Cicero, I started this poll over at the Kos just for you. It's currently at 64% of the Kossites thinking it's a good or great idea.
Sounds like a brave thing to do.
Will McCain consent to be interviewed by Keith Obermann, you think? Not likely if Larry King was too hardball for him!
ETA: Now that I think of it, this is actually a very smart move by Obama. It gets him high profile press on Fox News (and likely other networks as well due to the novelty of it) on the very same day that McCain accepts the GOP nomination. Smart.
Which is exactly why he took it. Though CNN had much higher ratings than Fox for the DNC, Fox always gets its best ratings covering the RNC. Obama's going to go on their biggest night.
Sounds like a brave thing to do.
Will McCain consent to be interviewed by Keith Obermann, you think? Not likely if Larry King was too hardball for him!
I really can't see Olberman being as restrained in an interview of McCain as O'Reilly was in interviewing Hillary Clinton. I expect he'll treat Obama with the same degree of respect. I also think that Obama wouldn't agree to this had O'Reilly not gone out of his way to give Hillary a fair shake. Is there any video out there of Olberman interviewing a conservative and going out of his way to be fair? I don't usually watch him, and I'd be interested in knowing. I consider the two of them equally annoying, for the record.
Since KO has referred to McCain as a war monger, and KO never has on guests with contrary views, the only reason for McCain to go on KO would be to KO KO. Maybe McCain will go on Raychill Maddow's new MSNBC show. Considering her sour outlook for all things not far left, he could get her ratings out of the cellar, for one night.
The Cos Hacks screwed the pooch, again. O'Reilly's interview with Obama airs hours earlier than McCain's convention speech tonight.
How so? How did this group you appear to consider as a monolithic one have any control over any such thing at all?
Should be an interesting interview. Also anyone mentioning Keith Olbermann and a real interview should be laughed out of town. Olbermann is so far up Obama and the KOS's ass that I'm surprised people can even get close to him. Also Olbermann has NEVER had anyone with a differing opinion on his show EVER. It's so predictible it's a wonder why people even watch it. Republican attack, Bush attack, anything said or done by anyone not republican praised, liberal friends and commentators agree with Olbermann, McCain attack, McCain attack, Obama love fest, Bill O'Reilly is the worst person in the world, ranting and raving for 5-10 minutes, the end. Every single show follows the same pattern.
For all the bitter feuding between O Reilly and Olbermann, they are cut from the same cloth, just different colors: BOth are blind Partisans who use the same half truths, dirty tricks, and general dishonesty to get thier ideology across.
Just change the names in the above description of a typical Olbermann show ..which I 100% agree with..and you have a perfect description of the OReilly show.
Both are so much up the butts of their respective parties it is pathetic.
For all the bitter feuding between O Reilly and Olbermann, they are cut from the same cloth, just different colors: BOth are blind Partisans who use the same half truths, dirty tricks, and general dishonesty to get thier ideology across.
Just change the names in the above description of a typical Olbermann show ..which I 100% agree with..and you have a perfect description of the OReilly show.
Both are so much up the butts of their respective parties it is pathetic.
OREILLY:
Believes in man-made global warming
Is against the death penalty
RFK is his all time hero
Believes in gun control
Attacks the oil companies at every opportunity
also has on liberal pundits and left wing group leaders
Contrast that to KO who is a true liberal ideologue and absolutely would never even entertain the idea of having on any guest with an opposing view.
Changing the names does in now way make these two commentators identical in that description.

I don't see things the same, for this reason:Kieth Olbermann is actually much worse than O'Reilly.
O'Reilly actually challenges some of his guests, while Olbermann just has someone on to agree with him.
Sure, they are both biased as all Hell, but I have slightly more respect for O'Reilly's method for being biased.
I have more respect for Rush Limbaugh than Billo for some of the same reasons I have more for Olbermann than Billo. Rush and KO don't lie about who they are, for one.Of course, I don't know that Olbermann ever tries to claim that he isn't biased like O'Reilly does, so maybe his is the more ethical bias.
I don't see things the same, for this reason:
I have more respect for Rush Limbaugh than Billo for some of the same reasons I have more for Olbermann than Billo. Rush and KO don't lie about who they are, for one.
Oh, gee, I guess he doesn't...wow, you sure got me there! Whew, do I feel sheepish!Where does KO admit that he is an invincibly biased liberal hack with zero journalistic credentials?
To satisfy an audience that doesn't want that.Well O'Reilly at least lets different viewpoints on his show. What is the point of a political show with no one ever disagreeing with the host?
'Cause they're good at what they do, even if what they do repulses you.I imagine a Countdown style would play well in North Korea. I think people like Olbermann or Rush or anyone who spews garbage while their feet are never held to the fire are just boring. Why are they so popular?
No doubt that's a large part of it.The truth, I fear, is that most people are just too stupid to have their own opinion and need someone who constantly feeds them one who is never questioned or challenged on their own show. It makes them feel smart and on the correct side of the argument.
Well O'Reilly at least lets different viewpoints on his show. What is the point of a political show with no one ever disagreeing with the host? I imagine a Countdown style would play well in North Korea. I think people like Olbermann or Rush or anyone who spews garbage while their feet are never held to the fire are just boring. Why are they so popular? The truth, I fear, is that most people are just too stupid to have their own opinion and need someone who constantly feeds them one who is never questioned or challenged on their own show. It makes them feel smart and on the correct side of the argument.
To satisfy an audience that doesn't want that.
I for one am enthralled by Cicero's mighty victory over the Daily Cos, which apparently is some kind of a blog. Who knew that this titanic struggle was taking place? But now that we all know about it, let us crown Cicero with laurels and proclaim him the victor.
There were some words in there that I recognised.What would we do without the Cos Hacks for such accurate reports like Trig is actually Bristol's child? You can no more emerge victorious over this blog than the Orkin Man can with Periplaneta americana.
What would we do without the Cos Hacks for such accurate reports like Trig is actually Bristol's child? You can no more emerge victorious over this blog than the Orkin Man can with Periplaneta americana.
If you got a problem with KOS, go post over there, OK?
Because bitching about them here is unproductive.