ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Religion and Philosophy
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags shroud of turin

Closed Thread
Old 7th October 2015, 07:21 AM   #1
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,206
Mod Info The previous thread was getting long and suffering from loading issues, so a new continuation has been opened. The split point was arbitrary and you may quote from or link to the posts in any of the previous threads into this one. For reference, the first thread is HERE, the second HERE, and the third HERE.
Posted By:Agatha







Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
- Most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it.
Actually, if they say it can't be explained, they are not real scientists.

A real scientist would say something like "based on the data I have now, I can't explain ....."

- Which is an entirely different statement.

Hans
__________________
If you love life, you must accept the traces it leaves.

Last edited by Agatha; 7th October 2015 at 10:54 AM.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 08:09 AM   #2
Jabba
Illuminator
 
Jabba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,851
Science can't explain

Agatha,
- These are probably the best places to start.
- http://shroud.com/78conclu.htm
- http://shroud.com/78team.htm
__________________
"The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts while the stupid ones are full of confidence." Charles Bukowski
"Most good ideas don't work." Jabba
"Se due argomenti sembrano altrettanto convincenti, il meno sarcastico probabilmente corretto." Jabba's Razor
Jabba is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 08:19 AM   #3
The Don
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cymru
Posts: 22,643
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- These are probably the best places to start.
- http://shroud.com/78conclu.htm
- http://shroud.com/78team.htm
Those aren't proper scientists, they're STURP who have a vested interest in the shroud being considered authentic.
The Don is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 08:19 AM   #4
MRC_Hans
Penultimate Amazing
 
MRC_Hans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 20,206
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- These are probably the best places to start.
- http://shroud.com/78conclu.htm
- http://shroud.com/78team.htm
From the first link:
Quote:
We can conclude for now that the Shroud image is that of a real human form of a scourged, crucified man. It is not the product of an artist. The blood stains are composed of hemoglobin and also give a positive test for serum albumin. The image is an ongoing mystery and until further chemical studies are made, perhaps by this group of scientists, or perhaps by some scientists in the future, the problem remains unsolved.
The highlighted part. They do not say that it cannot be answered. Only that they don't currently have an answer.

From the second link:
(Deleted: Those who did not take part in the investigation.)
Quote:
Joseph S. Accetta, Lockheed Corporation*
Steven Baumgart, U.S. Air Force Weapons Laboratories*
John D. German, U.S. Air Force Weapons Laboratories*
Ernest H. Brooks II, Brooks Institute of Photography*
Mark Evans, Brooks Institute of Photography*
Vernon D. Miller, Brooks Institute of Photography*
Donald Devan, Oceanographic Services Inc.*
Rudolph J. Dichtl, University of Colorado*
Robert Dinegar, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Donald & Joan Janney, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
J. Ronald London, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Roger A. Morris, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Ray Rogers, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Kenneth E. Stevenson, IBM*
Thomas F. D'Muhala, Nuclear Technology Corporation*
Roger & Marty Gilbert, Oriel Corporation*
Thomas Haverty, Rocky Mountain Thermograph*
John P. Jackson, U.S. Air Force Academy*
Eric J. Jumper, U.S. Air Force Academy*
Jean Lorre, Jet Propulsion Laboratory*
Donald J. Lynn, Jet Propulsion Laboratory*
Robert W. Mottern, Sandia Laboratories*
Samuel Pellicori, Santa Barbara Research Center*
Barrie M. Schwortz, Barrie Schwortz Studios*
No medical experts? No forensic experts? No biologists? No chemical specialists? No archaeological experts?

Ah, well ......

Hans
__________________
If you love life, you must accept the traces it leaves.
MRC_Hans is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 08:29 AM   #5
Monza
Alta Viro
 
Monza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,907
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- These are probably the best places to start.
- http://shroud.com/78conclu.htm
- http://shroud.com/78team.htm
Jabba,

It really is helpful if you would summarize in your own words what your argument is. Please do not just post links without any sort of comment from you. In the past you have shown an inability to be aware of what you link to. Sometimes, your linked articles have stated something opposite of what you had intended. It is OK to post links to your sources; in fact, it is much preferred. But this should be used to support what you have to say, not be a substitute for it.

Here is what Agatha has asked:

1. Please name some of these scientists.
2. Note their area of expertise.
3. Explain what aspect of the shroud they confess to finding inexplicable.
Monza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 08:34 AM   #6
Argumemnon
World Maker
 
Argumemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the thick of things
Posts: 67,356
Monza,
- Are you sure that this is what you want me to address?
- I'll be back.
__________________
<Roar!>

Argumemnon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 08:38 AM   #7
Slowvehicle
Membership Drive
Co-Ordinator,
Russell's Antinomy
 
Slowvehicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ...1888 miles from home by the shortest route without tolls...
Posts: 17,348
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- These are probably the best places to start.
- http://shroud.com/78conclu.htm
- http://shroud.com/78team.htm
Dear Mr. Savage:

Are these more links you have not read, or having read them, do not understand? What About the Iron (III) Oxide?
__________________
"They want to make their molehills equal to the mountains by cutting the mountains down." -turingtest
"The universe did not come from nothing, it came from 'We don't know'." -Dancing David
"Cry, booga, booga, booga! and let slip the Hamsters of Silly!" -JFDHintze
Slowvehicle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 08:56 AM   #8
Jabba
Illuminator
 
Jabba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,851
Science can't explain

Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- If you pose more than one Q/C (question/comment) in your post, be sure to pose the one you most wish me to deal with, first.
- Most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it.]
Agatha,,
- Note that my original, and specific, claim is that most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it. As far as I know, the only scientist who actually studied the shroud and claimed that he could explain it was Walter McCrone.
__________________
"The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts while the stupid ones are full of confidence." Charles Bukowski
"Most good ideas don't work." Jabba
"Se due argomenti sembrano altrettanto convincenti, il meno sarcastico probabilmente corretto." Jabba's Razor
Jabba is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 09:04 AM   #9
Slowvehicle
Membership Drive
Co-Ordinator,
Russell's Antinomy
 
Slowvehicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ...1888 miles from home by the shortest route without tolls...
Posts: 17,348
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,,
- Note that my original, and specific, claim is that most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it. As far as I know, the only scientist who actually studied the shroud and claimed that he could explain it was Walter McCrone.
In addition to your contemptuous continued dismissal of Mme F-L, the "scientists" you offer cannot even agree on whether there is, or is not, Iron (III) oxide upon the sized and gessoed surface of the manifestly medieval linen...

How many of the "scientists" you list, who have "studied" the CIQ, have actually examined the artifact itself?

The "lack of understanding" of which you speak appears to be an artifact of self-selection. Did you read the link I posted for you, last night?
__________________
"They want to make their molehills equal to the mountains by cutting the mountains down." -turingtest
"The universe did not come from nothing, it came from 'We don't know'." -Dancing David
"Cry, booga, booga, booga! and let slip the Hamsters of Silly!" -JFDHintze
Slowvehicle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 09:06 AM   #10
Jabba
Illuminator
 
Jabba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,851
Originally Posted by Monza View Post
Jabba,

It really is helpful if you would summarize in your own words what your argument is. Please do not just post links without any sort of comment from you. In the past you have shown an inability to be aware of what you link to. Sometimes, your linked articles have stated something opposite of what you had intended. It is OK to post links to your sources; in fact, it is much preferred. But this should be used to support what you have to say, not be a substitute for it.

Here is what Agatha has asked:

1. Please name some of these scientists.
2. Note their area of expertise.
3. Explain what aspect of the shroud they confess to finding inexplicable.
Monza,
- The second link addresses the first two requests.
- The first link "touches upon" the third request.
- Seems to me that they provide good places to start.
- I'll be back.
__________________
"The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts while the stupid ones are full of confidence." Charles Bukowski
"Most good ideas don't work." Jabba
"Se due argomenti sembrano altrettanto convincenti, il meno sarcastico probabilmente corretto." Jabba's Razor
Jabba is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 09:08 AM   #11
Mojo
Mostly harmless
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 29,360
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,,
- Note that my original, and specific, claim is that most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it.

Yes, and that was the claim that Agatha asked you to support:
Originally Posted by Agatha View Post
Originally Posted by Jabba
Originally Posted by Jabba
- Most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it.
Could you please support this assertion with evidence? Please name some of these scientists, note their area of expertise and explain what aspect of the shroud they confess to finding inexplicable.

Please do so rather than trying to evade the issue.
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

"The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky
Mojo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 09:08 AM   #12
Resume
Troublesome Passenger
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 15,545
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,,
- Note that my original, and specific, claim is that most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it. As far as I know, the only scientist who actually studied the shroud and claimed that he could explain it was Walter McCrone.
Unexplained does not mean unexplainable. Many scientists couldn't explain spoonbending until a certain someone came along.

Also, many scientists are aware of the medieval dating, and thus the Jesus explanation is right out.
__________________
A sentimental materialization of the kind of quasi‐rural bonhomie that seemed a millimeter from actual goose‐stepping and brown‐shirt uproars of bumpkin fascism.

Tom McGuane
Resume is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 09:09 AM   #13
Mojo
Mostly harmless
 
Mojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 29,360
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Monza,
- The second link addresses the first two requests.
- The first link "touches upon" the third request.
- Seems to me that they provide good places to start.

Well, start there, then, and say how they support your claim.
__________________
"You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

"The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky
Mojo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 09:23 AM   #14
John Jones
Penultimate Amazing
 
John Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Iowa USA
Posts: 11,385
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,,
- Note that my original, and specific, claim is that most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it. As far as I know, the only scientist who actually studied the shroud and claimed that he could explain it was Walter McCrone.
None of that counts toward authenticity.
__________________
Credibility is not a boomerang. If you throw it away, it's not coming back.
John Jones is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 10:57 AM   #15
John Jones
Penultimate Amazing
 
John Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Iowa USA
Posts: 11,385
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,,
- Note that my original, and specific, claim is that most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it. As far as I know, the only scientist who actually studied the shroud and claimed that he could explain it was Walter McCrone.
You forgot the scientists who did the 14C dating. They could explain it too: It was a 14th century fabrication.

We're on the fourth generation thread of this fiasco now Jabba, and you have no evidence of authenticity that stands up to the sniff test. It's been a long time since you did anything but a fringe reset or promise to be back.
__________________
Credibility is not a boomerang. If you throw it away, it's not coming back.
John Jones is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 11:05 AM   #16
Slowvehicle
Membership Drive
Co-Ordinator,
Russell's Antinomy
 
Slowvehicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ...1888 miles from home by the shortest route without tolls...
Posts: 17,348
Dear Mr. Savage:

I, for one, would appreciate it if you would address the fact that you appear to be basing at least some of your argument on Shroedinger's Rust. Which of your arguments (the one that is based upon the presence of Fe2O3, or the one that is based upon the absence of Fe2O3) represents reality?
__________________
"They want to make their molehills equal to the mountains by cutting the mountains down." -turingtest
"The universe did not come from nothing, it came from 'We don't know'." -Dancing David
"Cry, booga, booga, booga! and let slip the Hamsters of Silly!" -JFDHintze
Slowvehicle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 11:51 AM   #17
Monza
Alta Viro
 
Monza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,907
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Monza,
- The second link addresses the first two requests.
- The first link "touches upon" the third request.
- Seems to me that they provide good places to start.
- I'll be back.

Again, here is what Agatha asked you to address.

1. Please name some of these scientists.
2. Note their area of expertise.
3. Explain what aspect of the shroud they confess to finding inexplicable.

OK, let's just start with the first name on your second link.

Quote:
Joseph S. Accetta, Lockheed Corporation
Well, that does take care of item 1. We have a name. I guess we'll assume he is a scientist. But what about item 2? What is his area of expertise?

I read through your first link, but it does not mention Mr. Accetta at all. Since your information doesn't tell me what his area of expertise is, I can't tell what in the STURP final report he may have contributed to. I certainly can't tell what Mr. Accetta contributed to the research or what he feels he cannot explain based on his particular area of study. There are 32 other names that all have the same lack of information from you.

This is why I asked you to reply to Agatha in your own words. You don't seem to have read the information you link to in order to tell if it actually responds to the question at hand.
Monza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 11:55 AM   #18
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
 
Craig4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Next door to Florida Man, world's worst superhero.
Posts: 14,613
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- These are probably the best places to start.
- http://shroud.com/78conclu.htm
- http://shroud.com/78team.htm
You know, there are a whole lot of people from the labs that did the carbon dating who may not know how the image got on the cloth, but they sure know how old the cloth is.
Craig4 is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 11:57 AM   #19
Argumemnon
World Maker
 
Argumemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the thick of things
Posts: 67,356
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,,
- Note that my original, and specific, claim is that most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it. As far as I know, the only scientist who actually studied the shroud and claimed that he could explain it was Walter McCrone.
Seriously, who gives a ****? This has nothing to do with your claim that it's authentic.
__________________
<Roar!>

Argumemnon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 12:15 PM   #20
Agatha
Winking at the Moon
Moderator
 
Agatha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 11,832
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- These are probably the best places to start.
- http://shroud.com/78conclu.htm
- http://shroud.com/78team.htm
Joseph S. Accetta, Lockheed Corporation* His expertise is in optical sensors. But he does have a PhD.
Steven Baumgart, U.S. Air Force Weapons Laboratories* I can't find him on the internet to assess his area of expertise.
John D. German, U.S. Air Force Weapons Laboratories* Can't find him either, though to be fair his surname may make it difficult.
Ernest H. Brooks II, Brooks Institute of Photography* He appears to be a photographer, but not a scientist.
Mark Evans, Brooks Institute of Photography* There are too many famous people called Mark Evans for me to be able to find him on the net.
Vernon D. Miller, Brooks Institute of Photography* Another photographer, appearing to specialise in nudes.
Donald Devan, Oceanographic Services Inc.* His expertise was in computer image analysis, but though he studied physics he does not appear to have a PhD
Rudolph J. Dichtl, University of Colorado*
Robert Dinegar, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Donald & Joan Janney, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
J. Ronald London, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Roger A. Morris, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Ray Rogers, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Kenneth E. Stevenson, IBM*
Thomas F. D'Muhala, Nuclear Technology Corporation*
Roger & Marty Gilbert, Oriel Corporation*
Thomas Haverty, Rocky Mountain Thermograph*
John P. Jackson, U.S. Air Force Academy*
Eric J. Jumper, U.S. Air Force Academy*
Jean Lorre, Jet Propulsion Laboratory*
Donald J. Lynn, Jet Propulsion Laboratory*
Robert W. Mottern, Sandia Laboratories*
Samuel Pellicori, Santa Barbara Research Center*
Barrie M. Schwortz, Barrie Schwortz Studios*

I had expected that you would have listed their areas of expertise, Jabba, as I'd particularly asked you to do this.

So I went through the first seven names (as it was Jabba's job to do this, I stopped after seven) on the list of 'scientists' who took part in the investigation in 1978, and so far it seems that 'scientist' is being used in a very loose sense; only one of the first seven has a PhD that I can find, and in any case none of their areas of expertise appear to relate to textiles, art history, archaeology, chemistry, biology or forensics.

It is not even clear from this list how many of these people actually observed or handled the shroud itself (rather than photographs of it).

The investigation that these people did took place before the carbon dating analysis; it may be that if those results had been known, the results of their investigation may have been rather different.

I don't think you have evidenced your assertion that "most" scientists who have studied the shroud 'admit they cannot explain it'. In 1978, a number of people, at least one of whom can properly be described as a scientist (but including many who were not scientists) performed an investigation. Their conclusion was that some aspects could not currently be explained, but that they suspected explanations would be made in the future. That was 37 years ago.

I do not know, of course, how many scientists were part of that group, since you did not provide that information. Nor how many scientists have been involved in investigations before or since, including the carbon dating work.

But I don't think you have met your burden of proof of showing that "most" (51%+) scientists who have studied the shroud have admitted it cannot be explained.

Nor does any of this really touch on authenticity (see the many analogies already made to demonstrate that irreproducibility and inexplicability do not support or imply authenticity).
__________________
Not to put too fine a point on it, say I'm the only bee in your bonnet. Make a little birdhouse in your soul.

Vodka kills salmonella and all other enemies of freedom for sure - Nationalcosmopolitan
Agatha is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 12:42 PM   #21
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
 
Craig4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Next door to Florida Man, world's worst superhero.
Posts: 14,613
I looked up the two faculty from the Air Force Academy. Both are engineers.
Craig4 is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 01:54 PM   #22
Jabba
Illuminator
 
Jabba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,851
Originally Posted by Agatha View Post
Joseph S. Accetta, Lockheed Corporation* His expertise is in optical sensors. But he does have a PhD.
Steven Baumgart, U.S. Air Force Weapons Laboratories* I can't find him on the internet to assess his area of expertise.
John D. German, U.S. Air Force Weapons Laboratories* Can't find him either, though to be fair his surname may make it difficult.
Ernest H. Brooks II, Brooks Institute of Photography* He appears to be a photographer, but not a scientist.
Mark Evans, Brooks Institute of Photography* There are too many famous people called Mark Evans for me to be able to find him on the net.
Vernon D. Miller, Brooks Institute of Photography* Another photographer, appearing to specialise in nudes.
Donald Devan, Oceanographic Services Inc.* His expertise was in computer image analysis, but though he studied physics he does not appear to have a PhD
Rudolph J. Dichtl, University of Colorado*
Robert Dinegar, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Donald & Joan Janney, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
J. Ronald London, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Roger A. Morris, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Ray Rogers, Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories*
Kenneth E. Stevenson, IBM*
Thomas F. D'Muhala, Nuclear Technology Corporation*
Roger & Marty Gilbert, Oriel Corporation*
Thomas Haverty, Rocky Mountain Thermograph*
John P. Jackson, U.S. Air Force Academy*
Eric J. Jumper, U.S. Air Force Academy*
Jean Lorre, Jet Propulsion Laboratory*
Donald J. Lynn, Jet Propulsion Laboratory*
Robert W. Mottern, Sandia Laboratories*
Samuel Pellicori, Santa Barbara Research Center*
Barrie M. Schwortz, Barrie Schwortz Studios*

I had expected that you would have listed their areas of expertise, Jabba, as I'd particularly asked you to do this.
Agatha,
- You're right. I didn't think it through enough...
- I'll see what I can find out.
__________________
"The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts while the stupid ones are full of confidence." Charles Bukowski
"Most good ideas don't work." Jabba
"Se due argomenti sembrano altrettanto convincenti, il meno sarcastico probabilmente corretto." Jabba's Razor
Jabba is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 01:57 PM   #23
Filippo Lippi
Master Poster
 
Filippo Lippi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,664
How unusual for you to throw out some links to stuff you haven't read.
__________________
"You may not know anything about the issue but I bet you reckon something.
So why not tell us what you reckon? Let us enjoy the full majesty of your uninformed, ad hoc reckon..."
David Mitchell
Filippo Lippi is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 01:58 PM   #24
Sideroxylon
Featherless biped
 
Sideroxylon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 18,102
Yes, but how many of this list are called Steve?
__________________
'The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool.' - Richard Feynman
Sideroxylon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 02:01 PM   #25
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
 
abaddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 16,468
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- You're right. I didn't think it through enough...
- I'll see what I can find out.
Decades of study, and you will see what you can find out?

Shouldn't you have done this already?

Didn't you check who these people were and what they claimed before?
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?
abaddon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 02:02 PM   #26
Slowvehicle
Membership Drive
Co-Ordinator,
Russell's Antinomy
 
Slowvehicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ...1888 miles from home by the shortest route without tolls...
Posts: 17,348
Originally Posted by Filippo Lippi View Post
How unusual for you to throw out some links to stuff you haven't read.
Inorite?
__________________
"They want to make their molehills equal to the mountains by cutting the mountains down." -turingtest
"The universe did not come from nothing, it came from 'We don't know'." -Dancing David
"Cry, booga, booga, booga! and let slip the Hamsters of Silly!" -JFDHintze
Slowvehicle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 02:10 PM   #27
Slowvehicle
Membership Drive
Co-Ordinator,
Russell's Antinomy
 
Slowvehicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ...1888 miles from home by the shortest route without tolls...
Posts: 17,348
Originally Posted by abaddon View Post
Decades of study, and you will see what you can find out?

Shouldn't you have done this already?

Didn't you check who these people were and what they claimed before?
...you must be new to these parts...
__________________
"They want to make their molehills equal to the mountains by cutting the mountains down." -turingtest
"The universe did not come from nothing, it came from 'We don't know'." -Dancing David
"Cry, booga, booga, booga! and let slip the Hamsters of Silly!" -JFDHintze
Slowvehicle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 02:12 PM   #28
Nay_Sayer
I say nay!
 
Nay_Sayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,321
Wait, multiple threads and jabba is on "Well if X scientist(s) can't explain it, it must be true!"...wow
__________________
I am 100% confident all psychics and mediums are frauds.
----------------------------------------------
Proud woo denier
----------------------------------------------
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens-
Nay_Sayer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 05:22 PM   #29
Kid Eager
Philosopher
 
Kid Eager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,237
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Monza,
- The second link addresses the first two requests.
- The first link "touches upon" the third request.
- Seems to me that they provide good places to start.
- I'll be back.
Jabba,
Show me on the request where the scientist touched it...

Sheesh. Much bloviate. Many evade.
__________________
What do Narwhals, Magnets and Apollo 13 have in common? Think about it....
Kid Eager is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 05:36 PM   #30
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
 
Craig4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Next door to Florida Man, world's worst superhero.
Posts: 14,613
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- You're right. I didn't think it through enough...
- I'll see what I can find out.
Not to put too fine a point on things but what the **** have you been doing when you've been studying the Shroud? You know nothing about the scientists who you claim have studied the thing. You have to get back to everyone about everything. You can't handle even the most basic questions. You did not come here ready to have a serious discussion.
Craig4 is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 05:39 PM   #31
Argumemnon
World Maker
 
Argumemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the thick of things
Posts: 67,356
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- You're right. I didn't think it through enough...
- I'll see what I can find out.
Maybe you should stop trying to find factoids that fit your belief and instead admit that you have nothing.
__________________
<Roar!>

Argumemnon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 05:50 PM   #32
John Jones
Penultimate Amazing
 
John Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Iowa USA
Posts: 11,385
Originally Posted by MRC_Hans View Post
From the first link:


The highlighted part. They do not say that it cannot be answered. Only that they don't currently have an answer.

From the second link:
(Deleted: Those who did not take part in the investigation.)


No medical experts? No forensic experts? No biologists? No chemical specialists? No archaeological experts?
Jabba made complaint after complaint about the 14C scientists employed by the Vatican having no archaeologists on hand.

Did STURP have any, Jabba?

Let me guess - You'll be back.
__________________
Credibility is not a boomerang. If you throw it away, it's not coming back.
John Jones is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 05:59 PM   #33
John Jones
Penultimate Amazing
 
John Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Iowa USA
Posts: 11,385
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- You're right. I didn't think it through enough...
- I'll see what I can find out.
This is beyond pathetic. Jabba, listen to your family when they urge you to stay off the internet. Plant a garden or something.
__________________
Credibility is not a boomerang. If you throw it away, it's not coming back.
John Jones is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 09:09 PM   #34
Sideroxylon
Featherless biped
 
Sideroxylon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Aporia
Posts: 18,102
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
Agatha,
- You're right. I didn't think it through enough...
- I'll see what I can find out.
It's clear You haven't thought any of this shroud thing through.
__________________
'The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool.' - Richard Feynman
Sideroxylon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 10:40 PM   #35
SezMe
post-pre-born
 
SezMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 22,204
Jabba, why are you studiously avoiding Slowvehicle?
SezMe is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 7th October 2015, 11:44 PM   #36
Rincewind
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ankh Morpork/Plymouth, UK
Posts: 7,532
Originally Posted by SezMe View Post
Jabba, why are you studiously avoiding Slowvehicle?
Good question.

Of course, that Slowvehicle uses common sense, logic, facts, evidence, etc, etc, [with almost superhuman politeness!] that Jabba can't possibly address has nothing at all to do with it.

But you knew that already, of course...

Last edited by Rincewind; 7th October 2015 at 11:45 PM.
Rincewind is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 8th October 2015, 03:07 AM   #37
catsmate
No longer the 1
 
catsmate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 19,127
Originally Posted by Jabba View Post
- Note that my original, and specific, claim is that most scientists who have studied the shroud admit that they cannot explain it.
This is as untrue now as it was the last time you asserted it. And as you failed to produce evidence that time I have little expectation that you'll support this claim.
__________________
As human right is always something given, it always in reality reduces to the right which men give, "concede," to each other. If the right to existence is conceded to new-born children, then they have the right; if it is not conceded to them, as was the case among the Spartans and ancient Romans, then they do not have it. For only society can give or concede it to them; they themselves cannot take it, or give it to themselves.
catsmate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 8th October 2015, 04:27 AM   #38
Peter i
Critical Thinker
 
Peter i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 334
And as it had been said a zillion times before:

If the Vatican truly believed in the authenticity of The Fake of Turin, they would make it a publicity stunt.

Independent scientists, lots of accredited laboratories, invite the press, serve canapes.
Then publish the results, showing that The Rag was very close to 1980 years old!
It would be a huge victory for the RCC (Even though the result really only would show that it was ~2000 years old, and say nothing about the rest of the story).
And all the skeptics would look like losers, because "THE CHURCH WAS RIGHT"!
Hordes of gullible fools devout believers would come to see it, and the money would pour into the RCC.
(God loves you, and he always needs more money)


But they don't!
Because the RCC knows full well what the story of the cloth is, and they are fully aware, that more testing would only show, that the miraculously wedge shaped head of jesus never touched it, because the age support the "Medieval fabricated relic"-theory completely.

As it is now, they sit on their hands, cash in the money and have no intentions to change that.
Peter i is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 8th October 2015, 05:16 AM   #39
Filippo Lippi
Master Poster
 
Filippo Lippi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,664
In JabbaWorld the RCC are part of the conspiracy
__________________
"You may not know anything about the issue but I bet you reckon something.
So why not tell us what you reckon? Let us enjoy the full majesty of your uninformed, ad hoc reckon..."
David Mitchell
Filippo Lippi is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Old 8th October 2015, 06:20 AM   #40
Argumemnon
World Maker
 
Argumemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the thick of things
Posts: 67,356
Originally Posted by Filippo Lippi View Post
In JabbaWorld the RCC are part of the conspiracy
The Cathar thought so, and look where it got them.
__________________
<Roar!>

Argumemnon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top
Closed Thread

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Religion and Philosophy

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:46 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.