|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
6th October 2011, 07:21 PM | #1 |
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 24
|
Time changing and travelling technology is real, and is being secretly developed
http://andersoninstitute.com/
The above website says not only is time travel possible, but that governments have been secretly using time travel technology and don't want the public to know. This includes events like the Philadelphia experiment and the inventions of Nikola Tesla. This page shows all of the countries researching into time technology and the government funded organizations as well as Private organizations such as the Anderson Institute (the owner of the website). It also shows the 10 ways that government and private organizations are developing technology for time travel: http://andersoninstitute.com/time-tr...cret-truth.htm The link below shows the creator of the website. Dr. David Lewis Anderson, who worked for the US Air force and has first hand accounts of the secret experiments the US government conduct for time travel and he himself set the foundations of "time-warp theory". So there.
Quote:
http://www.andersoninstitute.com/tim...ed-fields.html This guy seems to be the real deal with real connections, his organization is dedicated to time controlling technology such as time fields and if you look around the website its full of knowledge on space time physics and how time travel works. Look at this link, here he shows all of the experiments that have been used in time travel technology: http://andersoninstitute.com/experim...e-control.html And if you look here he provides evidence of time travelers in our past that is being suppressed by governments and scientific organizations: http://andersoninstitute.com/forbidden-knowledge.html I just find it horrifying. The fact that there are governmentss and private organizations that are secretly developing time technology for the last 50 years and the fact that they don't want us to find out. The Anderson Institution wants full disclosure on this technology and to tap the potential to revolutionize the world, as explained in this interview he had with Art Bell: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70L6hqcB4ng Is this all true? Are we heading into an era where we (or the minority) will not only be able to manipulate the past, present and future, but will be able to completly change the course of humanity to levels that have never been reached before? |
6th October 2011, 07:28 PM | #2 |
New Blood
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22
|
Well, if it's on the interwebs then it MUST be true.
|
6th October 2011, 07:42 PM | #3 |
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 24
|
Don't start using that line. this is of utter most importance that the truth is seen.
|
6th October 2011, 07:43 PM | #4 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quick question if you don't mind, aliensdidit, since you've started many thread in that vein: how do you, personally, judge the validity of whatever info you come across?
|
6th October 2011, 07:48 PM | #5 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,499
|
So do I. To think that someone would resurrect the Meister footprints, debunked more than 20 years ago, says terrible things about the cynicism inherent in some people. And that other folk would actually believe it says terrible things about the wilful credulity in other people.
|
6th October 2011, 08:26 PM | #6 |
New Blood
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22
|
|
6th October 2011, 08:37 PM | #7 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
I wouldn't be concerned by these links. The laws of physics are a lot harder to break than man-made laws.
As far as I know, the only way that one could travel through time is still to travel as close to the speed of light as possible. That however, is a one way ticket into the future. |
6th October 2011, 09:32 PM | #8 |
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 95
|
Why hasn't "Dr. David Lewis Anderson" been stopped long ago by time traveling agents? Typical incompetent government!
|
6th October 2011, 09:59 PM | #9 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
Well, you can also go deep into a very deep gravity well for the same effect, but finding such a gravity well, getting into (and then out again) will likely be even more difficult and energy intensive than "travel[ing] as close to the speed of light as possible", so, yeah.
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
6th October 2011, 10:37 PM | #10 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 386
|
|
__________________
I hate those guys. Ever since their 9-11 conspiracy debunk show which didn't debunk anything I never liked them again. Tried to make CT'S out to be utter quacks. |
|
6th October 2011, 11:23 PM | #11 |
I'm watching you
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,320
|
|
__________________
This is a sig file. Does anyone even read this stuff? |
|
6th October 2011, 11:48 PM | #12 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
|
7th October 2011, 12:31 AM | #13 |
Scholar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 69
|
Of course time travel is possible. I've just lost 3 minutes by being stupid enough to click the link.
|
7th October 2011, 02:43 AM | #14 |
No longer the 1
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 30,145
|
But it's got a PESWiki page, it must be true. And he was interviewed on Coast to Coast AM...........
Oh and a little research about Anderson's claims (from the website and elsewhere) shows: 1. His claim to two doctorates (physics from Edwards Air Force Base and philosophy from University of Minnesota) appear to be untrue; no theses on record with CSU [who don't award doctorates in physics anyway] or UM for him. His only awarded degree appears to be a BSEE from WV University in 1983. 2. No record of his claimed patents or any pending. 3. He doesn't mention his employment by Bosch Securities, 2002-06. 4. No published journal articles. 5. He claimed to have worked with Lijun Wang (though he calls him "Julian") at Princeton University but Wang worked at NRC Research and there's no record of Anderson ever being there. 6. His "institute" appears to be a website and a UPS mailbox. 7. He's selling stuff. I call shenanigans. |
7th October 2011, 04:42 AM | #16 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,700
|
Wow, what an amazing lack of evidence, OMFSM, like where are the citations for the 'Philadelphia Experiment'?
"Many observers argue that it is inappropriate to grant much credence to an unusual story promoted by one individual, in the absence of more conclusive corroborating evidence. Robert Goerman wrote in Fate magazine in 1980, that "Carlos Allende" / "Carl Allen" was Carl Meredith Allen of New Kensington, Pennsylvania, who had an established history of psychiatric illness, and who may have fabricated the primary history of the experiment as a result of his mental illness. Some sources[who?] indicate that Allen was a known prankster, and that the "Philadelphia Experiment" story may have been an elaborate hoax." |
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar |
|
7th October 2011, 04:43 AM | #17 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,700
|
|
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar |
|
7th October 2011, 05:01 AM | #18 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,864
|
Nice work, catsmate!
The web site has a reasonably good list of theoretical time-travel ideas, mostly involving CTCs (Closed Timelike Curves), although it also mentions superluminal information transfer by quantum tunneling, which, AIUI, is not theoretically possible. The time-travel 'experiments' or 'projects' is just a list of time-travel related claims, stories, speculations, and fantasy, from secret artifacts from the future, through remote viewing, to crystal visions. Prime woo. Move along, nothing to see here. |
__________________
Simple probability tells us that we should expect coincidences, and simple psychology tells us that we'll remember the ones we notice... |
|
7th October 2011, 05:03 AM | #19 |
Muse
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 806
|
Well if (s)he is anything like the school pupil quoted in this BBC article, it's not that it's on the internet...it's that it's first item when you Google it
Originally Posted by BBC Article referred to above
|
7th October 2011, 05:31 AM | #20 |
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 24
|
You didn't do any research, you just got the information from this page:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Talk:Di...rol_Technology I though someone like you would not take a webssite like that or a person like Stanton Friedman seriously, so why now? But if you look at the end, you will find other people who have met him give a real description of him:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Its scary to think that goverments are now manipulating with our senses and now could manipulate the course of history and reality itself. |
7th October 2011, 05:37 AM | #21 |
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 24
|
Also, I DEMAND that this thread is put back in the original sub-forum that it was in. Don't you dare put this in a section where only ignorant and stupid people who think they know everything to start ruining everything. I wan't people who have even a little bit of knowledge in these fieelds to realise what is happening around us.
|
7th October 2011, 05:45 AM | #22 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 7,682
|
|
7th October 2011, 05:45 AM | #23 |
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 24
|
Re: Time changing and traveling technology is real, and is secretly being developed
Since ignorant people who thought that the topic belonged in the Conspiracy theory section (where idiots that are blinded by ignorance go to), this is a continuation of the the thread in the section it rightly deserves to be in.
You didn't do any research, you just got the information from this page: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Talk:Di...rol_Technology I though someone like you would not take a webssite like that or a person like Stanton Friedman seriously, so why now? But if you look at the end, you will find other people who have met him give a real description of him:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Its scary to think that goverments are now manipulating with our senses and now could manipulate the course of history and reality itself. |
7th October 2011, 05:48 AM | #24 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,593
|
Well, if the opera is behind Mr. Anderson, it's game over for The Man.
|
__________________
|
|
7th October 2011, 05:51 AM | #25 |
Pi
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 21,797
|
And we Demand Rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.
We are philosophers Though we migh not be Yes we are. We are quite definitely here as representatives of the Amalgamated Union of Philosophers, Sages, Luminaries and Other Thinking Persons, and we want this machine off, and we want it off now! |
__________________
Up the River! Anyone that wraps themselves in the Union Flag and also lives in tax exile is a [redacted] |
|
7th October 2011, 05:54 AM | #26 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,374
|
|
__________________
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison |
|
7th October 2011, 05:56 AM | #27 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,278
|
|
__________________
The poster formerly known as Redtail |
|
7th October 2011, 05:59 AM | #28 |
Atheist Tergiversator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,103
|
It's fun to pretend.
|
__________________
"One of the hardest parts of being an active skeptic - of anything - is knowing when to cut your losses, and then doing so." -Phil Plait |
|
7th October 2011, 05:59 AM | #29 |
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 20,952
|
This is a science forum. If you want to explain to us how time can be altered then we are all ears (or is that eyes?) but if you want to report how the PTB plans to use time changing technology then that rightly belongs in the CT section.
|
7th October 2011, 06:03 AM | #30 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 7,682
|
|
7th October 2011, 06:05 AM | #31 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 28,766
|
I have a tense feeling about this thread.
I feel the bit that says "is being developed" should be in the future future perfect indicative pluperfect tense. "..will have been being having been being developed." While the physics of time travel may now have will being been well understood, the grammar of time travel will always be a bitch. |
7th October 2011, 06:06 AM | #32 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,374
|
Where on Earth should this thread be except in the conspiracy theory section? It is about the government secretly developing time travel technology and hiding it from the public.
If that's not a conspiracy then what is? |
__________________
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison |
|
7th October 2011, 06:30 AM | #33 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,303
|
I think Aliensdidit is having a bit of a laugh... so there.
|
__________________
It's great being ideologically flexible. |
|
7th October 2011, 06:55 AM | #34 |
No longer the 1
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 30,145
|
|
7th October 2011, 07:05 AM | #35 |
No longer the 1
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 30,145
|
Actually, no I didn't. I started from there and did something you may be vaguely aware of called research. Like checking Anderson's lack of actual doctorates, lack of patents, lack of publications et cetera.
Perhaps you should give it a try sometime? Would you care to deal with the facts I listed? here they are again; I've added some hints as to how you could refute them: 1. His claim to two doctorates (physics from Edwards Air Force Base and philosophy from University of Minnesota) appear to be untrue; no theses on record with CSU [who don't award doctorates in physics anyway] or UM for him. His only awarded degree appears to be a BSEE from WV University in 1983. If you think I'm wrong feel free to cite the institutions that awarded the alleged doctorates and the theses titles. 2. No record of his claimed patents or any pending. If you think I'm wrong feel free to cite the patent numbers; be aware that these can very easily be verified. 3. He doesn't mention his employment by Bosch Securities, 2002-06. Do you deny this? 4. No published journal articles. If you think I'm wrong feel free to cite the articles that Anderson has authored along with the journals; again these are easily verified. 5. He claimed to have worked with Lijun Wang (though he calls him "Julian") at Princeton University but Wang worked at NRC Research and there's no record of Anderson ever being there. The audio and transcript of these lies (on CtoC AM) are available online. If you have evidence to refute my statement please provide it. 6. His "institute" appears to be a website and a UPS mailbox. Feel free to cite evidence that it isn't. 7. He's selling stuff. I think even the most deluded believer can't deny this. |
7th October 2011, 07:06 AM | #36 |
No longer the 1
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 30,145
|
|
7th October 2011, 08:21 AM | #37 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 16,041
|
Oops.
|
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together." Isaac Asimov |
|
7th October 2011, 08:58 AM | #38 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 14,423
|
No it isn't.
|
7th October 2011, 11:04 AM | #39 |
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,257
|
|
7th October 2011, 11:14 AM | #40 |
NWO Litter Technician
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Looks like Finland. Smells like Finland. Quacks like Finland. Where the hell am I?
Posts: 15,161
|
|
__________________
When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord, in his wisdom, doesn't work that way. I just stole one and asked Him to forgive me. - Emo Philips
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|