Banned JREF member kicked off AE911Truth Petition - repost

[alienentity]

Note to mods: PooztA identified himself as AHR on several threads before he was banned. His name is public knowledge.
This thread is in full compliance with Rule 8
'You may only post a Member's personal information if it is both publicly available and is relevant to the ongoing discussion'


Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez, aka banned JREF member PookztA,
has been removed from AE911Truth's petition.

As explained on Andrew Johnson's website, checktheevidence.com

'A short while ago, we were contacted by a Medical Student who found out his name had been deleted from the AE911 truth supporters petition because he was posting material and comments in relation Dr Judy Wood and Steven E Jones connections into Los Alamos National Labs and the energy issue (an example can be found here: http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/vie...=145077#145077)'

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cm...=280&Itemid=60

The letter from AE911Truth:

'Abrahm,(sic)

I am writing to you on behalf of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to explain why we removed your name from our list of petition signers and to offer you a full refund of your generous donations.

We decided to remove you from our list of petition signers because, whether you knew it or not, we have chosen to carefully limit the scope of our message to the collapse of the World Trade Center and the need for a new investigation that would specifically consider the use of explosives in bringing it down. Our message is displayed on our website in the petition and mission statement. The evidence supporting our message is also found on our website, which I am sure you have seen since you signed our petition.

www.ae911truth.org

Your suggestion about contacting Judy Wood and engaging in a discussion with her about her theories about directed energy weapons and other things is a suggestion for action that is outside the scope of our message. We would lose more than we would again. If nothing else we would lose the time required to make such a contact and engage in a discussion / debate whose duration would be unknown. We are also well aware of Judy Wood and her theories. The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message.

There is a lot of evidence besides the characteristics of controlled demolition seen in the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7 that strongly suggests or proves that the official story of 9/11 is false. As you know 9/11 is a very complicated subject. Yet Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth deliberately avoids those topics. We leave it to others to make those arguments and present the evidence to the public, to Congress, and so on.

If you will tell us the total amount of your donations to us we will refund all of your money. You mentioned that you donated over $100. What is the exact amount, if you know it? Please provide your check numbers if you have them. We do not want to leave the perception or the reality that we have taken advantage of you financially.

Will you accept our offer of a refund as a complete and equitable solution to this situation?

Take care,

Mark Graham
Volunteer Coordinator'

Just as the Tea Party nutcases have aligned with Republicans, so the evidence-averse 9/11 Truthers flock together (Johnson and Rodriguez).

Even AE911Truth is loath to criticize the most nutty theories, while they won't admit them on their petition.. 'The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message.'
Gee, they can't come out and say 'we don't think DEW weapons and no planes theories have any merit'? How hard would that be?

[A W Smith]

Did the mods forget that "Abe Rodriguez" was his actual post signature? or did they just assume you broke rule 8?

[alienentity]

Originally Posted by A W Smith

Did the mods forget that "Abe Rodriguez" was his actual post signature? or did they just assume you broke rule 8?

It was partly to do with my musing about another member, whose handle has been removed from this post. That was a violation of Rule 8 as it was not directly relevant to the subject of the thread.

[Sam.I.Am]

While it's my opinion that this should have been hashed out in Forum Management first by showing something like this post from PooztA to show that he himself had divulged his own personal information before starting this new thread. It's still interesting and humorous to watch the truthers throw each other under the bus because, hey, at least we aren't that brand of crazy, we're this brand of crazy which totally makes much more sense...

[Furcifer]

Originally Posted by Sam.I.Am

It's still interesting and humorous to watch the truthers throw each other under the bus because, hey, at least we aren't that brand of crazy, we're this brand of crazy which totally makes much more sense...

They are all "outside the scope" of their frackin minds.

[sheeplesnshills]

Quote:

Even AE911Truth is loath to criticize the most nutty theories, while they won't admit them on their petition.. 'The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message.'
Gee, they can't come out and say 'we don't think DEW weapons and no planes theories have any merit'? How hard would that be?

he got banned from 911oz (even quicker than I was )for doing the same thing.....apparently almost any CT is OK over there but not DEW.

[carlitos]

Reading pseudo-intellectual correspondence from these groups is enlightening.

Quote:

We would lose more than we would again.

[AaronMic22]

Recently, Pookzta made his way to Conspiracy Science:

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/...11-free-energy

Here is an article I wrote today on this confused, young man:

http://www.aaronmhatch.com/projects/abe/abe.html

[alienentity]

Originally Posted by AaronMHatch

Recently, Pookzta made his way to Conspiracy Science:

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/...11-free-energy

Here is an article I wrote today on this confused, young man:

http://www.aaronmhatch.com/projects/abe/abe.html

Thx!