On this point, about the significance of forensic data, you must record the initial position of Dr. LALLI, CT del Pubblico Ministero, Lalla, CT of the Public Ministry, under which there would be no findings in support of either hypothesis. The report of the Scientific Police (UACV) filed during the preliminary hearing focuses instead on the presence of typical defense wounds in the region on the thumb and palm of the right hand of the victim, apparently came into contact with the blade of the knife that fact, to reconnect with bruises from withholding, does suggest "action of violent coercion by multiple attackers, even to prevent the woman to oppose the blade of the weapon."
The technical memorandum filed by defense consultants K. argues instead that the state places and reveal the body injury "fully compatible with the action perpetrated by one person" as the face and neck can be produced by an agent who grab the victim with bare hands to strangle, suffocate or tacitly, and then (or simultaneously) the wound with a knife ", while those in other locations (right elbow and forearm on both sides of the pelvis, left thigh and right leg) are also reported to peacefully violent contact ( designed to hold, immobilize) between victim and aggressor, assuming that the latter dominates while he was lying on the ground, and could thus cause her bruises with body parts (knees, legs), other than hands. According to these consultants, "totally missing, however, traces of grasping or constriction of the wrists or ankles, potentially indicative of action made by immobilizing and containing more than one subject."
Especially in the face of so variously placed lesions, even to both sides, and with one hand and likely to wield a knife, however, appears rather bold claim that the attacker has essentially "gone over" to the girl, and traces of grasping on a pulse, albeit based on data derived from different aspect, it seems that there are.
snip
as to the problem of length by prof. CINGOLANI Cingolani noted at the hearing: "The only problem was that the knife blade is 17.5 cm long, is here along with the 8 and stops, we do not know why other hand, there is a zone of resistance in the which has stopped, but it can be stopped by the action of the agent or any other reason or because the weapon has been retracted "the second injury because it corresponds to 2 cm. from the tip of the knife is 1.5 cm wide. exactly what the width of the wound (just 2 cm deep.), the third apparently leads to different results because through is 4 cm., and the knife at that distance from the tip has a width of 3, but the injury is more than 1.5 cm. But - always say the Surveyor - "makes the path through which the blade is inside the body and we will evaluate in a static situation, whereas when there is penetration of the weapon was in a dynamic situation (..), there may have been a compression of the skin to the depth, there may have been a twist of the neck in a certain way, it is not possible indicate this fact that at first glance would seem as incompatible as absolutely incompatible. "Professor. UMANI RONCHI states correctly (by the excoriation of the lesions compared to superficial wounds more): "a knife that maybe .. . he had a back more often and had irregularities such as to these formations, here, might be more appropriate to the situation. "
. Exposed to such data, prof. TORRE stated that it supports the possibility of compression of the skin, the wound more, then observed that "the bottom of the wound (..) is a kind of mangled tissue as deep as a processing blade back and forth persistent and prolonged action always within the same lesion "on the possibility that moved the neck of the victim, added:" Yes, but it must be moved many times to do an injury so mangled, with the clarification instead by Prof. April that "just two movements."
Thus, the inferred "mangled", prof. UMANI RONCHI added: "This ray (..) small areas of erythematous excoriated I. .. I believe, has confirmed my belief that could be due to the fact that the knife introduced in this way, with the coast say adhering to the skin for wrist movements of the aggressor or the victim's reactions, can be explained without going to think about a different weapon. "
This is the state of the art: and logic, once again, requires a note: that certainly the blade of the knife assailant lingered in the neck of the victim, given the width of the lesion - very unusual, even in the eyes of those who has seen several - he had to procure, that certainly the neck of poor M.
move, since it could not defend himself with his hands, at least not with both.
Insignificant, all wanting to give, is the contribution of forensic consultants Defence S. about the mark of a knife on the mattress, those experts who want a double impression, almost parallel: apart from the finding that the knife blade of the phantom would be about 13-14 cm., also well above the means, the 'hypothesis that was supported twice in nearly parallel position is simply unrealistic (more reasonable would be confronted with a knife placed therein and then crawled or stumbled up to take a different position), as well as difficult to explain by the action of and it supported a "bounce" for having someone sitting immediately above the mattress.
Your ....generosity ...is noted though 
I did, Rose, thanks. 
