ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags !MOD BOX WARNING! , al franken , sex scandals , sexual abuse incidents , sexual harassment charges , sexual harassment issues

Reply
Old 16th November 2017, 07:45 PM   #361
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,429
Originally Posted by The Big Dog View Post
not kidding, literally the worst defense of slut shaming I have ever seen.

Post some NSFW pictures of the accuser to REALLY drive that point home....
Except I never defended any slut shaming since none took place.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:46 PM   #362
logger
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,939
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
Right... that's what I said. But thanks for your bizarro world grammatical parsing.
No actually you didn’t say that. You minimized it by strangely saying “he knows he did something” even Franken would not have said it like that.

I can imagine Franken saying, “gee I know I did something”
logger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:47 PM   #363
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,429
Originally Posted by Regnad Kcin View Post
Let me stop you after your third try and ask that, if you have an issue with a specific person's contribution, please...be specific. Vague, blanket denunciations (not to mention the faux quote in the second of your posts above) don't help address what you appear to claim is problematic.
Seconded
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:48 PM   #364
logger
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,939
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
Except I never defended any slut shaming since none took place.
Explain to me again her purpose for posting it?
logger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:48 PM   #365
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,429
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
Tweeden's interview with Jake Tapper is very good, and removes any lingering doubts I might have had about her motivations. She comes across as credible and sincere. I have immense respect for her.

And for what its worth, Franken's second apology (not sure if it's been posted or linked in this thread yet) is more articulate and heartfelt than his lame first attempt. He's admitted to what he did and is willing to face the consequences. I find that respectable too.
Good post.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:49 PM   #366
Regnad Kcin
Philosopher
 
Regnad Kcin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,515
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
Not if you think Moore's should end........

If you give one a pass, you need to give both a pass.
Do you believe a kid playing cops and robbers should be judged the same as one who steals from his mother's purse?*



*Yes, these examples are of children's actions; I understand. I'm only using them as an illustrative contrast in behavior.
__________________
My heros are Alex Zanardi and Evelyn Glennie.
Regnad Kcin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:50 PM   #367
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,429
Originally Posted by The Big Dog View Post
Uh huh. She just posted nsfw pictures of the accuser to uh... show that she would have been groped before and... therefore... walk us through it again?

Really, love to hear how her history at hooters and her nsfw pictures, you know, fit in here.

Because it seems like blunt slut shaming of the worst type.
I already walked you through it. Apparently no point in repeating the exercise when you wilfully refuse to follow. Just re-read.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:51 PM   #368
The Big Dog
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21,350
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
Correct, and neither Ginger nor I said or implied it did.
Nope just that her background makes it more likely that she was groped and the fact she was groped before and did not report it makes her not credible.

To prove it? Her are some nsfw work bikini pictures:

Nsfw bikini pictures! Yay
__________________
"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".
The Big Dog is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:52 PM   #369
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,429
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
So American Politics is coming to this:All that Matters is whether there is a R or a D after you name......
No. You really should not make such generalized accusations while never actually ever addressing anything anyone actually said.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:53 PM   #370
NoahFence
Psycho Kitty
 
NoahFence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Patriot Nation
Posts: 21,320
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
You even manage to misconstrue your own lie. Know no shame?


None of those people do. Did you see who they elected? They're truly vying to make hypocrisy an Olympic sport.

They're going to sweep the medals.
__________________
This space for rent.
In conservative heads!
NoahFence is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:53 PM   #371
The Big Dog
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21,350
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
I already walked you through it. Apparently no point in repeating the exercise when you wilfully refuse to follow. Just re-read.
Say, you got through that post without accusing me of lying.

No, you did walk us through why her nsfw bikini pictures were necessary to show that terrible argument with which you disagree.

Walk me through that.

Walk us through that will you?
__________________
"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".
The Big Dog is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:54 PM   #372
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,340
Originally Posted by logger View Post
USA politics might need to have US law referenced?
Well with groping of women in clubs, it's pretty much a worldwide problem. Talk to a few of the members of the opposite sex, you'll find that of those that go to clubs, most if not all have had it happen at some stage, yet you know what is missing? Stories on men being prosecuted for doing so. Clubs admit it's an issue and kick out the repeat offenders, but they rarely get the police called on them.

In the search I did, though admittedly limited, I found 5 cases going back 7 years (most in the UK but one in the US) where a guy was prosecuted, and in all but one case he was arrested not for groping, but rather because they got violent on being challenged.

One broke a bottle of his victim's husband's head when challenged.

One punched, knocked down, and then started kicking his victim's two female friends when they intervened.

One was thrown out but returned to the club and violently attacked the bouncer trying to force his way back inside.

One started fighting with the bouncers when they tried to remove him, and then attacked the police when they arrived (this was the US one) and it should be noted that "Officers did not charge him for assaulting the woman because they could not find her, police said."

The final one was charged with 3 counts because he was a known serial offender and got fined a grand total of 600 pounds.

Oh, and of cause in almost all cases it seems the lawyers for the defendant wrote it off and a "bit of harmless drunk groping, nothing serious."
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My Apollo Page.

Last edited by PhantomWolf; 16th November 2017 at 07:59 PM.
PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:57 PM   #373
logger
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,939
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
Well with groping of women in clubs, it's pretty much a worldwide problem. Talk to a few of the members of the opposite sex, you'll find that of those that go to clubs, most if not all have had it happen at some stage, yet you know what is missing? Stories on men being prosecuted for doing so. Clubs admit it's an issue and kick out the repeat offenders, but they rarely get the police called on them.

In the search I did, though admittedly limited, I found 5 cases going back 7 years (most in the UK but one in the US) where a guy was prosecuted, and in all but one case he was arrested not for groping, but rather because they got violent on being challenged.

One broke a bottle of his victim's husband's head when challenged.

One punched, knocked down, and then started kicking his victim's two female friends when they intervened.

One was thrown out but returned to the club and violently attacked the bouncer trying to force his way back inside.

One started fighting with the bouncers when they tried to remove him, and then attacked the police when they arrived (this was the US one.)

The final one was charged with 3 counts because he was a known serial offender and got fined a grand total of 600 pounds.
So you’re admitting that you were wrong?

I can agree that clubs don’t call the cops, but if they did, the offender would be charged.
logger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:57 PM   #374
Regnad Kcin
Philosopher
 
Regnad Kcin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,515
Originally Posted by JoeBentley View Post
Jesus the people pretending they would be having the discussion the exact same way if the only factor that was different was D at the end of the title was switched to an R is hilarious.
If I happen to have been included in your imaginary group scenario, please consider yourself corrected.
__________________
My heros are Alex Zanardi and Evelyn Glennie.
Regnad Kcin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:58 PM   #375
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 63,866
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
And that was their decision to make, same this time.
So based on a single incident/accusation and a bad joke (non-groping grope picture) every Senator or Congressperson should resign and run for reelection?
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 07:59 PM   #376
logger
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,939
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
So based on a single incident/accusation and a bad joke (non-groping grope picture) every Senator or Congressperson should resign and run for reelection?
Wow!!!

Hell must be freezing over!

Last edited by logger; 16th November 2017 at 08:01 PM.
logger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:01 PM   #377
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 63,866
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
This is kind of my point. We give people passes on their bad behaviour because it's "just a prank" and that allows it to become acceptable to do. It's time we stopped seeing it as acceptable behaviour when it quite clearly isn't.
Not everyone is saying boy on boy jokes are OK, I'm not. But honestly that photo is a non-grope grope. It's not like it was akin to the Steubenville videos.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:02 PM   #378
rwguinn
Penultimate Amazing
 
rwguinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 16 miles from 7 lakes
Posts: 10,890
The only way one can consider pictures of an individual in swimwear - or even nude, for that matter- as "slut-shaming" is if he has a real hang-up over the female (or make) form Devine.
In other words, only a "slut" would be seen in public in a bikini.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
__________________
"Political correctness is a doctrine,...,which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
"
I pointed out that his argument was wrong in every particular, but he rightfully took me to task for attacking only the weak points." Myriad http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=6853275#post6853275
rwguinn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:08 PM   #379
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 63,866
Originally Posted by xjx388 View Post
Elevatorgate involved a man who asked a woman to come back to his room. She declined. He did not force the issue, grope her or pursue any action beyond that. No harassment there, just a dude that got shot down.

Franken wrote a skit that included a kiss. He then insisted on a practice session. Why would the practice session need a real kiss? Actors talk with each other about what is acceptable in these kinds of scenes; there is consent. Marlon Brando did not obtain consent from Maria Schneider for what he was about to do to her in "Last Tango in Paris," and I'm sure you can see why that was a problem. While obviously not on the scale of the "Paris" scene, essentially the same thing happened here; Franken did not obtain consent for a real kiss from Tweeden and she did not like it. Then he took a picture pretending to grab her boobs while she was sleeping.

Now, I wouldn't go so far as to call Franken a monster. But his behavior is on the same spectrum as any other sexual harasser in the history of sexual harassment. You can argue that this was minor sexual harassment if you want to. I argue that any sexual harassment is unacceptable.

Moore? He should drop out of the race. Trump? He never should have been elected. O'Reilley and Ailes? Already given the boot and with good reason. Franken? It's time for him to step down.
First, yes elevatorgate involved something benign. But all sorts of people took the side of it being close to sexual assault, gripes about objectifying women flew, some people suggested men not get on elevators if a woman was alone on one.

Now you may see the Franken incident as worse than the elevator come-on. Fine. It was a skit Tweeden didn't appreciate. He didn't grope her in the dressing room. There are dozens of make-out skits on SNL.

I'll repeat it, it is possible Tweeden saw it differently than Franken. Tweeden is saying right now she accepts Franken's apology.

The Franken incident is not equivalent to the other incidents.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:10 PM   #380
The Big Dog
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21,350
Originally Posted by rwguinn View Post
The only way one can consider pictures of an individual in swimwear - or even nude, for that matter- as "slut-shaming" is if he has a real hang-up over the female (or make) form Devine.
In other words, only a "slut" would be seen in public in a bikini.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Umm, that is not slut shaming. Posting pictures of her in a bikini in a thread that has absolutely nothing to do with her in her bikini for the sole purpose of discrediting her is slut shaming.

This is so obvious that I am stunned that people are defending this argument.
__________________
"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".
The Big Dog is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:10 PM   #381
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,429
Originally Posted by The Big Dog View Post
Uh huh, she needed to post nsfw pictures to show whe would have had been groped before and was inconsistent, or some contemptible ********.

And the fact you disagree with me makes me lying?

The fact that she has a terrible excuse to post slut shaming pictures and claiming her work history and looks makes her a target for groping does not mean she was not being slut shamed.

Blatant obvious slut shaming. Not sure how you are missing this.

Although I get a kick out of the fact That you disagree with me makes me “lying.” Oh brother.

Post some bikini pictures. They are “relevant.”
I tell you why the google image search results are relevant:

Prior to tonight, I had never heard of Mrs. Tweeden. I read early tonight that she had been on the covers of FHM and Playboy magazines, but figured she is mostly a TV personality who also does photo shoots from time to time.

Turns out my perspective was a bit off. How did I find out? By googling her name and seeing the pictures that came up: the public image, literally, of Tweeden is that of a pretty face with a sexy body showing lots of skin in racy lingerie.

There is no shame in that! Unless YOU find it shameful.

However it could be taken as an indication that Tweeden would most likely not be a stranger to being abused by men who cannot distinguish public image from personal integrity. Would you agree she is more likely to experience being made the object of "locker room" abuse with some frequency than women with a less racy body of images in the public realm? Or at least acknowledge that such an assumption is not entirely incomprehensible? Again, this is neither defense of such abuse nor a judgement on Mrs. Tweeden, it is merely an estimation of likelihood of exposure.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:11 PM   #382
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 63,866
Originally Posted by xjx388 View Post
Surely you can see the difference between a comedic skit proposal and actually harassing someone outside of a skit?
You are asking me if I see the difference?

Pretty sure that's what I've been saying.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:13 PM   #383
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,340
Originally Posted by logger View Post
So you’re admitting that you were wrong?

I can agree that clubs don’t call the cops, but if they did, the offender would be charged.
Except that in the only US case I found (which sorry you got in too fast before I added it in edit) they didn't charge him even though they had the testimony of the bouncers, because, they claimed, they couldn't locate the victim. So no, just because they are called doesn't mean they will charge.

Now yes if the victim made a big enough stink about it and demanded that the Police do something, I would expect they would charge, I also would not be surprised to see it just go away quietly with a small fine or a warning at the most.

The fact remains that men think that this sort of behaviour, and more, is acceptable, and continue to do it without hesitation or remorse, and it's unacceptable. Whether he touched her or not, I think he needs to step down, because his behaviour was unacceptable in a leader.

And so was Moore's and Trump's and apparently a heap more if this multi million dollar fund to pay out claims is true. They all need to go, the lot of them, Rep, Dem, it doesn't matter what Letter they have, they need to be gone and if they are in a current elected position, then let's have the Voters decide their fates.
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My Apollo Page.
PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:16 PM   #384
The Big Dog
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21,350
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
I tell you why the google image search results are relevant:

Prior to tonight, I had never heard of Mrs. Tweeden. I read early tonight that she had been on the covers of FHM and Playboy magazines, but figured she is mostly a TV personality who also does photo shoots from time to time.

Turns out my perspective was a bit off. How did I find out? By googling her name and seeing the pictures that came up: the public image, literally, of Tweeden is that of a pretty face with a sexy body showing lots of skin in racy lingerie.

There is no shame in that! Unless YOU find it shameful.

However it could be taken as an indication that Tweeden would most likely not be a stranger to being abused by men who cannot distinguish public image from personal integrity. Would you agree she is more likely to experience being made the object of "locker room" abuse with some frequency than women with a less racy body of images in the public realm? Or at least acknowledge that such an assumption is not entirely incomprehensible? Again, this is neither defense of such abuse nor a judgement on Mrs. Tweeden, it is merely an estimation of likelihood of exposure.


This is absolutely the finest description of slut shaming one will ever see.

Nothing in this post has anything to do with Franken’s conduct at all. It is a blatant attack on the accuser. She is hot, she likely was groped before, and?

And nothing, the whole argument is appalling.
__________________
"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".
The Big Dog is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:16 PM   #385
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 63,866
Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
While I think that Ginger's arguments are biased and kinda miss the mark, you keep misconstruing them badly.

Ginger certainly did not shame Tweeden by referencing her well-known career in being a sexy model, as in "shame on the victim, she had it coming".

The argument is rather this: Although it is wrong, it is very likely that Tweeden has experienced a number of sexual harrassments and perhaps even assaults in her life - and very likely more than many other women her age because she is a sexy model and many men perceive her as a pin-up more than as a human being with dignity. And therefore, Ginger seems to question why Tweeden has come out to complain about Al Franken, but not about any other instances of having beem harrassed.
Exactly, thank you, even if we disagree on some of the rest.

Originally Posted by Oystein View Post
Again, I don't think that argument hits a worthy mark (there may be many reasons - perhaps there really were no other incidence worth telling; perhaps no other incidents involving significant leaders; perhaps Tweeden is only starting to come to terms with past incidents, and more will come out soon), but it is a different argument from what you have mocked, maliciously, in several posts.
That's a lot of hypothetical there. How does that differ from Franken was making a stupid joke and the skit didn't hit the mark but Tweeden has seriously exaggerated the incident?
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:19 PM   #386
The Big Dog
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21,350
Franken sticking his tongue in the victim’s mouth was not part of a skit.

But she does have a mouth, here are some nsfw pictures to prove she has a mouth:

Nsfw pictures of the accuser with her mouth;
__________________
"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".
The Big Dog is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:20 PM   #387
Minoosh
Philosopher
 
Minoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,495
Originally Posted by logger View Post
From what we know now. Franken would be charged and Moore wouldn’t. It’s that pesky evidence thing.
Pretending to squeeze someone's boobs isn't a crime, that I know of.
Minoosh is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:20 PM   #388
Regnad Kcin
Philosopher
 
Regnad Kcin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,515
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post
OK:SKeptic Ginger is doing her best to let Franken off the hook.
Thank you, that's productive. I'll try to reread SG's contributions here and see if I agree, disagree, or, most likely, land on some spot between.
__________________
My heros are Alex Zanardi and Evelyn Glennie.
Regnad Kcin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:20 PM   #389
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 63,866
Can we not distinguish between a guy who realizes he was a jerk when he was younger or even a couple years ago and Louis CK claiming he didn't know masturbating in front of women bothered them?

Is a picture of a pretend grope (and it is clearly a fake grope) the same as cornering a woman and actually groping her?


As for Franken's apology, anyone remember PZ Meyer's change of heart re his past behavior? Seems similar to me.

Last edited by Skeptic Ginger; 16th November 2017 at 08:22 PM.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:22 PM   #390
The Big Dog
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21,350
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
Can we not distinguish between a guy who realizes he was a jerk when he was younger or even a couple years ago and Louis CK claiming he didn't know masturbating in front of women bothered them?

Is a picture of a pretend grope (and it is clearly a fake grope) the same as cornering a woman and actually groping her?
Yeah, What about Louis C.K?

__________________
"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".
The Big Dog is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:23 PM   #391
logger
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,939
Originally Posted by Minoosh View Post
Pretending to squeeze someone's boobs isn't a crime, that I know of.
I don’t think you can say for sure he wasn’t touching.
logger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:24 PM   #392
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,779
Originally Posted by logger View Post
No actually you didn’t say that. You minimized it by strangely saying “he knows he did something” even Franken would not have said it like that.

I can imagine Franken saying, “gee I know I did something”
Your interpretation of what I said seems to indicate you don't understand how humans communicate or use words.

I didn't minimize anything and my posts speak for themselves.
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:26 PM   #393
The Big Dog
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 21,350
Originally Posted by logger View Post
I don’t think you can say for sure he wasn’t touching.
I can say for sure that photo does not document the entirety of franken’s conduct while the victim was sleeping on that plane.
__________________
"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".
The Big Dog is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:27 PM   #394
Minoosh
Philosopher
 
Minoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,495
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
They all need to go, the lot of them, Rep, Dem, it doesn't matter what Letter they have, they need to be gone and if they are in a current elected position, then let's have the Voters decide their fates.
Are you talking about special elections, or just the normal one that would roll around every 6 years?
Minoosh is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:29 PM   #395
logger
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,939
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
Your interpretation of what I said seems to indicate you don't understand how humans communicate or use words.
No, I interpreted your post accurately.
logger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:29 PM   #396
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,340
Originally Posted by Minoosh View Post
Are you talking about special elections, or just the normal one that would roll around every 6 years?
Specials, they can use the money they have in the sexual harassment pay out fund for them!
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My Apollo Page.
PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:31 PM   #397
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,340
Originally Posted by The Big Dog View Post
I can say for sure that photo does not document the entirety of franken’s conduct while the victim was sleeping on that plane.
You were there?
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My Apollo Page.
PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:31 PM   #398
Fudbucker
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,561
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
Not everyone is saying boy on boy jokes are OK, I'm not. But honestly that photo is a non-grope grope. It's not like it was akin to the Steubenville videos.
Don't try to soft-peddle it. When I saw it, I threw up in my mouth a little: a lech reaching for an unconscious woman's breasts with a leering grin? Disgusting. I lost all respect for Franken.

The victim says she believes his apology. Perhaps he could get off with censure and a pledge to retire at the end of his term. I wouldn't mind letting the woman choose his punishment. If no one else comes forward, we can say maybe this was a one-off of bad behavior. If there's other accusers, Franken needs to go.
Fudbucker is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:32 PM   #399
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,340
Originally Posted by logger View Post
I don’t think you can say for sure he wasn’t touching.
That's not the way it works, if you want to go legal then it's up to you to show that he was touching. I believe there is a lot of doubt to that.
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My Apollo Page.
PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th November 2017, 08:32 PM   #400
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
 
Oystein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 15,429
Originally Posted by The Big Dog View Post


This is absolutely the finest description of slut shaming one will ever see.

Nothing in this post has anything to do with Franken’s conduct at all. It is a blatant attack on the accuser. She is hot, she likely was groped before, and?

And nothing, the whole argument is appalling.
If you see a slut in those images, I think that is your true problem here.

<snip>


Edited by Loss Leader:  Edited for Rule 12.
__________________
Thermodynamics hates conspiracy theorists. (Foster Zygote)

Last edited by Loss Leader; 16th November 2017 at 10:03 PM.
Oystein is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.