IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez , ae911truth

Reply
Old 4th April 2010, 09:38 PM   #1
alienentity
Illuminator
 
alienentity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,325
Banned JREF member kicked off AE911Truth Petition - repost

Note to mods: PooztA identified himself as AHR on several threads before he was banned. His name is public knowledge.
This thread is in full compliance with Rule 8
'You may only post a Member's personal information if it is both publicly available and is relevant to the ongoing discussion'


Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez, aka banned JREF member PookztA,
has been removed from AE911Truth's petition.

As explained on Andrew Johnson's website, checktheevidence.com

'A short while ago, we were contacted by a Medical Student who found out his name had been deleted from the AE911 truth supporters petition because he was posting material and comments in relation Dr Judy Wood and Steven E Jones connections into Los Alamos National Labs and the energy issue (an example can be found here: http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/vie...=145077#145077)'

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...=280&Itemid=60

The letter from AE911Truth:

'Abrahm,(sic)

I am writing to you on behalf of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to explain why we removed your name from our list of petition signers and to offer you a full refund of your generous donations.

We decided to remove you from our list of petition signers because, whether you knew it or not, we have chosen to carefully limit the scope of our message to the collapse of the World Trade Center and the need for a new investigation that would specifically consider the use of explosives in bringing it down. Our message is displayed on our website in the petition and mission statement. The evidence supporting our message is also found on our website, which I am sure you have seen since you signed our petition.

www.ae911truth.org

Your suggestion about contacting Judy Wood and engaging in a discussion with her about her theories about directed energy weapons and other things is a suggestion for action that is outside the scope of our message. We would lose more than we would again. If nothing else we would lose the time required to make such a contact and engage in a discussion / debate whose duration would be unknown. We are also well aware of Judy Wood and her theories. The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message.

There is a lot of evidence besides the characteristics of controlled demolition seen in the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7 that strongly suggests or proves that the official story of 9/11 is false. As you know 9/11 is a very complicated subject. Yet Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth deliberately avoids those topics. We leave it to others to make those arguments and present the evidence to the public, to Congress, and so on.

If you will tell us the total amount of your donations to us we will refund all of your money. You mentioned that you donated over $100. What is the exact amount, if you know it? Please provide your check numbers if you have them. We do not want to leave the perception or the reality that we have taken advantage of you financially.

Will you accept our offer of a refund as a complete and equitable solution to this situation?

Take care,

Mark Graham
Volunteer Coordinator'

Just as the Tea Party nutcases have aligned with Republicans, so the evidence-averse 9/11 Truthers flock together (Johnson and Rodriguez).

Even AE911Truth is loath to criticize the most nutty theories, while they won't admit them on their petition.. 'The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message.'
Gee, they can't come out and say 'we don't think DEW weapons and no planes theories have any merit'? How hard would that be?
__________________
Heiwa - 'Anyone suggesting that part C structure can one-way crush down part A structure is complicit to mass murder!'
000063 - 'Problem with the Truthers' theories is that anyone with enough power to pull it off doesn't need to in the first place.'
mrkinnies 'I'm not a no-planer' 'I don't believe Flight 77 hit the Pentagon'
alienentity is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th April 2010, 09:59 PM   #2
A W Smith
Philosopher
 
A W Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,032
Who can forget Dishonest Abe

Did the mods forget that "Abe Rodriguez" was his actual post signature? or did they just assume you broke rule 8?
__________________
911 resource site by Mark Roberts
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home
Gravy: Christopher7; You are a Basking Shark in a sea of ignorance.
Galileo:The jury said I didn't have any mental defects or diseases, they declared me 100% sane. Has a jury ever declared you sane?
Don’t get me lol’n off my chesterfield dude.
A W Smith is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th April 2010, 10:15 PM   #3
alienentity
Illuminator
 
alienentity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,325
Originally Posted by A W Smith View Post
Did the mods forget that "Abe Rodriguez" was his actual post signature? or did they just assume you broke rule 8?
It was partly to do with my musing about another member, whose handle has been removed from this post. That was a violation of Rule 8 as it was not directly relevant to the subject of the thread.
__________________
Heiwa - 'Anyone suggesting that part C structure can one-way crush down part A structure is complicit to mass murder!'
000063 - 'Problem with the Truthers' theories is that anyone with enough power to pull it off doesn't need to in the first place.'
mrkinnies 'I'm not a no-planer' 'I don't believe Flight 77 hit the Pentagon'
alienentity is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 4th April 2010, 10:30 PM   #4
Sam.I.Am
Illuminator
 
Sam.I.Am's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,627
While it's my opinion that this should have been hashed out in Forum Management first by showing something like this post from PooztA to show that he himself had divulged his own personal information before starting this new thread. It's still interesting and humorous to watch the truthers throw each other under the bus because, hey, at least we aren't that brand of crazy, we're this brand of crazy which totally makes much more sense...
__________________
"Swift, silent and deadly" was a part of my job description Upon hearing me say that my friend asked me "So you're a fart?"...

About my avatar.
Sam.I.Am is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th April 2010, 10:52 AM   #5
Furcifer
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,796
Originally Posted by Sam.I.Am View Post
It's still interesting and humorous to watch the truthers throw each other under the bus because, hey, at least we aren't that brand of crazy, we're this brand of crazy which totally makes much more sense...
They are all "outside the scope" of their frackin minds.
Furcifer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th April 2010, 12:14 PM   #6
sheeplesnshills
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,706
Quote:
Even AE911Truth is loath to criticize the most nutty theories, while they won't admit them on their petition.. 'The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message.'
Gee, they can't come out and say 'we don't think DEW weapons and no planes theories have any merit'? How hard would that be?
he got banned from 911oz (even quicker than I was )for doing the same thing.....apparently almost any CT is OK over there but not DEW.
sheeplesnshills is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th April 2010, 01:24 PM   #7
carlitos
"más divertido"
 
carlitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 22,779
Reading pseudo-intellectual correspondence from these groups is enlightening.

Quote:
We would lose more than we would again.
carlitos is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th August 2010, 05:02 PM   #8
AaronMic22
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 347
Recently, Pookzta made his way to Conspiracy Science:

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/...11-free-energy

Here is an article I wrote today on this confused, young man:

http://www.aaronmhatch.com/projects/abe/abe.html
AaronMic22 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th August 2010, 05:25 PM   #9
alienentity
Illuminator
 
alienentity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,325
Originally Posted by AaronMHatch View Post
Recently, Pookzta made his way to Conspiracy Science:

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/...11-free-energy

Here is an article I wrote today on this confused, young man:

http://www.aaronmhatch.com/projects/abe/abe.html
Thx!
__________________
Heiwa - 'Anyone suggesting that part C structure can one-way crush down part A structure is complicit to mass murder!'
000063 - 'Problem with the Truthers' theories is that anyone with enough power to pull it off doesn't need to in the first place.'
mrkinnies 'I'm not a no-planer' 'I don't believe Flight 77 hit the Pentagon'
alienentity is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:42 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.