|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
3rd April 2018, 07:17 PM | #81 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,039
|
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
3rd April 2018, 07:49 PM | #82 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mounts Farm
Posts: 11,901
|
Legendary Comedy Duo: Harris and Murray
No idea how you got from my linking to the dictionary definition to conjecture about what I want to happen regarding the meanings that words convey. My name isn’t Merriam nor is it Webster. The word ”racism“ conveys what it does, you don’t have to like it.
You are welcome, of course, to argue that claims of genetic superiority in terms of measurable general intelligence aren’t really what’s at issue here, but rather something else such as systemic discrimination within some cultural context. I’d be interested to hear how that one plays out, given the OP. |
__________________
“Knowledge is Power; France is Bacon.” |
|
3rd April 2018, 08:03 PM | #83 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 371
|
Harris released a podcast going over all this today. He will have Ezra on to discuss their beef and iq and all that. Sounds like he is not going to hold back, should be good.
|
4th April 2018, 12:19 AM | #84 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
You seem to be hopelessly confused here. So much so that I don't know how to help you out at this point.
The question that was at issue in the Harris-Murray podcast was the question of whether or not genetics plays some part in determining the differences in intelligence among groups and individuals. Whether they do or not is an empirical fact which can be represented by data. As Sam Harris points out in his latest podcast, data cannot be racist. The only way in which you can begin down the racist path is when you decide what to do about these empirical facts however they may turn out to be. If you decide that the data justifies discrimination, then you are being racist. If you overinterpret the data to say, for example, that black people aren't smart enough to go to university then you are being extremely racist. If you think the data justifies white supremacy then you are being extraordinarily and unforgivably racist. If you think "Intelligence is valuable, therefore it is racist to claim that some groups are, on average, more intelligent than other groups as a result of any amount of genetics, because Merriam-Webster says so" then, for whatever combination of environmental or genetic reasons, you are being extraordinarily dimwitted. |
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
4th April 2018, 02:14 AM | #85 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,039
|
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
4th April 2018, 07:55 AM | #86 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mounts Farm
Posts: 11,901
|
I'm not seeing anything about empiricism or data in any common defintion of racism. Once again, when I say "racism," what I mean to convey is simply the view that some group of people is superior to some other group of people (regarding some important variable) on account of their differing ancestry.
There is a common expression in the law of defamation to the effect that a statement cannot be libel if it's true. It seems to me that you are attempting to carve out a similar exception for the concept of racism. I don't believe you will be successful in this, for fairly obvious reasons. |
__________________
“Knowledge is Power; France is Bacon.” |
|
4th April 2018, 07:57 AM | #87 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mounts Farm
Posts: 11,901
|
|
__________________
“Knowledge is Power; France is Bacon.” |
|
4th April 2018, 08:03 AM | #88 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
|
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
4th April 2018, 04:55 PM | #89 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
5th April 2018, 12:31 AM | #90 |
Maledictorian
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 22,554
|
nvm
|
__________________
“Don’t blame me. I voted for Kodos.” |
|
5th April 2018, 04:53 AM | #91 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
|
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
5th April 2018, 05:05 AM | #92 |
Maledictorian
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 22,554
|
There is too much demand to identify genes who by their absence or presence enhance intelligence as to be bothered by the possible implication of giving racists more fodder, as if they needed any.
Would White Supremacists refuse a hypothetical gene injection therapy for and extra 10 IQ points if the sequences were primarily found in Africans? Only the stupid ones would. |
__________________
“Don’t blame me. I voted for Kodos.” |
|
5th April 2018, 08:06 AM | #93 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
5th April 2018, 08:25 AM | #94 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,709
|
|
5th April 2018, 08:40 AM | #95 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
5th April 2018, 02:05 PM | #96 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
|
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
5th April 2018, 02:40 PM | #97 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
5th April 2018, 03:21 PM | #98 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
|
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
5th April 2018, 03:46 PM | #99 |
Philosopher
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cole Valley, CA
Posts: 5,335
|
Yes, the housekeeping episode. I listened to almost all of it. Not sure how good the Ezra podcast will be - I could see it going either way.
I usually enjoy the Sam Harris podcast. I enjoyed the Charles Murray episode. The Glenn Loury one on race was also very good, as is Glenn;s own podcast. |
__________________
So, if he's doing it by divine means, I can only tell him this: 'Mr. Geller, you're doing it the hard way.' --James Randi |
|
5th April 2018, 04:04 PM | #100 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
Can anyone provide the best evidence with links that IQ tests are not biased?
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
5th April 2018, 09:47 PM | #101 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 58,581
|
Couple of fun points here though: Japan and Germany are both countries with cleanliness concerns that are well ingrained yet a reasonably large percent of their porn material (app. 25-35%) involves waste material. Countries such as France, Germany and Italy go big for priest and nun (with or without civilians as it were) or preachers (not Catholic). The US, of course, is big on most everything so can't be specific for it. There is more but I suspect forum management would not be happy if I clarified.
On the bright side, it is correct though. |
5th April 2018, 10:00 PM | #102 |
Maledictorian
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 22,554
|
Actually, Nazi-ideology had it that Arians were less smart than "The Jews", but more physically fit and willing to fight.
Hitler feared that, unless stopped, their superior intelligence would inevitably let "the jewish race" take over the world. And the stopping had to be done with brute force because, obviously, the Germanic Race was to dumb to outsmart them. |
__________________
“Don’t blame me. I voted for Kodos.” |
|
6th April 2018, 06:23 AM | #103 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
The claim that "racial group A" may have a difference in average IQ than "racial group B", in part as a result of nature, and not entirely because of nurture, is obviously a target-rich environment.
What, if anything, is a "race" anyway? Is it a social construct or a biological concept? If we are only considering self-reported "race" then are we capturing anything meaningful? What is "intelligence" anyway? Do IQ tests reliably represent intelligence? Are IQ tests culturally biased? How can we disentangle nature from nurture? Etc... All of these are questions that are probably not settled definitively and for most people the mere existence of the doubt is sufficient to say we cannot and should not try to assert the claim above. But what if those questions were settled and it became possible to assert the claim truthfully? Is it not a matter of empirical fact in that case? For many people it would be very unwelcome, and I think that I prefer the idea that it is meaningless to assert it. That said, I think if it is true, then we just have to accept it, just like we may have to accept other "inconvenient truths". We cannot just pick and choose those that we wish were true. Not if we have any respect for truth. Now, having said that, what people then decide to do as a result of this is another matter. It is then that I agree with you that people will attempt to put such things to nefarious uses. And that is what should be resisted. |
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
6th April 2018, 03:51 PM | #104 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
My own intuitive sense (how's that for stellar skepticism, huh? lol) is that if there are differences, they really are just differences, in that no one perfectly "controlled" (by economic status, etc) ethnic group will consistently score better or worse according to all possible metrics and tests of intelligence.
It's the nature of the tests that interests me the most in this regard, because I think the capacity for bias is extraordinary. For example, if you were to let Temple Grandin devise an IQ test, I bet you'd see a higher correlation between autism and high IQ. If you were to have an Amazonian tribe with little contact with the larger world devise one, who the heck knows what demographic would score highest there? Etc and so on. |
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
7th April 2018, 03:23 PM | #105 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,039
|
I haven’t disputed that. But Harris hasn’t made any claim of superiority, nor has anyone in this thread. Again, the bit of my post that you cut:
Quote:
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
7th April 2018, 03:29 PM | #106 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,039
|
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
7th April 2018, 04:14 PM | #107 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
7th April 2018, 04:25 PM | #108 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
The wiki article in general IQ exclusively or almost exclusively cites this book for it's validation claims regarding employment outcomes, income, scholastic achievement, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_g_...Mental_Ability Does anyone have it, or has anyone here read it? Or know if the relevant information contained within it is available on the web somewhere? |
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
8th April 2018, 10:17 AM | #109 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mounts Farm
Posts: 11,901
|
Legendary Comedy Duo: Harris and Murray
Harris doesn’t believe that it is better for people to have higher intelligence and more potential cognitive abilities? Murray doesn’t believe that, either? Okay, if you say so, but I really doubt that people can be indifferent to such a vital set of attributes in any modern increasingly cognitive economy. |
__________________
“Knowledge is Power; France is Bacon.” |
|
8th April 2018, 11:36 AM | #110 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,709
|
|
8th April 2018, 11:40 AM | #111 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
8th April 2018, 11:43 AM | #112 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mounts Farm
Posts: 11,901
|
|
__________________
“Knowledge is Power; France is Bacon.” |
|
8th April 2018, 11:49 AM | #113 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,709
|
Oh really?
Firstly, as genes are hereditary, are you not worried about racist findings? Secondly, if augmentations become possible, can you guarantee that they are performed proportionally to all ethnicities (otherwise a specific ethnicity may become stereotyped as the unaugmented “inferiors”)? Just ban it. Only way to be safe. |
8th April 2018, 11:56 AM | #114 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
If they're simply correlating genes to the g factor as it's currently understood and tested for, I have a feeling it's going to be the genetics of wealthier white men.
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
8th April 2018, 11:59 AM | #115 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,632
|
I think genetic and other enhancements in cognition (and medical technological enhancements of all sorts) are probable destined to be useful toys for the super rich.
|
__________________
"We are enjoined, no matter how uncomfortable it might be, to consider ourselves and our cultural institutions scientifically — not to accept uncritically whatever we’re told; to surmount as best we can our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs; to view ourselves as we really are." - Carl Sagan |
|
8th April 2018, 12:05 PM | #116 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mounts Farm
Posts: 11,901
|
Not particularly...don't see any reason to perform cognitive research on racially distinct population samples in particular. Plenty of other relevant research to be done.
Even if everyone on Earth was a uniform shade of tan, unaugmented folks would still be seen as inferior, on account of their actual cognitive inferiority. |
__________________
“Knowledge is Power; France is Bacon.” |
|
8th April 2018, 12:07 PM | #117 |
Guest
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,627
|
My view is that there are almost certainly IQ differences between ethnic groups, but this is no more than an academic point of interest. The knowledge cannot and should not have practical application and therefore cannot be a measure of superiority. People who use it in this way either have an agenda or are too stupid to understand the concept of averages.
|
8th April 2018, 12:16 PM | #118 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,709
|
Not suggesting research racially distinct populations. But hereditary characteristics are unlikely to be completely uniformally distributed between the various different groupings of family trees.
Not what I was saying at all. My point was typecasting ethnicities because their prevalence (or lack of) augmentation. You jumped to talking about individuals whose augmentation status is known. That’s like me saying; lif ethnicity X has proportionately more felons, isn’t there a risk of racist stereotyping?”. And you replying, “well, felons will always be stereotyped as criminals on account of their criminality “. |
8th April 2018, 12:33 PM | #119 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mounts Farm
Posts: 11,901
|
It strikes me as really odd to base public policy on the possibility of people reasoning badly. I'm not seeing any way to prevent stereotyping or other hasty generalizations. About all we can do is teach people to reason carefully, instead of indulging in such shortcuts.
|
__________________
“Knowledge is Power; France is Bacon.” |
|
8th April 2018, 03:39 PM | #120 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
|
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|