Faked footage of Apollo astronauts being halfway to the moon

Status
Not open for further replies.

FatFreddy88

Critical Thinker
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
388
Collins' jacket corner bounces up and down the way it would in gravity when they were supposed to be halfway to the moon in this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fqdB1b53jc
(00:52 time mark)

It moves in the same manner that the corners of this guys' jacket move.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTNGNW5Evs4
(00:14 time mark)

The corner goes up, stops, and goes back down the way it would in gravity. There's no identifiable force making it go back down except for gravity.

The movement of Collins' jacket corner is very different from that of the straps in this clip which is in zero-G.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ofwzby1c7o
(3:17 time mark)

This footage in zero-G shows jacket corners moving quite differently from the way Collins' jacket corner moved.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4

They obviously faked some of the footage of the Apollo 11 astronauts' being halfway to the moon. This closes the whole case by itself. They never went to the moon.

Edited by LashL: 
Removed link spam


When I make several posts in one sitting, the posts in which I made my main points usually get deleted so I'll only be making one post per day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Collins' jacket corner bounces up and down the way.....

....it would in weightlessness, when being struck by something repeatedly.

Why don't you tell us how you are qualified to determine what is and isn't weightless footage?

You asked this identical question before and it was answered, this is just spam. The guy on the political forum gave one of the most complete answers to this stupidity. This is five years and counting of the same posts.

Mind boggling dedication to woo.

http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/2011/06/apollo-11-michael-collins-jacket.html

The first video just tears you a new one...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NkijOFUnu0
 
Last edited:
Haven't you posted these claims before?


Here, for example.
And here.
And here.
And here.
And here.
And here.
And here.
And here.
And here.


And that's just a small selection of the results a search returned.

I make 3 observations:
1) You are as obsessed with Collins' jacket as Patrcik1000 is with poop.
2) You have ignored the times when members of this forum have explained to you why you're wrong.
3) You continue to spam the same thing across the internet, and are plainly not interested in an exchange of ideas, only sycophantic nods.
 
DavidC, since you are only going to make one post per day, and you have posted this same drivel - and been debunked - many times before, I suggest that in tomorrow's post you either provide evidence that Jay, I, and others here do not believe what we're saying - or retract the claim and apologize.
 
DavidC, since you are only going to make one post per day, and you have posted this same drivel - and been debunked - many times before, I suggest that in tomorrow's post you either provide evidence that Jay, I, and others here do not believe what we're saying - or retract the claim and apologize.
I already have.
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=125628

Let's see if this gets deleted.
 
I should have included this in post #1. That guy doesn't even believe his own arguments. That blog of his was just an attempt to obfuscate the anomaly. He also destroyed his credibility by trying to obfuscate the evidence that the Chinese spacewalk was faked. Read about it here.
http://www.politicalforum.com/moon-...20-1969-sir-questions-sir-13.html#post4779133

Wtf? You want to assess somebody's credibility by using the yardstick of an even more stupid conspiracy theory??? One which you lovingly embrace with staggering gullibility:jaw-dropp:
 
Thread closed. There is currently a [ Moderated ] thread for Apollo Hoax discussion. Please take it there.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom