The Secret Life of Sir Knight

Gravy

Downsitting Citizen
Gravy
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
17,078
A new poster here, Sir Knight, has been making many interesting claims about conspiracy, assassination attempts, etc. He's been posting in the Loose Change thread. This is a place to discuss his claims that aren't directly related to 9/11.
 
2. Car set to blow up (this one was quite interesting and it was setup to look like an accident and it had worked it wouldn't have left any evidence.
Click to expand...
an accident? because cars just blow up all the time, dont they?

3. Different Car tampered with to disable the air bag and there was a micro switch set underneath the dash that had disabled the rear brake lights so it wouldn't show on the dash they were not working. The last was involving two attempts on me, one was to maybe kill me with a rear end collision with no airbag, and if that didn't do the job
Click to expand...
since when does a rear-end collision deploy the airbag?
 
Typical attention syndrome stuff. I seen it with my GF's ex's friend. He would say the stupidest stuff.

I got so frustrated and angry at him one day when he was seriously saying that the government has a secret chip in his head so when he gets paid his unemployment benefit he goes and spends it on poker machines because then the government gets it back. I told him to stop smoking pot and gambling and making up a reality for the boring one he lived in.

Another bloke years and years back was the same. Friend of an ex from so long ago and was trying to tell my girl he new all these high up people in the mafia in Australia and that he would transfer 1,000,000 to my bank account if she gave him the credit card number. Of course, by that stage, he'd said many a stupid thing, and that was the 'stay well away from here or else' kind of thing to say.

Some peoples lives are so boring and glum and the only way to get some attention is through sensational stories.

J O K E
 
defaultdotxbe said:
an accident? because cars just blow up all the time, dont they?
Click to expand...

The only way I can think of doing this is to replace parts for worn ones, so maybe a an old worn fuel hose that would split, send fuel everywhere, car goes up. Except that wouldn't work, because the wear on the part would have to match the wear on the rest of the vehicle, or at least the surrounding area. I mean, a part with 100000 miles of wear would look very suspicious on a 3 year old car, or a car that has been to the garage recently, because it'd get picked up.


since when does a rear-end collision deploy the airbag?
Click to expand...

A rear end shunt would push you into your seat, because it would accelerate you. The only real danger would be whiplash, so make sure you have a correctly adjusted head restraint, and always wear a seatbelt.

I've not actually read that much of Sir Knights posts, they give me brainache, but I saw these two quotes and thought I'd stick an oar in.
 
I've not actually read that much of Sir Knights posts, they give me brainache, but I saw these two quotes and thought I'd stick an oar in.
Click to expand...

You leave me out of this Mr Pixels.
 
Johnny Pixels said:
A rear end shunt would push you into your seat, because it would accelerate you. The only real danger would be whiplash, so make sure you have a correctly adjusted head restraint, and always wear a seatbelt.
Click to expand...



Incidentally...

According to New Zealand's 2004 Casualty and Crash Statistics whilst 10% of injury accidents were rear ends, only 1.6% of fatal accidents were rear end. Compared to, say, head-on (27.1% fatal, 6.9% injury).

Seems to me if you want to kill someone in a car accident you don't fiddle with their brake lights so someone rear-ends them.

That seems akin to yanking their wing mirror off in the hope they don't check their blind spot.

-Andrew
 
there was a micro switch set underneath the dash that had disabled the rear brake lights so it wouldn't show on the dash they were not working.
Click to expand...

What car has an indicator light that shows when the brake lights aren't working?
 
gumboot said:
That seems akin to yanking their wing mirror off in the hope they don't check their blind spot.
Click to expand...

[PSA]
BTW, you should adjust your side mirrors to cover the "blind" spot so there isn't one. Adjust the mirrors so a car travelling next to you will move from the rear-view mirror to the side mirror seemlessly. Most people adjust their mirrors to look down the side of the car, that has too much overlap with the rear-view mirror and creates the blind spot.
[/PSA]

Of course if someone rips off your side mirrors it won't work.
 
gumboot said:
Incidentally...

According to New Zealand's 2004 Casualty and Crash Statistics whilst 10% of injury accidents were rear ends, only 1.6% of fatal accidents were rear end. Compared to, say, head-on (27.1% fatal, 6.9% injury).

Seems to me if you want to kill someone in a car accident you don't fiddle with their brake lights so someone rear-ends them.

That seems akin to yanking their wing mirror off in the hope they don't check their blind spot.

-Andrew
Click to expand...


You didn't see the second part of the plan I said in the post?

Geesh, if you are going to read FINISH reading it please.
 
kevin said:
What car has an indicator light that shows when the brake lights aren't working?
Click to expand...
I have actually seen (and driven) a car that showed a computerized display of the car when you started it. Any lights that were burned out were marked on the for a little while before the display switched to speedometer and other gauges.

The blipping thing didn't work by checking to see if the bulbs lit up, though. All it did was check for continuity. A burned out bulb is an open circuit. All you have to do to fake it out is to put a resistor in parallel to the burned out (or disconnected) bulb. No fooling around with "microswitches and the right timing," as I mentioned to Sir Knight in that other thread.
 
A rear end shunt would push you into your seat, because it would accelerate you. The only real danger would be whiplash, so make sure you have a correctly adjusted head restraint, and always wear a seatbelt.

First of all, all I said was what they did, and gave some ideas of why they did it, YES if I got in a head on collision and no air bag it would have been a bad thing, but the LAST part of what I said in the post was probably the real reason, to get me on insurance fraud. If they CLAIMED I put the switch in to cut off the brake lights so some one would rear end me to collect insurance it would not be good for me.

Again if people don't read all I post what is the point to answer them?
 
Sir Knight said:
If they CLAIMED I put the switch in to cut off the brake lights so some one would rear end me to collect insurance it would not be good for me.

Again if people don't read all I post what is the point to answer them?
Click to expand...
That is the kind of convoluted thing only a conspiracy nut could come up with. If you are going for insurance fraud, all you have to do is replace the tail lights with burned out bulbs. The "microswitch" thing is a complication that no one would seriously consider. And again, all that is needed to fake out the burned out bulb detector is a simple little resistor - that can well hidden in the wiring harness of the car so that it won't be noticed.
 
Sir Knight said:
First of all, all I said was what they did, and gave some ideas of why they did it, YES if I got in a head on collision and no air bag it would have been a bad thing, but the LAST part of what I said in the post was probably the real reason, to get me on insurance fraud.
Click to expand...

They ... want to get you on insurance fraud ? Why not just kill you ?
 
kevin said:
What car has an indicator light that shows when the brake lights aren't working?
Click to expand...

Actually, quite a few. If a brake light on my 1984 Volvo burns out, when I apply the brakes a light comes on on the dashboard that tells me a bulb has burned out.

The thing that does puzzle me is the use of "a micro switch" to "disable the rear brake lights". Why a switch of any sort?
 
MortFurd said:
I have actually seen (and driven) a car that showed a computerized display of the car when you started it. Any lights that were burned out were marked on the for a little while before the display switched to speedometer and other gauges.

The blipping thing didn't work by checking to see if the bulbs lit up, though. All it did was check for continuity. A burned out bulb is an open circuit. All you have to do to fake it out is to put a resistor in parallel to the burned out (or disconnected) bulb. No fooling around with "microswitches and the right timing," as I mentioned to Sir Knight in that other thread.
Click to expand...

Oh geesh, you are partialy right, but the TIMING had to do with me checking the cars. When they were able to put in the switch and they didn't turn it on then, but LATER, not the timing of the car. YES if they had just cut the wires the CAR would have SHOWN the lights not working.
So the problem was to put in the switch into the circuit and when the switch was ON and the lights OFF/NOT WORKING ...to NOT show on the display they were not working. We checked the cars every weekend, the switch was turned on/off depending on what you consider on or off like on a Monday night. Yes they had keys to the car I found out later, had to get rid of the car eventually for other reasons.

I wish it was more simple, maybe then you could understand, I am not making this up and some of the REASONS they did things I have construed, it isn't like they came forth and said, "this is EXACTLY what I did and why". I may know EXACTLY what they did and maybe even WHEN but to know the EXACT reasons isn't always easy, well with the exceptions that they wanted me DEAD. That wasn't too hard to figure out. In this particular car the computer was pretty smart, the electrical expert said they really had to know what they were doing to put the switch inline where they did. The first guy I took it too spent 6 hours and didn't even find it and/or the problem, the second guy after me telling him what was going on found it within an hour and fixed it. And no I didn't do it to myself, it cost way to much money to straighten out and I do have the receipts etc.
 
Belz... said:
They ... want to get you on insurance fraud ? Why not just kill you ?
Click to expand...
If "they" really wanted him dead, "they" would break into his house and kill him, making it look like a burglary gone bad. But, that's too simple for a conspiracy nut.
 
Ah! I see that while composing my response a number of others got their licks in. Point made.
 
Sir Knight said:
Oh geesh, you are partialy right, but the TIMING had to do with me checking the cars. When they were able to put in the switch and they didn't turn it on then, but LATER, not the timing of the car. YES if they had just cut the wires the CAR would have SHOWN the lights not working.
So the problem was to put in the switch into the circuit and when the switch was ON and the lights OFF/NOT WORKING ...to NOT show on the display they were not working. We checked the cars every weekend, the switch was turned on/off depending on what you consider on or off like on a Monday night. Yes they had keys to the car I found out later, had to get rid of the car eventually for other reasons.

I wish it was more simple, maybe then you could understand, I am not making this up and some of the REASONS they did things I have construed, it isn't like they came forth and said, "this is EXACTLY what I did and why". I may know EXACTLY what they did and maybe even WHEN but to know the EXACT reasons isn't always easy, well with the exceptions that they wanted me DEAD. That wasn't too hard to figure out. In this particular car the computer was pretty smart, the electrical expert said they really had to know what they were doing to put the switch inline where they did. The first guy I took it too spent 6 hours and didn't even find it and/or the problem, the second guy after me telling him what was going on found it within an hour and fixed it. And no I didn't do it to myself, it cost way to much money to straighten out and I do have the receipts etc.
Click to expand...
In common with so many conspiracy nuts, your reading skills are sorely lacking. To make the display show that the bulbs as OK when they are not working, all it takes is a simple resistor. Cut wire, wire resistor to ground, finish.

Brake lights are NOT rocket science. A moron can understand the circuitry.
 
MortFurd said:
If "they" really wanted him dead, "they" would break into his house and kill him, making it look like a burglary gone bad. But, that's too simple for a conspiracy nut.
Click to expand...

No this is too complicated for the likes of you. They had lots of things they were doing, not just one thing, and destroying my credibility for various reasons was on the list. Sometimes killing someone like you suggest would make it so there would HAVE TO BE AN INVESTIGATION, and they didn't want an investigation of any kind. You keep forgetting so much, or have failed to read my posts entirely but I really hate having to repeat myself. Once things started happening, and I wasn't suppose to live beyond the poisoning but I did, I had records and other people knew things, so failures made things a little more complicated than they wanted.
And you are correct, IF YOU DON'T KNOW ALL OF THE FACTS it is hard to make proper judgments.........Oh you didn't say that.....well you should have.
 
MortFurd said:
In common with so many conspiracy nuts, your reading skills are sorely lacking. To make the display show that the bulbs as OK when they are not working, all it takes is a simple resistor. Cut wire, wire resistor to ground, finish.

Brake lights are NOT rocket science. A moron can understand the circuitry.
Click to expand...

Look you are the one that isn't exactly READING, when we tested the lights and checked out the cars WEEKLY, we had PEOPLE LOOKING at the lights, a resistor making them not work WOULD NOT HAVE FOOLED THE PERSON LOOKING AT THE ACTUAL LIGHTS........DUH????? You are the one that didn't read. I did NOT say ALL WE EVER DID was look at the DASH. That really wouldn't have been smart.......and so much easier, if that was the case they would NOT have needed to do anything but CUT THE WIRES. They knew we were checking the cars, because I am not stupid and I KNEW they were going to try something. Hey I even installed remote controlled start up in my vehicles.
 
Last edited:
MortFurd said:
If "they" really wanted him dead, "they" would break into his house and kill him, making it look like a burglary gone bad. But, that's too simple for a conspiracy nut.
Click to expand...
Can you imagine how sad his real life must be if he believes this stuff about assassins coming after him? Personally, I doubt he really thinks this is all true. I think he's just making up stories to keep us all entertained.
 
Belz... said:
They ... want to get you on insurance fraud ? Why not just kill you ?
Click to expand...


Well to answer this again, there were many reasons for what they were doing to me, and they had plans, and more backup plans, and if you had read my previous posts they have TRIED but failed to kill me in something that would look like an accident. Direct killing would give way too much credibility to what I have claimed and filed with the FBI, local Police etc.
And sometimes it is better to let someone live but strip ALL credibility from them than to just off them. But since they have tried both, the point is mute don't you think?
 
Sir Knight said:
No this is too complicated for the likes of you. They had lots of things they were doing, not just one thing, and destroying my credibility for various reasons was on the list. Sometimes killing someone like you suggest would make it so there would HAVE TO BE AN INVESTIGATION, and they didn't want an investigation of any kind. You keep forgetting so much, or have failed to read my posts entirely but I really hate having to repeat myself. Once things started happening, and I wasn't suppose to live beyond the poisoning but I did, I had records and other people knew things, so failures made things a little more complicated than they wanted.
And you are correct, IF YOU DON'T KNOW ALL OF THE FACTS it is hard to make proper judgments.........Oh you didn't say that.....well you should have.
Click to expand...
So, Sir Knight. Since you are in hiding from the evil ones, do I take it that you use TOR or JAP or someother anonymizer service to disguise the connection from which you are posting? If not, you should be aware that you can be tracked through the IP address of your connection. Whoever is after you could match the IP of your connection to the messages being posted here and discover the owner of the internet connection you are using, quite likely leading them to whichever address was used to register the connection.

You mention using a SAT connection. Are you using a satellite phone connection or a two-way dish connection a one way sat dish connection with a land line or are you using one of those fake sat systems that actually points at a tower somewhere?

In any case, be aware that whatever you are doing you can be found.

A satellite phone system can be tracked to the person who subscribed to the service. These people get big bucks for the usage of their systems. They will have made certain to have a valid address and name for whoever is using it.

Two way sat is also expensive, and no easily portable. The companies I am familiar with do the setup for the customer, so they do know exactly where the customer is - unless you can dismantle the system and set it up again on your own.

One way-sat ties you to a land line for upload, and that's an easy one to track.

The fake sat systems are limited to a relatively short range. The ISP can find out which tower you are using. And again, the companies set those up for you, so they would know where to find you.


Do you still feel safe and anonymous posting here?
 
delphi_ote said:
Can you imagine how sad his real life must be if he believes this stuff about assassins coming after him? Personally, I doubt he really thinks this is all true. I think he's just making up stories to keep us all entertained.
Click to expand...

The real problem here is that maybe you have dealt with a lot of people that cried wolf or maybe you are just died in the wool pesimists. You keep saying I THINK, I FEEL and it is all NEG. Well what if you are wrong? Do you ever really think about that?

And I dont' have to believe anything, I know it, and I not in this alone by any means another person has had these things happen to them and they KNOW I am not making this up. I am have a Private Eye that I have spend thousands of dollars with that knows the facts also.

So your petty conclusions do nothing to help me what so ever and they don't bother me because I just feel sorry for you.
 
Sir Knight said:
Look you are the one that isn't exactly READING, when we tested the lights and checked out the cars WEEKLY, we had PEOPLE LOOKING at the lights, a resistor making them not work WOULD NOT HAVE FOOLED THE PERSON LOOKING AT THE ACTUAL LIGHTS........DUH????? You are the one that didn't read. I did NOT say ALL WE EVER DID was look at the DASH. That really wouldn't have been smart.......and so much easier, if that was the case they would NOT have needed to do anything but CUT THE WIRES. They knew we were checking the cars, because I am not stupid and I KNEW they were going to try something. Hey I even installed remote controlled start up in my vehicles.
Click to expand...
So all they do is wait until after you've made your weekly check (why not daily, or before each use of the vehicle?) and cut the wires.
 
Sir Knight said:
The real problem here is that maybe you have dealt with a lot of people that cried wolf or maybe you are just died in the wool pesimists. You keep saying I THINK, I FEEL and it is all NEG. Well what if you are wrong? Do you ever really think about that?

And I dont' have to believe anything, I know it, and I not in this alone by any means another person has had these things happen to them and they KNOW I am not making this up. I am have a Private Eye that I have spend thousands of dollars with that knows the facts also.

So your petty conclusions do nothing to help me what so ever and they don't bother me because I just feel sorry for you.
Click to expand...
So, you are in fear of your life and in hiding, and choose to spend your time arguing with a bunch folks on an internet forum.

Wouldn't your time be better spent protecting your ass and not doing things that could give your enemies a lead on your location?
 
MortFurd said:
So, Sir Knight. Since you are in hiding from the evil ones, do I take it that you use TOR or JAP or someother anonymizer service to disguise the connection from which you are posting? If not, you should be aware that you can be tracked through the IP address of your connection. Whoever is after you could match the IP of your connection to the messages being posted here and discover the owner of the internet connection you are using, quite likely leading them to whichever address was used to register the connection.

You mention using a SAT connection. Are you using a satellite phone connection or a two-way dish connection a one way sat dish connection with a land line or are you using one of those fake sat systems that actually points at a tower somewhere?

In any case, be aware that whatever you are doing you can be found.

A satellite phone system can be tracked to the person who subscribed to the service. These people get big bucks for the usage of their systems. They will have made certain to have a valid address and name for whoever is using it.

Two way sat is also expensive, and no easily portable. The companies I am familiar with do the setup for the customer, so they do know exactly where the customer is - unless you can dismantle the system and set it up again on your own.

One way-sat ties you to a land line for upload, and that's an easy one to track.

The fake sat systems are limited to a relatively short range. The ISP can find out which tower you are using. And again, the companies set those up for you, so they would know where to find you.


Do you still feel safe and anonymous posting here?
Click to expand...


YES because I know things you don't. I have answers to everything you have said, like I have an address which is valid but not where I am. I do things electronically which doesn't show exactly where I am. And even though there is a small risk considering what I have been through it isn't all that much And considering I have a Sat system that is totally mobile, expensive yes, but they KNOW who I am already, the problem is WHERE I am. The people, if they found me on here would know who I am, and tracing to my IP isn't anything that would help them in itself. And I get on and off different sats, and I can be on two at the same time. All the confuses the issues you are talking about, and with all this I still don't feel safe. In my shoes you never feel totally safe, only a fool would, which I am not. And I have no land lines or anything in my name for good reasons.

P.S. I installed the system myself and what if I was in a motor home? And what if it was a 2 way up and down ......yep the one ways do need a land line. Duh..... The real problem here is that you guys already have labled me a loon which if that was the case these things you say and such would be correct, but since the premise you use is faulty to begin with most of what you have to say is pointless.
 
Last edited:
MortFurd said:
So, you are in fear of your life and in hiding, and choose to spend your time arguing with a bunch folks on an internet forum.

Wouldn't your time be better spent protecting your ass and not doing things that could give your enemies a lead on your location?
Click to expand...


Oh I am doing that, and nothing I have said on here and I am BEING VERY CAREFUL would tell anyone where I am. Again your premise is faulty which you have based all your assumptions on. Again I am sure you have not read the post where I state why I am looking on here. No one has really given me any credit what so ever. And I didn't ask for this stupid thread and have come over here to check it out. If it doesn't prove any value to me you are right, it will not last long. hiding doesn't make things go away or change, finding a way to fight back and make them go away might. Make you happy?
 
MortFurd said:
So all they do is wait until after you've made your weekly check (why not daily, or before each use of the vehicle?) and cut the wires.
Click to expand...


Well, they never knew which day exactly we would check the cars, and we checked different cars at different times. I had many cars. And I do think the one we are all talking about was a backup plan again, not the main thing they were trying. So I didn't make it easy for them and the switch was put in long before they actually used it, it was a FOR LATER USE POSSIBLE THING. See you are not giving me any credit what so ever and again you don't all the facts and you really aren't putting the pieces together properly. I am not stupid and they aren't dumb. Makes for a great chess game though.
 
Gord_in_Toronto said:
Actually, quite a few. If a brake light on my 1984 Volvo burns out, when I apply the brakes a light comes on on the dashboard that tells me a bulb has burned out.

The thing that does puzzle me is the use of "a micro switch" to "disable the rear brake lights". Why a switch of any sort?
Click to expand...

guess i haven't had enough people try to kill me. None of my cars has had such an indicator. hmmm, or they were all disabled.
 
If Sir Knight suddenly stops posting, I suppose we can assume the worst....
 
MortFurd said:
So, you are in fear of your life and in hiding, and choose to spend your time arguing with a bunch folks on an internet forum.

No I didn't expect to spend so much time ARGUING with people on here, I expected some resistance, but I expect and still do expect to find someone who pays attention and has some reasonable intuition to see some truth in what I am saying which will give me the benefit of the doubt and let me prove something in a manne which is condusive to HELP ME in the long or short run. I dont' know who I am looking for, just I am looking on here for HELP, all of which I have said in other posts which appears to have fallen on DEAD EARS.
Click to expand...
 
twinstead said:
If Sir Knight suddenly stops posting, I suppose we can assume the worst....
Click to expand...


Now that was another inconclusive and convoluted post. The worst could be many things INCLUDING MY DEATH, but don't hold your breath on that, it could be simply I find no value here, and that to me is the WORST thing that could happen. I might just not come back to this thread and then this thread would die, now for you that would be the WORST for you would not have me to beat up on.

I wonder what you do for fun with cats and other animals?
 
CTist mode: I'm just asking questions.

Delusions

Delusions are false beliefs or misinterpretations of events & their significance. For instance, a person may get accidentally bumped in the subway & may conclude that this is a Government plot to harass him. He may be awakened by noise from his neighbors apartment & may decide this is a deliberate attempt to interrupt his sleep. Everyone tends to personalize & misinterpret events, especially during times of stress or fatigue. What is characteristic of the schizophrenic however, especially during an acute period, is that the conviction is fixed & alternate explanations for the events experienced are not even considered. Usually attempts at reasoning or discussion about possible other meanings of the bumping or the noise in the night can only lead to the further conviction that the reasoner must be in on the plot, too. Arguing with a delusion only leads to further mistrust or anger. The beliefs are tenaciously held, against all reason, & they are characteristically not shared beliefs. They are held only by the person himself & by no one else.
...
Talking Nonsense

This generally occurs when a person is in the active phase of his illness. It can re-emerge sometimes when medications are too low or stress is too high. What the patient says becomes incomprehensible to those around him either because sentences are unconnected to each other, or else because there seems to be no point to the stories told, or else because topics seem to switch with great frequency. Words may take on special meanings in schizophrenia either because they trigger private associations or because attention is paid to individual sounds rather than hole words. For instance "psychiatry" may sound like "sigh Kaya tree" & the topic may switch suddenly from a discussion of psychiatry to a discussion about mystical trees. Certain words may be avoided because they sound harsh or evil. Sometimes intonations are changed for similar reasons. Sometimes language is used as an incantation to ward off threats. Difficulty making sense to others is a symptom of the acute phase of the illness. It is almost impossible to communicate with patients when they are in this phase & it is very frustrating to family.

Try to communicate non-verbally. Sometimes communication through writing works, as thoughts tend to be more organized in writing. Do not force yourself to listen & understand; it will usually lead to headache & irritation. When talking to others, however, do not speak as if the patient were absent. Do not tease or mimic him. Most people use one side of their brain for language & the other side for art or music or movement. If the language side is disturbed, it might be a good idea to concentrate on the other side & encourage patients to draw, sing, or play an instrument, to exercise or dance. These are other ways of communicating which might prove to be effective.

Like other positive symptoms, thought disturbances respond to a reduction of stress & an increase in antipsychotic medication. Preoccupations These are fixed ideas, not necessarily false (like delusions) but overvalued. They take on extraordinary importance & take up an inordinate amount of thought time. One idea often returns & returns. Frequently it is a worry about doing the right thing or doing it well or in time. Characteristically, the worry grows & becomes unrealistic. A common sequence of events is for the worry to take up so much of a person's time that the "right thing" does not get done & its not being done is then attributed to the bad motives of others. Or it may be rationalized as God's wish. OR, frequently, the person may decide he's physically unable to carry out the task.

Example of unrealistic explanation: "I can't get up because I'm paralyzed." "I'm supposed to stay in bed today because it's the Lord's day." "If I get up, I'll get hurt." These kinds of explanations sound odd to others but to the schizophrenic they seem warranted. They do not understand why others see them merely as "excuses". To them they explain the facts better than any other explanation. Sometimes these preoccupations have a mystifying character to them. They seem to require puzzling over & decoding.
Click to expand...
source: http://www.schizophrenia.com/family/delusions.html
 
Sir Knight said:
I expected some resistance
Click to expand...

Of course. Between the brake light's hot lead and chassis ground.

Why am I thinking of the refrain from Pink Floyd's "Pigs (Three Different Ones)"?

[edit] Please, SK, learn the meanings of the words you're using. F'rex, "convoluted." Using big words right is okay. Using big words wrong makes you look... well, not terribly smart. Capisce?
 
Meffy said:
Of course. Between the brake light's hot lead and chassis ground.

Why am I thinking of the refrain from Pink Floyd's "Pigs (Three Different Ones)"?

[edit] Please, SK, learn the meanings of the words you're using. F'rex, "convoluted." Using big words right is okay. Using big words wrong makes you look... well, not terribly smart. Capisce?
Click to expand...

HUH? This is the pot calling the kettle black, you failed to address the issues but insult me and MISUSED the resistance word TERRIBLY. You know the resistance I was talking about had nothing to do with the WIRING and you turned it around. And the statement to ME was a convuluted one but maybe I was thinking about your thinking processes when I said it.
 
Sir Knight said:
And sometimes it is better to let someone live but strip ALL credibility from them than to just off them. But since they have tried both, the point is mute don't you think?
Click to expand...

You seem pretty good at stripping your own credibility away. Btw, it is a 'moot' point not a 'mute point' (or a 'moo' point...spot the reference anyone?).

As someone else has already suggested, I advise you to seek professional help for your paranoid delusions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom