I recently saw a tv show, who's basic premise was that the inquiry into the twin towers collapse, was that the commission failed to take into account the massive amounts of aluminium injected into the buildings in the form of the two planes.
apart from the fact that I was totally ignorant of the fact that aluminium is explosive under the right conditions, it appeared to provide a logical explanation
hiw likely is this to be at least a partial explanation?
apart from the fact that I was totally ignorant of the fact that aluminium is explosive under the right conditions, it appeared to provide a logical explanation
hiw likely is this to be at least a partial explanation?