|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
![]() |
#1 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
Nice meta-summary of "conspiranoia" as social control, implications for 911 activists
Full thread title:
Nice meta-summary of "conspiranoia" as a means of social control, and implications for 911 street activists From: Towards a Theory of Conspiracy Theories This essay doesn't support the author's conclusions with examples, or develop arguments all that much, beyond what we can glean from reading online summary articles regarding 911/left gatekeepers. However, it's worth a read, as it takes an analytical viewpoint that, it seems to me, can challenge the more intelligent reader who is, nevertheless, constrained in his/her thinking by ambient frames imposed by the societal structure which (coincidence or not?) protects the ruling class so well. Especially, I suppose, it precludes reaction against 911 as a government-assisted conspiracy, as there is no detailed discussion of 911, or any other specific conspiracy. IOW, you might look at this essay as having special value, since it effectively abstracts out the basic arguments presented by analysts of 911/left gatekeepers, and thus doesn't get caught up in the details of specific conspiracies that are being obscured by the intelligentsia. It could be argued that this is particularly valueable when approaching somebody who has a reflexive aversion to any arguments questioning the official 911 story. And that suggests another approach, by 911 street activist, to attacking the pseudo-reality which serves the ruling class. And that is: Print out a copy of this essay, and distribute it to political science and sociology students, as they walk into the doors of their classes. Don't write about 911 - just put a link to your group's 911 website on the bottom. Even better, I think, would be printing out Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed's "9/11 "Conspiracies" and the Defactualisation of Analysis", and stapling this underneath "Towards a Theory of Conspiracy Theories". Ahmed's lucid analysis is also partly a "meta" one - he is examining defects in the very process of reasoning about 9/11, which - wouldn't you know it! - lead away from a conspiratorial conclusion. Some excerpts:
Quote:
As a resurgent populism is showing signs of gaining strength, and threatening the Democratic / Republican elite control of government, it may well be the case that the government is going to increase it's demonisation of "conspiracy theories" and conspiracy theorists, as a means to try and dampen populism. I kind of doubt it, as "conspiracy theories" are what I call "high strangeness", and thus I expect that populist political movements, themselves, will not openly make a big deal about 911 or any other "conspiracy theory." |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 24,384
|
What?
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 308
|
Just as I thought^^^^^
Metamars, you might want to take some of the big words out of your post if you want your thread to go anywhere. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,032
|
![]() No. No it is not. It is fading into the background of insignificance as it should. in over 9 years no physical evidence whatsoever of this vast 9/11 conspiracy. You lost your fantasy. Face it. Your hollow claims of a vast omnipotent world power silencing and thwarting you at every turn is a fantasy. You are so deep into the conspiradroid rabbit hole that you cannot rescue yourself and no one else even cares or notices you are "missing". Keep chugging the kool aide Metamars. |
__________________
911 resource site by Mark Roberts http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home Gravy: Christopher7; You are a Basking Shark in a sea of ignorance. Galileo:The jury said I didn't have any mental defects or diseases, they declared me 100% sane. Has a jury ever declared you sane? Don’t get me lol’n off my chesterfield dude. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25,817
|
Originally Posted by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
But unfortunately for you guys, this is the meat of your movement, and it's not the government or the debunkers fault. In other words clean up your act, truthers. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 24,384
|
There is 'resurgent populism' all the time, and as far as "threatening" the Democrat / Republican parties, I don't remember us electing Huey Long, George Wallace or Ross Perot.
metamars, when you are older, I suspect that you will have more perspective, and laugh at these claims of grand conspiracies. You seem smart enough that you will figure it out eventually. The "pseudo-reality which serves the ruling class" (sic) is just reality. Your psychobabble is trying to apply the 'ambient frame' of ... I don't know, probably too much pot-smoking-induced "deep thought" to it, resulting in a skewed view of reality. Get out of the philosophy department and study some history and logic. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25,817
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
Your comment appears to have nothing to do with your quote of me. Muddled thinking, much? Another stellar JREF intellect at work?
As to the quote, itself, consider the following, from Self-identified Independents surge in poll:
Quote:
'Tea party' polls better than GOP
Quote:
So, I will guess that 5/8 is the lower bound for independents who are populists, and I'm very comfortable with guessing 3/4's. If you figure 5/8 of republican-leaners and 3/8 of Democratic-leaners, are populists, then you're talking about a majority of the voters. I don't want to figure it out, 'exactly', but it looks like a third party which was strongly populist and could peel off 1/2 of populist Democratic - leaners and 1/2 of populist Republican leaners would smash the Democratic/Republican duopoly. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
I see. So in your inestimable opinion, Nafeez Ahmed, in an article critical of defactualised 'analysis', in a quote from a zmag article which includes
Quote:
Methinks you didn't read very carefully, and confused Ahmed words with that of the people that he is quoting and criticizing. Why don't you read it again, and this time look carefully at where he begins his quotes, and where he ends them? You might also want to pay close attention to the word "vacuous" in the following:
Quote:
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,854
|
I've been asking for years to see one of these "sane" alternate 9/11 theories.
Never, ever got one. The least insane I ever found had something to do with CIA control of opium in Afghanistan... If there are no sane alternative theories, then there is no cloaking going on. It's pretty simple to figure out. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25,817
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 24,384
|
re: tea parties and independents
Yes, metamars, the populist revolution that "smashes" the two party duopoly is just around the corner. Any day now, we will see it. The end (of the elites' rule) is nigh. The people are rising up against the 'elites.' Where have you heard these phrases before, and how did it work out? Study your history and logic, please.
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 57,211
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25,817
|
So I was right then. He agrees that those theories are horse manure.
And when he says that there hadn't been any detailed analysis of these claims (the MIHOP theories), he was lying, because if he changed his mind, this means he encountered such detailed information that disproved these theories. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,032
|
Peculiar in that these "populist independents" don't seem to vote for independent candidates. All they do is cross party lines. Voting Either / or. Election results bear this out. You might want to get your head out of your ass with your own Muddled thinking and face reality. 911 truth is going nowhere. |
__________________
911 resource site by Mark Roberts http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home Gravy: Christopher7; You are a Basking Shark in a sea of ignorance. Galileo:The jury said I didn't have any mental defects or diseases, they declared me 100% sane. Has a jury ever declared you sane? Don’t get me lol’n off my chesterfield dude. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 24,384
|
re: Zinn
Wow, I almost corrected you (re: "late") and teh google tells me that Mr. Zinn passed away a few days ago. I was not a fan, but I wish his family well.
I recall an interview that he did with one of the conservative radio guys, and he was just eviscerated, and would never, ever concede that Western civilization was superior in any way to whatever society in the world - Indians, Communists, Al Qaeda, whatever. It breaks my heart that college kids are still reading "A People's History" and taking it at face value. The anti "elite" stuff is just semantic crap, whether it's used against the "elite media," the "ruling elite," the bilderbergs, the Fed, whatever. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 24,384
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
No, I don't think it's "around the corner", if you consider "around the corner" to be less than 2 election cycles.
Because of roadblocks to ballot access by non-Dem and non-Repubs, it's seems like a much smarter strategy to form voting blocs. Sizeable enough voting blocs can dominate on either a Dem or Repub ballot. And if Dems or Repubs make this too hard*, the voting bloc can then go with a third party as a ballot-enabled vehicle. With this mindset, third parties are less essential. However, there is an effort underfoot to meld Greens, Libertarians, Constitutionalists, and independents into a new third party. While forming such a new party is not completely antithetical to the party-hopping strategy I recommend, the adherents of such a third party may be averse to flipping their voting registration back and forth, since they are interested in "building a brand". May the best strategy win. ![]()
Quote:
However, historical comparisons with a pre-internet era strike me as fundamentally flawed. * The "pros" do, indeed, sabotage their own. See John Emerson's front-paged diaries at OpenLeft. Plus, insiders, who are not necessarily corporatists, sometimes rightly sabotage candidates who they suspect of being trojan horses who are being run just to split votes and create dissension. This is a tricky subject, of which I don't know a whole heck of a lot. Suffice it to say that I have no problem with sabotaging corporatist agendas. What seems underhanded to a person depends on what their values are, since we're basically talking about fully legal maneuvering, either by corporatists, plutocracy-loving Mandarins, ideologues, or populists. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,032
|
|
__________________
911 resource site by Mark Roberts http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home Gravy: Christopher7; You are a Basking Shark in a sea of ignorance. Galileo:The jury said I didn't have any mental defects or diseases, they declared me 100% sane. Has a jury ever declared you sane? Don’t get me lol’n off my chesterfield dude. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 10,493
|
|
__________________
For 15 years I never put anyone on ignore. I felt it important to see everyone's view point. Finally I realized the value of some views can be measured in negative terms and were personally destructive. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
I don't see anything peculiar about this, at all. Historically, first past the post voting has made the prospect of a 3rd party becoming dominant, doubtful.* Thus, valid concerns about "wasting your vote". Secondly, Dems and Repubs have effectively collaborated to make fusion voting illegal in most states. Thirdly, campaign financing has become more and more expensive, which discourages primary challenges of incumbents even from within the ranks of party stalwarts. Finally, the populist surge I'm referring to is relatively recent (and probably still nowhere near it's potential). Correct me if I'm wrong, but there was no teabagger movement 5 years ago. Society doesn't turn on a dime.
However, a) we may be in a period of realignment, where disgust with both Dem and Repub parties forces the issue and b) the internet makes historical framing doubtful.
Quote:
Whether or not the 911 Truth movement goes anywhere has, IMO, basically nothing to do with the success of a populist movement in the US, except that 1) 911 Truthers who do street activism might play a key role in getting the populist ball rolling, since 911 Truthers are remarkably non-partisan (ito D/R), hence no conflict on that score with independents. 2) a populist government would, presumably, also be a more honest one. A more honest government won't cover up for incompetents, and worse, within itself. Hence, after waiting their turn, they may indeed find a sympathetic ear within the government, to seek accountability. IMO, the best thing to come out of the 911 Truth Movement is We Are Change, but even they will never make much of an impact unless they help spearhead a populist political movement and/or teach the populace about other (non-911) false flag treachery and media manipulation. Because of the "high strangeness" aspect of 911, as I have said many times, before, the political activism should be kept at arms length from the "conspiracy thinking" - teaching activism. * My understanding is that game theorists would consider this completely unremarkable. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,032
|
Quote:
|
__________________
911 resource site by Mark Roberts http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home Gravy: Christopher7; You are a Basking Shark in a sea of ignorance. Galileo:The jury said I didn't have any mental defects or diseases, they declared me 100% sane. Has a jury ever declared you sane? Don’t get me lol’n off my chesterfield dude. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 24,384
|
1 - 911 Truthers doing street action result in said truthers being mocked. No populism will result. They self-defeat. Here is an example the insanity on parade. While they may be 'remarkably non-partisan,' they are also 'remarkably insane.' People tend to notice this before signing up for the revolution. Who signs up more populists - Wonder woman or spiderman?
2 - There will be no populist government. Your paradigm shift is a fantasy. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
Good question. I don't know the answer, do you?
Actually, I'd be more interested in knowing how many street actions they participated in. If you have 100 people holding up signs saying the same thing, on 1 occasion, IMO, that is far less valuable than 10 people holding up signs saying the same thing on 10 occasions. The fact is, at least where I live, there is virtually no street activism, of any kind, whatsoever, going on. There was one huge demonstration involving local politics, that actually took over a very busy street, for a while. That's about it. I have another question, for you: Do you think We Are Changers would, at this time, stimulate more subsequent investigation on the part of passers-by, if they held up signs saying "Google FALSE FLAG ATTACK", instead of "Google WTC7" or "9-11 was an inside job"? Actually, I think I'll start a new thread on dealing with just this question. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
Carlitos (Post #25) :
See the second part of my answer in post #23. Also, make sure that you don't miss
Quote:
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,374
|
|
__________________
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 57,211
|
I could actually see that happening,although you are right about it's total illogic.
Look at how many on the Left embraced Ron Paul in the early days of his campaign. It's really ,with a lot of these people, more about being Anti Establishment then any specific political ideology. You will be amazed how well left wing and right wing militants can get along under certain circumstances. They both hate the "Establishment" more then each other. With CTers that is squared. Just look at Prison Planet, where left and right wing conpriacy wackjobs get along fine together.. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,032
|
Don't even bother to start that thread. Read the google results yourself. 9/11 conspiracy doesn't even appear on the first page of results. What does that tell you? Oh I know!! Google is in on the vast conspiracy to silence 9/11 discussion! |
__________________
911 resource site by Mark Roberts http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home Gravy: Christopher7; You are a Basking Shark in a sea of ignorance. Galileo:The jury said I didn't have any mental defects or diseases, they declared me 100% sane. Has a jury ever declared you sane? Don’t get me lol’n off my chesterfield dude. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
Whatever the answer to your question is, what I am asking is, simply, "which will stimulate more subsequent investigation?"
I think the simplest way to think about this is to define "more subsequent investigation" as "what % of passers-by that see WAC signs, googled as a result of those signs, within the next 3 weeks?" |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 24,384
|
Quote:
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,694
|
While i agree with your statement, i must take issue with the insinuation that smoking pot makes one a moron.
I smoke a lot of pot, not as much as i did a while ago, but still a decent amount per week, and at no point does this keep me from, or inhibit me from being skeptical. Though , on the flip side it dosn't suddenly make me some philosophical genius, like some users would claim. Pot makes one enjoy the things they enjoy, i can smoke a joint and watch some randi speaks, or a bowl and watch kent hovind make an ass out of himself. While your average truther would still be rocking his truther stuff. Pot is not something that makes one more or less susceptible to wacky ideas. When it comes to being a skeptic, pot has little to no bearing. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
NWO Master Conspirator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 59,856
|
|
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Dreaming of unicorns
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 11,938
|
Nafeez Ahmed is an idiotic truther.
See this section for proof. VII. The Irrationality of Attempts to Delegitimise 9/11 Inquiry No better than any of the socks here. He just clouds his pieces with big words and mumbo jumbo. |
__________________
![]() Stundie - Avoided like the plaque, its a scottish turn of phrase. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
IIRC, the magic number for advertisers is 30. Present a message 30 times, and the effects will persist in the mind of the beholder, whether or not they have any conscious realization of how their thought processes have been effected.
Why else would McDonald's, which has a very simple menu that hardly ever changes, keep showing people pictures of an orange-haired clown? Somehow or other, if it weren't increasing their sales (by making "McDonald's" pop into people's minds when they get hungry), I doubt they would have spent the millions of dollars. Repetition works in advertising of products. I see no reason why is won't work similarly in stimulating curiosity. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Dreaming of unicorns
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 11,938
|
|
__________________
![]() Stundie - Avoided like the plaque, its a scottish turn of phrase. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 24,384
|
I addressed this on the poll thread. No, there is no 'magic number' because the quality of the message plays a big part. If travel at 60MPH past a billboard with really small writing 30 times, you still don't know what it says. Seeing 10 dudes in black hoodies 30 times just creeps most people out.
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
|
Gary Null, founder of the explosively growing progressiveradionetwork.com, has recently started adding shows, in back-to-back time slots, for Greens, Libertarians, independents, and Constitutionalists. He is trying to facilitate the formation of a new third party, but he apparently is not going into a lot of details, just yet. Obviously, complete purists would not join in coalitions. However, in politics, complete purists don't go far.
Greens and libertarians probably have more in common than Greens and mainstream republicans. See the frontpaged diary, on OpenLeft, called Talk Me Down from Contributing to Rand Paul's Campaign. Forming a unified party where constituent groups as disparate as former Greens and former Libertarians are kept happy on a long-term basis may indeed be unworkable. On a short term basis, where the plutocracy + the Dem/Republican duopoly are widely recognized as the prime enemies to the middle-class, holding one's nose for 10-15 years, until the corrupted Congress critters are mostly gone, seems like a viable strategy. Especially if you consider the alternative to be, essentially, serfdom and corporatacracy. How many people enthusiastically vote for Dems and Repubs, now? If they do, I would suggest that they are 'low-information voters'..... Finally, note that there is a transpartisan political movement, where the program is to meld policy options from across the political spectrum, by taking seriously the best ideas, no matter from which ideology they may have originated from. See, e.g. Voice of the People: The Transpartisan Imperative in American Life by Chickering and Turner. Chickering is the conservative, Turner is the former Nader's raider. In a sense, what Null is trying to do is to extend such a transpartisan approach to direct electoral success. Chickering, Turner, and associates have no discernible electoral strategy. Not an effective way to proceed, when Democratic and Republican lawmakers are spending 1/4 to 1/3 of their time at fund-raisers, and lobbyist get to write legislation regarding the industry they represent. When a lawmakers ears are tuned to lobbyists sending the most campaign cash their way, will they even hear the transpartisan dudes if they lobby them, absent the boodle? BTW, Null hosts Turner's radio program. Since you, presumably, think about what you post, why don't you give us your considered opinion as to whether or not this is a coincidence? I say "no, it's not a coincidence". But a thinker, such as yourself, may have profounder insights to share. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 26,103
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|