Stephen Hawking died in 1985 and was replaced by an imposter

Slings and Arrows

Graduate Poster
Slings and Arrows
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Messages
1,743
Location
USA
"Physics has become a giant cash cow, milked straight from the various national treasuries by the usual suspects. Hundreds of billions of dollars are siphoned from the people of Europe, China, Russia, and the Americas via these fake programs. And Hawking was an important PR personality in the early 1980's, one they didn't want to lose. He was a top salesman of their various boondoggles, and he became an even better salesman once he was replaced by an impostor. Once he was replaced, his puppeteers had complete control over the product they were creating, with no fear that the real Hawking might develop scruples."

http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
 
Jango said:
Well, good thing we have you hear to continue their message as well belittle them without them knowing about it. Congratulations.
Click to expand...

Personally, I'm more inclined to believe the McCartney death. Even John Lennon suspected something was terribly wrong when he first heard the song 'Ob la di, Ob la da'.
 
Last edited:
MikeG said:
Lennon co-wrote it. He shouldn't have been too surprised by what it sounded like.
Click to expand...

John Lennon, by this point infatuated by Yoko Ono and addicted to heroin, hated working on Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da. He described the song as "Paul's granny ********".
Edited by jsfisher: 
Edited to comply with Rule 10 of the Membership Agreement.

"I might have given him a couple of lyrics, but it's his song, his lyric." -- John Lennon (All We Are Saying, David Sheff)

http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/ob-la-di-ob-la-da/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lennon & McCartney are often credited as co-writers, but apart from the early Beatles days they were mostly the work of one or the other.

As far as the OP goes, the same thing applies to Hawking as it does to McCartney: just as well they managed to find a 100% accurate body double with exactly the same talents.
 
I just watched The Theory of Everything. That fake Hawking is too young to be 72. I'm no fool.
 
Stephen Hawking died in 1985 and was replaced by an imposter
Click to expand...

As "A Brief History of Time" was published in 1988, that imposter had quite a passable knowledge of the current state of thinking in astro-physics and theoretical physics. "They" (that mysterious group), did quite well to find someone who was prepared to spend the rest of their life in a wheelchair and had such a grasp of science. Oh, and who looked uncannily like Hawkins. Well done them.
 
MikeG said:


As "A Brief History of Time" was published in 1988, that imposter had quite a passable knowledge of the current state of thinking in astro-physics and theoretical physics. "They" (that mysterious group), did quite well to find someone who was prepared to spend the rest of their life in a wheelchair and had such a grasp of science. Oh, and who looked uncannily like Hawkins. Well done them.
Click to expand...


Don’t lose sight of the fact that the originator of the ‘Hawking is dead’ conspiracy is none other than Miles Mathis -- the pi=4 guy:

http://milesmathis.com/pi2.html

Mathis has also written extensively about how John Lennon faked his own death, and is still alive and currently preforming in Canada using an alias:

http://mileswmathis.com/lennon.pdf
 
Last edited:
Slings and Arrows said:
Mathis has also written extensively about how John Lennon faked his own death, and is still alive and currently preforming in Canada using an alias:
Click to expand...

Yes leaving your wife and abandoning your children plus Beatles residual revenues after pretending to be shot dead 35 years ago makes so much sense.

Norm
 
fromdownunder said:
Yes leaving your wife and abandoning your children plus Beatles residual revenues after pretending to be shot dead 35 years ago makes so much sense.

Norm
Click to expand...

Not to mention just as you are about to release an album whose fairly obvious subtext is how comfortable you are with life right now and that things are pretty good...
 
Slings and Arrows said:
"Physics has become a giant cash cow, milked straight from the various national treasuries by the usual suspects. Hundreds of billions of dollars are siphoned from the people of Europe, China, Russia, and the Americas via these fake programs. [/url]
Click to expand...


It seems similar to the claims I frequently see that Climate Change is being hoaxed so climate scientists can get rich collecting research grant money.

All those millionaire climate scientists in their fancy mansions... :confused:
 
He does have a point in that Stephan has been talking quite about about the eventuality of alien invaders of late. I predict it won't be long before he starts talking about the Matrix.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
"Physics has become a giant cash cow, milked straight from the various national treasuries by the usual suspects. Hundreds of billions of dollars are siphoned from the people of Europe, China, Russia, and the Americas via these fake programs. And Hawking was an important PR personality in the early 1980's, one they didn't want to lose. He was a top salesman of their various boondoggles, and he became an even better salesman once he was replaced by an impostor. Once he was replaced, his puppeteers had complete control over the product they were creating, with no fear that the real Hawking might develop scruples."
Click to expand...

That poor man, doesn't he have enough problems already?

Someone should start a GoFundMe for Hawking. Money is one of the best inoculations against scruples.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
"Physics has become a giant cash cow, milked straight from the various national treasuries by the usual suspects. Hundreds of billions of dollars are siphoned from the people of Europe, China, Russia, and the Americas via these fake programs. And Hawking was an important PR personality in the early 1980's, one they didn't want to lose. He was a top salesman of their various boondoggles, and he became an even better salesman once he was replaced by an impostor. Once he was replaced, his puppeteers had complete control over the product they were creating, with no fear that the real Hawking might develop scruples."

http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf
Click to expand...

Wow. The guy who replaced him sure hit the jackpot, right ? Right ?
 
threadworm said:
Lennon & McCartney are often credited as co-writers, but apart from the early Beatles days they were mostly the work of one or the other.

As far as the OP goes, the same thing applies to Hawking as it does to McCartney: just as well they managed to find a 100% accurate body double with exactly the same talents.
Click to expand...

By the time of "Rubber Soul", the McCartney/Lennon song writing team had pretty much broken up. For legal reasons they kept the joint song credit.
 
Belz... said:
That's one of my favourite conspiracy theories. The website I read many years back was one of the most hilarious, logic-free things I've ever had the fortune of reading.
Click to expand...

John found the whole thing absolutely hilarious...so much so that the theory has arisen that he delibertly planted some of the clues to play a huge joke on the world. Only hallway plausible theory I have heard about the Paul is dead nonsense.
Those who buy into this theory point out that the timing of the hoax is interesting...that it started at the same time the Beatles were having the severe internal problems that led to the group's breakup,and the decision to start the hoax was a attempt to distract attention from this.
 
dudalb said:
John found the whole thing absolutely hilarious...so much so that the theory has arisen that he delibertly planted some of the clues to play a huge joke on the world. Only hallway plausible theory I have heard about the Paul is dead nonsense.
Those who buy into this theory point out that the timing of the hoax is interesting...that it started at the same time the Beatles were having the severe internal problems that led to the group's breakup,and the decision to start the hoax was a attempt to distract attention from this.
Click to expand...


During the height of the psychedelic 60’s (1967), when nearly everyone was getting stoned and listening to Jimi Hendrik (‘Purple Haze’), Paul McCartney inexplicably hatched the idea that The Beatles should start doing 1940’s style Broadway show tunes, complete with white tuxedo’s and chorus girls; the only missing ingredient are the top hats and canes.

Now don’t get me wrong, I really like this song, but then so did my grandmother; in fact, it was one of her two favorite Beatles tunes (the other being ‘Honey Pie’, which harkens back to the 1920’s).

'Your Mother Should Know'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP_68prpJK0

Note: McCartney is wearing a black rose on his lapel; the symbol of death.
 
Last edited:
Just a thought....if Paul died in the mid-60's....then the look alike they found for him not only looked and sounded like him...but was arguably one of the best musicians/composers of the 20th century. What a *********** find. Clearly fake Paul should be in the hall of fame and not real paul.
 
Last edited:
Slings and Arrows said:
Note: McCartney is wearing a black rose on his lapel; the symbol of death.
Click to expand...

I love conspiracy theories. For some reason, despite their perfect execution of the conspiracy, the perpetrators always feel the need to show off symbolic representations of their deeds (that only the intrepid conspiracy theorists can interpret, of course).
 
Macgyver1968 said:
Just a thought....if Paul died in the mid-60's....then the look alike they found for him not only looked and sounded like him...but was arguably one of the best musicians/composers of the 20th century. What a *********** find. Clearly fake Paul should be in the hall of fame and not real paul.
Click to expand...

AND

he was able to fool the real Paul's mother.....
 
Slings and Arrows said:
During the height of the psychedelic 60’s (1967), when nearly everyone was getting stoned and listening to Jimi Hendrik (‘Purple Haze’), Paul McCartney inexplicably hatched the idea that The Beatles should start doing 1940’s style Broadway show tunes, complete with white tuxedo’s and chorus girls; the only missing ingredient are the top hats and canes.

Now don’t get me wrong, I really like this song, but then so did my grandmother; in fact, it was one of her two favorite Beatles tunes (the other being ‘Honey Pie’, which harkens back to the 1920’s).

'Your Mother Should Know'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP_68prpJK0

Note: McCartney is wearing a black rose on his lapel; the symbol of death.
Click to expand...

Maybe not entirely true. It's hearsay of course, but I listened to a very interesting BBC Radio 4 programme about McCartney's music and how much of it was stylistically and lyrically deeply rooted in old time music hall songs. His father was a jazz musician who played trumpet and piano - that kind of music would have been in his childhood.

You might not realise, but at the time McCartney was also getting stoned and listening to Jimi Hendrix. He probably still is. Liking one sort of music does not prevent you from liking another type.

I love the line in that song is "Let's all get up and dance to a song that was a hit before your mother was born" - it came to mind immediately when I found out I would be seeing him perform at Glastonbury to an audience of people a lot younger than me.

Whoever was up on stage there did a damned fine job.
 
Last edited:
First I've heard of this Miles Mathis fellow...he sure thinks highly of himself. He got right what Leibniz, Newton, Cauchy, Feyman and others all got wrong.

I only skimmed the article on the page that was linked earlier, but I swear he said that a limit is not needed, as there is no approach to zero. Then, like two paragraphs later he mentions calculating his limit similar to some other fellow that also found pi to equal 4. But I thought a limit wasn't needed?

I'm finishing up finals this week, and then I get a whole week off until summer classes. I may have to fill my free time looking over some of this guy's wild claims, they look pretty entertaining. Does he have a math background or did he teach himself calculus with Youtube?
 
DuvalHMFIC said:
First I've heard of this Miles Mathis fellow...he sure thinks highly of himself. He got right what Leibniz, Newton, Cauchy, Feyman and others all got wrong.

I only skimmed the article on the page that was linked earlier, but I swear he said that a limit is not needed, as there is no approach to zero. Then, like two paragraphs later he mentions calculating his limit similar to some other fellow that also found pi to equal 4. But I thought a limit wasn't needed?

I'm finishing up finals this week, and then I get a whole week off until summer classes. I may have to fill my free time looking over some of this guy's wild claims, they look pretty entertaining. Does he have a math background or did he teach himself calculus with Youtube?
Click to expand...


Miles Mathis is an artist (primarily a portrait painter), a rabid conspiracy theorist, and a make-believe scientist. He does have a Bachelor's degree in liberal arts, but all of his math and science has been self taught. And though he rarely gets anything right, he is always good for a hearty laugh.

Here is his rigorous mathematical proof (giggle) that pi=4, and the NASA conspiracy to conceal this information from the public:

http://milesmathis.com/pi3.html
http://milesmathis.com/pi4.html

And his most recent comments:

Miles Mathis (April 27 said:
Another strange thing is the new promotion of Pi Day. Pi Day has been around for years, but it hasn't
been promoted heavily in the mainstream press until very recently. So why the new promotion?
Could it have anything to do with my 2008 paper showing that Pi is actually wrong in a majority of
physical and mathematical cases, including orbits and quantum mechanics? Could it have anything to
do with the fact that that paper is gaining more traction every year, despite great efforts to surround it
with noise and disinfo? Could it be because the “direct” assaults on that paper have been such
miserable failures, convincing no rational person I am on the wrong track, and in fact confirming that I
must be onto something? Why else bother responding to me, if I am just “a deluded crank.” Does the
mainstream hire hundreds of people to respond to other deluded cranks, slandering them viciously all
over the internet and trying to destroy their reputations and business contacts? No, because it isn't
necessary.

I would suggest that because these attacks on me have failed so miserably, they gave up and moved to
gambit B: simply promote Pi in “fun and casual ways” that appeal to non-scientists. They were talking
about Pi Day in yoga class today, which surprised me mightily. But that is the reach of the MATRIX: if
they can't out-argue you they just out-promote you. They will link Pi to apple pie and mother and the
flag and babies and kittens, so that when I try to take it away from you, you will react like a kid losing
a school holiday.

http://mileswmathis.com/chem2.pdf
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
So Hawking is dead and they got someone else with MotorNeurone disease(?) to impersonate him! What are the chances?!

Anyway Cluesless forum has already gone there (as you'd expect):D
 
Last edited:
Azrael 5 said:
So Hawking is dead and they got someone else with MotorNeurone disease(?) to impersonate him! What are the chances?!

Anyway Cluesless forum has already gone there (as you'd expect):D
Click to expand...

No, he's a semi-lifelike animatronic robot, like they have at Disneyland. Seriously, have you ever heard how he talks? Duh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom