Praktik
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2007
- Messages
- 5,244
This doesn't need to be a big thread but just a morning smile for my fellow debunkers out there. On another board WTC7 has come up - again - and after finally demonstrating that yes indeed, there was damage to WTC 7 and it was not "undamaged" prior to collapse as alleged in the more fact-free Truther analyses, we moved to motive.
I wrote:
Highly unlikely..
Looks like someone's been reading a bit too much about the infamous, satanic "Bohemian Grove"....
I wrote:
And there are larger questions. What possible motive would the conspirators have for bringing down an empty building? The other two towers were already felled, WTC 7 could have stayed standing I don't see how that would impact their supposed conspiracy in any negative way or not.
Oh, you might say, the CIA have offices there!
Well if the destruction of interrogation tapes of terror suspects is any indication, the CIA has no qualms in destroying evidence of their wrongdoing - and they destroyed those tapes without designing a crazy elabourate conspiracy to bring down the building wherever those tapes are stored.
They just destroyed them straight up - probably burned in a trash can or some such thing.
And this was the reply:Oh, you might say, the CIA have offices there!
Well if the destruction of interrogation tapes of terror suspects is any indication, the CIA has no qualms in destroying evidence of their wrongdoing - and they destroyed those tapes without designing a crazy elabourate conspiracy to bring down the building wherever those tapes are stored.
They just destroyed them straight up - probably burned in a trash can or some such thing.
There are occult reasons for the 3 buildings being destroyed - but I have no desire to get into that round here.
Occult?? Geez... when they're that far down the rabbit-hole there really is no hope. Like, could I ever convince him of anything??Highly unlikely..
Last edited:
