A standard MSM response . There are hundreds of matters which MSM under-report or ignore ( these then get called CTs when discussed by honest and better informed people) . You are simply unaware of them
OK. Please link to a conspiracy theory involving Iran or Russia. Both are heavily involved in Syria, yet I see no mention of how this is an attempt to seize the oil, establish the NWO upon the ashes of the Middle East or begin the apocalypse. Then you can link to a CT that says China is covering up UFO sightings. (They have a space programme, you know).
I would then like you to tell me exactly how you were able to establish what I am and am not aware of. Otherwise it would look like you were being condescending, without any solid foundation for your sneering. And we wouldn't want that, would we?
Then we can establish how the (as you claim) better-informed people, who are at present anonymous, have built any kind of case for any of their far-fetched and fanciful theories about lizards, Nibiru, FEMA death camps and ancient races of giants. As I have said before, every single time you have linked to anything remotely resembling evidence, you have been rendered a laughing stock. The last time, about NASA's supposedly "finally admitting" the existence of UFOs and aliens, you had to resort to pretending it was just a joke.
You see, Malbec, most journalism is built on investigation rather than speculation. These CT theories are not published in major media outlets, not because there is a conspiracy to suppress them, but because they lack any substance. The Times, or the BBC, for example, won't touch them with a barge-pole because they would instantly lose any respect they enjoy. Alex Jones, on the other hand, has nothing to lose, so he can publicise any old rubbish, knowing that people like you will believe it simply because it no reputable news agency will go anywhere near it, not because it is solid journalism. This is the mistake you seem to be making over and over again.
.If you travel all over the world you will realise that CTs exist everywhere and in useful terms increase in number as a reflection of the Fascist nature of any single power block.
You really don't know anything about me, do you? Where am I now, and how many countries have I visited?
The US seems top of the list for precisely that very reason --- it has become increasingly a Fascist State and "people " are neither blind or stupid .
I have not noted any recent changes in the US constitution. Perhaps you could link to them as support for this assertion?
However , in the US there are fewer deaths and missing person scenarios involving so called CTs than there are in a country like The Russian Federation . Or , God forbid , North Korea. Hence , you imagine there are few if any CTs outside of the one major area that makes a pretence of Free Speech and transparency -- at least for matters that are deemed peripheral . But try writing honestly about HC's health for example and you would be out of a job and blacklisted faster than you could clear your desk .
By "HC", I assume you mean Hillary Clinton. What gives you the idea that writing about her health would get me fired? Has this happened to anyone in the US, never mind non-Americans (which I am) outside the US (which I am as well)?
I guess you don't do irony.