ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » General Skepticism and The Paranormal
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags james oberg , Kenneth Arnold , UFO sightings , ufos

Reply
Old Yesterday, 01:28 AM   #281
Cosmic Yak
Graduate Poster
 
Cosmic Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Where there's never a road broader than the back of your hand.
Posts: 1,607
Quote:
The Belgian Air Force was unable to identify neither the nature nor the origin of the phenomena.
How is this proof of aliens?
__________________
Fortuna Faveat Fatuis
Cosmic Yak is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 01:31 AM   #282
Cosmic Yak
Graduate Poster
 
Cosmic Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Where there's never a road broader than the back of your hand.
Posts: 1,607
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
This is the same General De Brouwer conducting the international press conference pointing out the radar lock-on on the F-16's radar screen of the UFO that night. The diamond proved the object in the sky that night, which was also visually confirmed and by ground-based radars.
So it is the same one. Excellent.
Please quote him saying the radar contacts were proven to be alien spacecraft.
__________________
Fortuna Faveat Fatuis
Cosmic Yak is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 01:45 AM   #283
Tolls
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,424
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
Thrusters had nothing to do with the object's movements.
So.
We have a video of a speck moving in one direction, slowly.
There's a flash to the lower right, then the speck moves rapidly in a different direction, followed shortly by another speck moving rapidly in the same direction.

But you assert there's no thruster (or the other possibility of simple venting).

Guess your assertion wins!

Space aliens it is!
Tolls is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 09:47 AM   #284
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,155
Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak View Post
How is this proof of aliens?

The verified data provided by the Belgian Air Force had summed it up. The lock-on diamond proved that there was an object in the sky, which was confirmed by ground-based radar and witnessed by observers on the ground. Three sources of information confirming the object in the sky that night that was not an aircraft which was proven by its extreme maneuvering capability.

The data was analyzed by the military and radar experts who confirmed the object in the sky that night and the lead F-16 pilot also confirmed his radar contact was also tracked by his wingman and ground-based radar. Remember, witnesses on the ground observed the object and later, ground-based radar confirmed the object that witnesses were observing. That is why the F-16's were scrambled to investigate.

The F-16's were guided to the object whereas they own radars tracked the object. In other words, there can be no denying there was an object in the sky that night as confirmed by airborne and ground-based radar and ground-based observers.

Now, what the object was could not have been an aircraft or balloon, which were ruled out by the investigation because of its extreme maneuver performance and it is that extreme maneuvering performance depicted in the data the proves the object was not that of mankind because mankind has no such aircraft. The incident that night was also published in the Wall Street Journal. The target speed changes within seconds from 150 to 970 knots, altitude coming down from 9000 to 5000 feet, then up to 11000 feet, and, shortly after, down to ground level. From this results a "break lock." The object also sent jamming signals at the aircraft.

Despite the object exceeding the speed of sound there was no sonic boom and its airspeed is clearly depicted in the radar data provided by the Belgian Air Force so the facts we have are:

1. The object was a real craft in the sky that night as confirmed by airborne and ground-based radars and observers on the ground

2. The extreme maneuvering performance rules out any aircraft produced by mankind

3. The fact the object produced no sonic boom also turns the page toward the ET explanation.

4. Thousands of people saw the object during sightings that lasted many months, and the object was also sighted in other countries during that time frame that spanned a number of months.

No aircraft in existence can duplicate such maneuvers nor fly at supersonic speeds and not generate a sonic boom. Since we don't have such a flying vehicle, whose triangular vehicle was it?

.

Last edited by skyeagle409; Yesterday at 09:50 AM.
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 10:32 AM   #285
Steve001
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,223
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
The verified data provided by the Belgian Air Force had summed it up. The lock-on diamond proved that there was an object in the sky, which was confirmed by ground-based radar and witnessed by observers on the ground. Three sources of information confirming the object in the sky that night that was not an aircraft which was proven by its extreme maneuvering capability.

The data was analyzed by the military and radar experts who confirmed the object in the sky that night and the lead F-16 pilot also confirmed his radar contact was also tracked by his wingman and ground-based radar. Remember, witnesses on the ground observed the object and later, ground-based radar confirmed the object that witnesses were observing. That is why the F-16's were scrambled to investigate.

The F-16's were guided to the object whereas they own radars tracked the object. In other words, there can be no denying there was an object in the sky that night as confirmed by airborne and ground-based radar and ground-based observers.

Now, what the object was could not have been an aircraft or balloon, which were ruled out by the investigation because of its extreme maneuver performance and it is that extreme maneuvering performance depicted in the data the proves the object was not that of mankind because mankind has no such aircraft. The incident that night was also published in the Wall Street Journal. The target speed changes within seconds from 150 to 970 knots, altitude coming down from 9000 to 5000 feet, then up to 11000 feet, and, shortly after, down to ground level. From this results a "break lock." The object also sent jamming signals at the aircraft.

Despite the object exceeding the speed of sound there was no sonic boom and its airspeed is clearly depicted in the radar data provided by the Belgian Air Force so the facts we have are:

1. The object was a real craft in the sky that night as confirmed by airborne and ground-based radars and observers on the ground

2. The extreme maneuvering performance rules out any aircraft produced by mankind

3. The fact the object produced no sonic boom also turns the page toward the ET explanation.

4. Thousands of people saw the object during sightings that lasted many months, and the object was also sighted in other countries during that time frame that spanned a number of months.

No aircraft in existence can duplicate such maneuvers nor fly at supersonic speeds and not generate a sonic boom. Since we don't have such a flying vehicle, whose triangular vehicle was it?

.
All you've written can be ignored in answering your last question which I've bolded. Your last question should be asked in this manner: Since we don't have such a flying vehicle, whose triangular vehicle was it? what was it? As I've stated before, you jump to conclusions. I doubt there's a skeptically minded person whom would not like definitive proof of ETs, but the way you and all the others present this argument isn't persuasive. What is, is physical evidence. Such as seeing said objects up close. Close enough to touch. Got any of that?

Last edited by Steve001; Yesterday at 10:55 AM.
Steve001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 10:32 AM   #286
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,155
Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak View Post
So it is the same one. Excellent.
Please quote him saying the radar contacts were proven to be alien spacecraft.

In case you missed this video, jump to time line 1:25 to the end of the video. What does General De Brouwer say?


General De Brouwer Video Interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7psGj4M1ZI&t=17s


The rest of the Belgian UFO story


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taGuuHv5Bsc
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:24 AM   #287
John Jones
Penultimate Amazing
 
John Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,707
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Obviously. Ghosts don't need thrusters.
Neither do time travelers. They can move through time with no thrusters at all.
__________________
Credibility is not a boomerang. If you throw it away, it's not coming back.
John Jones is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:25 AM   #288
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
 
Jack by the hedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,409
Your preferred explanation depends heavily on the 'extreme maneuvering capability' of the F-16's radar contact. Can you address the anomaly in the data which shows the contact climbing at supersonic speed while showing its speed as 570 knots or less?
Jack by the hedge is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:26 AM   #289
John Jones
Penultimate Amazing
 
John Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,707
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
The verified data provided by the Belgian Air Force had summed it up. [...]

.
That doesn't answer the question.
__________________
Credibility is not a boomerang. If you throw it away, it's not coming back.
John Jones is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 11:30 AM   #290
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
 
RoboTimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Prosperity, AZ
Posts: 27,678
Originally Posted by John Jones View Post
Neither do time travelers. They can move through time with no thrusters at all.
Neither do witches. They can mess with the data.
RoboTimbo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 12:20 PM   #291
John Jones
Penultimate Amazing
 
John Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,707
Originally Posted by RoboTimbo View Post
Neither do witches. They can mess with the data.
But unlike ETs, there is no evidence that witches even exist.

No. Wait. Time Travelers. Yeah! That's the ticket.
__________________
Credibility is not a boomerang. If you throw it away, it's not coming back.
John Jones is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 03:18 PM   #292
arthwollipot
Observer of Phenomena
 
arthwollipot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 55,597
Originally Posted by John Jones View Post
But unlike ETs, there is no evidence that witches even exist.

No. Wait. Time Travelers. Yeah! That's the ticket.
It's ghosts, I tell ya! Time travellers would still leave a radar shadow duh!
__________________
Read my fantasy novel for free!
arthwollipot is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 04:17 PM   #293
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
 
RoboTimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Prosperity, AZ
Posts: 27,678
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
It's ghosts, I tell ya! Time travellers would still leave a radar shadow duh!
Witches have been proven in courts of law to exist. Courts of law have trials to determine fact. I win.
RoboTimbo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Yesterday, 08:02 PM   #294
smartcooky
Philosopher
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 5,887
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
The lock-on diamond proved that there was an object in the sky.
Yes and no.

Radar lock is fallible.The F-16AMs and F-16BMs flown by the Belgian Air Force uses the same AN/APG-66 Pulse Doppler X-Band Multi-Mode Weapons Radar that we used in our A4Ks after the Project Kahu refit. APG-66 was well known for getting "False lock", a condition sometimes brought about when the radar receives information from another friendly aircraft (possibly the wingman's F-16). It can also occur if the radar locks onto a spurious X-Band signal. for example, synthetic aperture radar (used in J-Stars and AWACS), weather monitoring, air traffic control, shipping traffic control, air defence tracking, and vehicle speed detection. When testing them on the ground, we were able to get a lock on the local TACAN transmitter. Its even been known for the radar to lock on a flock of birds or on dense ice crystals in storm clouds

Now, while I am not suggesting that any of these are the reason the Belgian Air Force's F-16 got a missile lock, I am pointing out that your blanket statement to the effect that missile lock PROVES that an aircraft or a UFO must have been there, is wrong. Its a good indication of the presence of an aircraft, but its not proof.
__________________
► 9/11 was a terrorist attack by Islamic extremists; 12 Apollo astronauts really did walk on the Moon; JFK was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald,who acted alone.
► Never underestimate the power of the Internet to lend unwarranted credibility to the colossally misinformed. - Jay Utah
► Heisenberg's Law - The weirdness of the Universe is inversely proportional to the scale at which you observe it, or not.

Last edited by smartcooky; Yesterday at 08:05 PM.
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 12:29 AM   #295
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,155
Originally Posted by Jack by the hedge View Post
Your preferred explanation depends heavily on the 'extreme maneuvering capability' of the F-16's radar contact. Can you address the anomaly in the data which shows the contact climbing at supersonic speed while showing its speed as 570 knots or less?

I can show the vertical movements at supersonic speed.

07 270 570 6000

11 210 570 10000

14 270 770 7000

18 290 1010 4000
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 12:36 AM   #296
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,155
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
It's ghosts, I tell ya! Time travellers would still leave a radar shadow duh!

Radar "ghost angels" have been ruled out, thanks to an Air Force study.


Quote:
Quantitative Aspects of Mirages

"According to a 1969 study by the Air Force Environmental Technical Applications Center, the conditions needed to produce the UFO-like effects attributed to inversions cannot exist in the Earth's atmosphere."

Menkello, F.V., "Quantitative Aspects of Mirages," USAF Environmental Technical Applications Center, 1969.

https://books.google.com/books?id=ZS...irages&f=false

Last edited by skyeagle409; Today at 12:37 AM.
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 12:41 AM   #297
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,155
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Yes and no.

Radar lock is fallible.The F-16AMs and F-16BMs flown by the Belgian Air Force uses the same AN/APG-66 Pulse Doppler X-Band Multi-Mode Weapons Radar that we used in our A4Ks after the Project Kahu refit. APG-66 was well known for getting "False lock", a condition sometimes brought about when the radar receives information from another friendly aircraft (possibly the wingman's F-16). It can also occur if the radar locks onto a spurious X-Band signal. for example, synthetic aperture radar (used in J-Stars and AWACS), weather monitoring, air traffic control, shipping traffic control, air defence tracking, and vehicle speed detection. When testing them on the ground, we were able to get a lock on the local TACAN transmitter. Its even been known for the radar to lock on a flock of birds or on dense ice crystals in storm clouds

Now, while I am not suggesting that any of these are the reason the Belgian Air Force's F-16 got a missile lock, I am pointing out that your blanket statement to the effect that missile lock PROVES that an aircraft or a UFO must have been there, is wrong. Its a good indication of the presence of an aircraft, but its not proof.

In the Belgian UFO incident, that was not the case. As the lead F-16 pilot stated in his video interview, ground-based radar tracked the same UFO that he and wingman were tracking. There was no "buddy spike" calls during the encounter.
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 12:53 AM   #298
Jack by the hedge
Safely Ignored
 
Jack by the hedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,409
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
I can show the vertical movements at supersonic speed.





07 270 570 6000





11 210 570 10000





14 270 770 7000





18 290 1010 4000


That wasn't the question. Can you explain how supersonic changes in altitude were contemporaneous with subsonic speed readings? How does any object climb 4000 feet in 3 seconds at 550-570 knots?

Last edited by Jack by the hedge; Today at 12:54 AM.
Jack by the hedge is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 01:40 AM   #299
skyeagle409
Master Poster
 
skyeagle409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,155
Originally Posted by Jack by the hedge View Post
That wasn't the question. Can you explain how supersonic changes in altitude were contemporaneous with subsonic speed readings? How does any object climb 4000 feet in 3 seconds at 550-570 knots?

I think I see what you mean now. It all has to do with the kind of radar that was in use, which was a Pulse-Doppler radar that measures velocity of an object as it approaches and pass by the radar and if you fly perpendicular to a Pulse-Doppler radar, you will not get an accurate airspeed measurement.

It reminds me of slant range error readings regarding an aircraft's DME.
skyeagle409 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 02:13 AM   #300
quadraginta
Becoming Beth
 
quadraginta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Vale of Humility
Posts: 17,996
Originally Posted by Jack by the hedge View Post
That wasn't the question. Can you explain how supersonic changes in altitude were contemporaneous with subsonic speed readings? How does any object climb 4000 feet in 3 seconds at 550-570 knots?

Okay.

Maybe it is time travelers.
__________________
"It never does just what I want, but only what I tell it."
quadraginta is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old Today, 03:06 AM   #301
Cosmic Yak
Graduate Poster
 
Cosmic Yak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Where there's never a road broader than the back of your hand.
Posts: 1,607
Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak View Post
So it is the same one. Excellent.
Please quote him saying the radar contacts were proven to be alien spacecraft.
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
In case you missed this video, jump to time line 1:25 to the end of the video. What does General De Brouwer say?


General De Brouwer Video Interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7psGj4M1ZI&t=17s


The rest of the Belgian UFO story


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taGuuHv5Bsc
Watched the first video. Nowhere does he say there was proof this was an alien spacecraft. Are you sure you linked to the right video?
__________________
Fortuna Faveat Fatuis
Cosmic Yak is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » General Skepticism and The Paranormal

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:56 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.