gnome
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2001
- Messages
- 14,853
We've heard the charge before... so and so is "Politicizing" 9-11, or "Politicizing" the abuse of Iraqi prisoners, and so forth...
I want to throw out a semantic point--is this always wrong?
At its core, "Politics" refers to how a group determines policy. So, in a sense, if someone brings up recent controversial/tragic/horrifying events, and uses them to open up a discussion of whether a change in policy, or a change in policy makers, is needed... that is "politicizing" it, but very necessary.
What seems wrong is exploiting the events to take cheap shots or emotional appeals against one's political opponents--for example, if anyone did this, showing the face of a dead victim of 9-11, and asking "Would (insert name of victim here) want Kerry to be president?"
Having the same term for both clouds the issue. Why not simply refer to the former as "politicizing"... with no pejorative meaning, and the latter as "exploiting"?
I want to throw out a semantic point--is this always wrong?
At its core, "Politics" refers to how a group determines policy. So, in a sense, if someone brings up recent controversial/tragic/horrifying events, and uses them to open up a discussion of whether a change in policy, or a change in policy makers, is needed... that is "politicizing" it, but very necessary.
What seems wrong is exploiting the events to take cheap shots or emotional appeals against one's political opponents--for example, if anyone did this, showing the face of a dead victim of 9-11, and asking "Would (insert name of victim here) want Kerry to be president?"
Having the same term for both clouds the issue. Why not simply refer to the former as "politicizing"... with no pejorative meaning, and the latter as "exploiting"?