Chris Bollyn finds a new scientist

JamesB · 9th January 2008, 03:54 PM

I will have to do a SLC post on this when I get a chance, but I figured you guys would want a head start.

http://tinyurl.com/2olw2z

Quote:

Recently, Anders Björkman, an independent structural engineer from Europe, has written a response to the conclusions of Zdenek Bazant of Northwestern University about what caused the collapses of the World Trade Center.

Björkman, a Swedish naval architect and engineer, has exposed the biggest fraud in maritime history behind the 1994 sinking of the Baltic ferry Estonia. Now he has joined the discussion about the demolition of the World Trade Center with an article in which he does a good job of disproving Bazant's "false theory" that burning jet fuel brought down the twin towers.

Björkman's article was written for "children and amateurs of skyscraper design who want to get a better understanding of the world around us."

He "describes the structure of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and what happens when the release of potential energy, due to downward movement of the mass above one of its supporting columns when buckling, exceeds the strain energy that can be absorbed by the same column below."

He concludes that "no global collapse of the Towers can ensue under the given circumstances." He even describes a simple test that can be done to see how the steel in the towers would have responded to the 500 degree C. heat it was exposed to.

You can find the link to the Swedish "structural engineer" (naval engineer actually) in the article. For some reason rather than submitting it for review, he posted it on a free tripod webpage.

WildCat · 9th January 2008, 03:57 PM

Originally Posted by JamesB

You can find the link to the Swedish "structural engineer" (naval engineer actually) in the article. For some reason rather than submitting it for review, he posted it on a free tripod webpage.

He posts here under the name Heiwa. He's a no-planer!

JamesB · 9th January 2008, 04:02 PM

OMG it is Spooked!

Quote:

1. Introduction - a bird cage

The structural design of the World Trade Center Twin Towers is very simple as its very lightweight steel framework is similar to a box shaped bird cage in which human beings are working. Most skyscrapers or office towers in the world are built according similar principles. None has ever globally collapsed in seconds before or after 911 except WTC 1, 2 and 7.

Hokulele · 9th January 2008, 04:12 PM

Heiwa was last seen trying to defend his paper over here.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...75#post3292375

maccy · 9th January 2008, 04:14 PM

Originally Posted by WildCat

He posts here under the name Heiwa. He's a no-planer!

Heiwa's "paper" is discussed in this thread:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=101791

Also, 2 "question for Heiwa" threads:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=102407
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=102629

Jonnyclueless · 9th January 2008, 04:21 PM

So he's trying to prove they intentionally sank the WTC?

JamesB · 9th January 2008, 04:22 PM

Damn, I missed that. I guess the 16 hours a day I spend following the CTers is not enough, but I can't get the NWO to approve the overtime...

peteweaver · 9th January 2008, 04:24 PM

A U Boat did it!!

maccy · 9th January 2008, 04:25 PM

Also, we're only 9 days into January and Heiwa has already been nominated for two Stundies for the month:

Originally Posted by Gravy

Naval engineer Heiwa sure knows his physics and structural engineering. The Twin Towers shouldn't have collapsed because,

Originally Posted by Heiwa

...the top part should bounce back. Elementary. Giga powers! But it is like a feather falling on a straw. Physics.

Originally Posted by Dave Rogers

I just don't have any words fit to describe this Stundie masterpiece from Heiwa.

Originally Posted by Heiwa

I have to repeat that the forensic evidence doesn't support my theory above. Forensic evidence shows that a bomb is dropped on the building.

Where could it have come from?

Dave

bje · 9th January 2008, 04:32 PM

Originally Posted by JamesB

You can find the link to the Swedish "structural engineer" (naval engineer actually) in the article. For some reason rather than submitting it for review, he posted it on a free tripod webpage.

Bollyn and Heiwa have had a long connection with the Estonia affair:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=183

Google both their names together.

AMTMAN · 9th January 2008, 04:52 PM

Chris Bollyn should be happy that chasing drunks who don't show up in court is not high on the priority list for most law enfocement agencies.

Alferd_Packer · 9th January 2008, 05:08 PM

Chris is safe, they won't extradite him from the Netherlands.

JamesB · 9th January 2008, 05:26 PM

Originally Posted by bje

Bollyn and Heiwa have had a long connection with the Estonia affair:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=183

Google both their names together.

Does he have his "I (heart) Chris Bollyn" Photo?

AMTMAN · 9th January 2008, 07:09 PM

Originally Posted by Alferd_Packer

Chris is safe, they won't extradite him from the Netherlands.

Is that he is hiding these days? If so the Dutch can keep him.

Shrinker · 10th January 2008, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Björkman's article was written for "children and amateurs..."

Now that's no way to talk about the Truth Movement...

WildCat · 10th January 2008, 07:27 AM

Originally Posted by peteweaver

A U Boat did it!!

And a depth charge dropped by a destroyer missed the U-Boat and hit WTC 7!!!1!!1

Myron Proudfoot · 10th January 2008, 02:32 PM

Sighted building, sank same?

9th January 2008, 03:54 PM	#1
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	Chris Bollyn finds a new scientist I will have to do a SLC post on this when I get a chance, but I figured you guys would want a head start. http://tinyurl.com/2olw2z Quote: Recently, Anders Björkman, an independent structural engineer from Europe, has written a response to the conclusions of Zdenek Bazant of Northwestern University about what caused the collapses of the World Trade Center. Björkman, a Swedish naval architect and engineer, has exposed the biggest fraud in maritime history behind the 1994 sinking of the Baltic ferry Estonia. Now he has joined the discussion about the demolition of the World Trade Center with an article in which he does a good job of disproving Bazant's "false theory" that burning jet fuel brought down the twin towers. Björkman's article was written for "children and amateurs of skyscraper design who want to get a better understanding of the world around us." He "describes the structure of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and what happens when the release of potential energy, due to downward movement of the mass above one of its supporting columns when buckling, exceeds the strain energy that can be absorbed by the same column below." He concludes that "no global collapse of the Towers can ensue under the given circumstances." He even describes a simple test that can be done to see how the steel in the towers would have responded to the 500 degree C. heat it was exposed to. You can find the link to the Swedish "structural engineer" (naval engineer actually) in the article. For some reason rather than submitting it for review, he posted it on a free tripod webpage.
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	__________________ I said lots of things in NPH that I would not say today and that I did not repeat in NPHR, where I specifically corrected at least some of the errors I had made in that earlier book, written 5 years ago. -David Ray Griffin-

9th January 2008, 03:57 PM	#2
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 59,856	Originally Posted by JamesB You can find the link to the Swedish "structural engineer" (naval engineer actually) in the article. For some reason rather than submitting it for review, he posted it on a free tripod webpage. He posts here under the name Heiwa. He's a no-planer!
	__________________ Vive la liberté! Last edited by WildCat; 9th January 2008 at 03:58 PM.

9th January 2008, 04:02 PM	#3
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	OMG it is Spooked! Quote: 1. Introduction - a bird cage The structural design of the World Trade Center Twin Towers is very simple as its very lightweight steel framework is similar to a box shaped bird cage in which human beings are working. Most skyscrapers or office towers in the world are built according similar principles. None has ever globally collapsed in seconds before or after 911 except WTC 1, 2 and 7.
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	__________________ I said lots of things in NPH that I would not say today and that I did not repeat in NPHR, where I specifically corrected at least some of the errors I had made in that earlier book, written 5 years ago. -David Ray Griffin-

9th January 2008, 04:12 PM	#4
Hokulele Deleterious Slab of Damnation Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: The Biggest Little City in the World Posts: 29,576	Heiwa was last seen trying to defend his paper over here. http://www.internationalskeptics.com...75#post3292375
	__________________ "Oh god...What have you done, zooterkin? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?!?!" - Cleon

9th January 2008, 04:14 PM	#5
maccy Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 2,094	Originally Posted by WildCat He posts here under the name Heiwa. He's a no-planer! Heiwa's "paper" is discussed in this thread: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=101791 Also, 2 "question for Heiwa" threads: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=102407 http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=102629
maccy Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 2,094

9th January 2008, 04:21 PM	#6
Jonnyclueless Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,546	So he's trying to prove they intentionally sank the WTC?

9th January 2008, 04:22 PM	#7
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	Damn, I missed that. I guess the 16 hours a day I spend following the CTers is not enough, but I can't get the NWO to approve the overtime...
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	__________________ I said lots of things in NPH that I would not say today and that I did not repeat in NPHR, where I specifically corrected at least some of the errors I had made in that earlier book, written 5 years ago. -David Ray Griffin-

9th January 2008, 04:24 PM	#8
peteweaver Graduate Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,006	A U Boat did it!!

9th January 2008, 04:25 PM	#9
maccy Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 2,094	Also, we're only 9 days into January and Heiwa has already been nominated for two Stundies for the month: Originally Posted by Gravy Naval engineer Heiwa sure knows his physics and structural engineering. The Twin Towers shouldn't have collapsed because, Originally Posted by Heiwa ...the top part should bounce back. Elementary. Giga powers! But it is like a feather falling on a straw. Physics. Originally Posted by Dave Rogers I just don't have any words fit to describe this Stundie masterpiece from Heiwa. Originally Posted by Heiwa I have to repeat that the forensic evidence doesn't support my theory above. Forensic evidence shows that a bomb is dropped on the building. Where could it have come from? Dave
maccy Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 2,094	Last edited by maccy; 9th January 2008 at 04:27 PM.

9th January 2008, 04:32 PM	#10
bje Graduate Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,280	Originally Posted by JamesB You can find the link to the Swedish "structural engineer" (naval engineer actually) in the article. For some reason rather than submitting it for review, he posted it on a free tripod webpage. Bollyn and Heiwa have had a long connection with the Estonia affair: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=183 Google both their names together.
bje Graduate Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,280	__________________ - There is only one way to be right, but an infinite number of ways to be wrong.

9th January 2008, 04:52 PM	#11
AMTMAN Muse Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 578	Chris Bollyn should be happy that chasing drunks who don't show up in court is not high on the priority list for most law enfocement agencies.
AMTMAN Muse Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 578	__________________ You of course would forget that the original burden of proof falls upon truthers. Swing Dangler commenting on the air phones issue Here is a diagram of a Boeing 767. I see numerous potential exit points. For example, the Nose Gear Door.... A-Train on "potential" exits on a 767.

9th January 2008, 05:08 PM	#12
Alferd_Packer Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 8,746	Chris is safe, they won't extradite him from the Netherlands.
	__________________ No laws of physics were broken in the writing of this post Last edited by Alferd_Packer; 9th January 2008 at 05:08 PM.

9th January 2008, 05:26 PM	#13
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	Originally Posted by bje Bollyn and Heiwa have had a long connection with the Estonia affair: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...&postcount=183 Google both their names together. Does he have his "I (heart) Chris Bollyn" Photo?
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	__________________ I said lots of things in NPH that I would not say today and that I did not repeat in NPHR, where I specifically corrected at least some of the errors I had made in that earlier book, written 5 years ago. -David Ray Griffin-

9th January 2008, 07:09 PM	#14
AMTMAN Muse Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 578	Originally Posted by Alferd_Packer Chris is safe, they won't extradite him from the Netherlands. Is that he is hiding these days? If so the Dutch can keep him.
AMTMAN Muse Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 578	__________________ You of course would forget that the original burden of proof falls upon truthers. Swing Dangler commenting on the air phones issue Here is a diagram of a Boeing 767. I see numerous potential exit points. For example, the Nose Gear Door.... A-Train on "potential" exits on a 767.

10th January 2008, 06:04 AM	#15
Shrinker Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,056	Quote: Björkman's article was written for "children and amateurs..." Now that's no way to talk about the Truth Movement...
	Last edited by Shrinker; 10th January 2008 at 06:05 AM.

10th January 2008, 07:27 AM	#16
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 59,856	Originally Posted by peteweaver A U Boat did it!! And a depth charge dropped by a destroyer missed the U-Boat and hit WTC 7!!!1!!1
	__________________ Vive la liberté!

10th January 2008, 02:32 PM	#17
Myron Proudfoot Master Poster Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Northern VA/DC Posts: 2,361	Sighted building, sank same?