Gravy
Downsitting Citizen
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2006
- Messages
- 17,078
Dear Kevin,
In October I sent you the email below, which refers to this page on your website: http://www.mujca.com/anniversaries.htm
Why have you not corrected your egregious errors? Please do so now.
Sincerely,
Mark Roberts
My reply:
My reply:
In October I sent you the email below, which refers to this page on your website: http://www.mujca.com/anniversaries.htm
Why have you not corrected your egregious errors? Please do so now.
Sincerely,
Mark Roberts
I heard back from Barrett (well, he replied as "Khidria," but I assume it's him). In a two-sentence email, he said that he would be saving my email as evidence against me, and that I would be standing on the gallows beside the traitor, mass murderer, and insurance fraudster Larry Silverstein.---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mark Roberts <[email protected] >
Date: Oct 12, 2006
Subject: Serious errors on your website.
To: [email protected]
Dear Kevin,
In reviewing your website mujca.com, I noticed a particularly baffling passage on the first page:
"9/11 insurance-fraudster Larry Silverstein, like the Poe narrator, was apparently confounded by the noise of his own lying heartbeat when he confessed on national TV to making "a decision to pull (WTC-7)...and we made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse." Silverstein's inability to get anything built on the site during the past five years, leaving a gigantic bomb crater screaming silently to the world that the WTC was destroyed by bombs, not by planes, is another, far more eloquent confession. To borrow a phrase from the Loose Change logo, Larry's bomb crater is "louder than words." Perhaps the best possible memorial would be to leave the site exactly the way it is, and hold a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the Larry Silverstein Memorial Bomb Crater.
Several corrections need to be made here:
1) "Insurance-fraudster." I am not aware of Silverstein having done anything illegal involving WTC insurance, and apparently neither are the insurance companies. If you have evidence of such wrongdoing, which would be front-page news in New York, please present it. If not, you should retract the accusation.
2) "We made that decision to pull." Kevin, this is a particularly egregious error. I shouldn't have to remind you that the quote is "And they made that decision to pull." Here is the exact quote:
"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, uh, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
With the sentence 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it," Silverstein is obviously referring to saving lives, not blowing up buildings.
"They," of course, was the Fire Department of New York, and particularly Chief Daniel Nigro, who was in charge of operations on 9/11 after Chief Peter Ganci was killed. Nigro:
"The biggest decision we had to make was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged [WTC 7] building. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt." [Fire Engineering magazine, 10/2002]
In another interview, Chief Nigro says,
"The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was [that] the col-lapse [Of the WTC towers] had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did col-lapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, 7 World Trade Center collapsed completely." http://tinyurl.com/g8c6y
In this paper I list 28 instances of the word "pull" being used by first responders on 9/11 to refer to the withdrawal of firefighting and rescue operations due to the danger presented by WTC building 7: http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.doc (doc file version), or http://www.911myths.com/WTC7_Lies.pdf (PDF version)
3) "Silverstein's inability to get anything built on the site during the past five years, leaving a gigantic bomb crater screaming silently to the world that the WTC was destroyed by bombs, not by planes, is another, far more eloquent confession."
I'll avoid the "bomb" comment for now. My paper will disabuse you of that notion. As I'm sure you know, Silverstein's new, 52-story WTC 7 has been open since May, 2006. To state that he has built nothing on the site is to ignore one of the largest skyscrapers in New York City. Delays in building the rest of the site have been due primarily to problems with design and planning that are not Silverstein's province.
I look forward to hearing from you that your site will be corrected of these errors as soon as possible. I am revising my WTC 7 paper that's linked above and would prefer not to include your name amongst those who have chosen politics above honesty and so badly misrepresented this part of the tragic story.
Sincerely,
Mark Roberts
Brooklyn, NY
My reply:
I received another two-sentence reply, which said that the information I seek is publicly available and that I should figure it out for myself.First, please identify yourself. Are you Kevin Barrett?
Next, please provide evidence of Larry Silverstein's
1) Treason
2) Mass murdering
3) Insurance fraud
You have not done so on your website or anywhere else that I've seen.
Thank you.
Mark Roberts
My reply:
And that's where we left it. If I'm being called a traitor by "patriots" like Bermas, Balsamo (JDX), and Barrett, I must be doing something right.Since the information I seek is in your imagination only, I have turned to you for clarification. Most people understand that serious accusations, such as yours against Larry Silverstein, require proof. Since there is no evidence that Larry Silverstein has done anything wrong, much less murdered people or committed treason or insurance fraud, you should retract your accusations. Beyond the legal issue of libel, it's simply the right thing to do.
Do you really want to live in a world in which an accuser's baseless, hateful ranting is an acceptable standard of evidence? Please think about that, Mr. Barrett. Do the responsible and adult thing and withdraw your accusations against Larry Silverstein. The truth demands it.
Sincerely,
Mark Roberts
Brooklyn, NY