The article pulls quotes from an interview with Peter Sauer. I can sort of imagine how this interview actually went and was edited:
Interviewer: "Tell me about this technology."
"This sounds like a perpetual motion machine, which is impossible according to the laws of physics. These people are probably crackpots and should be ignored. These days, mostly you hear about perpetual motion from some sort of penny-stock swindler. Or maybe from amateurs who have misdiagnosed their own garage inventions. Like, some moron builds a wheel that spins for a long time, and thinks it's powering itself, but when you get into the details, you find out there’s a constant injection of energy at certain levels. Maybe they’re small, but over time, they’re not zero."
Interviewer: "But they say they're making 30 kW of electricity. Doesn't that change the world?"
"They're probably lying and you should say so in your article."
Interviewer. "Suppose it was real. What would it mean for global warming?"
"Not much. 30 kilowatts is down in the almost noise level of production."
Interviewer. "Really? If someone offered you a no-cost 30kW generator, how could that not be a good thing?"
"I really hope your article will make clear that these are probably scammers."
Interviewer: "I just need one quote on this, please."
"Fine, whatever. Forgetting about this Brazilian scam for a moment; energy is all about economics these days. If someone can demonstrate 30 kilowatts for free, that sounds like an interesting concept that we should hear about. Like, if you had an organic solar panel that was as cheap as a sheet of paper, that'd be interesting."