
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. 
30th January 2012, 02:04 PM  #1 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,563

1,2,3,4,5,6 in the lottery
For years, I've been telling people that it's as likely for you to get the above numbers as something like 35,32,18,16, 28, 21.
People can't seem to believe it. Is this actually the case, or am I making a fool of myself? 
__________________
Man's material discoveries have outpaced his moral progress.  Clement Attlee, 1945 

30th January 2012, 02:08 PM  #2 
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,177

Not only is it the same but if you won you'd probably share the jackpot with thousands of other people who play those numbers to make a point to their friends at the convenience store.

30th January 2012, 02:15 PM  #3 
Masterblazer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 6,825

Yes, the likelyhood of winning is the same. But in the event of a win, you share it with others who played the same numbers. So you want to avoid picking numbers that other people are likely to pick.

__________________
Almo! My Blog "No society ever collapsed because the poor had too much." — LeftySergeant "It may be that there is no body really at rest, to which the places and motions of others may be referred." –Issac Newton in the Principia 

30th January 2012, 02:19 PM  #4 
"más divertido"
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 17,452


30th January 2012, 02:26 PM  #5 
Just the right amount of cowbell
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Well past Hither, looking for Yon
Posts: 5,704

[pedantic] It depends on what you mean by "something like." <1,2,3,4,5,6> should be exactly as likely as <16, 18, 21, 28, 32, 35>, but to the typical lottery player, there are several billion sequences "like" <16, 18, 21, 28, 32, 35> while there's only one sequence "like" <1,2,3,4,5,6>, and maybe ~40 case that are "like" <12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17> (i.e. sequential numbers).
Of course, once you've picked one particular sequence, the "like" part becomes inconsequential; <16, 18, 21, 28, 32, 35> should have the same chance of winning as <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6> [/pedantic] 
__________________
"In times of war, we need warriors. But this isn't a war."  Phil Plaitt 

30th January 2012, 02:26 PM  #6 
Muse
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 893


30th January 2012, 02:36 PM  #7 
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,594

The data is available from you local lottery office on the number of minor prizes for partial matches in each lottery drawing. From that you can calculate the probabilities that someone would pick any sequence of numbers for that lottery. I did this for the first couple of years that we had a lottery here but quickly lost interest because I never play.

30th January 2012, 02:36 PM  #8 
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,255

I read that people tend to avoid filling out numbers which make a geometric shape on the ticket, like
*** ** * in a corner  because it seems "doubly unlikely". Of course the likelyhood of that winning is ther same as 1,2,3,4,5,6 or 35,32,18,16,28,21 or any other sequence, but apparently if you DO win your pot is less likely to be split. And fewer people would do so to make a point, unlike 1,2,3,4,5,6. 
__________________
Gamemaster: "A horde of rotting zombies is shambling toward you. The sign over the door says 'Accounting'" 

30th January 2012, 02:50 PM  #9 
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 16,722

What are the chances that all the numbers for a couple major lotteries could be found in a random 1000digit block of pi?
Pretty good so far, as it turns out. 
__________________
Science is selfcorrecting. Woo is selfcontradicting. 

30th January 2012, 03:01 PM  #10 
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,594

Every possible set of numbers has exactly the same probability of being drawn. About the only thing you could count on is a lottery drawing the same set of numbers as they had drawn previously. That would be like doubly astronomically impossible.

30th January 2012, 03:53 PM  #11 
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,241

In a 6/49 lottery the combinations that have some sort of obvious looking pattern or sequence count for only a very small number of the 14 million possible combinations so it's more likely that a draw won't have any obvious sequence but every combination has an equal chance of showing up.
Another way of looking at it and shows how unlikely it is to win the lottery is that any random sequence you select has exactly the same odds of being drawn as 1,2,3,4,5,6 The best you can do if you do play is to choose a sequence that is less likely to be chosen by other people so that if you do win then you share the jackpot with fewer people, so don't use birthdays/use at least 1 number above 31, avoid making lines and patterns on the ticket or having incremental steps of your numbers. Another thing is that instead of playing every draw, playing 2 tickets every second draw or 10 tickets every ten draws etc. increases your chances slightly though if you do that and play the same numbers each time it could be a bit disappointing if one of your tickets comes up in the draws you don't play in so maybe better to choose different numbers each time you play instead. 
__________________
The secret NASA doesn't want you to know  God makes rockets work in space. 

30th January 2012, 05:55 PM  #12 
Philosopher
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,620

I figure the longer I go without ever once participating in the lottery, the better the odds are that the day I do I will be the winner of hundreds of millions of dollars. Yep.

30th January 2012, 05:57 PM  #13 
formerly skeptigirl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 61,438


30th January 2012, 06:00 PM  #14 
NWO Kitty Wrangler
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,789


__________________
Obviously, that means cats are indeed evil and that ownership or display of a feline is an overt declaration of one's affiliation with dark forces.  Cl1mh4224rd 

30th January 2012, 06:02 PM  #15 
formerly skeptigirl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 61,438

There are number wheels that give you slightly better odds playing. So for example you can play 7 numbers in a 6 number game and cover most combinations so that instead of playing with 6 numbers you are essentially playing with 7. But it's expensive just to cover that many combinations so most of the wheels give you 3 or 4 numbers picked if any of the 7 are drawn. The increase in odds is so tiny however, it may not be worth the extra effort.

30th January 2012, 06:33 PM  #16 
Nap, interrupted.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 19,143

Originally Posted by alfaniner
pi = 3.1415926...19729715941700531415926095214704122509... Position 50,366,472. ~~ Paul 
__________________
Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. Susan Ertz RIP Mr. Skinny, Tim 

30th January 2012, 06:36 PM  #17 
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,241

Yep, don't play for 14 million draws and save the price of a ticket each time, then wait for the jackpot to exceed 14M and use your savings, guaranteed win, you might get unlucky and have to share it though. There was someone who did that (well not save up each draw), there were 3 winners but with all the lower prizes he still made off it.
Originally Posted by Horatius
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger

__________________
The secret NASA doesn't want you to know  God makes rockets work in space. 

30th January 2012, 06:43 PM  #18 
Philanthropic Misanthrope
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Space, The Final Frontier
Posts: 2,556

As has been mentioned repeatedly, yes, you're right, any given set of 6 numbers in a fair lottery is equally likely to occur.
What is true, however, is that any set of 6 numbers with a simple pattern is less likely to occur than one of the sets of 6 numbers with no obvious pattern. Obvious might not be the best adjective, but there are far more combinations of the (3, 8, 22, 24, 37, 45) variety (i.e. no obvious pattern) than there are of the (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11) variety. There are an awful lot of obvious patterns, to be sure, but there are far more sets that have none. 
__________________
Sandra's seen a leprechaun, Eddie touched a troll, Laurie danced with witches once, Charlie found some goblins' gold. Donald heard a mermaid sing, Susie spied an elf, But all the magic I have known I've had to make myself.  Shel Silverstein 

30th January 2012, 06:48 PM  #19 
Philanthropic Misanthrope
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Space, The Final Frontier
Posts: 2,556

If the game is fair, there's no way to increase your chances of winning aside from playing more times. Any given ticket is as likely as any other to win. I had to look up "lottery wheels," to be honest, but they just appear to be a mechanism for generating lots of lottery combinations.

__________________
Sandra's seen a leprechaun, Eddie touched a troll, Laurie danced with witches once, Charlie found some goblins' gold. Donald heard a mermaid sing, Susie spied an elf, But all the magic I have known I've had to make myself.  Shel Silverstein 

30th January 2012, 07:26 PM  #20 
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,670

I've heard that the odds of winning the lottery are about the same whether you buy a ticket or not.

__________________
It's nice to be nice to the nice. Aristotle, so far as I know, was the first man to proclaim explicitly that man is a rational animal. His reason for this view was one which does not now seem very impressive: it was, that some people can do sums.  Bertrand Russell 

30th January 2012, 07:33 PM  #21 
Daydreamer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,044

I think I know what you're talking about. Here's one I came up with years ago...
Pick 12 numbers: A B C D E F G H I J K L Play these games... Game 1: A B C D E F Game 2: A B C D G H Game 3: A B E F G H Game 4: C D E F G H Game 5: A B C E G I Game 6: A B D F G I Game 7: A B D E H I Game 8: A B C F H I If all six numbers fall within the twelve numbers chosen, you're guaranteed a 5number win. But I never play this system. The greatly improved odds on the rare occasions all six numbers fall within your chosen twelve are offset by the greatly reduced odds (compared to 8 random games) when they don't, so there's no real advantage. 
__________________
"That is just what you feel, that isn't reality."  hamelekim 

30th January 2012, 07:36 PM  #22 
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 11,063

Is a number wheel the same thing as what we call "systems" lotto?
In systems lotto you select more than 6 numbers which is equivalent to playing more lotto tickets. A system 7 is equivalent to 7 tickets (^{7}C_{6} = 7) A system 8 is equivalent to 28 tickets (^{8}C_{6} = 28) etc. You can also play a system 5 where one of the drawn numbers is a given or a system 4 where 2 of the drawn numbers are a given etc. 
30th January 2012, 07:57 PM  #23 
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,241

not entirely, your system 7 and 8 there guarantee the jackpot if the 6 numbers appear within the 7 or 8, most wheels are designed to give the lower prizes, like guaranteeing 3 or 4 numbers in one line if the 6 drawn numbers are from something like a pool of 18 numbers, and yes, they can also have key numbers included.
Here's one way of making money off wheeling: http://www.lotterywheels.com/wheel_list.htm#6 
__________________
The secret NASA doesn't want you to know  God makes rockets work in space. 

30th January 2012, 08:11 PM  #24 
Daydreamer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,044


__________________
"That is just what you feel, that isn't reality."  hamelekim 

30th January 2012, 08:14 PM  #25 
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,241


__________________
The secret NASA doesn't want you to know  God makes rockets work in space. 

30th January 2012, 08:17 PM  #26 
lorcutus.tolere
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 25,327

I think I might have a theory on why people find this so hard to believe. Obviously, the odds of drawing any specific set of numbers is identical to drawing any other specific set of numbers and I think people understand this. At the same time, I think people understand that the odds are much lower of drawing a "specific set" than a "random set". (This relates to the birthday paradox). Indeed with a game like Lotto the odds of drawing "any random set" are 1, whereas the odds of drawing a specific set are very very small. I think where people come undone is that they think of a set with a clear pattern as "specific" but if they randomly select numbers, they think of it in terms of "any random set". Thus think their set has greater chance than a specific set with a recognised pattern. Of course, the moment you have a set, whether selected from a pattern or selected at random, it becomes a specific set, and therefore has equal odds of being drawn. I think a lot of people can't get this distinction through their head (indeed, it's the reason behind the birthday paradox). It's kind of like people who refer to the statistical probability of an event that already happened and use it to argue that the event didn't happen (i.e. something else happened). This is quite popular with conspiracy theorists. 
__________________
O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tęde keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi. A fan of fantasy? Check out Project Dreamforge. 

30th January 2012, 08:31 PM  #27 
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 954

4 years ago this combination came out at lotoquébec's 649.
23, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45 http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/5715/loto.jpg Normaly the prize in the 5/6+ category is shared by 23 persons. That week 239 persons had to share the 5/6+ prize. That proves, I guess, that a lot of people choose consecutive numbers and that this method is worse that choosing random numbers. 
30th January 2012, 08:41 PM  #28 
Agave Wine Connoisseur
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,687


__________________
" What if the Hokey Pokey is what it's all about? " Prove your computer is not a wimp ! Join Team 13232 ! 

30th January 2012, 08:42 PM  #29 
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 11,063

http://www.lotterywheels.com/informa...ling%20system?
Now I get it. A "full wheel" is indeed equivalent to "systems" lotto while an "abbreviated" wheel doesn't include all combinations. 
30th January 2012, 08:47 PM  #30 
Skeptical about skeptics
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: 31°57'S 115°57'E
Posts: 11,063

It's the same reasoning that people think that the odds of tossing 6 heads in a row is less than tossing 5 heads and 1 tail. This is true if it doesn't matter which toss is the tail.
However, tossing 5 heads followed by 1 tail is the same as tossing 5 heads followed by 1 head. 
30th January 2012, 08:53 PM  #31 
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 253


30th January 2012, 08:57 PM  #32 
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 954


30th January 2012, 10:06 PM  #33 
formerly skeptigirl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 61,438


30th January 2012, 10:07 PM  #34 
formerly skeptigirl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 61,438


30th January 2012, 10:08 PM  #35 
formerly skeptigirl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 61,438


30th January 2012, 10:16 PM  #36 
formerly skeptigirl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 61,438

(Are you sure about your wheel? Because getting 5 numbers in 8 games of 12 numbers seems much better odds than I recall. We have a 6 number game and I believe one can play 7 numbers and guarantee 4 with 4 plays. But never mind that question, I'll take your word for it for this discussion that your wheel is correct.)
Anyway, let's think about this. In each of the 8 games you have an equal chance of winning be it 5 numbers or 6. So that would suggest you have the same odds as a quick pick. But you are playing 12 numbers rather than 6 numbers. I do believe that gives one better odds. 
30th January 2012, 10:19 PM  #37 
formerly skeptigirl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 61,438


30th January 2012, 10:21 PM  #38 
formerly skeptigirl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 61,438


30th January 2012, 10:29 PM  #39 
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,831

I don't think that can be right.
There are 792 combinations of 5 choices represented by the 12 numbers. Each Game you pick covers only 6 combinations of 5 choices, giving you at most 48 choices for the eight games. Unless I've missed something here, you can cover eight numbers with ten games, or seven numbers with four games. You can't cover twelve numbers with eight games. EDIT: I realized my mistake. Of the 792 combinations, six of them will be represented in the lotto draw. So you only need to cover, optimally, 132 combinations, which means you can do it picking just 22 games. Similarly, you can theoretically cover ten numbers with eight games. That factor of 6 really makes a difference. 
31st January 2012, 04:54 AM  #40 
Daydreamer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,044

Sorry, I got a 9 number system mixed up with a 12 number system  the absence of J, K and L in the games should have tipped me off to the mistake. I should have written...
Pick 9 numbers: A B C D E F G H I Play these games... Game 1: A B C D E F Game 2: A B C D G H Game 3: A B E F G H Game 4: C D E F G H Game 5: A B C E G I Game 6: A B D F G I Game 7: A B D E H I Game 8: A B C F H I If all six numbers fall within the nine numbers chosen, you're guaranteed a 5number win. 
__________________
"That is just what you feel, that isn't reality."  hamelekim 

Bookmarks 
Thread Tools  

