DC Gilchrist’s attempts to explain it [mislabelling] were at worst evasive and at best confusing" [ source - official verdict PDF ]
So, Black's recollection was it was discovered 6 moths after the bombing in the shirt fragement "in a wood 25 miles from Lockerbie." The wording imples it was found there at that time. Wording can be imprecise.

The other version says the cloth/hidden chip were found in January, the chip discovered in mid-May, 4.5 (or rounded to five) months after the bombing. So the irreconcilable discrepancy is one month and some wording? These both might well be describing the same sequence, in my opinion.

Quote:
Or according to Ulrich Lumpert it was stolen by him from MeBo and handed to a person investigating the "Lockerbie Case"
Quote:
What motive does Lumpert have to perjure himself at the original trial? If he didn't then why admit to it in 2007?

Leaving that aside for a moment.
In one version he really didn't lie or cover anything up in the trial, but did falsely say so in 2007 with his chopped up board story. Perhaps he's getting even a good portion of Ghadaffi's $200 million under the table. That whole company is strange, from what I've seen, behaving like either some kind of agents, or a group collectively pissed-off at getting caught up in a fraudulent case like this, and so taking an unusual activist stance. I think it's best to leave Lumpert's and Mebo's word as much as possible aside for now, but it's so cool to have this in the discussion now to have on the back burner. Thanks!

Originally Posted by TriskettheKid
So they wanted Iran, before going after Libya....

Because Libya was an easy target due to political messes?

How does this not seem convoluted to anyone else?
I don't think anyone would deny the political intrigue involved here is unusual. There could be many reasons/motives that we can't do more now than guess at. Though an educated guess is better than nothing, it's not going to satisfy anyone's hunger for proof or rock-solid motive analysis...
And just sticking to the facts on the ground, as we're doing here, there is plenty room for confusion and uncertainty, and speculation is all that can fill the gaps.

However, at the bare minimum, we have an absolutely solid case for "reasonable doubt" that should suffice to overturn the conviction or spur a new investigation on a whole new track. At the most we're looking at something more serious - counter-actions against those who framed al Megrahi, new blame on Iran and new sanctions or who knows what in that direction...

At any rate, if you want to be ahead of any possible curve, pay attention to this story.
Caustic Logic is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th September 2009, 11:11 PM   #75
Caustic Logic
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
[quote=Ambrosia;5113230]
Or according to Ulrich Lumpert it was stolen by him from MeBo and handed to a person investigating the "Lockerbie Case"

Quote:
Quote:
I confirm today on 18th July 2007 that I stole the third hand manufactured MST13 Timer PCBoard consisting of 8 layers of fiberglass
from MEBO Ltd. and gave it without permission on 22nd June 1989 to a person officially investigated in the "Lockerbie case".
[ source ]

Emphasis mine. What's up with that? Bad wording again? The difference is huge.
Caustic Logic is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2009, 01:16 AM   #76
Caustic Logic
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
Holy crud, typed this hours ago but never submitted.

Originally Posted by ANTPogo View Post
All of these arguments from incredulity are irrelevant, because it happened before. All of it.
<snip>
In other words, four years before Lockerbie, a terrorist group did exactly what you find so suspiciously unbelievable in the Pan Am Flight 103 case - send unaccompanied bags with explosives through multiple baggage-check points because of multiple aircraft transfers (on entirely separate airlines, even), and set the timer in a way that flight delays or misread schedules could cause the bomb to detonate when it wasn't planned to.
You should check the "all of it" part. I agree that this 'unlikely' scenario is entirely possible, weird things happen, and I'm no expert. And this is a good counter-point, like others above. But one thing here is this alleged timed bomb happened to blow up 38 minutes after leaving Heathrow, while (coincidentally?) the PFLP bombs recently IDd were designed to blow up 35-45 minutes after takeoff. Consistent with one of these planted at Heathrow, OR a badly-timed time bomb earlier. I'm willing to call it undecided there.
Caustic Logic is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2009, 01:27 AM   #77
Travis
Misanthrope of the Mountains
 
Travis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24,133
I don't get it, why go through all this trouble to exonerate Al-Megrahi without also going through the trouble to make sure that it was "evil" American agents who themselves put the bomb on the plane (presumably before going somewhere to kill puppies for sport)? If you're going to create a thread just to piss off Americans don't half ass it, make sure you have President H.W. Bush himself giving the order to bomb the plane then laughing maniacally while thunder claps in the background.

Sorry if I sound grouchy but your slanted take on the USS Vincennes shootdown reveals a bias here.
__________________
"Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com
Zingiber Officinale

Travis is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2009, 01:47 AM   #78
Ambrosia
Good of the Fods
 
Ambrosia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,675
Originally Posted by Caustic Logic View Post
What's up with that? Bad wording again? The difference is huge.
It's a translation error, I should have added a [sic] to my post.

If you read the PDF I linked to, that that quote is sourced from, in Document 3 you read:

Quote:
On 4 August 2007 Dr. Hans Koechler received ... a copy of the German original of an Affidavit, dated 18 July 2007 and signed by Mr. Ulrich Lumpert ...

In a statement released today, Dr. Hans Koechler, ...
highlighted basic aspects and questions of this new revelation that appear to be of relevance not only in connection with the upcoming second appeal of the convicted Libyan national, but also for new prosecutorial action ex officio by the Scottish authorities.

In his affidavit Mr. Lumpert implicitly admits having committed perjury as witness No. 550 before the Scottish Court in the Netherlands. He states (Par. 2) that he has stolen a handmade (by him) sample of an “MST13
Timer PCboard” from MEBO company in Zurich and handed it over, on 22 June 1989 (!), to an “official person investigating the Lockerbie case.”

He further states (in Par. 5) that the fragment of the MST13 timer, cut into two pieces for “supposedly forensic reasons,” which was presented in Court as vital part of evidence, stemmed from the piece which he had stolen and handed over to an investigator in 1989.
Ambrosia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2009, 03:55 AM   #79
Rolfe
Adult human female
 
Rolfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
Originally Posted by Travis View Post
I don't get it, why go through all this trouble to exonerate Al-Megrahi without also going through the trouble to make sure that it was "evil" American agents who themselves put the bomb on the plane (presumably before going somewhere to kill puppies for sport)? If you're going to create a thread just to piss off Americans don't half ass it, make sure you have President H.W. Bush himself giving the order to bomb the plane then laughing maniacally while thunder claps in the background.

Sorry if I sound grouchy but your slanted take on the USS Vincennes shootdown reveals a bias here.

Could I point out the title of the thread? Was the MST-13 timer planted in the wreckage? This isn't about exonerating Megrahi, or providing exact details of motive, means and opportunity for everyone involved as regards everything done. It's about trying to figure out whether the claims that the timer fragment was planted are credible.

Bear in mind that this incident is at the very least, one third the size of 9/11. In fact it's really bigger than that. Although there was only one plane involved, that flight is surrounded by far more mystery and anomaly than any of the 9/11 flights.

You've not just got multiple threads on 9/11, you've got a whole damn sub-furum. You would need a dozen threads on PA103 at the very least, to start covering all the aspects to the incident. If we start dragging every point into every thread, it'll flounder.

We've got the mysterious release of Khreesat. We've got the VIPs pulled off PA103 shortly before takeoff. We've got the US officials appearing within three hours of the crash, searching the wreckage and apparently interfering with the evidence. We've got the suitcase full of drugs. We've got the missing body. We've got the red tarpaulin and the helicopter.

We've got the anomalous time of the explosion. We've got the anomalies in the evidence trail of the timer fragment. We've got people claiming that the timer fragment was manipulated. We've got the pressurising and bribery of witnesses. We've got the prosecution relying on evidence from someone they knew was a liar, and concealing this knowledge from the defence.

We've got the anomalous behaviour of Megrahi's defence team, both in parts of the trial and the first appeal. We've got a bunch of judges bringing in a guilty verdict on the basis of evidence that was quite clearly unsound. After acquitting the co-defendant, who in the original indictment was essential to the operation as postulated.

And that's before we even start down the rabbit hole of the more fanciful suggestions, such as the explosion not taking place in the baggage container, or the entire slalom shirt being a fabrication, or the suggestion that it was Giaka who bought the clothes from Gauci....

Now we could have threads on every one of these points. But I can't cope with all of them simultaneously, so if anyone wants to discuss one or more of them now, then start a thread on it.

I picked the timer fragment, because that seems to be the key anomaly. I can see reasons for suspecting it could have been planted, but I can also see reasons for thinking it's perfectly genuine. If it's genuine, then the theorising has to accommodate its existence. If it was planted, then the affair is altogether stranger. Who had motive, means and opportunity to do that? Was Williamson involved?

Although it's de Braeckeleer and Bollier who are making the most fuss about the fragment, and they're not quite the full shilling on the subject, a number of perfectly reputable commentators also believe the item was a plant. So I think it's worth looking at that aspect in detail. Is there any sense in what de Braeckeleer and Bollier are saying? Do these pictures, which I never saw before yesterday, show what they allege they show?

I tried to outline the wider suspicions to explain why it was worth examining the fragment. Maybe that was a mistake. So could we maybe concentrate on the actual fragment, rather than peripheral matters, in this thread?

Oh, and by the way, I'm just repeating all the news commentary I've read and seen about the Vincennes. Oh, that and the accounts of one of the people I work with very closely, who was on the HMS York and saw the whole thing.

Rolfe.
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012.

Last edited by Rolfe; 17th September 2009 at 05:51 AM.
Rolfe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th September 2009, 04:39 AM   #80
Caustic Logic
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,494
Hmmm... We all have our biases. I'm sure Rolfe's no different, right?

Travis, forumside biases aside, do you feel there's been any reasonable doubt cast on the court's conviction? If not, let's not get sidetracked too much and focus on the thread's issue mostly. What can you say about the provenance of this timer fragment? How can we know it was actually found at the scene and put there by the explosion?

Ambrosia: Thanks, I presumed as much, after scanning the document. It was just such an interesting goof.

Rolfe, I was getting the tl;dr shut-down with your post at first - does your computer have a terseness filter you can switch on? lol. But then I got the point, that being, with a million confusing tangential things we could go off on, we should stick to the main issue of this thread.

Quote:
this incident is at the very least, one third the size of 9/11. In fact it's really bigger than that.
See, we could go sooo far off track with a Hulk/Superman debate on something like this. It's a big case, as everyone should know. What matters are things like
Quote:
We've got the anomalous time of the explosion. We've got the anomalies in the evidence trail of the timer fragment. We've got people claiming that the timer fragment was manipulated. We've got the pressurising and bribery of witnesses.
So far 'official story supporters' have made some 'maybe' and 'there's no proof' and 'mistakes happen' cases, mostly about the logic of using a timer. Valid, but Little relevant detail, just general opinions.

That's a nudge, folks, use it. Specific claims are being made... debunk!

Quote:
I tried to outline the wider suspicions to explain why it was worth examining the fragment. Maybe that was a mistake. So could we maybe concentrate on the actual fragment, rather than peripheral matters, in this thread?
We can get hung up on so many aspects, but it IS important for those who don't already know to understand this is worth looking at. This case, at the least, is not some no-brainer. Mysteries exist, and this one chip is about half the evidence the case is built on. That evidence has details, and those are troubling, if you look close.

ETA Rolfe, have you put down your Vicennes case elsewhere? If not maybe something that would be cool to look at both sides, some day. Not here now tho. Alright, soldierin on.

Last edited by Caustic Logic; 17th September 2009 at 04:41 AM.
Caustic Logic is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:19 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.