Creekfreak's Bigfoot hair samples and other non-photo related claims.

kitakaze

Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
kitakaze
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
9,272
Location
Sapporo ichiban!
Creekfreak said:
Ive got 4 large amounts of different hair samples from bigfoots if anyone wants to pay for them to be dna tested let me know .
I will give them up for free just to shut some of you up .
Click to expand...
I'd like to ask that the discussion from 'Another Bigfoot Thread' concerning the hair samples be merged here. I'd rather not but it may be best to set this thread to moderated status from the beginning considering past performances. I would really hope that it wouldn't be necessary.
 
If anyone can get a scientist at Florida State University to do the testing, I would be willing to act as a liaison. I live in Tallahassee, and Creekfreak is not too far from here either.

eta: I know some people in the bio-lab at FSU; I may be able to ask if this would be possible.
 
Last edited:
I'd be willing to pay if I thought there was any chance of them being from 'bigfoots".
Why can't the people with the samples do these things themselves in order to shut people up? Oh yeah...
You can spend your time and resources chasing, documenting and collecting samples but just can't to seem to have your findings verified.
Hint...Stop spending your money on searching, you have the evidence already, and spend it on DNA tests. Simple.
 
Creekfreak said:
I dont why there is a delay .
Click to expand...

Could it be they considered the source dubious and didn't waste resources testing? Is this the place you sent them? You gave it as a link in your MDC thread when asked for proof that you sent the hair for testing (that is not proof, BTW):

http://onprc.ohsu.edu/

Creekfreak said:
Ive found two more hair samples but I am not sending them tell I hear back from the first I sent .
Click to expand...

You never told me how and under what circumstances the other samples were collected. Could you please answer the question and also for these two new samples?

Creekfreak said:
Meldrum will get nothing from me .
Click to expand...

Why?

Creekfreak said:
Come on down kit man up theres a bigfoot waiting to meet you .
Click to expand...

If so, and they behave in the manner you claim, how come you can produce no reliable evidence for them? These creatures that raid your trash and come into your home and jack your cans of beans with your screwdrivers.
 
What would a DNA test show? If the species is unknown, is that what would come back?

Or would it be some sort of primate DNA? Or invisible DNA?
 
You will often find footers using degraded DNA to test. Just look at that Monsterquest episode. DNA that had been out in the weather for 2 years.

Then when the test is inconclusive, they can claim a sort of victory. It's never inconclusive because of the degradation. It's always inconclusive because it's unknown DNA, read sasquatch.
 
FSU would be fine with me while your at it ask them if they have a department to analize photos .
Yes kit thats where the hair was sent .
Ive answered your question about meldrum before dont bring his name up to me again hes a low life .
 
As far as collecting the samples I used a set of hemostats that where cleaned with acetone to pick them up then they where placed in clean plain white paper then wraped and marked as bigfoot hair good enough ?
 
Creekfreak said:
FSU would be fine with me while your at it ask them if they have a department to analize photos .
Yes kit thats where the hair was sent .
Ive answered your question about meldrum before dont bring his name up to me again hes a low life .
Click to expand...
When did you send your sample off, to whom, how, when is the last time you checked on an update, who is your POC, what specifically did they say they would do? Were these samples intact (ie. roots and all) or simply just hair, what color, how long, etc.?

Like most of your other claims, I'll wager you never sent anything to be tested...prove me wrong. Answering the questions I've asked would help you establish some level of credibility in terms of your claim.

ETA: What is your issue with Meldrum? He is a "BF" proponent...have you been in contact with him and he shoot down your claims as unbelievable/false?
 
Last edited:
Creekfreak said:
Ive answered your question about meldrum before dont bring his name up to me again hes a low life .
Click to expand...
What, you mean this?:

Creekfreak said:
Thats hard to say brother I guess it would depened on there immune systems ability to fight off infection if you ask me doing something like this is mean as hell . I have lost all respect for meldrum for doing this he will never get any evidence from me after doing something like this .
Click to expand...
This was in response about the nail board from the Monster Quest sasquatch episode. What's going on in there? You think he actually set out the nail board? I mean, you don't actually think that, do you? You knew what you were talking about before you started hating him, right?
 
Creekfreak said:
As far as collecting the samples I used a set of hemostats that where cleaned with acetone to pick them up then they where placed in clean plain white paper then wraped and marked as bigfoot hair good enough ?
Click to expand...
Actually, no. It's not good enough, freak. The first four you mention you said were large amounts. Under what circumstances did you collect the hair and what gives you any reason to believe they are from a bigfoot? Again, if you would like someone here to assist with getting the samples tested, why don't you make the basic first step of posting images of these four large amounts of hair from different bigfoots and the two new samples?
 
There are private firms that do DNA testing. This would cost some money, but I think they would be more amenable to something like this (rather than an academic institution, who would worry about their reputation). Unfortunately, in cases like this (hair samples of indeterminate age and quality) the best results are going to be from mitochondrial DNA tests. While there are hundreds of private labs that perform nuclear DNA testing for a variety of reasons, it's going to be rather difficult to find a private lab which will perform mitochondrial DNA studies. So perhaps UFla is going to be the best bet, after all...
 
Locknar said:
Like most of your other claims, I'll wager you never sent anything to be tested...prove me wrong. Answering the questions I've asked would help you establish some level of credibility in terms of your claim.
Click to expand...
Here's what I'm guessing, Lock. I think if anything, freak stuck something in the mail and that was it. Maybe an "ive cent yuo sum bigfut heyr" e-mail. Remember, in the MDC thread he was cornered and demanded for proof that he sent the sample(s) and promised he would the following day. In typical freak fashion sometime later he posted a link the Oregon Primate Research Center website as though it meant something.

In freak logic he's clean. Noboby can prove he didn't send anything and no response to whatever was sent is out of his hands. It's not his fault, you see? It's teh siantists folt. Or maybe teh post offise! Regardless, he's done his duty as a maverick researcher and it's the system's failure for not supporting him.
 
sthomson said:
While there are hundreds of private labs that perform nuclear DNA testing for a variety of reasons, it's going to be rather difficult to find a private lab which will perform mitochondrial DNA studies. So perhaps UFla is going to be the best bet, after all...
Click to expand...
Freak needs to feel the love again for Meldrum and see if he can get resident Monster Quest punk rock mohawk DNA doc Professor Todd Disotell of NYU to test the hair for a Swamp Beast episode part deux.

Go to 4:35:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hkG-hS9iFXM&feature=related
 
Last edited:
kitakaze said:
Freak needs to feel the love again for Meldrum and see if he can get resident Monster Quest punk rock mohawk DNA doc Professor Todd Disotell of NYU to test the hair for a Swamp Beast episode part deux.

Go to 4:35:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hkG-hS9iFXM&feature=related
Click to expand...

I haven't seen that show, and furthermore I've only taken a few mol. and gen. bio courses in my time, but it seems to me that the reason all these DNA samples come back "inconclusive" is because they're using the wrong techniques for the sample - for example, I know that shafts of hair, as well as very old or very small samples of DNA (like from a blood spot), do not contain much nuclear DNA, and thus it's unsuprising that there have been no results from those quarters. Can anyone else comment as to whether mitochondrial DNA can be used to differentiate between a human and non-human sample of hair?

(I should mention, by the way, that it is to the discredit of Bigfoot researchers if they continue to crow results with nuclear DNA testing on old, contaminated, or unsuitable samples of DNA).
 
kitakaze said:
Here's what I'm guessing, Lock. I think if anything, freak stuck something in the mail and that was it. Maybe an "ive cent yuo sum bigfut heyr" e-mail. Remember, in the MDC thread he was cornered and demanded for proof that he sent the sample(s) and promised he would the following day. In typical freak fashion sometime later he posted a link the Oregon Primate Research Center website as though it meant something.

In freak logic he's clean. Noboby can prove he didn't send anything and no response to whatever was sent is out of his hands. It's not his fault, you see? It's teh siantists folt. Or maybe teh post offise! Regardless, he's done his duty as a maverick researcher and it's the system's failure for not supporting him.
Click to expand...
I suspect you are right; of course Creekfreak help establish credibility on this claim by answering the simple questions I've asked. Proof is in the pudding (to coin the phrase); the more details (that can be verified) the more credibility he would establish wrt his claims.

I mean, certainly if he really mailed the stuff he didn't just dump it in an envelop addressed to "ANYONE" at OHSU.
 
kitakaze said:
This was in response about the nail board from the Monster Quest sasquatch episode. What's going on in there? You think he actually set out the nail board? I mean, you don't actually think that, do you? You knew what you were talking about before you started hating him, right?
Click to expand...
You think this is the reason? Well I can see where Creekfreak might have a point...then again, I seem to recall him saying he'd shoot and kill one to prove they exist.

Nail in foot bad...shooting good (at least according to Creekfreak)?
 
lock if its that importent to you it was taken in an envolope by my research partner that was going to part of the pnw to give it to them personaly .
That was months ago the last I talked to him he had given it to them and was waiting for the results .
At this time I have not been able to contact him by email or by phone .
If something happened to the hair its no big deal I have plenty more .
 
Creekfreak said:
lock if its that importent to you it was taken in an envolope by my research partner that was going to part of the pnw to give it to them personaly .
That was months ago the last I talked to him he had given it to them and was waiting for the results .
At this time I have not been able to contact him by email or by phone .
If something happened to the hair its no big deal I have plenty more .
Click to expand...
Wow...you ok? Didn't pull anything in your back did you? I worry about ya...all the contortions you gotta do to be so vague in your answers, you are gonna hurt yourself.

Research partner? Holy surprises Batman....after all this time this is the first you've mentioned a partner.

So to get this straight...you have hair samples you feel may conclusively prove "BF", and your strategy was to give them to this partner...who is never heard from again? Did this partner say who their POC was, who they gave the samples to, what tests were to be performed, etc?

I'm gonna go out on a limb, and suggest this "partner" threw your samples away, has blocked your calls and e-mails.
 
Thats about the size of it lock I even gave him some as a gift .
I never said he was never heard from again just not lately he could be in the mountains out there dead for all I know .

Hes not the only research partner I have ether lock does that shock you ?
Beleave it or not I am still very respected by some .
 
Creekfreak said:
Thats about the size of it lock I even gave him some as a gift .
I never said he was never heard from again just not lately he could be in the mountains out there dead for all I know .

Hes not the only research partner I have ether lock does that shock you ?
Beleave it or not I am still very respected by some .
Click to expand...
I must say I'm suprised...as you've never mentioned a partner; not here, other sites you post to (or did post to), or on your "Captains log".

Speaking of which, your myspace page is about the worst I've EVER seen...the camouflage background is absolutely awful; please consider changing it. Not trying to insult you...give some constructive feedback for what its worth.
 
Creekfreak said:
FSU would be fine with me while your at it ask them if they have a department to analize photos .
Yes kit thats where the hair was sent .
Ive answered your question about meldrum before dont bring his name up to me again hes a low life .
Click to expand...

pot and kettle, spanky...
 
I havent seen the camo it doesent show when I log on so I dident know what it looked like thanks for pointing that out .

No I dont talk about my partners or for them they can talk for themselfs .
 
Has anyone ever found any bigfoot poo? (probably been asked before but I haven't seen it). Surely that would be just the thing to test.

With something this big roaming the woods and judging by the size of an orang utangs droppings (saw it in a zoo once), this thing must drop huge piles all over the place.

Let's say it is 25 years old. Just based upon 15 years of adult life and 1 poo a day, you can imagine how many piles of poop are sitting out there. If there is more than one BF, then multiply it by how many there are and 'bobs your uncle', BF poop everywhere.

If they inhabit the woods around where creekfreak lives, then droppings should be a regular find.
 
bobhope2112 said:
I read in an earlier thread that Creekfreak's bigfoot had laid a big pile in his front yard. How about it CF, wouldn't that be a good source of nuclear DNA?
Click to expand...

IIRC, he mowed the lawn, and all the evidence got mowed away, 'cause he did not consider it that important. (If an itinerant tramp ◊◊◊◊ all over my lawn, I would not consider it all that important either.

I really feel sorry for Creek - every time he gets evidence for anything, it gets stolen, given away (and never heard from again - of course neither is the person who stole the evidence - except the person who stole the bungee cord), or the entire Government has this amazing conspiracy to stop Creek from revealing the greatest story of our time, or refuse to fund his "research".

And the members of this forum are just as bad, refusing to pay for his STUFF when he was almost willing to provide pruuff.

You have had a sad life Creek, and everybody is out to rob you. You have my deepest sympathy - your life experience has truly touched my heart, and I hope that one day you will get exactly what you deserve.

Norm
 
Last edited:
Poo, prints, hair will not prove anything the existence of a bigfoot. The existence of something, maybe. Live, dead or partial specimen will be the key. Btw, I am now a beliver....just saw Harry and the Hendersons with my kid.
 
OK, freak, forget about the samples you gave to your missing 'research partner'. After you gave them (some as a *sigh* gift) to your buddy you don't know what happened.

As a researcher you should be able to provide the following for the four large amount samples and the two more recent:

1) A written detailed description of the morphology and characteristics. The condition (roots present), length, colour, thickness, etc.

2) A written detailed description of the circumstances around the collection of the samples including what about those circumstances brought you to the conclusion that you were collecting bigfoot hair as opposed to some known species or non-animal fibers.

3) Visual documentation of the samples. Preferably before and after collection.

Mind you, that's just to start. But if you're going to come making the claim that you are a researcher who has bigfoot hair samples, it should be the very least you can do and by no means should anyone else have to explain that to you. Do you understand?

Also, please address the issue. Prof. Meldrum is a viable resource in seeking to have testing done on your samples. Is your reason for despising him because you think he set out a screw board trap for an unwary bigfoot to step on? If that is the case, you're completely out to lunch. He simply examined a board that had been left outside for two years that had been set by the owner of the cabin to deter bears. So what's the real deal, freak?
 
Last edited:
And maybe you don't even need to have the fur tested for DNA.
IMO it would seem reasonable to start out with an microscopic analysis, as it may be enough to conclude that the hairs are from bear, dog etc.
Would be cheaper too, I think.
 
Creekfreak said:
At this time I have not been able to contact him by email or by phone.
Click to expand...



I'm told the same thing happened to Marie Curie. She was unable to contact her research partner by email or phone and was reduced to yelling up the stairs to him. "Pierre," she would holler, "Pick up your socks!"
 
Ive been looking for an inexpencive microscope but havent found one yet so I can compare it to a of some pictures of hair meldrum beleaves is bigfoot hair .
As for the excrement I did talk to the bfro about it when they where out here and they told me unless it was very fresh it was no good .
You have to get it while its still warm they told me .
I dident mow over it I pushed the mower on top of it and left it there I asked them if they wanted to see it and they where not even intrested .
No kit he is the one that left the board anyone that would harm an animal just to get a sample is a low life in my book .
They are all the same Ive got a biologist here that keeps telling me to do the same thing I wont do it doing something like this is not ethical .
Even if he wasent the one that put it there he was involved when you bust a whore house you bust the piano player too .
 
PBTree said:
Has anyone ever found any bigfoot poo? (probably been asked before but I haven't seen it). Surely that would be just the thing to test.

With something this big roaming the woods and judging by the size of an orang utangs droppings (saw it in a zoo once), this thing must drop huge piles all over the place.

Let's say it is 25 years old. Just based upon 15 years of adult life and 1 poo a day, you can imagine how many piles of poop are sitting out there. If there is more than one BF, then multiply it by how many there are and 'bobs your uncle', BF poop everywhere.

If they inhabit the woods around where creekfreak lives, then droppings should be a regular find.
Click to expand...

Typically the bigfeet fling the poo at people's cameras. That is why no one can get a good picture of one!

LLH
 
Creekfreak said:
Ive been looking for an inexpencive microscope but havent found one yet so I can compare it to a of some pictures of hair meldrum beleaves is bigfoot hair .
Click to expand...

Orion Telescopes carries some inexpensive models for kids that are sufficient to examining hairs and are only $50 or $60 dollars. Go to www-dot-telescope-dot-com to check them out.
 
Creek, could you PM me the name and number of your researcher? I'd like to see what his initial impressions were, as well as the status on the tests. I am very interested.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom