Senate Trial Witnesses - who do you want to see?

The Great Zaganza

Maledictorian
Joined
Aug 14, 2016
Messages
29,295
I put the chance of witnesses in general being allowed at 50/50.

High time to send in your favorites!
 
Weird Al Yankovic. To break up the boredom.

Weird Al on the stand. Jim Carrey, in character as the guy from Liar, Liar, doing the questioning.

At this point all this farce can do is entertain us until the results we've all agree on before it even started get around to happening.
 
Weird Al on the stand. Jim Carrey, in character as the guy from Liar, Liar, doing the questioning.

At this point all this farce can do is entertain us until the results we've all agree on before it even started get around to happening.

Yeah it wouldn't make it any sillier.
 
Jerome Corsi and Rodger Stone, along with Alex Jones, and Sean Hannity.
They can Explain how Barrack Obama set this up to cover the fact that IBM punch cards from the 1960s didn't use holes and Electrical Current to record Barrack Obama's Birth. And that the Lady who designed the System of Recording Birth Certificates for the department if Statistics wasn't an African American.
If that's not one hundred percent the Gospel Truth it would mean Republicans

Made a deal with the devil, fox Fraud News, to cover up the fact that Trump thought he had more Legal justification to declair Barrack Obama a citizen, than the State if Hawaii and the Federal government solely on the basis he couldn't understand holes
In paper punch cards!

Thous this Impeachment has to be a set Up by the deep state, controlled By IBM.
 
Mulvaney, Jared Kushner, Giuliani, Manafort, Pompeo, Putin, Oleg Deripaska, also publish Trump's tax returns.
 
Funny thing is that the Republicans can call whoever they want.
I suggest they make the most of this power to subpoena their favorite actors and athletes and ask them really personal questions.
 
Funny thing is that the Republicans can call whoever they want.
I suggest they make the most of this power to subpoena their favorite actors and athletes and ask them really personal questions.

I was just trying for the Dumbest Answer possible but I consider myself defeated.
 
I think various Ukranians.

And Giulliani. I'm not sure he's relevant, but it could be entertaining.
 
let's imagine Hunter Biden:
Q: You served on the board at Burisma
A: Yes.
Q: you are not an oil man or a gas man, why did they need you?
A: As a lawyer and businessman. Burisma had some bad history in the early days of Ukraine. We cleared all that, paid the fines and got the OK for Mykola Zlochevsky to return to Ukraine. It is a legitimate business now.
Q: Really?
A: Really.
 
let's imagine Hunter Biden:
Q: You served on the board at Burisma
A: Yes.
Q: you are not an oil man or a gas man, why did they need you?
A: As a lawyer and businessman. Burisma had some bad history in the early days of Ukraine. We cleared all that, paid the fines and got the OK for Mykola Zlochevsky to return to Ukraine. It is a legitimate business now.
Q: Really?
A: Really.

Hat tip Julie Mason's show today:

Q: You served on the board at Burisma
A: Yes.
Q: you are not an oil man or a gas man, why did they need you?
A: I had as much oil and gas experience as Rick Perry, when he was appointed Secretary of Energy.
 
let's imagine Hunter Biden:
Q: You served on the board at Burisma
A: Yes.
Q: you are not an oil man or a gas man, why did they need you?
A: As a lawyer and businessman. Burisma had some bad history in the early days of Ukraine. We cleared all that, paid the fines and got the OK for Mykola Zlochevsky to return to Ukraine. It is a legitimate business now.
Q: Really?
A: Really.

LOL.
 
Democratic lawmakers and trial witnesses alike should just tu quoque the hell out of every question about Biden's eligibility about his job, about how Trump treats the media and how clingy he is with the purveyors of fake news.

Make it messy and brutal.
 

It seems quite unlikely that there was anything untoward in Hunter Biden's actions - judging from the accounts it sounds like he was acting as bid by the US government. But people can be very corrupt, so it might be that he was acting in bad faith. In which case there is the regular US justice system to investigate that. No need for a president to blackmail a friendly nation to throw dirt on a presidential rival, not to mention that such an action would be clearly unconstitutional. Simple as that.
 
It seems quite unlikely that there was anything untoward in Hunter Biden's actions - judging from the accounts it sounds like he was acting as bid by the US government. But people can be very corrupt, so it might be that he was acting in bad faith. In which case there is the regular US justice system to investigate that. No need for a president to blackmail a friendly nation to throw dirt on a presidential rival, not to mention that such an action would be clearly unconstitutional. Simple as that.

Sorry. I'm not disputing Biden's innocence. I'm just amused at the blandness of it.
 
Because there's only so many hours in my day, and watching the trial doesn't actually make my life better.
What we need to liven things up is the Scooby Doo ending where we pull the mask off and it turns out Trump was the old man from the abandoned fairground all along.
 

Back
Top Bottom