Docker's OKC Bombing Conspiracy Thread

Gravy said:
In which Docker will provide evidence to support this claim:
Docker said:
Incidentally, OKC was not a single truck bomb.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Not OKC again. Docker, do you think the front of this building was going to defy gravity once the transfer beam was taken out by McVeigh's bomb?

murrah.jpg


Steve S
 
Gravy said:
WTC 7 also used transfer beams in crucial areas. Docker may be experiencing some type of beam block.
Click to expand...

Gravy, General Partin is an expert in these matters. I will return to this thread periodically and expect to find your full debunking of this experts tests and analyses.
 
Docker said:
Gravy, General Partin is an expert in these matters. I will return to this thread periodically and expect to find your full debunking of this experts tests and analyses.
Click to expand...
Care to post that evidence you said you had?
 
Gravy said:
Care to post that evidence you said you had?
Click to expand...

I already posted it in the other thread. I gave you two reports by Brigadier General Benton K. Partin (USAF, ret.), former director of the Air Force Armament Technology Laboratory and one of the world’s premier explosives and ordnance authorities.

I awaiting your debunking of this experts analysis.

You always listen to experts, I am interested to hear why you won't list to this one.
 
Here's an interesting snippet from the first article.

Robert Frias, president of Frias Engineering of Arlington, Texas,
after examining the EBES, concluded: “The Murrah Building would
still be standing and the upper floors would be intact had the truck
loaded with explosives been the only culprit.” Moreover, Frias, a
practicing engineer for over 40 years and a registered engineer in
Texas, New Mexico, and Louisiana, stated: “Explosives had to have
been placed near, or on, the structural columns inside the building to
cause the collapse that occurred to the Murrah Building.”
Click to expand...
 
Docker said:
Gravy I await your thorough debunking of this. BHy christmas will do, no rush.
Click to expand...
Well, I clicked the first link and made it about 30 seconds before coming to this:
Three different explosives tests were conducted on the Eglin Test
Structure. The first test used 704 pounds of Tritonal, which is
equivalent to 830 pounds of TNT, or roughly 2,200 pounds of a
properly prepared ammonium nitrate / fuel oil (ANFO) mixture.
The Tritonal was contained in a light aluminum case and was placed outside the
structure at ground level 25 feet from the vertical surface of the
40-foot side wall. This test most closely parallels the truck bomb at
the Murrah Building and provides important parametric data for
assessing blast-wave damage at the Oklahoma City site. Besides being
external to the ETS, the aluminum casing provided a container similar
to the light shell of the Ryder truck. Like the truck bomb, the
Tritonal test attempted to effect damage to the concrete structure
with an air-couple blast wave without the help of heavy shrapnel.

By contrast, the second and third tests used steel-cased warheads
detonated inside the ETS. The second test used a standard Mk-82
warhead (equivalent to 180 pounds of TNT) placed within the first
floor corner room approximately four feet from the exterior wall. The
third test involved a 250-pound penetrating warhead (having an
equivalent explosive weight of 35 pounds TNT) which was placed in the
corner of a second floor room approximately two and a half feet from
the adjoining walls. As the photographs from Wright Laboratory
graphically show, these two explosive devices, although much smaller
than the Tritonal device, effected far greater damage to the ETS. This
disproportionate destruction was largely a function of three critical
factors: distance, mechanical coupling of the blast wave, mechanical
coupling via shrapnel, and contained pressure (due to being confined
within the structure).
Click to expand...
Quiz for Docker

How large was the OKC ANFO bomb compared to the Eglin Tritonal test bomb?

1) Half as large
2) About the same size
3) One-third larger
4) Twice as large
5) The OKC bomb was a MOAB
6) All bombs on Planet X are the same size.

​
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
Well, I clicked the first link and made it about 30 seconds before coming to this:
Quiz for Docker

How large was the OKC ANFO bomb compared to the Eglin Tritonal test bomb?

1) Half as large
2) About the same size
3) One-third larger
4) Twice as large
5) The OKC bomb was a MOAB
6) All bombs on Planet X are the same size.

​
Click to expand...

This is a government test. They were trying to show it was the truck bomb. I doubt they would use the wrong amount of explosive.

Keep digging.

Please debunk the other paper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom