How I Debated a 9/11 Truther and Survived - Dave Thomas

Edx · 18th March 2010, 02:00 PM

How I Debated a 9/11 Truther and Survived:
http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/how_i_..._and_survived/

Interesting article.

Mr.Herbert · 18th March 2010, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Negotiations for a debate in the spring of 2010 are underway.

I would love to see it.

Quote:

Dave Thomas, a CSI fellow, is a physics and mathematics graduate of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and is currently a senior scientist at Quasar International, Inc., in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is the president of New Mexicans for Science and Reason.

ElMondoHummus · 18th March 2010, 02:29 PM

Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert

Quote:

Dave Thomas, a CSI fellow, is a physics and mathematics graduate of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and is currently a senior scientist at Quasar International, Inc., in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is the president of New Mexicans for Science and Reason.

Oh! Okay... Good. For a bit there, I was wondering if the link was referring to this Dave Thomas:

Given that he passed away in 2002, that would've been a shock

. And I would've been wondering what the heck was up with the Skeptical Inquiry folks. Communing with the dead isn't quite their style.

JohnG · 18th March 2010, 03:01 PM

Interesting article, good for him. This portion in particular caught my eye:

"Gage wants to debate me again, on Denver public television station KBDI. While I normally prefer not to provide platforms for conspiracy theorists to push their cases, in this instance KBDI has already been running Gage’s 9/11 “Truth” documentaries during fundraising specials."

And I thought I had it bad where my local PBS station plays endless Doo-wop reunion specials, André Rieu concerts and Wayne Dyer lectures during their pledge drives

ElMondoHummus · 18th March 2010, 03:14 PM

I wonder if he's familiar with http://www.ae911truth.info/tiki-index.php. I think I'll email him to offer it, just on the off chance that he's not.

Newtons Bit · 18th March 2010, 03:41 PM

This is what I get for not paying attention to Alumni mail. I didn't even go down during 49'ers this year.

Incidentally, I have seen the Vigilantes play at the Cap one 49'ers. They're pretty good.

I'm also extremely disappointed that there were that many truthers there to begin with.

rwguinn · 18th March 2010, 06:07 PM

Originally Posted by Newtons Bit

This is what I get for not paying attention to Alumni mail. I didn't even go down during 49'ers this year.

Incidentally, I have seen the Vigilantes play at the Cap one 49'ers. They're pretty good.

I'm also extremely disappointed that there were that many truthers there to begin with.

You went to soko-roo?
I was down the road in lost crutches...
If anybody ought to know about explosions and explosives, the "Energetic materials" folks there are it!

Newtons Bit · 18th March 2010, 07:15 PM

Originally Posted by rwguinn

You went to soko-roo?
I was down the road in lost crutches...
If anybody ought to know about explosions and explosives, the "Energetic materials" folks there are it!

Indeed. We would hear a couple of rather large bangs once or twice a day on campus.

Orphia Nay · 18th March 2010, 11:51 PM

Originally Posted by Edx

How I Debated a 9/11 Truther and Survived:
http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/how_i_..._and_survived/

Interesting article.

Quote:

Gage argued that there are ten reasons WTC 7, which was not hit by an airplane, was intentionally demolished:

[...]

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

[...]

7. Chemical signature of Thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples by physics professor Steven Jones, PhD

Thermite causes "pyroclastic clouds" now?

Gage is all over the place.

Brainster · 19th March 2010, 01:51 AM

Originally Posted by Dave Thomas

I discussed the claims that thermite was used and showed a test filmed at Tech in which a large quantity of thermite failed to cut a large steel beam.

Jeebus, you know what he's talking about? He's talking about the clip of Van Romero that Jesse Ventura used on his Conspiracy Theory program. Except Ventura conveniently skipped over the part about how the thermite failed to cut the steel beam. Here's the clip (part with Van Romero starts about forty seconds in):

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

Ventura lets him ask the question, "Does it burn long enough and hot enough so that we have structural failure?" But hilariously, rather than answer the question, they then cut to Jesse asking, "Alright, anybody still got any doubts?"

Newton's Bit, do you have any kind of relationship with Romero, where you can ask him about the Ventura show? I sent him an email when the show aired but he never replied.

Edx · 19th March 2010, 06:48 AM

Originally Posted by Brainster

Jeebus, you know what he's talking about? He's talking about the clip of Van Romero that Jesse Ventura used on his Conspiracy Theory program. Except Ventura conveniently skipped over the part about how the thermite failed to cut the steel beam. Here's the clip (part with Van Romero starts about forty seconds in):

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

Ventura lets him ask the question, "Does it burn long enough and hot enough so that we have structural failure?" But hilariously, rather than answer the question, they then cut to Jesse asking, "Alright, anybody still got any doubts?"

Newton's Bit, do you have any kind of relationship with Romero, where you can ask him about the Ventura show? I sent him an email when the show aired but he never replied.

I also suspect that he was asked to show something different compared to what they made out he was showing. The first part of the experiment was really stupid, essentially amounting to throwing a match on the steel and observing it not collapsing. Surely this could not be what Romero was intending to demonstrate, or else he is a freaking idiot, which doesn't make sense. So I'd love to know the full story here as well.

CurtC · 19th March 2010, 07:58 PM

Originally Posted by Brainster

Jeebus, you know what he's talking about? He's talking about the clip of Van Romero that Jesse Ventura used on his Conspiracy Theory program.

I believe that Dave Thomas and Van Romero are friends. I listen to Dave on the "Science Watch" podcast (of their radio show), and I think he mentioned this recently.

Garb · 19th March 2010, 10:07 PM

Does anyone else notice that the steel beam they are heating with the super-thermite is horizontal instead of vertical?

At least make the experiment look legitimate, instead of watching some chemicals burn on a horizontal beam and say "so any doubts?"

tfk · 20th March 2010, 01:50 AM

Originally Posted by Garb

Does anyone else notice that the steel beam they are heating with the super-thermite is horizontal instead of vertical?

At least make the experiment look legitimate, instead of watching some chemicals burn on a horizontal beam and say "so any doubts?"

Don't confuse a daytime soap opera for a real sociological exposition of human interpersonal relations.

Don't confuse a Jerry Springer show for a real investigation of American family dynamics.

Don't confuse a Bill O'Reilly or Geraldo Rivera interview for a reporter giving his guest a real opportunity to present his/her ideas.

In each case, the key word is "real".

Don't confuse Ventura's show for, well, as far as I can tell, anything real.

The arguments are fake.
The disagreements are fake.
The skepticism is fake.
The investigation is fake.

They should call it "The WWF does 60 Minutes".

They whole thing is fixed.

Grizzly Bear · 20th March 2010, 08:53 AM

Just put it this way... when they did their fire test on the steel, I kept saying to myself: "and truther's complain about national geographic's experiment?

"

ETA: Oh by any chance does somebody have the barfing smiles image?

Sherman Bay · 20th March 2010, 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by ElMondoHummus

Oh! Okay... Good. For a bit there, I was wondering if the link was referring to this Dave Thomas:
http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n...d_2p_widec.jpg

No this Dave Thomas.

Edx · 20th March 2010, 11:27 AM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Bear

Just put it this way... when they did their fire test on the steel, I kept saying to myself: "and truther's complain about national geographic's experiment?

"

Thats what I thought as well, of course you won't find them doing anything but praising Ventura though. How honest of them!

McHrozni · 20th March 2010, 02:00 PM

Originally Posted by Brainster

Ventura lets him ask the question, "Does it burn long enough and hot enough so that we have structural failure?" But hilariously, rather than answer the question, they then cut to Jesse asking, "Alright, anybody still got any doubts?"

As retarded as the show is, I think this was just Romero misspeaking. He probably wanted to say it does burn long and hot enough to cause a structural failure, at least the intonation is right for that.

Of course with twoofers you never know. It's entirely possible he phrased it as a question, but spoke it as a statement to make it seem as if he claimed it was going to fail, but not state it, as not to be liable for lying.

McHrozni

Orphia Nay · 20th March 2010, 11:24 PM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Bear

Just put it this way... when they did their fire test on the steel, I kept saying to myself: "and truther's complain about national geographic's experiment?

"

ETA: Oh by any chance does somebody have the barfing smiles image?

Yep, it's ridiculous, and this is totally appropriate:

tfk · 21st March 2010, 02:26 PM

Originally Posted by orphia nay

Yep, it's ridiculous, and this is totally appropriate:

Most of those smileys are falling "in their own footprint". But a couple of them look like they're being thrown huge distances to the side. Almost as if they were "nano-thermited"...!

grandmastershek · 22nd March 2010, 07:45 PM

Originally Posted by McHrozni

As retarded as the show is, I think this was just Romero misspeaking. He probably wanted to say it does burn long and hot enough to cause a structural failure, at least the intonation is right for that.

Of course with twoofers you never know. It's entirely possible he phrased it as a question, but spoke it as a statement to make it seem as if he claimed it was going to fail, but not state it, as not to be liable for lying.

McHrozni

To me it sounds as if it's a quote mine. All this nonsense about "transparency" why isn't Ventura releasing all his footage unedited?

My bet is Van Romero said something like "The key question is does it burn long enough and hot enough so that we have structural failure" or something like that. With the gross misrepresentation and grand standing in that friggin show its no big stretch.

Edx · 23rd March 2010, 07:59 AM

I really want to know the full story about that thermite experiment, anyone trying to get to the bottom of it? Someone said they knew they guy?

CurtC · 23rd March 2010, 10:34 AM

Originally Posted by Edx

Someone said they knew they guy?

Dave Thomas, the guy who wrote the article linked in the OP, knows Van Romero, who conducted the experiment. You should be able to start with Dave.

Orphia Nay · 23rd March 2010, 08:42 PM

I just emailed Dave Thomas asking for a link to or a copy of the full clip, and I will announce when I have his answer.

DaveThomasNMSR · 23rd March 2010, 09:46 PM

Howdy there. By the time Orphia had e-mailed me, I'd already gotten signed up. I've lurked around the JREF off and on, and do appreciate the nuggets that sometimes blossom here. I gave a talk on Bible Codes at TAM4 a few years back, FWIW.

Anyway, the videos! The videos! Here's what I've told Orphia:

Quote:

Let me check with the EMRTC folks to see if I can send these videos out. The Ventura show had Romero asking the question about the beam with thermite, "Will it burn hot enough and long enough to fail structurally?" The cheesy part of the Ventura show is that, while they gave the results of the non-thermite test (didn't fail), they only HINTED at the results of the actual thermite test, with Ventura leading the charge by asking "Any questions?" Of course, the question that needed to be asked was "Did it burn hot enough and long enough to fail structurally?" The answer was no, and there's a video of Van Romero proving that by smacking the beam with a hammer.

More later, Dave Thomas

Anyway, nice to finally come aboard. I am teaching a class on critical thinking for physics at NM Tech, and today's class was on 9-11 physics. I've developed a nice little simple model that actually does fairly well with the twin towers piledriver collapses, getting very close to the results that Bazant acheived (What Did and Did not Cause Collapse
of WTC Twin Towers in New York, Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE , Vol. 134 (2008), in press) with a very detailed model that includes beam busting, concrete pulverization, air pushed out the windows, etc.

I a junior, so I can't post hyperlinks as yet - you'll have to find these on your own. Cheers, Dave Thomas (not the Wendy's, and not a MacKenzie brother either).

Baylor · 23rd March 2010, 09:55 PM

Welcome aboard!

I've seen New Mexico Tech on TV a few times. It looks like a fun place to work. Just blow stuff up all day in the middle of the desert.

edit -- seriously, I saw their full-scale test of the Murrah Building bombing.

Orphia Nay · 23rd March 2010, 11:36 PM

Originally Posted by DaveThomasNMSR

Howdy there. By the time Orphia had e-mailed me, I'd already gotten signed up. I've lurked around the JREF off and on, and do appreciate the nuggets that sometimes blossom here. I gave a talk on Bible Codes at TAM4 a few years back, FWIW.

Anyway, the videos! The videos! Here's what I've told Orphia:

Quote:

Let me check with the EMRTC folks to see if I can send these videos out. The Ventura show had Romero asking the question about the beam with thermite, "Will it burn hot enough and long enough to fail structurally?" The cheesy part of the Ventura show is that, while they gave the results of the non-thermite test (didn't fail), they only HINTED at the results of the actual thermite test, with Ventura leading the charge by asking "Any questions?" Of course, the question that needed to be asked was "Did it burn hot enough and long enough to fail structurally?" The answer was no, and there's a video of Van Romero proving that by smacking the beam with a hammer.

More later, Dave Thomas

Anyway, nice to finally come aboard. I am teaching a class on critical thinking for physics at NM Tech, and today's class was on 9-11 physics. I've developed a nice little simple model that actually does fairly well with the twin towers piledriver collapses, getting very close to the results that Bazant acheived (What Did and Did not Cause Collapse
of WTC Twin Towers in New York, Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE , Vol. 134 (2008), in press) with a very detailed model that includes beam busting, concrete pulverization, air pushed out the windows, etc.

I a junior, so I can't post hyperlinks as yet - you'll have to find these on your own. Cheers, Dave Thomas (not the Wendy's, and not a MacKenzie brother either).

Welcome to the forum, Dave, and thanks again for your prompt and cordial email replies.

I've saved my gut reaction to that email till now...

So the thermite didn't even weaken the horizontal steel beam, let alone render it "molten"?

It's as we suspected, but it's nice to see it confirmed.

I hope you can get the full video of the experiment, as that would add to the lulz, especially the factor where the truthers would squirm and spin.

DaveThomasNMSR · 24th March 2010, 07:30 AM

Orphia wrote

Quote:

Welcome to the forum, Dave, and thanks again for your prompt and cordial email replies.

I've saved my gut reaction to that email till now...

So the thermite didn't even weaken the horizontal steel beam, let alone render it "molten"?

It's as we suspected, but it's nice to see it confirmed.

I hope you can get the full video of the experiment, as that would add to the lulz, especially the factor where the truthers would squirm and spin.

Indeed, I've sent a query seeking permission to release the video JESSE VENTURA DOESN'T WANT THE WORLD TO SEE!

I'll let y'all know if it gets the OK.

Cheers, Dave

ElMondoHummus · 24th March 2010, 07:50 AM

Welcome, sir. Glad to see you here.

BTW: Yes, the links prevention is in place, but it's not against the rules to leave off parts that would trip the autoprevent. For example: "You can see (topic being referenced) at cnn.com". That seems to work. Just leaving off the http:// and www. seems to work.

--------

Just out of curiosity, does anyone have any idea why Gage is so willing to take on opposition on TV/radio shows? My only guess is to popularize his AE911T group, but just getting signatures and site members isn't really generating any income for hm. Plus, it isn't exactly a risk-free method of gaining adherents; he could simply be interviewed or participate in non-argumentative settings and get the same amount of exposure. And lets be blunt: He didn't exactly cover himself with glory when he met Gravy (Mark Roberts, who's forum handle here is "Gravy") on the air. Anyway, the only reason I can see is to popularize himself and his group, but he seems to be choosing a way that would certainly backfire on him.

DaveThomasNMSR · 24th March 2010, 11:32 AM

They are on my Youtube channel, thegrizzledwizard.

I've sent Orphia an explanatory letter with the links, that I've asked her to post here on my behalf (newbies can't Link!)

Cheers, Dave

DGM · 24th March 2010, 11:40 AM

Originally Posted by DaveThomasNMSR

They are on my Youtube channel, thegrizzledwizard.

I've sent Orphia an explanatory letter with the links, that I've asked her to post here on my behalf (newbies can't Link!)

Cheers, Dave

Welcome:
I'll assume these are the videos your referring to.

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

again welcome.

DaveThomasNMSR · 24th March 2010, 11:50 AM

Originally Posted by DGM

Welcome:
I'll assume these are the videos your referring to.
...
again welcome.

You missed one - the Romero comment after the thermite test!
Here's the YouTube code: d-pZf56L0lg

Cheers, Dave Thomas

DGM · 24th March 2010, 12:07 PM

Here you go.

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

Edx · 24th March 2010, 12:29 PM

AWESOME.

I'm going to have to make a youtube video comparing that with the Venturas version.

So he actually filmed it all HIMSELF and then gave the footage to the production company? Is that why he has this footage?

This is pretty devastating to Venturas honesty really.

DaveThomasNMSR · 24th March 2010, 12:47 PM

Originally Posted by Edx

AWESOME.

I'm going to have to make a youtube video comparing that with the Venturas version.

So he actually filmed it all HIMSELF and then gave the footage to the production company? Is that why he has this footage?

This is pretty devastating to Venturas honesty really.

The three videos I've posted at my YouTube grizzledwizard channel were all made by NM Tech, EMRTC, to support requests made on behalf of Ventura's crew.

While the "Conspiracy Theory" episode on 9-11 indeed showed some of the tests, they did NOT show the concluding test (Romero and the hammer), which was left on the cutting room floor.

However, they were filmed at NM Tech by Tech personnel, and not by "HIMSELF" (if you mean Jesse Ventura is "HIMSELF").

If you mean "Van Romero" by "HIMSELF", that does make sense - Van had the filming done to support Ventura, and then Van allowed me to make copies.
Sarite?

Cheers, Dave

Brainster · 24th March 2010, 12:56 PM

Originally Posted by DaveThomasNMSR

You missed one - the Romero comment after the thermite test!
Here's the YouTube code: d-pZf56L0lg

Cheers, Dave Thomas

Hahahahahaha! Thanks, Dave! I knew Ventura was gliding right over the "Did it fail structurally," part of that but it's hilarious to see the part that he left out.

ETA: Props to Orphia for inviting you to the forum and welcome!

Newtons Bit · 24th March 2010, 01:17 PM

Good work on the Gage nonsense, Dave.

And it's nice to see another Techie on these boards

grandmastershek · 24th March 2010, 01:24 PM

OMG! I can't wait to show this to the truthers I know in real life.

Edx · 24th March 2010, 02:06 PM

Originally Posted by DaveThomasNMSR

The three videos I've posted at my YouTube grizzledwizard channel were all made by NM Tech, EMRTC, to support requests made on behalf of Ventura's crew.

While the "Conspiracy Theory" episode on 9-11 indeed showed some of the tests, they did NOT show the concluding test (Romero and the hammer), which was left on the cutting room floor.

However, they were filmed at NM Tech by Tech personnel, and not by "HIMSELF" (if you mean Jesse Ventura is "HIMSELF").

If you mean "Van Romero" by "HIMSELF", that does make sense - Van had the filming done to support Ventura, and then Van allowed me to make copies.
Sarite?

Cheers, Dave

Thanks Dave,

I am curious as to ...

1. Why Romero would trust that someone like Ventura could be trusted to not twist his words (like all truthers do) and...
2. What Romero thinks of how they used his footage?

I also also interested in that the quote "does it burn long enough and hot enough" since in the clip you showed with the hammer it didn't say "and hot enough" so was probably a different taken or from a different scene right?

rwguinn · 24th March 2010, 03:18 PM

Originally Posted by Newtons Bit

Good work on the Gage nonsense, Dave.

And it's nice to see another Techie on these boards

I'm now officially outnumbered
2 Techies, 1 Aggie...

18th March 2010, 02:00 PM	#1
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642	How I Debated a 9/11 Truther and Survived - Dave Thomas How I Debated a 9/11 Truther and Survived: http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/how_i_..._and_survived/ Interesting article.
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642

18th March 2010, 02:13 PM	#2
Mr.Herbert Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,448	Quote: Negotiations for a debate in the spring of 2010 are underway. I would love to see it. Quote: Dave Thomas, a CSI fellow, is a physics and mathematics graduate of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and is currently a senior scientist at Quasar International, Inc., in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is the president of New Mexicans for Science and Reason.
	__________________ www.curedfoundation.org Learn more about EOE here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eosinophilic_esophagitis

18th March 2010, 02:29 PM	#3
ElMondoHummus 0.25 short of being half-witted Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Somewhere north of the South Pole Posts: 12,282	Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert Quote: Dave Thomas, a CSI fellow, is a physics and mathematics graduate of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and is currently a senior scientist at Quasar International, Inc., in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is the president of New Mexicans for Science and Reason. Oh! Okay... Good. For a bit there, I was wondering if the link was referring to this Dave Thomas: Given that he passed away in 2002, that would've been a shock . And I would've been wondering what the heck was up with the Skeptical Inquiry folks. Communing with the dead isn't quite their style.
	__________________ "AND ZEPPELINS!!! We haven't even begun to talk about Zeppelins yet! Marauding inflatable Teutonic johnsons waggling their way across the sky! Indecent and flammable all at once."

18th March 2010, 03:01 PM	#4
JohnG Pedantic Bore Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Abandon All Hope Posts: 6,808	Interesting article, good for him. This portion in particular caught my eye: "Gage wants to debate me again, on Denver public television station KBDI. While I normally prefer not to provide platforms for conspiracy theorists to push their cases, in this instance KBDI has already been running Gage’s 9/11 “Truth” documentaries during fundraising specials." And I thought I had it bad where my local PBS station plays endless Doo-wop reunion specials, André Rieu concerts and Wayne Dyer lectures during their pledge drives
	__________________ Do not weep. Do not wax indignant. Understand. - Baruch Spinoza You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. - Harlan Ellison

18th March 2010, 03:14 PM	#5
ElMondoHummus 0.25 short of being half-witted Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Somewhere north of the South Pole Posts: 12,282	I wonder if he's familiar with http://www.ae911truth.info/tiki-index.php. I think I'll email him to offer it, just on the off chance that he's not.
	__________________ "AND ZEPPELINS!!! We haven't even begun to talk about Zeppelins yet! Marauding inflatable Teutonic johnsons waggling their way across the sky! Indecent and flammable all at once."

18th March 2010, 03:41 PM	#6
Newtons Bit Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 10,049	This is what I get for not paying attention to Alumni mail. I didn't even go down during 49'ers this year. Incidentally, I have seen the Vigilantes play at the Cap one 49'ers. They're pretty good. I'm also extremely disappointed that there were that many truthers there to begin with.
	__________________ "Structural Engineering is the art of molding materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyze so as to understand forces we cannot really assess in such a way that the community at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our own ignorance." James E Amrhein

18th March 2010, 06:07 PM	#7
rwguinn Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: 16 miles from 7 lakes Posts: 11,098	Originally Posted by Newtons Bit This is what I get for not paying attention to Alumni mail. I didn't even go down during 49'ers this year. Incidentally, I have seen the Vigilantes play at the Cap one 49'ers. They're pretty good. I'm also extremely disappointed that there were that many truthers there to begin with. You went to soko-roo? I was down the road in lost crutches... If anybody ought to know about explosions and explosives, the "Energetic materials" folks there are it!
	__________________ "Political correctness is a doctrine,...,which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." "I pointed out that his argument was wrong in every particular, but he rightfully took me to task for attacking only the weak points." Myriad http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=6853275#post6853275

18th March 2010, 07:15 PM	#8
Newtons Bit Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 10,049	Originally Posted by rwguinn You went to soko-roo? I was down the road in lost crutches... If anybody ought to know about explosions and explosives, the "Energetic materials" folks there are it! Indeed. We would hear a couple of rather large bangs once or twice a day on campus.
	__________________ "Structural Engineering is the art of molding materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyze so as to understand forces we cannot really assess in such a way that the community at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our own ignorance." James E Amrhein

18th March 2010, 11:51 PM	#9
Orphia Nay Penguilicious Spodmaster. Tagger Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables). Posts: 44,286	Originally Posted by Edx How I Debated a 9/11 Truther and Survived: http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/how_i_..._and_survived/ Interesting article. Quote: Gage argued that there are ten reasons WTC 7, which was not hit by an airplane, was intentionally demolished: [...] 5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds [...] 7. Chemical signature of Thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples by physics professor Steven Jones, PhD Thermite causes "pyroclastic clouds" now? Gage is all over the place.

19th March 2010, 07:58 PM	#12
CurtC Illuminator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 4,785	Originally Posted by Brainster Jeebus, you know what he's talking about? He's talking about the clip of Van Romero that Jesse Ventura used on his Conspiracy Theory program. I believe that Dave Thomas and Van Romero are friends. I listen to Dave on the "Science Watch" podcast (of their radio show), and I think he mentioned this recently.
	__________________ Is there a God? Find the answer at The Official God FAQ.

19th March 2010, 10:07 PM	#13
Garb Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 1,005	Does anyone else notice that the steel beam they are heating with the super-thermite is horizontal instead of vertical? At least make the experiment look legitimate, instead of watching some chemicals burn on a horizontal beam and say "so any doubts?"
Garb Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 1,005	__________________ When I changed to my new computer, I was worried about info on the old computer being used for identity theft and such. Folks said: "Just yank the hard drive" and somesuch. But I blew up the apartment. Only way to be safe. -kookbreaker

20th March 2010, 01:50 AM	#14
tfk Illuminator Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 3,454	Originally Posted by Garb Does anyone else notice that the steel beam they are heating with the super-thermite is horizontal instead of vertical? At least make the experiment look legitimate, instead of watching some chemicals burn on a horizontal beam and say "so any doubts?" Don't confuse a daytime soap opera for a real sociological exposition of human interpersonal relations. Don't confuse a Jerry Springer show for a real investigation of American family dynamics. Don't confuse a Bill O'Reilly or Geraldo Rivera interview for a reporter giving his guest a real opportunity to present his/her ideas. In each case, the key word is "real". Don't confuse Ventura's show for, well, as far as I can tell, anything real. The arguments are fake. The disagreements are fake. The skepticism is fake. The investigation is fake. They should call it "The WWF does 60 Minutes". They whole thing is fixed.
tfk Illuminator Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 3,454

20th March 2010, 08:53 AM	#15
Grizzly Bear このマスクによっ Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 7,866	Just put it this way... when they did their fire test on the steel, I kept saying to myself: "and truther's complain about national geographic's experiment? " ETA: Oh by any chance does somebody have the barfing smiles image?
Grizzly Bear このマスクによっ Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 7,866	__________________ Current Set:http://i.imgur.com/IoqiUdK.jpg

20th March 2010, 09:03 AM	#16
Sherman Bay Master Poster Join Date: May 2002 Location: Wisconsin, USA Posts: 2,424	Originally Posted by ElMondoHummus Oh! Okay... Good. For a bit there, I was wondering if the link was referring to this Dave Thomas: http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n...d_2p_widec.jpg No this Dave Thomas.

20th March 2010, 11:27 AM	#17
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642	Originally Posted by Grizzly Bear Just put it this way... when they did their fire test on the steel, I kept saying to myself: "and truther's complain about national geographic's experiment? " Thats what I thought as well, of course you won't find them doing anything but praising Ventura though. How honest of them!
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642

20th March 2010, 02:00 PM	#18
McHrozni Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 11,919	Originally Posted by Brainster Ventura lets him ask the question, "Does it burn long enough and hot enough so that we have structural failure?" But hilariously, rather than answer the question, they then cut to Jesse asking, "Alright, anybody still got any doubts?" As retarded as the show is, I think this was just Romero misspeaking. He probably wanted to say it does burn long and hot enough to cause a structural failure, at least the intonation is right for that. Of course with twoofers you never know. It's entirely possible he phrased it as a question, but spoke it as a statement to make it seem as if he claimed it was going to fail, but not state it, as not to be liable for lying. McHrozni

20th March 2010, 11:24 PM	#19
Orphia Nay Penguilicious Spodmaster. Tagger Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables). Posts: 44,286	Originally Posted by Grizzly Bear Just put it this way... when they did their fire test on the steel, I kept saying to myself: "and truther's complain about national geographic's experiment? " ETA: Oh by any chance does somebody have the barfing smiles image? Yep, it's ridiculous, and this is totally appropriate:

21st March 2010, 02:26 PM	#20
tfk Illuminator Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 3,454	Originally Posted by orphia nay Yep, it's ridiculous, and this is totally appropriate: Most of those smileys are falling "in their own footprint". But a couple of them look like they're being thrown huge distances to the side. Almost as if they were "nano-thermited"...!
tfk Illuminator Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 3,454	Last edited by tfk; 21st March 2010 at 02:27 PM.

22nd March 2010, 07:45 PM	#21
grandmastershek Graduate Poster Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,461	Originally Posted by McHrozni As retarded as the show is, I think this was just Romero misspeaking. He probably wanted to say it does burn long and hot enough to cause a structural failure, at least the intonation is right for that. Of course with twoofers you never know. It's entirely possible he phrased it as a question, but spoke it as a statement to make it seem as if he claimed it was going to fail, but not state it, as not to be liable for lying. McHrozni To me it sounds as if it's a quote mine. All this nonsense about "transparency" why isn't Ventura releasing all his footage unedited? My bet is Van Romero said something like "The key question is does it burn long enough and hot enough so that we have structural failure" or something like that. With the gross misrepresentation and grand standing in that friggin show its no big stretch.

23rd March 2010, 07:59 AM	#22
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642	I really want to know the full story about that thermite experiment, anyone trying to get to the bottom of it? Someone said they knew they guy?
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642

23rd March 2010, 10:34 AM	#23
CurtC Illuminator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 4,785	Originally Posted by Edx Someone said they knew they guy? Dave Thomas, the guy who wrote the article linked in the OP, knows Van Romero, who conducted the experiment. You should be able to start with Dave.
	__________________ Is there a God? Find the answer at The Official God FAQ.

23rd March 2010, 08:42 PM	#24
Orphia Nay Penguilicious Spodmaster. Tagger Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables). Posts: 44,286	I just emailed Dave Thomas asking for a link to or a copy of the full clip, and I will announce when I have his answer.

23rd March 2010, 09:46 PM	#25
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877	Ahoy from Dave Thomas Howdy there. By the time Orphia had e-mailed me, I'd already gotten signed up. I've lurked around the JREF off and on, and do appreciate the nuggets that sometimes blossom here. I gave a talk on Bible Codes at TAM4 a few years back, FWIW. Anyway, the videos! The videos! Here's what I've told Orphia: Quote: Let me check with the EMRTC folks to see if I can send these videos out. The Ventura show had Romero asking the question about the beam with thermite, "Will it burn hot enough and long enough to fail structurally?" The cheesy part of the Ventura show is that, while they gave the results of the non-thermite test (didn't fail), they only HINTED at the results of the actual thermite test, with Ventura leading the charge by asking "Any questions?" Of course, the question that needed to be asked was "Did it burn hot enough and long enough to fail structurally?" The answer was no, and there's a video of Van Romero proving that by smacking the beam with a hammer. More later, Dave Thomas Anyway, nice to finally come aboard. I am teaching a class on critical thinking for physics at NM Tech, and today's class was on 9-11 physics. I've developed a nice little simple model that actually does fairly well with the twin towers piledriver collapses, getting very close to the results that Bazant acheived (What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York, Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE , Vol. 134 (2008), in press) with a very detailed model that includes beam busting, concrete pulverization, air pushed out the windows, etc. I a junior, so I can't post hyperlinks as yet - you'll have to find these on your own. Cheers, Dave Thomas (not the Wendy's, and not a MacKenzie brother either).
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877

23rd March 2010, 09:55 PM	#26
Baylor Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 8,394	Welcome aboard! I've seen New Mexico Tech on TV a few times. It looks like a fun place to work. Just blow stuff up all day in the middle of the desert. edit -- seriously, I saw their full-scale test of the Murrah Building bombing.
Baylor Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 8,394	Last edited by Baylor; 23rd March 2010 at 09:56 PM.

23rd March 2010, 11:36 PM	#27
Orphia Nay Penguilicious Spodmaster. Tagger Join Date: May 2005 Location: Ponylandistan Presidential Palace (above the Spods' stables). Posts: 44,286	Originally Posted by DaveThomasNMSR Howdy there. By the time Orphia had e-mailed me, I'd already gotten signed up. I've lurked around the JREF off and on, and do appreciate the nuggets that sometimes blossom here. I gave a talk on Bible Codes at TAM4 a few years back, FWIW. Anyway, the videos! The videos! Here's what I've told Orphia: Quote: Let me check with the EMRTC folks to see if I can send these videos out. The Ventura show had Romero asking the question about the beam with thermite, "Will it burn hot enough and long enough to fail structurally?" The cheesy part of the Ventura show is that, while they gave the results of the non-thermite test (didn't fail), they only HINTED at the results of the actual thermite test, with Ventura leading the charge by asking "Any questions?" Of course, the question that needed to be asked was "Did it burn hot enough and long enough to fail structurally?" The answer was no, and there's a video of Van Romero proving that by smacking the beam with a hammer. More later, Dave Thomas Anyway, nice to finally come aboard. I am teaching a class on critical thinking for physics at NM Tech, and today's class was on 9-11 physics. I've developed a nice little simple model that actually does fairly well with the twin towers piledriver collapses, getting very close to the results that Bazant acheived (What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York, Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE , Vol. 134 (2008), in press) with a very detailed model that includes beam busting, concrete pulverization, air pushed out the windows, etc. I a junior, so I can't post hyperlinks as yet - you'll have to find these on your own. Cheers, Dave Thomas (not the Wendy's, and not a MacKenzie brother either). Welcome to the forum, Dave, and thanks again for your prompt and cordial email replies. I've saved my gut reaction to that email till now... So the thermite didn't even weaken the horizontal steel beam, let alone render it "molten"? It's as we suspected, but it's nice to see it confirmed. I hope you can get the full video of the experiment, as that would add to the lulz, especially the factor where the truthers would squirm and spin.

24th March 2010, 07:30 AM	#28
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877	Waiting on NM Tech Orphia wrote Quote: Welcome to the forum, Dave, and thanks again for your prompt and cordial email replies. I've saved my gut reaction to that email till now... So the thermite didn't even weaken the horizontal steel beam, let alone render it "molten"? It's as we suspected, but it's nice to see it confirmed. I hope you can get the full video of the experiment, as that would add to the lulz, especially the factor where the truthers would squirm and spin. Indeed, I've sent a query seeking permission to release the video JESSE VENTURA DOESN'T WANT THE WORLD TO SEE! I'll let y'all know if it gets the OK. Cheers, Dave
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877

24th March 2010, 07:50 AM	#29
ElMondoHummus 0.25 short of being half-witted Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Somewhere north of the South Pole Posts: 12,282	Welcome, sir. Glad to see you here. BTW: Yes, the links prevention is in place, but it's not against the rules to leave off parts that would trip the autoprevent. For example: "You can see (topic being referenced) at cnn.com". That seems to work. Just leaving off the http:// and www. seems to work. -------- Just out of curiosity, does anyone have any idea why Gage is so willing to take on opposition on TV/radio shows? My only guess is to popularize his AE911T group, but just getting signatures and site members isn't really generating any income for hm. Plus, it isn't exactly a risk-free method of gaining adherents; he could simply be interviewed or participate in non-argumentative settings and get the same amount of exposure. And lets be blunt: He didn't exactly cover himself with glory when he met Gravy (Mark Roberts, who's forum handle here is "Gravy") on the air. Anyway, the only reason I can see is to popularize himself and his group, but he seems to be choosing a way that would certainly backfire on him.
	__________________ "AND ZEPPELINS!!! We haven't even begun to talk about Zeppelins yet! Marauding inflatable Teutonic johnsons waggling their way across the sky! Indecent and flammable all at once."

24th March 2010, 11:32 AM	#30
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877	Here are the Videos! They are on my Youtube channel, thegrizzledwizard. I've sent Orphia an explanatory letter with the links, that I've asked her to post here on my behalf (newbies can't Link!) Cheers, Dave
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877

24th March 2010, 11:50 AM	#32
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877	Originally Posted by DGM Welcome: I'll assume these are the videos your referring to. ... again welcome. You missed one - the Romero comment after the thermite test! Here's the YouTube code: d-pZf56L0lg Cheers, Dave Thomas
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877

24th March 2010, 12:29 PM	#34
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642	AWESOME. I'm going to have to make a youtube video comparing that with the Venturas version. So he actually filmed it all HIMSELF and then gave the footage to the production company? Is that why he has this footage? This is pretty devastating to Venturas honesty really.
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642	Last edited by Edx; 24th March 2010 at 12:30 PM.

24th March 2010, 12:47 PM	#35
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877	Originally Posted by Edx AWESOME. I'm going to have to make a youtube video comparing that with the Venturas version. So he actually filmed it all HIMSELF and then gave the footage to the production company? Is that why he has this footage? This is pretty devastating to Venturas honesty really. The three videos I've posted at my YouTube grizzledwizard channel were all made by NM Tech, EMRTC, to support requests made on behalf of Ventura's crew. While the "Conspiracy Theory" episode on 9-11 indeed showed some of the tests, they did NOT show the concluding test (Romero and the hammer), which was left on the cutting room floor. However, they were filmed at NM Tech by Tech personnel, and not by "HIMSELF" (if you mean Jesse Ventura is "HIMSELF"). If you mean "Van Romero" by "HIMSELF", that does make sense - Van had the filming done to support Ventura, and then Van allowed me to make copies. Sarite? Cheers, Dave
DaveThomasNMSR Muse Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 877

24th March 2010, 12:56 PM	#36
Brainster Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 20,310	Originally Posted by DaveThomasNMSR You missed one - the Romero comment after the thermite test! Here's the YouTube code: d-pZf56L0lg Cheers, Dave Thomas Hahahahahaha! Thanks, Dave! I knew Ventura was gliding right over the "Did it fail structurally," part of that but it's hilarious to see the part that he left out. ETA: Props to Orphia for inviting you to the forum and welcome!
	__________________ My new blog: Recent Reads. 1960s Comic Book Nostalgia Visit the Screw Loose Change blog. Last edited by Brainster; 24th March 2010 at 01:16 PM.

24th March 2010, 01:17 PM	#37
Newtons Bit Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 10,049	Good work on the Gage nonsense, Dave. And it's nice to see another Techie on these boards
	__________________ "Structural Engineering is the art of molding materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyze so as to understand forces we cannot really assess in such a way that the community at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our own ignorance." James E Amrhein

24th March 2010, 01:24 PM	#38
grandmastershek Graduate Poster Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,461	OMG! I can't wait to show this to the truthers I know in real life.

24th March 2010, 02:06 PM	#39
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642	Originally Posted by DaveThomasNMSR The three videos I've posted at my YouTube grizzledwizard channel were all made by NM Tech, EMRTC, to support requests made on behalf of Ventura's crew. While the "Conspiracy Theory" episode on 9-11 indeed showed some of the tests, they did NOT show the concluding test (Romero and the hammer), which was left on the cutting room floor. However, they were filmed at NM Tech by Tech personnel, and not by "HIMSELF" (if you mean Jesse Ventura is "HIMSELF"). If you mean "Van Romero" by "HIMSELF", that does make sense - Van had the filming done to support Ventura, and then Van allowed me to make copies. Sarite? Cheers, Dave Thanks Dave, I am curious as to ... 1. Why Romero would trust that someone like Ventura could be trusted to not twist his words (like all truthers do) and... 2. What Romero thinks of how they used his footage? I also also interested in that the quote "does it burn long enough and hot enough" since in the clip you showed with the hammer it didn't say "and hot enough" so was probably a different taken or from a different scene right?
Edx Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5,642	Last edited by Edx; 24th March 2010 at 02:09 PM.