Questioninggeller
Illuminator
- Joined
- May 11, 2002
- Messages
- 3,048
Kent Hovind, a creationist who sells videos claiming there is no proof for evolution and runs a young earth creationist dinosaur-theme park, had been involved in various tax schemes over the years. As for not paying income taxes in 1995-97, the case ened on July 6, 2006.
From: http://www.ustaxcourt.gov docket # 11894-05L
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/Hovind.TCM.WPD.pdf
Some interesting parts:
An unaccredited "education."
According to another document search, the tax liens are for $540,957.24. Leaving one to wonder if anything will happen to his property which includes his dinosaur adventure land (which sits on the same property as his home).
From: http://www.ustaxcourt.gov docket # 11894-05L
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/Hovind.TCM.WPD.pdf
Some interesting parts:
Page 2 said:Petitioner apparently has a college degree from the Midwestern Baptist College located in Pontiac, Michigan with a major in religious education.
An unaccredited "education."
Page 3 said:The organizational structure petitioner established for the above activities . . . apparently was based on various questionable trust documents purchased from Glenn Stoll, a known promoter of tax avoidance schemes.
Petitioner has not filed individual Federal income tax returns for 1995, 1996, and 1997.
During an audit and criminal tax investigation that began in early spring of 2004, respondent concluded (1) that petitioner appeared to be using the referred-to trust documents as well as various nominees and sham entities and properties, and (2) that substantial revenue from various activities with which petitioner was involved appeared to constitute income to petitioner personally.
Page 4-5 said:On July 29, 2004, respondent mailed to petitioner at petitioner's address a notice of deficiency with respect to petitioner's Federal income taxes for 1995, 1996, and 1997, in amounts identical to the above jeopardy assessments.
Page 6 said:On August 13, 2004, petitioner mailed back to respondent an envelope containing respondent's June 4, 2004, notice to petitioner of tax lien filing with the words stamped on the first page "REFUSED FOR FRAUD". Also included in petitioner's envelope mailed to respondent was a letter making various bizarre arguments, some of which constitute tax protestor arguments involving excise taxes and the alleged "100% voluntary" nature of the income tax.
Page 12 said:Petitioner actually had two opportunities (upon receipt of the Lien Notice -- which receipt petitioner does not dispute-- and upon receipt of the notice of deficiency) to challenge the existence of his 1995, 1996, and 1997 Federal income tax liabilities. Under section 6330(c)(2)(B) petitioner may not now.
Page 14 said:Petitioner makes various other arguments which we have considered and which we conclude are without merit and are rejected.
For reasons stated, petitioner's motion for summary judgment will be denied, and respondent's motion for summary will be granted.
According to another document search, the tax liens are for $540,957.24. Leaving one to wonder if anything will happen to his property which includes his dinosaur adventure land (which sits on the same property as his home).
Last edited: