• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Gang stalking paranoia

LightinDarkness

Master Poster
LightinDarkness
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
2,583
I have noticed among the conspiracy crowd a recent increase in people claiming that they are being "gang stalked" - basically, they believe that there are tens to hundreds of people hired to "stalk" them (for reasons unknown, they usually believe they have 'exposed' the government or something) by harassing them every time they are out in public.

This is a rather scary phenomena because the claims are similar to paranoid schizophrenia. These people have grouped together online and have formed their own little mini-victim's community and language - they call themselves "targeted individuals."

Of course, anyone who questions them is told they are part of the gang stalking, and no proof or evidence can be offered for the claims. The people who claim they are gang stalked take every day normal events and say that is "proof" that they are gang stalked. For example, if they see the same person that lives around them somewhere else in town, this is proof of gang stalking.

Is the conspiracy crowd now catering to the mentally ill (I guess they always have, but this is a bit extreme), or are these people infiltrating the conspiracy crowd? Any thoughts on this?
 
Those who were just using the movement to further their own agenda (money, fame, anti-Americanism, religious ideology) are moving on because the truth movement is dying. The true-believers have probably exhausted 9/11 and have incorporated it into the wider CT (just as you see few dedicated JFK researchers these days). The suckers who were drawn into 9/11 have wised up and moved on and the lack of publicity means that new punters aren't being drawn into the movement in the same numbers. This just leaves the mentally ill, who have always been a part of the movement but are now the most visible remnant.

That's my guess.
 
gang stalking

I had an employee who this year announced that he was a "targeted individual" of gang stalking. In reality he was developing paranoid schizophrenia.

The sad part, besides this brilliant young man's decline, was discovering this online community. Not only are there other people out there who believe they are victims and supporting each other's delusions but there are also people profiting from them. There are scumbags offering seminars for "targeted individuals" and selling various gadgets for their protection.

These people know they are preying on the mentally ill.
 
TitanPilot said:
I had an employee who this year announced that he was a "targeted individual" of gang stalking. In reality he was developing paranoid schizophrenia.

The sad part, besides this brilliant young man's decline, was discovering this online community. Not only are there other people out there who believe they are victims and supporting each other's delusions but there are also people profiting from them. There are scumbags offering seminars for "targeted individuals" and selling various gadgets for their protection.

These people know they are preying on the mentally ill.
Click to expand...

You raise a VERY good point here. The net, for all its great aspects, has also enabled those suffering from paranoid delusions to reinforce each other's beliefs systems. If you are delusional the last you need to do is to talk to other schizophrenics who confirm all your false beliefs.

Again, I suggest this is why CTs are so popular on the net, yet they barely touch people in their daily lives. "Turn off the net and it goes away", as someone said on here.

Also, bear in mind that the peak age for the onset of schizophrenia is late teens, early adulthood, possibly around about the same age as many of the most passionate and paranoid troothers. It will be interesting to see the consequences of the net on the incidence of psychosis in the future.
 
Even if these people are not suffering from paranoia, it's a way of feeling special. "See, I'm so important, I'm being stalked"
 
TitanPilot said:
These people know they are preying on the mentally ill.
Click to expand...

Agreed 100%. Disgusting.

From the NYT article linked by neltana:

For people who say they are the target of mind control or gang stalking, there may be enough evidence in the scientific literature to fan their beliefs. Many sites point to MK-ULTRA, the code name for a covert C.I.A. mind-control and chemical interrogation program begun in the 1950s.
Click to expand...

Just enough reality to seem plausible to those already on the edge.

And what about Jim Guest?

And the users of some sites have found the support of Jim Guest, a Republican state representative in Missouri, who wrote last year to his fellow legislators calling for an investigation into the claims of those who say they are being tortured by mind control.

“I’ve had enough calls, some from credible people — professors — being targeted by nonlethal weapons,” Mr. Guest said in a telephone interview, adding that nothing came of his request for a legislative investigation. “They become psychologically affected by it. They have trouble sleeping at night.”

He added: “I believe there are people who have been targeted by this. With this equipment, you have to test it on somebody to see if it works.”
Click to expand...

So what's the deal with Jim Guest?

Pandering to "the crazy vote"?

Another Paulian crackpot?

And who are the "credible people" (professors) in question?

I am extremely skeptical of any "mind control" actually in existence, but the reality of the MKULTRA project really makes me wonder sometimes. :boxedin:
 
Lisa Simpson said:
Even if these people are not suffering from paranoia, it's a way of feeling special. "See, I'm so important, I'm being stalked"
Click to expand...

This. As with so many things, there can be a fine line between normal behvaiour and mental illness. In fact, there was an article on the BBC on that just yesterday. Some of those people are almost cetainly suffering from genuine mental illness, but that does not mean all of them are. It's clear that many in the conspiracy movement want to see themselves as special, and this is just another way of doing so. Mentally ill, mildly paranoid, role playing, gullible, lying, and probably many other explanations exist for this kind of behaviour. You don't have to be mad to be weird.
 
The NYT article touches on something that seems very counterintuitive:

“We know, for example, that things like social support, all of these positive social aspects are very good for people’s mental illness,” Dr. Bell said. “I wouldn’t say it’s entirely and completely positive, but it can be positive.”

Some research has shown that when people with delusions undergo group cognitive therapy, the group process can be helpful in their treatment.

But the Web sites are not moderated by professionals, and many postings discuss the failure of medication and say that mental health professionals are part of the conspiracy against them.

“These people lead quietly desperate lives,” said Dr. Jeffrey A. Lieberman, chairman of the Department of Psychiatry at Columbia University. “And if they are reinforcing each other and pulling people toward something, if they are using the Internet and getting reinforcement, that’s good.”
Click to expand...

So maybe they will still carry the delusions, but the group getting together online may help them lead a relatively normal life.
 
I think its a good point that some of these people just simply NEED to feel special. Believing that the government is paying hundreds of people simply to harass you covertly simply means you must be a very special person.

I wonder how long it takes though before someone who is simply approaching this from a "gang stalking is real because I'm special" approach really begins to believe themselves. I mean, after a while it would become apparent to even the most unintelligent that the "evidence" of gang stalking is actually nothing more than evidence of daily living.

I was looking at one of the "gang stalking" forums and one of the people claimed their "proof" was that people would look at her in a odd way every time she would go outside her house and video tape the gang stalkers. Her fellow delusional posters told her this was a key sign of gang stalking. It seemed not to occur to her that going outside your home and pointing a video camera at people and screaming at them that they are gang stalkers might cause them to look at you strangely.
 
The extent of the community, Dr. Bell said, poses a paradox to the traditional way delusion is defined under the diagnostic guidelines of the American Psychiatric Association, which says that if a belief is held by a person’s “culture or subculture,” it is not a delusion. The exception accounts for rituals of religious faith, for example.
Click to expand...

From the article. I think this has very interesting implications about religion.
 
neltana said:
For those of you who haven't heard about this before, here is a NY Times article that gives some background:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/fashion/13psych.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
Click to expand...

Wow. I followed the link to Gang Stalking World, and it is incredibly disturbing. Most disturbing so far is the list of techniques the bad guys use. It is no exaggeration to say that according to these people every single sound you hear, every single mishap you have, every single stranger you meet, and every single relationship problem of any type that you have, is proof that you are being stalked and manipulated.
 
Here are the "characteristics" of those who are "targeted":
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1205738832/0

Basically, things that can characterize everyone. So everyone can be targeted for any reason. I find it fascinating that some organization is dedicated to stalking so many people and spending so much money to do it...instead of doing the simpler thing of just killing them. But no, they would rather hire thousands of people to stalk...
 
Well, the NWO's contract with the Faceless Evil Minion's Union requires that they get a minimum of 32 paid hours per week.

They're on the clock, so we've gotta find something for the featherbedding weasels to do- and it has to be evil.
 
Checkmite said:
Most disturbing so far is the list of techniques the bad guys use.
Click to expand...



Random Encounters

This will be people on the street who you randomly and unexpectedly run into. It looks completely natural and it seems to be a random encounter.

They might ask for your phone number after engaging you in conversation. Ask you out, or just ask you where you are going. Anything from small talk to lengthier conversations.

All with the purpose of finding out something about you, or even just getting you to do something.
Click to expand...


Oh, yeah, great. Let's get a bunch of sad, lonely, isolated people, and then convince them that the one time someone wants to ask them out on a date, the person is a government spy....Real nice, that.
 
What...Who?!? All of you...stay away from me!!!!!

Alex Jones!!! Save me with your witchcraft!!!!

they're coming to take me away ho ho ha ha hee hee...

In all seriousness, has anyone seen the tinfoil hat site that has warmarks to identify spots in urban areas where mind control is taking place and what type? I can't remember the URL but I have got to believe it's a parody of some sort - it's THAT ridiculous.
 
OMG! Everything I own has been stolen and replaced with exact duplicates!

Everyone I know has been cloned as well ... Including me!
 
Trojan_Jockey said:
You raise a VERY good point here. The net, for all its great aspects, has also enabled those suffering from paranoid delusions to reinforce each other's beliefs systems. If you are delusional the last you need to do is to talk to other schizophrenics who confirm all your false beliefs.
Click to expand...

It goes both ways though. People also are more connected to real knowledge and people who are brilliant and have facts and information to share with those that want to learn.

To some extent, there has always been a way for people of certain mindsets to get together and feed off each other. Newsletters, radio shows, even little conventions and stuff. Yes, it's more easy now for them to get bad info and pool together on insane beliefs. But the world is also interconnected and people have access to reams of knowledge and facts, and can be educated much more than ever before. I think, on balance, that the net is going to be much more of a positive force in human development than a negative. I think there will be a time in the future where the interconnectivity of the whole world is going to be remembered as a major milestone in our overall enlightenment as a species.
 
Well this is just weird

I read this thread last night and then went out to get some milk at the local market. It was fairly late at night and the guy ahead of me in the check out line gave me a strange look and said a few things to the check out girl I couldn't hear. When I came up for my turn. The checker whom I know faintly said. "That man said you were following him and that you worked for the government".

We just looked at one another and laught.

Oh that was just weird - or did I just say that?
 
Whiplash said:
It goes both ways though. People also are more connected to real knowledge and people who are brilliant and have facts and information to share with those that want to learn.
Click to expand...

I think the net has also shown us that many people don't know how to separate valid facts from ********. It's true that there is so much information out there, but not all of it is "real" knowledge at all. You have people with no reasoning skills and little formal education, who are being bombarded with all these theories presented in flowery language and with so much passion that it sounds convincing. Plus, logic tells them these guys only want to make the world a better place so they must be good.

We can't limit what is put out there, so people have to be able to filter out what is a good source from a bad source, what statements are supported by facts and what isn't. The 9/11 CT showed just how much garbage people will swallow. Yes, the net is a good thing, but I dont think humans are quite as good at filtering out the "real" facts from the garbage as we'd like to think.
 
Last edited:
I'm interested, could you tell me about this "conspiracy crowd" whose members suddenly believe that they are being gang stalked?

I find the language and tone of the original post fascinating. LightinDarkness seems to know an awful lot about these people. Could he elaborate?

Could he also explain to the survivors of East Germany's regime, many of whom experienced the Stasi's 'zersetzung' tactics which are similar to gang stalking, that they were imagining things? He could let them know that an anonymous poster on an Internet bulletin board has figured out that no government which is trying to whitewash its international reputation would possibly waste resources on ruining dissidents' lives, instead of simply executing them.

In post #3, gtc says the truth movement is dying. This is also fascinating. Could you show us graphs, charts, etc., demonstrating this?
 
Oh look, we have a CTer who...wants to bump year old threads! Im glad you did. The gang stalking paranoia is always such a good example of CT lunacy/mental health issues that rise with CT belief, so its nice of you to do so.

FriendlyAndLively said:
I'm interested, could you tell me about this "conspiracy crowd" whose members suddenly believe that they are being gang stalked?
Click to expand...

Sure. You can read up about it for yourself here:

http://gangstalkingworld.com/
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/

I know this probably doesn't occur to you, but belief in conspiracies is just about required to suffer from gang stalking delusions. Thus, those who suffer from gang stalking paranoia are members of the "conspiracy crowd." A national organized group hell-bent on harassing people otherwise unimportant in subtle ways that can't be proven to anyone else is a conspiracy.


FriendlyAndLively said:
I find the language and tone of the original post fascinating. LightinDarkness seems to know an awful lot about these people. Could he elaborate?
Click to expand...

I find your smug arrogance amusing. You seem to know a lot about it. Can you elaborate?

FriendlyAndLively said:
Could he also explain to the survivors of East Germany's regime, many of whom experienced the Stasi's 'zersetzung' tactics which are similar to gang stalking, that they were imagining things? He could let them know that an anonymous poster on an Internet bulletin board has figured out that no government which is trying to whitewash its international reputation would possibly waste resources on ruining dissidents' lives, instead of simply executing them.
Click to expand...

Sure.

You see, there is a difference between living under East Germany's regime and living in a modern democracy. Of course, the reality is that even if you wanted to fantasize that some secret police exists in the US or in European countries, you would need to provide some evidence. We know that the Stasi existed - where is your evidence of these gang stalking police forces and governments spending millions of dollars to covertly harass people for no obvious reason?

Perhaps the government has better things to do than spend countless amounts of money hiring and training covert police forces in complete secrecy whose only job appears to be "harassing" people who pose no threat to the government?


FriendlyAndLively said:
In post #3, gtc says the truth movement is dying. This is also fascinating. Could you show us graphs, charts, etc., demonstrating this?
Click to expand...

As a truther I know this is hard for you to accept, but 9/11 was not an inside job and your movement is dying. We know this due to the surveys on the belief in the twoof movement, which show that not only is it laughably small, but its decreasing in numbers. There are numerous posts linking and analyzing these surveys in the 9/11 forum.
 
Did the Stasis routinely break into people's homes and replace items of clothing with similar but inferior ones, or start going out with a subject's sister with the intent of ruining the subject's love life? It doesn't sound like the sort of thing a secret police force would do.
 
Those aren't terribly good sites. Gang Stalking World, in particular, is only at the top of the Google results because it has Gang Stalking in the title.

LightinDarkness said:
I know this probably doesn't occur to you, but belief in conspiracies is just about required to suffer from gang stalking delusions.
Click to expand...

What if the gang stalking isn't delusional?

Thus, those who suffer from gang stalking paranoia are members of the "conspiracy crowd."
Click to expand...

You say "those who suffer from gang stalking paranoia". What about people who are being stalked by a single person or a small group of people, which is a phenomenon I hope you will not dispute the existence of, seeing as how it's in the DOJ's statistics - they are undoubtedly 'suffering from paranoia'. Are you trying to anchor feelings of being hunted to mental illness?

A national organized group hell-bent on harassing people otherwise unimportant in subtle ways that can't be proven to anyone else is a conspiracy.
Click to expand...

Yes, indeed it would be a conspiracy, but what does that have to do with delusional thinking?

I find your smug arrogance amusing. You seem to know a lot about it. Can you elaborate?
Click to expand...

I find your word games, disguised as logic, to be transparent.


You see, there is a difference between living under East Germany's regime and living in a modern democracy.
Click to expand...

First of all, we in the US don't live in a democracy. Technically, we live in a Constitutional Republic. Second, East Germany called itself a democracy AND a republic, specifically, the German Democratic Republic. The outside world might have known differently, but to the East German citizens who weren't being persecuted by the Stasi, the GDR was a democracy. And the reason they knew this was because the GDR made a point of telling them how free they were. That wall, you see, was there to protect them.

Of course, the reality is that even if you wanted to fantasize that some secret police exists in the US or in European countries, you would need to provide some evidence. We know that the Stasi existed - where is your evidence of these gang stalking police forces and governments spending millions of dollars to covertly harass people for no obvious reason?
Click to expand...

You could step back in time to the 1970's as an East German citizen and make the same argument about the existence of the Stasi. The GDR did not tell its citizens they lived in a fascist dictatorship. The citizens had to learn it, the hard way.

Perhaps the government has better things to do than spend countless amounts of money hiring and training covert police forces in complete secrecy whose only job appears to be "harassing" people who pose no threat to the government?
Click to expand...

The East German regime switched tactics from execution squads and forced labor camps to more subtle Zersetzung tactics (gang stalking tactics) when it wanted to whitewash its appearance to the world due to the 1975 Helsinki accords; the ranks of the Stasi grew enormously. They did this because from the perspective of people with power, no amount of money is too great to spend to stay in power. The most powerful people in corrupt governments co-opt the machinery of government for their own gain. This is not terribly conspiratorial in nature.

As a truther I know this is hard for you to accept, but 9/11 was not an inside job and your movement is dying. We know this due to the surveys on the belief in the twoof movement, which show that not only is it laughably small, but its decreasing in numbers. There are numerous posts linking and analyzing these surveys in the 9/11 forum.
Click to expand...

Obviously, I can't respond to this off the cuff, as I'll have to check through the 9/11 forum's posts. Thank you for that tidbit of information.
 
The stasi had hundreds of thousands of people working directly for them or as informants. Most East Germans also had access to West German broadcasts.

For these reasons, I would be surprised if the East Germans weren't acutely aware of their situation.
 
Why is it that we in Australia are so much more knowledgeable and sophisticated than others. The C.S.I.R.O has developed technology that does not require people to stalk people. We use nano-technology with highly sophisticated computer devices in insects - bees, ants, flies, mosquitos, cicadas, spiders (birds proved to be too expensive and had a tendancy to fly into power poles) and simply monitor them remotely. All such insects carry cameras, and recording devices.

And unlike people, we do not have to pay or feed the super spy spiders. They don't eat. You don't even want to know what we have done with trees.

It is so much easier and cheaper to do it this way. Please, people outside Australia catch up, or contact the C.S.I.R.O. for further information, and a chance to join the revolution.

Norm
 
Last edited:
From the Gang Stalking site

Mimicking

This is trying to copy things in a targets life.


Leaving when they do.
Dressing like they dress.
Throwing out the garbage
Going to the bathroom
Doing whatever the target is doing.

This is all designed to be psychological warfare, so that the target again feels like they are under observation at all times.
-----------------------------

Oh crap. Mrs. Beirman next door always takes her garbage out at the same time as me, you know, Wednesday morning, right before the garbageman arrives. I knew she was up to something...Well, I best go kill her. Be right back.

Kidding. I'm a kidder. This is sad. I work with a lady who is very paranoid about, well, everything. She always tells me about this person or that person and how they are persecuting her. She stands really close when she talks and she hardly ever moves her lips while speaking, as if these persecutors are somewhere with binoculars, reading her lips. I try to put her at ease, but I think she believes I'm in on it.

I'm not, by the way.
 
Howie Felterbush said:
From the Gang Stalking site

Mimicking

This is trying to copy things in a targets life.


Leaving when they do.
Dressing like they dress.
Throwing out the garbage
Going to the bathroom
Doing whatever the target is doing.

This is all designed to be psychological warfare, so that the target again feels like they are under observation at all times.
-----------------------------

Oh crap. Mrs. Beirman next door always takes her garbage out at the same time as me, you know, Wednesday morning, right before the garbageman arrives. I knew she was up to something...Well, I best go kill her. Be right back.

Kidding. I'm a kidder. This is sad. I work with a lady who is very paranoid about, well, everything. She always tells me about this person or that person and how they are persecuting her. She stands really close when she talks and she hardly ever moves her lips while speaking, as if these persecutors are somewhere with binoculars, reading her lips. I try to put her at ease, but I think she believes I'm in on it.

I'm not, by the way.
Click to expand...

Oh sure! Mr Felterbush... She stands really close? Suddenly your surname makes sense...
 
FriendlyAndLively said:
Those aren't terribly good sites. Gang Stalking World, in particular, is only at the top of the Google results because it has Gang Stalking in the title.
Click to expand...

Your opinion doesn't really matter. They are both excellent sites for presenting the delusional and fantastical nature of gang stalking conspiracy claims.

FriendlyAndLively said:
What if the gang stalking isn't delusional?
Click to expand...

Argument from ignorance logical fallacy. You have provided no evidence that gang stalking is real, nor has anyone else. Meanwhile, all the evidence suggests - its paranoia and mental illness:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/fashion/13psych.html?pagewanted=all

FriendlyAndLively said:
You say "those who suffer from gang stalking paranoia". What about people who are being stalked by a single person or a small group of people, which is a phenomenon I hope you will not dispute the existence of, seeing as how it's in the DOJ's statistics - they are undoubtedly 'suffering from paranoia'. Are you trying to anchor feelings of being hunted to mental illness?
Click to expand...

What about people who are being stalked by a single person? No one has ever claimed such does not exist. You are beating up a straw man. People claiming to be stalked by small groups of people? Unlikely, but sitll unrelated to the gang stalking claims. Nice try to use DOJ statistics on individual stalking to prove gang stalking - shows you really don't have an argument?

FriendlyAndLively said:
Yes, indeed it would be a conspiracy, but what does that have to do with delusional thinking?
Click to expand...

Do you even read what you write? You are the one posting arrogant posts about how this isn't conspiracy theory.

FriendlyAndLively said:
I find your word games, disguised as logic, to be transparent.
Click to expand...

I find your attempts to ignore logic and reason pretty normal for most conspiracy theorists.

FriendlyAndLively said:
First of all, we in the US don't live in a democracy. Technically, we live in a Constitutional Republic. Second, East Germany called itself a democracy AND a republic, specifically, the German Democratic Republic. The outside world might have known differently, but to the East German citizens who weren't being persecuted by the Stasi, the GDR was a democracy. And the reason they knew this was because the GDR made a point of telling them how free they were. That wall, you see, was there to protect them.
Click to expand...

Yawn. First of all, we live in a representative DEMOCRACY. Second of all, if you are incapable of understanding the difference between what systems of governments are and what they call themselves there is little help for you. Do you think China is a republic because its called the Peoples Republic of China? Are you that ignorant?

FriendlyAndLively said:
You could step back in time to the 1970's as an East German citizen and make the same argument about the existence of the Stasi. The GDR did not tell its citizens they lived in a fascist dictatorship. The citizens had to learn it, the hard way.
Click to expand...

Wrong. You couldn't. Everyone knew about the existence of the Stasi. NO ONE can provide any evidence of these millions of government operatives trained to harass unimportant people for no obvious reason.

FriendlyAndLively said:
The East German regime switched tactics from execution squads and forced labor camps to more subtle Zersetzung tactics (gang stalking tactics) when it wanted to whitewash its appearance to the world due to the 1975 Helsinki accords; the ranks of the Stasi grew enormously. They did this because from the perspective of people with power, no amount of money is too great to spend to stay in power. The most powerful people in corrupt governments co-opt the machinery of government for their own gain. This is not terribly conspiratorial in nature.
Click to expand...

Wrong as usual. Gang stalking tactics involve the supposed training of millions of normal people whose only job is to drive people nuts by doing things like staring at them. Quite different from any tactics the Statsi used.

You can keep beating the dead horse all you want, but you've been debunked. Screaming "but..but..Stasi!!" is not proof of gang stalking claims.
 
Howie Felterbush said:
From the Gang Stalking site

Mimicking

This is trying to copy things in a targets life.


Leaving when they do.
Dressing like they dress.
Throwing out the garbage
Going to the bathroom
Doing whatever the target is doing.

This is all designed to be psychological warfare, so that the target again feels like they are under observation at all times.
-----------------------------

Oh crap. Mrs. Beirman next door always takes her garbage out at the same time as me, you know, Wednesday morning, right before the garbageman arrives. I knew she was up to something...Well, I best go kill her. Be right back.

Kidding. I'm a kidder. This is sad. I work with a lady who is very paranoid about, well, everything. She always tells me about this person or that person and how they are persecuting her. She stands really close when she talks and she hardly ever moves her lips while speaking, as if these persecutors are somewhere with binoculars, reading her lips. I try to put her at ease, but I think she believes I'm in on it.

I'm not, by the way.
Click to expand...

Wow. I can't imagine working with someone like that. People who are that paranoid could get violent if they think you are in on it.

By the way...would our new conspiracy theorist please tell us how the Statsi used throwing out the trash to harass people? Please describe exactly how the above tactics quoted from the gang stalking site have any similarities to the Stasi. I can't believe anyone could be so ignorant as to read these claims and not see the obvious signs of mental illness, we ARE dealing with CTers...
 
Think about the logistics of gang stalking.

Imagine being the supervisor of just one gang stalking.

You have to hire about forty people from an enormous pool of willing professional gang stalkers. Do you place an ad or is there a tem agency specialising in this stuff?
Alternatively you have to recruit people from the targets surroundings.

Then you have to instruct them to a lot of very subtle things like dressing alike etc.

What a headache that would be.

I once saw a documentary about the wife of a jailed Chinese dissident. They assigned three goons specially to her. On would guard the entrance of her apartment building. The other two moved into her apartment!

Imagine that: some alfa hotel sitting in your kitchen, smoking, with his feet on the table.
She was not allowed to close the toilet door. This lady was going crazy.

that's what it looks like when a repressive government wants to get it's point across. It's not subtle.

Surveillance is another matter. It's supposed to be covert.

If you're under surveillance and the agents take care to give you subtle hints. Call your shrink.
 
I wonder...Would the old Co-intel-pro tactics from the 60's qualify as gang stalking in the past?

I know cointel is dead, but would this be comparable?

Also, I'm curious about this video and what it suggests...From the Gang Stalking Website you listed above:
((((OKAY, NEVER MIND, HOW THE HELL DO YOU EMBED?)

I don't really believe in the woo anymore, but the process underwhich its debunked has become fascinating to watch...
 
Last edited:
The problem is the word gang is misleading. Because of the media supersaturation many people tend to associated it with gang bangers such as the Crips and the bloods. All a gang is a group of people.
 
From that site FAQ:

What are other Names for Gang Stalking?


There are many names for this form of systemic control and harassment. Under the Gang Stalking label you will also find such terms as Organised Stalking, Cause Stalking, Multi-Stalking, Community Mobbing, but it's all part of the same harassment protocol. What many people do not realise is that Gang Stalking is just one appendage of this systemic form of control. There are other forms of control used to repress, and keep individuals in line. Other forms or appendages include, but are not limited to: Mobbing, Cointelpro, The Buzzsaw, Covert War, Electronic Harassment, etc. These are the just some of the names being given to a very old game, that is once again being played by governments on their unsuspecting citizens.
Click to expand...
Why not just call it paranoid schizophrenia since that gets the idea across more accurately?
 
Sunray Breaker said:
I wonder...Would the old Co-intel-pro tactics from the 60's qualify as gang stalking in the past?

I know cointel is dead, but would this be comparable?

Also, I'm curious about this video and what it suggests...From the Gang Stalking Website you listed above:
((((OKAY, NEVER MIND, HOW THE HELL DO YOU EMBED?)

I don't really believe in the woo anymore, but the process underwhich its debunked has become fascinating to watch...
Click to expand...

I don't think even cointeopro would be an example of historical gang stalking. The CIA used it to target political groups, not individuals. The point of the program was to destroy such movements from within COVERTLY - gang stalking isn't covert, its (supposedly) extremely obvious by those claiming to be gang stalked.

For example, if I want to disrupt a communist group the last thing I want to do is train 20 people to wear coordinating T-Shirts saying DEMOCRACY and have them walk past the communist group leader when he goes out for a walk. All thats going to do is make it obvious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom