Bjarne, I actually think you believe in your idea, and are genuinely trying your best. I have not gone through your calculation in detail, for three reasons:
- I think others will do that, if they haven't already done .. didn't you already post this earlier?
- An 80% approximation is simply not good enough.
- As far as I can see, you have still not understood what a perihelion precession is.
However, more importantly, try to understand that you cannot prove stuff in this way. Even IF you had a correct formula, and got the result spot on, it would not prove anything.
Why is this? ... It is because the result is already known. Of course, once we know the result (which is based on observation), it is possible to plug some new factors in to a formula and get the same result. Anybody with sufficient proficiency in math can do that. All that shows is that you picked some numbers that fit the result.
What you need to do is to provide the formula for your claim, that is the formula for RR, stretched space or whatever else you claim. Like exactly how great is RR, how does it depend on speed and mass, etc.? THEN you can plug it into existing observations and try to show that it fits.
As already mentioned, we already have a lot of
evidence.
But we don't know what to do with that. - Or in some cases it have been misinterpreted.
From very reality small scale orbit anomalies, such as...
- Perihelion anomalies,
- Flyby anomalies
- Pioneer anomalies
- Perihelion anomalies
- Sedna’s impossible orbit / anomaly
- Hot Jupiter that should not exist billions of years after solar system formation / anomalies.
- Allais Anomalies
And in 2016 one more mysterious orbit anomaly is discovered; …
Source …
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...onal-tug-on-saturn-may-help-find-planet-nine/
Final Orbit…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mkj3Gvfp8PA
Notice this is also a perihelion
speed increment anomaly similar to perihelion anomalies and flyby anomalies.
Finally the very huge orbits (stars orbiting galaxies) we know something is wrong too...
Doesn’t matter how hard you try, our world view seems to be too narrow and stuck.
So there is a lot of
evidence that something is serious wrong.
Now the only question is how all these (and many other anomalies can adapt to a overall picture of the world.
The point is that the aspect of the new theory,...
- Relativistic Resistance - and -
- Dark Flow Acceleration,
- was for years only incoherent speculation and ended up as the now known Modified Theory of Relativity - simply solving all huge astrophysics mysteries in our time.
Relativistic resistance against motion and Dark Flow acceleration, are both subjects that finally have lead to the conclusion able to predict that ISS and Galileo 5 & 6 - anomalies, - This is the key / starting gun to uncover the nature of what really went wrong.
I think you is not really ready to understand what I am saying, but the point is not only just a simple single prediction you soon have to seriously face that you are up against, - but rather you will soon understand, - it's nothing or everything.
Either you have to accept the
whole theory, ... or nothing..
Now you have chosen nothing, but wait and see what the theory can do
Sooner or later you will have to accept its a one way ticket, - the journey ends in a dark flow and a whole new world view that you have to relate too.
Remember, if RR exists it will not only affect pioneer probes and other exotic stuff. It will affect ALL orbits of ALL planets, moons and satellites. You mist show that you can resolve not only various anomalies but all the ordinary orbits as well. - With the same formula.
Remember that, the GR influence is larger the deeper you get into gravitational field, - so is SR, - but the GR influence will always dominate and always counteract the weaker SR influence, and therefore you will in a gravitational orbit not have any left SR / RR effect / deceleration.
It took my years to reach that conclusion, and now simple and crystal clear, you cannot separate the SR and GR effects, - but only count with the difference, - which on the one hand mean GR effect is the net-result
in a any gravitational orbit. – But when leaving for example the solar system SR must dominate, and therefore also the RR effect will dominate and this is where the deceleration comes in..
