|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
7th July 2010, 09:59 AM | #161 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Yes. You must have missed the post where I said that I'd reconsidered my opinion of Karol Sikora after seeing a bit more of his form in other cases. I was mistaken. When you say "paid" or "hired", it's normal for someone in this position to be able to get their own medical opinion. It's normal for the medical opinion to be paid his normal consultancy fee. Sikora did what it seems he usually does - support his client's position if it can be reasonably supported. He's fallen foul of that one in other cases, too. So what is your point, caller? There were a lot of people who wanted Megrahi to be released for a whole lot of different reasons, AS WE HAVE DISCUSSED TO DEATH IN THE OTHER THREAD, and Sikora's opinion was one of the least of the issues. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th July 2010, 09:59 AM | #162 |
Dreaming of unicorns
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 11,938
|
|
__________________
Stundie - Avoided like the plaque, its a scottish turn of phrase. |
|
7th July 2010, 10:01 AM | #163 |
Dreaming of unicorns
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 11,938
|
|
__________________
Stundie - Avoided like the plaque, its a scottish turn of phrase. |
|
7th July 2010, 10:02 AM | #164 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
I've asked for the thread to be merged, but of course these things take time. It's funny how a thread can be as active as hell and a lot of people take no notice, then as soon as someone starts another one on EXACTLY the same topic, a lot of people suddenly leap in and start posting stuff that has been debunked to hell and gone right here, like yesterday.
Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th July 2010, 10:04 AM | #165 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,064
|
|
7th July 2010, 10:12 AM | #166 |
Dreaming of unicorns
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 11,938
|
Even the trolling on this has reached a new low.
|
__________________
Stundie - Avoided like the plaque, its a scottish turn of phrase. |
|
7th July 2010, 10:16 AM | #167 |
NWO Master Conspirator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 59,856
|
Because I don't recall much being made at the time about his being paid by Libya. It was framed as a concurring opinion by an acclaimed university doctor.
Quote:
|
__________________
Vive la liberté! |
|
7th July 2010, 10:18 AM | #168 |
NWO Master Conspirator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 59,856
|
|
__________________
Vive la liberté! |
|
7th July 2010, 10:23 AM | #169 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,064
|
|
7th July 2010, 10:24 AM | #170 |
Dreaming of unicorns
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 11,938
|
|
__________________
Stundie - Avoided like the plaque, its a scottish turn of phrase. |
|
7th July 2010, 10:26 AM | #171 |
NWO Master Conspirator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 59,856
|
|
__________________
Vive la liberté! |
|
7th July 2010, 10:29 AM | #172 |
NWO Master Conspirator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 59,856
|
|
__________________
Vive la liberté! |
|
7th July 2010, 11:42 AM | #173 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Sigh, It seems that merging the threads has had no effect as regards prompting posters to actually read what has already been posted on the subject.
The people who actually had the authority to repease Megrahi were the Scottish government. They had no interest in a BP oil deal; on the contrary they would have preferred not to agree to the wishes of the Westminster government, who did want him released because of the oil deal. However, the Scottish government wanted him released for a completely different reason. There was marked official reluctance for Megrahi's appeal to come to court. It had been delayed for about six years at the time of the release, but it was set to come back to court in November last year. Documents were sought by the defence that the government was determined would not be released. Even the parts of the appeal that weren't covered by this veil of secrecy were clearly strong enough that the appeal was likely to be successful. Which would leave everyone in the embarrassing position of having 270 unsolved murders on their hands. Offering Megrahi the chance of compassionate release if only he would be so good as to abandon that appeal was an extremely attractive option. However, that meant having a medical prognosis of around a 3-month survival time. If the Libyan government hadn't paid Sikora enough, I just bet Kenny MacAskill would have been prepared to chip in. I've explained this before. To the very people who are posting now. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th July 2010, 11:44 AM | #174 |
Up The Irons
Tagger
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 34,458
|
|
__________________
i loves the little birdies they goes tweet tweet tweet hee hee i loves them they sings to each other tweet twet tweet hee hee i loves them they is so cute i love yje little birdies little birdies in the room when birfies sings ther is no gloom i lobes the little birdies they goess tweet tweet tweet hee hee hee i loves them they sings me to sleep sing me to slrrp now little birdies - The wisdom of Shemp. |
|
7th July 2010, 11:50 AM | #175 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
I don't know who you're calling a rube. The ramifications of all this weren't exactly top secret in Scotland. The really furiously annoying part of it all was the withdrawal of the appeal. So many people had been pinning a lot of hope on that, as regards finding out what the hell did happen to that aeroplane, and why Megrahi was convicted of smuggling a bomb on board on evidence that wouldn't have got him a parking ticket under normal circumstances. You've posted all this before. You seem completely incapable of comprehending that there were many different aspects to this complex case, aspects most people outside the USA seem to be able to get their heads round. They've been explained to you several times, but you just go away, then reappear every time someone starts a new thread, posting as if you'd never heard a word about it before. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th July 2010, 11:53 AM | #176 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Good question. I've remarked before that anyone who believes Megrahi smuggled the bomb on board that aircraft, on the basis of the actual evidence available, should come to the appropriate thread in the CT forum. No takers. http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=169917 Ignorant outrage is very easy, knowing nothing about the case. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th July 2010, 04:14 PM | #177 | |||
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Here's an interview in which the official spokesman of the US Families of Pan Am 103 explains why he's certain Megrahi blew up the plane. It's a pity it's Gorgeous George doing the interviewing, but I swear Paxman couldn't have done a better job.
Hint.
Rolfe. |
|||
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
||||
7th July 2010, 04:56 PM | #178 |
NWO Master Conspirator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 59,856
|
So the way to overturn what may be a wrongful conviction in Scotland, particularly a politically charged one, is to overstate the severity of an illness, declare the prisoner has 3 months to live, and then release him on compassionate grounds?
No, that doesn't sound bush league at all. |
__________________
Vive la liberté! |
|
7th July 2010, 06:03 PM | #179 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
No, the way to avoid having to overturn the conviction, and indeed to avoid having that very very dodgy evidence looked at again, is to release the prisoner on compassionate grounds. All the while going on about how guilty he is. That way we don't have to produce the confidential documents we've been fighting for several years not to have to reveal, and we don't have to have a bright light shone on the kangaroo court that happened at Camp Zeist, and most importantly we can go on pretending that crime was solved so we don't have to get back to looking for someone else. If it was possible to give someone prostate cancer on purpose, I'd suspect Kenny MacAskill of doing just that. I know this has been explained to you before. More than once. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
7th July 2010, 06:07 PM | #180 |
Anti-homeopathy illuminati member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 28,209
|
Hmm this week's private eye mentions that briggs is still alive of course but the record appears to be held by Ernest Saunders at 19 years (in fairness he really did fake his symptoms).
|
7th July 2010, 06:16 PM | #181 |
Has a Rucksack
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,625
|
I don't really know much about this issue, whether he did it or not, whether the doctor lied or not, but I want to share a point about doctors.
When giving a prognosis, a doctor will usually lean towards the pessimistic end of the scale. If you tell someone they have 3 months to live and they do 6, then everyone is very happy. If you tell someone they have 6 months to live and they do 3, you have some explaining to do to emotional relatives who don't understand that a doctor can almost never give an absolutely accurate prediction of lifespan. It avoids complaints and malpractice issues to air on the side of caution. That's all. Make of it what you will. |
7th July 2010, 06:19 PM | #182 |
Not bored. Never bored.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 10,619
|
In my experience, doctors will do all they can to avoid giving a prognosis in actual terms of time, for much the reasons you suggest. If really pushed, they might give a wide range of times "anywhere from 3 months to 2 years", while explaining how inexact a science it is and that we really can't tell.
|
__________________
"Man muß den Menschen vor allem nach seinen Lastern beurteilen. Tugenden können vorgetäuscht sein. Laster sind echt." - Klaus Kinski UKLS 1988- Sitting on the fence throwing stones at both sides. |
|
7th July 2010, 07:03 PM | #183 |
Has a Rucksack
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,625
|
|
8th July 2010, 02:35 AM | #184 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
I don't really think that was what Karol Sikora was doing though, to be fair to his detractors. (I have memories of him as a well-respected expert, from many years ago. Either he has changed his approach as he became more senior, or I was mistaken in the first place.)
Look at his involvement in the case of Lisa Norris.
Quote:
That is absolutely classic "hired gun" behaviour. Oh, you think the radiation overdose killed your little girl? Yes, I can go along with that, here's an expert witness report saying so. Then they get to the point where the experts from both sides confer to try to reach an agreement, and he realises he's not on solid ground at all. He revises his report to be less certain than it was originally, and the case collapses. It's not really, consciously dishonest. It's unprofessional. It's an outlook that aligns itself too closely with the side of the dispute you're talking to, and fails to take a properly professional, unbiassed, disinterested view. I've seen it scores of times in the witness box, often from senior academics. As y'all know, I'm a big fan of David Colquhoun. What David has to say about Karol is quite distressing. http://www.dcscience.net/?p=2073
Quote:
http://www.dcscience.net/?p=1466
Quote:
I happened across this lot after I'd posted my out-dated opinion about Karol Sikora being a respected expert. He may have been at one time. Now he's something else. Which is actually fairly peripheral to the Megrahi affair. In that situation, all parties involved in the decision were aligned in their wishes. Libya wanted their human sacrifice home, being as they didn't believe Lockerbie was a Libyan operation in the first place and had only agreed to pay compensation for political advantage. The Westminster government wanted him home to get rid of this perennial bump in the road that was complicating their oil deals. And the Holyrood government wanted him home so they could get that appeal stopped. Having Megrahi die in a Scottish jail was also politically unacceptable, as it would have done lasting damage to UK/Middle Eastern relations. In that situation, just who was paying whom to come up with an agreeable opinion really isn't all that important. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
8th July 2010, 03:00 AM | #185 |
Dreaming of unicorns
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 11,938
|
|
__________________
Stundie - Avoided like the plaque, its a scottish turn of phrase. |
|
8th July 2010, 04:21 AM | #186 |
Mafia Penguin
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19,579
|
|
__________________
"I think it is very beautiful for the poor to accept their lot, to share it with the passion of Christ. I think the world is being much helped by the suffering of the poor people." - "Saint" Teresa, the lying thieving Albanian dwarf "I think accuracy is important" - Vixen |
|
8th July 2010, 02:03 PM | #187 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
I had to listen to it again because I was too busy ROTFL to take it all in the first time.
Frank Duggan is an odd cove. He was a political placeman parachuted into the Families of PA103 by the US government, and he seems to have found himself a cosy little sinecure. These people are all now extremely rich, thanks to the very large compensation payments they received from both Pan Am and Gadaffi. They can well afford a paid spokesman to keep the media off their backs. I'm genuinely shocked though, at how ignorant he is about his subject. There's a huge amount of information available, from official reports and judgements to jpgs of crucial items of evidence. It's not that hard to become informed. Nobody's paying me to do it, but I could wipe the floor with him on the subject after less than a year, compared to his boasted 20 years involvement. I could actually make a far better case for Megrahi's guilt than he can. It wouldn't be a strong case, compared to the evidence suggesting he didn't do it, but there are a couple of pieces of evidence you could build a rational discussion out of. I've never heard him mention either of them. He just tells us how angry this all makes him, and shouts over anyone expressing a contrary opinion. Just about every single thing he says in that interview is simply WRONG. He says there's no doubt in the mind of anyone who has looked at the evidence that Megrahi is guilty. This is utter nonsense. It's actually extremely difficult to find anyone in that category - in the end you come down to David Shayler of all people, and a couple of guys who were involved in the original investigation who won't consider they might have got it wrong. In contrast, the internet and the quality press are pretty much lousy with people who don't see how anyone could have been convicted on the evidence presented. George counters (with some justification) that the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Board thought there was a possible miscarriage of justice. Duggan dismisses this by maintaining that the evidence presented to the SCCRB was the work of Robert Black and Jim Swire, not Megrahi's lawyers (which is nonsense), and says it was all dismissed. Which it wasn't. He then admits 3 or 4 points were to go before the court again (actually it was six). He's correct that all the points we know about (four of them) concerned the evidence of Tony Gauci. (There were two more points, but these were never made public.) His misunderstanding of Gauci's evidence is laughable. He declares Gauci was interviewed 19 times and gave 19 statements because 19 jurisdictions were involved in the incident - 19 different countries. "So it's not surprising there were a few inconsistencies." This is nonsense. Gauci actually gave about 25 statements, though only 21 were produced in court, the others having unaccountably gone astray. They were all given to the Scottish and/or the Maltese detectives, as he was interviewed and re-interviewed, and said he remembered something else, or changed his story. Where Frank got the idea that he did 19 identical de novo interviews with 19 different jurisdictions I can't imagine - his own fevered imagination, it seems. When George asked him why he dismissed the doubts about this testimony, he simply declared that the judges found it credible. George then asked what he thought about the $2 million bribe Gauci had been paid by the US government for this testimony. Bluster. Who says he was paid that? As George said, it's a matter of public record. Frank missed a trick, because although it appears to be true, I think it's a massive leak (underpinned by the humble shopkeeper's current luxury lifestyle in Australia) rather than something with full documentation. But Frank could only bluster, and then, as he always does, get incoherent with anger. Frank then missed another trick. George asked him his opinion about the discrepancies between Gauci's description of his customer and Megrahi himself, but he made a mistake. He declared that Gauci said the purchaser was "in his sixties". This is wrong. Gauci said he was about 50, or perhaps over 50. (Megrahi was 36.) Frank didn't pull him up on it, instead admitted he's "not that familiar" with Gauci's evidence. George quite reasonably suggests that perhaps he should be. Frank falls back on "the judges thought he was credible!" George points out that Gauci's evidence was in fact the decisive piece of evidence against Megrahi, and that if that falls, the conviction falls. Frank gets back in bluster mode, declaring that no, there's "a huge amount of evidence". This isn't the case of course. If you take out Gauci's evidence, which should never have stood in the first place, there is only one very circumstantial and very questionable piece of evidence against Megrahi left. Frank just doesn't get it. He crowns his tirade by declaring that Megrahi lied on oath - in particular that he lied about being in Gauci's store, which is a bit circular if Gauci's identification evidence is what is in question. But he lied and lied and lied repeatedly! In court, under oath! Er, Megrahi never took the witness stand in court. He never opened his mouth. (This may have been a bad mistake.) Anyone with even a trivial acquaintance with the case knows this. (Megrahi seems to have lied to a journalist making a documentary at one stage. Er, so?) This is about the point where Duggan hangs up on Galloway, after calling the Emeritus Professor of Scots Law at Edinburgh University and the spokesman for the UK families of Flight 103 (the father of one of the victims) "cranks". Why does this matter in this thread? It matters because Frank Duggan is the voice US residents hear in their media, pontificating about this case. It is Frank those posters are echoing and parroting, when they declare that Megrahi is unquestionably guilty and start castigating the Scottish criminal justice system. A man who has no personal connection with the incident, who knows less about it than someone who has spent a few weeks reading around the subject on the internet, and who is being paid handsomely to defend the status quo by people who owe their current wealth to the Official Story, and have a vested interest in not having that challenged. Think about that, posters. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
8th July 2010, 03:34 PM | #188 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,806
|
Usan senators still think they run the world
'...Four US senators are calling on Britain to investigate the circumstances surrounding the release of the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing. ...'
From http://www.ukwirednews.com/news.php/...-release-probe As usual, the geopolitical understanding of Usan politicians is lamentably non-existent. Before the Usan politicos embarrass themselves further and try and throw their weight around, someone should have told them that the only authority in this matter is Scotland - not the UK. As such they have absolutely no chance of getting their way. In fact, I understand that the official Scottish response is is 'Go forth and multiply ya bamheids.' The deep anti-Britishness of the USA governing bodies is on show yet again (cf Obama calling BP British Petroleum). So much for the non-existent 'special relationship'. It seems its only 'special' when UK politicians do what Usans want. Al Megrahi was released on compassionate grounds and happily, no huffing ad puffing by Usan nonentities with the idea that they run the world and also sadly with a deeply distasteful, blood lust will change that one iota. |
__________________
“Everybody is somebody’s Jew. And today the Palestinians are the Jews of the Israelis.” Primo Levi Capitalist (n) Someone who pays himself and his friends billions of dollars of your money as a reward for destroying your entire economy. Israelis are taught that Palestinians are not human beings like them. Gideon Levy The Punishment of Gaza |
|
8th July 2010, 03:46 PM | #189 |
Based on a true story!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 13,092
|
Well, of course. When your pathetic country earns our respect again, we'll let you play with the big boys again. Until then, do as your told, and all will be right.
What's the problem here? P.S. You live in Guam, right? |
__________________
"JimBenArm is right" Hokulele Mom |
|
8th July 2010, 03:48 PM | #190 |
Anti-homeopathy illuminati member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 28,209
|
|
8th July 2010, 03:53 PM | #191 |
Master Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,150
|
If Scotland ever sends its own ambassador to the U.S., perhaps they can petition him. Until then, the UK ambassador represents Scotland in bilateral relations. The four American Senators understand this. Apparently, you don't.
I have an idea: perhaps you should stop embarrassing yourself, before worrying about what American politicians are doing. |
8th July 2010, 03:54 PM | #192 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,696
|
Strange. EJ's little opinion pieces seem to have little to do with the news article and reality.
|
__________________
"The method of science is tried and true. It is not perfect, it's just the best we have. And to abandon it with its skeptical protocols is the pathway to a dark age." -Carl Sagan "They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance."-Terry Pratchett |
|
8th July 2010, 04:01 PM | #193 | |||
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
There's already a thread on this you know. If the "USans" would stop listening to Frank Duggan, who knows less about Lockerbie than my cat does, despite being paid by the (very very rich) Lockerbie relatives to defend the official understanding of the incident (to which they owe these riches), they might find more of a sense of proportion about the incident.
Here's the official spokesman (read, US government placeman) of the American Families of Pan Am 103 showing his mastery of his subject.
ETA: Clue. Virtually every single thing Duggan says about the case in that interview is flat wrong, and demonstrably so. Rolfe. |
|||
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
||||
8th July 2010, 04:10 PM | #194 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,885
|
Pip pip!
|
8th July 2010, 04:53 PM | #195 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
Actually, I just heard Scotland talking about it quite a lot. (Question Time, from Edinburgh.) They managed to go nearly the full length without even mentioning the appeal. Forsyth finally mentioned it, and Nicola Sturgeon promptly leaped in to insist that there was no requirement on Megrahi to withdraw the appeal as a quid pro quo for the compassionate release. "He didn't have to withdraw the appeal. He chose to do that." That's a flat lie, Nicola, and I say this as one of your most loyal political supporters. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
9th July 2010, 02:43 AM | #196 |
Adult human female
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NT 150 511
Posts: 50,594
|
I've been thinking about Frank Duggan and his very peculiar attitude. It's very bad form for a paid spokesman to come over the way he does. Bluster and aggression and "I just get so angry" might be understandable from someone who actually lost a loved one at Lockerbie. They're emotionally involved, and they weren't hand-picked for their PR skills. Duggan has no personal stake in the affair, and if he's for anything at all, it's surely for a PR role. (In contrast Jim Swire, the spokesman of the UK Pan Am 103 families, who lost his daughter on the plane, is capable of discussing the matter calmly and rationally and based on the evidence.)
Duggan's ignorance of the case seems positively wilful. It takes a special sort of blinkers to be paid money to discuss the issue, and to go on TV and radio for that specific purpose, and to confront people in that environment who are familiar with the evidence, and still know essentially bugger-all about it. In this context the irritability, the shouting over anyone trying to put a contrary view, and putting the phone down, seems like a defence mechanism. He doesn't want to know anything about the case, to become informed about the issue, because if he did, he might have to re-examine his position. It works, though. As far as I can see, he's often the only voice on US programmes dealing with the issue. So his bluster and baseless assertions are all US audiences get to hear, most of the time. If this is the extent of exposure US senators get to the subject, which is quite possible, no wonder they have a rather one-sided view of the matter. Duggan is quite pro-active in making sure only his side of the story gets an airing. For example, six months ago the Lockerbie parish priest who was nearly killed that night had been invited to contribute an address to be included in the 21st anniversary commemoration of the disaster at Arlington. Frank Duggan took exception to his involvement in the proceedings, and blocked his contribution. http://www.ayrshirepost.net/ayrshire...2545-25456040/
Quote:
The address was published, so anyone can see and judge for themselves how appropriate or inappropriate it was. http://lockerbiecase.blogspot.com/20...not-being.html In contrast, an address from a supporter of the US relatives' position was delivered, the text of which is also in the public domain. http://lockerbiecase.blogspot.com/20...o-brennan.html
Quote:
It's hard to see how this was in any way less political, less a discussion of Megrahi's trial etc. than Fr. Keegans' address was. However, Duggan blocked one while warmly introducing the other. Of course, Duggan didn't get his job by chance. He got it as a US government placeman appointed to manage the relatives of the victims. It's all a bit incestuous really. Rolfe. |
__________________
"The way we vote will depend, ultimately, on whether we are persuaded to hope or to fear." - Aonghas MacNeacail, June 2012. |
|
9th July 2010, 04:01 AM | #197 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,806
|
|
__________________
“Everybody is somebody’s Jew. And today the Palestinians are the Jews of the Israelis.” Primo Levi Capitalist (n) Someone who pays himself and his friends billions of dollars of your money as a reward for destroying your entire economy. Israelis are taught that Palestinians are not human beings like them. Gideon Levy The Punishment of Gaza |
|
9th July 2010, 04:04 AM | #198 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,806
|
|
__________________
“Everybody is somebody’s Jew. And today the Palestinians are the Jews of the Israelis.” Primo Levi Capitalist (n) Someone who pays himself and his friends billions of dollars of your money as a reward for destroying your entire economy. Israelis are taught that Palestinians are not human beings like them. Gideon Levy The Punishment of Gaza |
|
9th July 2010, 04:07 AM | #199 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,806
|
|
__________________
“Everybody is somebody’s Jew. And today the Palestinians are the Jews of the Israelis.” Primo Levi Capitalist (n) Someone who pays himself and his friends billions of dollars of your money as a reward for destroying your entire economy. Israelis are taught that Palestinians are not human beings like them. Gideon Levy The Punishment of Gaza |
|
9th July 2010, 04:08 AM | #200 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,806
|
|
__________________
“Everybody is somebody’s Jew. And today the Palestinians are the Jews of the Israelis.” Primo Levi Capitalist (n) Someone who pays himself and his friends billions of dollars of your money as a reward for destroying your entire economy. Israelis are taught that Palestinians are not human beings like them. Gideon Levy The Punishment of Gaza |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|