One thing that bugs me the most about those CTist imbeciles is that they are asking for an "international" investigation, whatever that means, but yet they're not doing anything to start it.
Who are they asking ? The Bush administration? Are they waiting for their permission or something?
What exactly are they waiting for?
What actual steps have they really undertaken to start another investigation?
Will they be satisfied with the results of the new one?
How is this investigation going to be done? Who will take part in it? How will we know it's legitimate?
My guess is that they really just like to ask questions, and they don't want the answers. They know a new investigation will end up pretty much with the same conclusions as the 9/11 Commission. They are happy with just asking questions, stemming doubt in the general population, creating dissent from utter lies and fabrications, manipulating the facts without being reprimented by the real experts. It's a nice status quo. They like to doubt, doubt is fun. Real research is not, real science and real facts aren't cool. It's like a pseudo scientist, why would he want his work peer-reviewed when he knows he's full of *****. I think the Deniers are afraid of the real experts, of the real story being true.
Sorry, I just had to vent...
Who are they asking ? The Bush administration? Are they waiting for their permission or something?
What exactly are they waiting for?
What actual steps have they really undertaken to start another investigation?
Will they be satisfied with the results of the new one?
How is this investigation going to be done? Who will take part in it? How will we know it's legitimate?
My guess is that they really just like to ask questions, and they don't want the answers. They know a new investigation will end up pretty much with the same conclusions as the 9/11 Commission. They are happy with just asking questions, stemming doubt in the general population, creating dissent from utter lies and fabrications, manipulating the facts without being reprimented by the real experts. It's a nice status quo. They like to doubt, doubt is fun. Real research is not, real science and real facts aren't cool. It's like a pseudo scientist, why would he want his work peer-reviewed when he knows he's full of *****. I think the Deniers are afraid of the real experts, of the real story being true.
Sorry, I just had to vent...
Last edited: