• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Rothschild's Portals -- called central banks

malbec

Muse
M
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
960
ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:

Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan...
Edited by Agatha: 
Edited long list of banks for breach of rule 4. This list can be found elsewhere on the net, e.g. at http://humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.html. Please do not copypasta large amounts of material available elsewhere, but provide a short excerpt and a link.


Just saying .
Believe there are three countries remaining where he is not represented .
Must niggle .
Isn't in Panama rofl .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sure there is oodles of verifiable evidence for this.
 
I would expect the argument to go something like:

1) Ignore the "OWNED" claim.
2) Show tenuous connections between something Rothschild and something Bank.
3) Claim that the connection proves "CONTROLLED".
 
Personally I'd love to see the evidence that the Rotschilds are controlling the National Bank of Denmark :)
 
KDLarsen said:
Personally I'd love to see the evidence that the Rotschilds are controlling the National Bank of Denmark :)
Click to expand...


Or that they control the Reserve Bank of Australia:

RBA said:
As an independent central bank, the Reserve Bank is accountable to the Parliament for its actions. There are requirements in the Reserve Bank Act 1959 for the Bank to consult with the Australian Government. In terms of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013, the Governor gives its annual report to the Treasurer, for presentation to the Commonwealth Parliament.
Click to expand...
http://www.rba.gov.au/about-rba/accountability.html

RBA said:
The Bank has two boards: the Reserve Bank Board, which has responsibility for monetary policy and financial stability and the Bank's policy on other matters excluding payments system policy; and the Payments System Board, which has responsibility for matters relating to payments system policy. This governance structure is set out in the Reserve Bank Act 1959. Subject to those matters, the Bank is managed by the Governor. The Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (PGPA Act) also imposes particular responsibilities on the Governor concerning management of the Bank.
Click to expand...
http://www.rba.gov.au/about-rba/governance.html
 
KDLarsen said:
Personally I'd love to see the evidence that the Rotschilds are controlling the National Bank of Denmark :)
Click to expand...

That would indeed be skægget i postkassen


Yeah and Malbec's copied list has the name of it wrong......lol
 
Last edited:
He read it wrong.
It says the Monopoly Bank.
He read it as Monopoly of Banks.

They had a game last Christmas, there was an argument about who was going to be the little dog or the Top Hat then someone nudged the board and all the little houses got scattered. While they were putting them back a glass of wine got spilled and all the money was soggy.
They gave up and went in the other room to watch Goldfinger for the umpteenth time until someone remembered A Close Shave was on the other side and, while it's a repeat as well, everyone likes Wallace and Gromit.
 
Last edited:
Captain_Swoop said:
He read it wrong.
It says the Monopoly Bank.
He read it as Monopoly of Banks.

They had a game last Christmas, there was an argument about who was going to be the little dog or the Top Hat then someone nudged the board and all the little houses got scattered. While they were putting them back a glass of wine got spilled and all the money was soggy.
They gave up and went in the other room to watch Goldfinger for the umpteenth time until someone remembered A Close Shave was on the other side and while it's a repeat as well, everyone likes Wallace and Gromit.
Click to expand...

And Wallace & Gromit probably own all those banks anyway...
 
What I want to know is who controls the $2 million (billion?) "bond" that supposedly was created in my corporate name (ALL CAPS) when I was born (as the Freeman on the Land tell me)? I would love to find out who I can ask for some withdrawal slips for this account.

Also as to the Rothchilds: I know that there is a wealthy family by this name, although they don't seem to make even the top ten list (http://www.therichest.com/rich-list/world/the-top-10-richest-families-in-the-world/?view=all). Presumably they are keeping it all secret? But I also knew quite a few poor or middle class Rothchild's growing up. Do they also own some part of these banks but just don't know it? Should I tell them?
 
Malbec said:
ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:

[...]
United Kingdom: Bank of England
[...]
Click to expand...

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England

The Bank [of England] was privately owned by stockholders from its foundation in 1694 until nationalised in 1946. [nationalised=wholly owned by the state]

In 1998, it became an independent public organisation, wholly owned by the Treasury Solicitor [whoever is at the head of the Government Legal Department, currently Jonathan Jones, but it's the office that owns the BofE rather than the office holder] on behalf of the government.
Click to expand...

The government owns the bank.
 
Hans said:
Oh the Horror!
Click to expand...

Actually we miss him. The Great World Wide Banking Collapse was a minor blip here thanks to him (and the previous Liberal government's refusal to let our banks amalgamate so they could play with the big boys).
 
Total crap.
The Rothschilds, though still very wealthy, are,in terms of power,pretty much minor players in the Banking community nowdays.
 
fagin said:
Are portals the same as dots? And can you join them?
Click to expand...

I was chatting about this site last night at a local function and without having seen even the first comment on this thread , I was recounting the general aversion to facts , the atmosphere of deluded self importance and the complete lack of humour .
Thanks for your total agreement .
Without resorting to name calling -- far too easy --- let me just say that you make fishing seem child's play .
 
Malbec said:
Simple fact unless you bombed one last night .
Click to expand...

If it's fact, you'll be able to produce evidence. Not a cut & pasted list. Actual verifiable evidence.

Evidence is a concept you struggle with. You are going to need some education.
 
Last edited:
Malbec said:
I was chatting about this site last night at a local function and without having seen even the first comment on this thread , I was recounting the general aversion to facts ,
Click to expand...

I think you've got that wrong. We're quite partial to facts, what we're not so fond of is baseless assertion like the O.P.


Malbec said:
the atmosphere of deluded self importance
Click to expand...

Well there's one person in this thread who is refusing to engage, refusing to provide facts to back up their assertions. If accusations of deluded self importance are being flung around I'd suggest that person is the prime suspect.

Malbec said:
and the complete lack of humour .
Click to expand...

Riiiiiight so the OP was an attempt at humour :rolleyes:
 
As a post script .
I have just been talking ( Skype) with Ms T Bogush who heads up the Sociology Faculty at Grodno University in Belarus . She specialises in Deviant behaviour .
I cited her this thread and its wider background as an example of deviant behaviour but outside of the usual remit .
I told her of the list of the Rothschild central banks and my pithy link to portals which of course had her laughing straightaway .
I then started to tell her the topic replies .
The chat ended unexpectedly when her coffee went all over her . We call it the , Literal Mind Set .Or , as I see it , imagined sceptics who themselves have become Conspiracy Theorists -- silly term . But hey ho .
 
Malbec said:
As a post script .
I have just been talking ( Skype) with Ms T Bogush who heads up the Sociology Faculty at Grodno University in Belarus . She specialises in Deviant behaviour .
I cited her this thread and its wider background as an example of deviant behaviour but outside of the usual remit .
I told her of the list of the Rothschild central banks and my pithy link to portals which of course had her laughing straightaway .
I then started to tell her the topic replies .
The chat ended unexpectedly when her coffee went all over her . We call it the , Literal Mind Set .Or , as I see it , imagined sceptics who themselves have become Conspiracy Theorists -- silly term . But hey ho .
Click to expand...

What has this got to do with the topic? You are aware of Rule 11, I take it?
 
Malbec said:
I was chatting about this site last night at a local function and without having seen even the first comment on this thread , I was recounting the general aversion to facts , the atmosphere of deluded self importance and the complete lack of humour .
Thanks for your total agreement .
Without resorting to name calling -- far too easy --- let me just say that you make fishing seem child's play .
Click to expand...

Malbec said:
As a post script .
I have just been talking ( Skype) with Ms T Bogush who heads up the Sociology Faculty at Grodno University in Belarus . She specialises in Deviant behaviour .
I cited her this thread and its wider background as an example of deviant behaviour but outside of the usual remit .
I told her of the list of the Rothschild central banks and my pithy link to portals which of course had her laughing straightaway .
I then started to tell her the topic replies .
The chat ended unexpectedly when her coffee went all over her . We call it the , Literal Mind Set .Or , as I see it , imagined sceptics who themselves have become Conspiracy Theorists -- silly term . But hey ho .
Click to expand...

Twin admissions of defeat. You have made no case other than the case against taking you seriously.
 
Malbec said:
As a post script .
I have just been talking ( Skype) with Ms T Bogush who heads up the Sociology Faculty at Grodno University in Belarus . She specialises in Deviant behaviour .
I cited her this thread and its wider background as an example of deviant behaviour but outside of the usual remit .
I told her of the list of the Rothschild central banks and my pithy link to portals which of course had her laughing straightaway .
I then started to tell her the topic replies .
The chat ended unexpectedly when her coffee went all over her . We call it the , Literal Mind Set .Or , as I see it , imagined sceptics who themselves have become Conspiracy Theorists -- silly term . But hey ho .
Click to expand...
Does Mrs Bogush have the evidence you are going to provide?

Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
 
Obviously the thread was some kind of experiment or test of our reaction.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Obviously the thread was some kind of experiment or test of our reaction.
Click to expand...

... and it pruduced a result: we don't believe claptrap without supporting evidence, even if said claptrap is alphabetically ordered. There has to be some other trick to it. Mentioning a sociologist from a post-soviet hellhole might work.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom