• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Pro Uri Gellar article with crazy innuendos regarding James Randi

jahbrations

New Blood
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
5
I just read this crazy article called "Uri Geller and the YouTube Video Smear" by Peter Fotis Kapnistos, and I was blown away by the lowdown accusations of the author.

He basically is accusing James Randi of being an online child predator based on the fact that some internet user who goes by the name Randi Schimnosky - posts pro pedophile content on Mother Jones' website.

It's a shockingly absurd article that borders on pure slander. I was wondering if anyone from the JREF community has seen this?

I can't posts links yet, but if you google Uri Geller and the YouTube Video Smear, you'll find the article.

Sorry if this was posted already, I did a search for the author's last name and didn't turn up any results in the forum.
 
Aw, whats the matter Uri? Just because did good by exposing you as the fraud you are, you make up harmful rumors that could be damaging to his reputation, due to the fact that the public accepts most crap without critical thinking.
 
"Randi claimed that he made the tape under the direction of the police chief of Rumson, New Jersey, to entrap harassing obscene callers."

Is there a copy of any kind of police documentation that would prove this?
 
"Randi claimed that he made the tape under the direction of the police chief of Rumson, New Jersey, to entrap harassing obscene callers."

Is there a copy of any kind of police documentation that would prove this?

Whether such documentation can be produced or not, the fact that Randi was not arrested as a result of this incident proves the truth of what he says. :mad:
 
So that's a no?

I wonder if the police chief of Rumson, New Jersey knows anything about this? Maybe someone should give him a call?

This crap has be hashed and re-hashed over and over by the weak minded believers in woo who have nothing substantive to add to humanity. IF THERE WAS ANYTHING TOO IT, Randi would have been charged. He has not been. :mad: :mad: :mad:


Give him a call yourself. :boggled:
 
Last edited:
I feel bad for Randi. I have been reading his books recently, some of which were written in the 80's, and in them, he has so thoroughly debunked the likes of, for example, Uri Geller, and Peter Popoff - that the tone of his writing takes on a "well, they're done for now" sort of attitude. But these douche-nozzles are still around! Is there nothing he can do?
 
I feel bad for Randi. I have been reading his books recently, some of which were written in the 80's, and in them, he has so thoroughly debunked the likes of, for example, Uri Geller, and Peter Popoff - that the tone of his writing takes on a "well, they're done for now" sort of attitude. But these douche-nozzles are still around! Is there nothing he can do?

These scammers and charlatans want to get revenge on Randi, and that is by spreading lies.
 
Randi wrote:

...
Yes! You finally got something right, "journalist"! I flooded the media, law enforcement, the U.S. Postal Service, and New Jersey police, with that document, and later related the entire matter to an audience at Cal Tech. But you forgot (?) to mention that on that same occasion, as I finished reading the document, I took the opportunity of flooring a nasty chap who had made similar accusations about me, and had been boasting about it loudly. One shot, to the chops. He went down, and was carried out. VERY satisfying, I assure you. Want some, Mr. Kapnistos? I got some...
...

I remember reading about that.
 
UFOs and the Bible

I just read this crazy article called "Uri Geller and the YouTube Video Smear" by Peter Fotis Kapnistos, and I was blown away by the lowdown accusations of the author.

Search google for "Peter Fotis Kapnistos". There's some funny articles, the guy is crazy.

The following is his own words:

Interview with Peter Fotis Kapnistos, American Journalist
Paul Dale Roberts
Alienseekernews.com
February 20 2009
...
Just before dawn on Saturday, April 20, 1974, as I sat near the port of the Aegean island of Mykonos, I met a Man in Black who telepathically revealed to me a metal seal, the cap of a well pipe in the flagstone near my feet, with the design of what he said was the universe engraved on it. The man was well dressed, like a bridegroom, or a young business executive. I could hear his soft voice in my mind with perfect clarity. He told me that his father had claimed the judgment of Hitler's soul. Astonished by that weird idea, I tried to get up from my chair and walk on. But the stranger stopped me. Stepping forward, he stretched out both his arms with his fingers extended in my direction. Then he turned and looked across the bay. Dawn had arrived. But a thick black line or dark rectangular object blocked out part of the orange sun.

I heard him say, Peter, will you look at me? When I did, the man fixed his concentration and asked me; do you know what I must do?

He then broke the metal seal by melting its small central rod with a forceful gaze. I could see a cloud of steam or vapor swirling around his forehead. I heard the loud trumpet-blast of a ship's horn, but I didn't see any large boats moving in the harbor. He walked towards me and said; know the faith, as he passed by my chair. Then he disappeared into the village footpaths behind me. The sun looked normal again.
...
If we describe those mysterious aerial phenomena in the Bible as UFOs, some critics wrongly take it for granted that we have somehow tried to identify them as products of alien technology. But that, of course, doesn't really mean a thing, because the word technology can imply anything from a pair of synthetic slippers to an array of galactic supercomputers. What's more, the Bible seems to describe baffling events like time dilation, such as the stopping of the sun's movement in the sky.
...
Paul: What do you think the alien agenda is?

Peter: There are possibly several alien agendas, according to the exopolitics of Michael Salla and Alex Collier. Just as there are many life forms in the ocean, there are perhaps many different types of intelligent extraterrestrials. Reports of small beings with outsized heads and locust eyes could represent an agenda to manipulate life on earth in a way that might be harmful to humans. If they are occupants of unidentified submersible objects or USOs, they could be mining our planet's oceans for natural resources. Criminal experiments on humans that were abducted could have a sinister aspect with long-term consequences. If they feed on human endocrine products, as some writers have suggested, perhaps they see humans as just another type of core resource.
...
Some people accuse me of saying that Aleister Crowley was Hitler. But that's not true. We know that Hitler had up to three or four doubles or political decoys. I merely suggested that Crowley might have been one of them. After all, he was an originator of the supernatural ideas of Nazism and even wrote the nonsense that when he was born, a few hairs on his chest formed the shape of a swastika.
...
Yes, I have been to Santorini a few times. I did museum photography for Spiridon Marinatos, the archaeologist who discovered the ruins there. Atlantis was a global bronze-age civilization with its hub probably in Santorini. A volcano destroyed it. The sound of that volcano blast could be heard as far away as Spain. Its soot and ashes destroyed all vegetation in the entire Mediterranean. But don't make the mistake of trying to date Atlantis with the volcano. That was only the last of a long series of eruptions. The very old civilization of Atlantis was far more ancient than the last eruption we know of.
...

So Peter Fotis Kapnistos believes he had an experience with a man in black, Crowley was a double for Hitler, he believes Atlantis existed, he knows of an "alien agenda," and websites choose to associate with this type of thinking?
 
Limbo is aware of this as he/she had started a thread on this libel in this thread.

The subsequent backpedalling by Limba was embarrassing.

But it doesn't seem to have stopped Limbo spreading the unsubstantiated muck.


Aware of what? The scandal? Yes, I was aware of it. How is that "backpedaling", exactly? :confused:

Or perhaps you think that "the fact that Randi was not arrested as a result of this incident proves the truth of what he says" is what I should be aware of. If you're willing to make that fanboi assumption, go right ahead. I'm not. Such an assumption, coming from the "skeptical" folk, smacks of hypocrisy. I doubt Randi fanbois would make such a generous assumption if the tables were reversed.
 
Last edited:
Aware of what? The scandal? Yes, I was aware of it. How is that "backpedaling", exactly? :confused:

Or perhaps you think that "the fact that Randi was not arrested as a result of this incident proves the truth of what he says" is what I should be aware of. If you're willing to make that fanboi assumption, go right ahead. I'm not. Such an assumption, coming from the "skeptical" folk, smacks of hypocrisy. I doubt Randi fanbois would make such a generous assumption if the tables were reversed.

Ok then. Call the cops. Go ahead. I'll wait.

Well? Let me guess "I'm not going to do your homework for you" or some other phrase will be your reply. And then I'll point out you made the claim and we'll go back and forth for awhile while you continue to slander and libel someone.

There, I think I just summed up the next five pages. Do I get the million?
 
Aware of what? The scandal? Yes, I was aware of it. How is that "backpedaling", exactly? :confused:

Or perhaps you think that "the fact that Randi was not arrested as a result of this incident proves the truth of what he says" is what I should be aware of. If you're willing to make that fanboi assumption, go right ahead. I'm not. Such an assumption, coming from the "skeptical" folk, smacks of hypocrisy. I doubt Randi fanbois would make such a generous assumption if the tables were reversed.
I was referring to the original thread you started and your one and only mealy-mouthed follow up post in it, as you well know.

Quite a number of posters gave their opinions of you rehashing this libel, and continuing it here as though you were unaware of this is disingenuous.
 
Last edited:
Aware of what? The scandal? Yes, I was aware of it. How is that "backpedaling", exactly? :confused:

Or perhaps you think that "the fact that Randi was not arrested as a result of this incident proves the truth of what he says" is what I should be aware of. If you're willing to make that fanboi assumption, go right ahead. I'm not. Such an assumption, coming from the "skeptical" folk, smacks of hypocrisy. I doubt Randi fanbois would make such a generous assumption if the tables were reversed.

Snicker.
 
Some of us like to use our spare time on the internet for the betterment of ourselves and others. I for one would love to know who to write to make whoever wrote this crap about about Mr. Randi think twice about slandering people on the internet.
 
I was referring to the original thread you started and your one and only mealy-mouthed follow up post in it, as you well know.

Quite a number of posters gave their opinions of you rehashing this libel, and continuing it here as though you were unaware of this is disingenuous.

And the libellers shouldn't think for one moment that Randi won't take action.
A certain Canadian 'psychic' beat a court case by dying (which was a surprise to him)..
 
And the libellers shouldn't think for one moment that Randi won't take action.
A certain Canadian 'psychic' beat a court case by dying (which was a surprise to him)..

Well not such a surprise for Earl, actually. The scuttlebutt at the time was that he committed suicide.
 
I was referring to the original thread you started and your one and only mealy-mouthed follow up post in it, as you well know.

Quite a number of posters gave their opinions of you rehashing this libel, and continuing it here as though you were unaware of this is disingenuous.


I guess I might be a little pissed too if someone questioned the integrity and honesty of my hero and asked for some sort of evidence to back up his story.
 

Back
Top Bottom