A long post on 911blogger.com by a deranged, semi-literate loon. It's fascinating that he gets NOTHING right. These are the people who want to change the world, who brand as "sheeple" others whose reasoning abilities are vastly superior. How can such an incredibly stupid person pontificate about subjects he can't begin to comprehend??
Submitted by RemoveBush on Mon, 12/25/2006 - 12:20am.
The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories
This is a reply that I wrote to them....
I encourage everyone to do something similar.
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=A...
This article is really a farce!!!
I can tear it appart peice by peice.... Here.... Alow me!
1) The World Trade Center (WTC) twin towers were destroyed by controlled demolitions.
This is how the collapses may have appeared to non-experts, but demolition experts point out many differences:
* Demolition professionals always blow the bottom floors of a structure first, but the WTC tower collapses began at the upper levels, where the planes hit the buildings.
- Sure, but that does not mean that a building CANNOT be destroyed in this fashion. In fact, there are SEVERAL instances where DEMOLITIONS have destroyed the top part first and then blew the bottom part.
* Non-experts claim that debris seen blowing out of windows was evidence of explosive charges, but experts identify this as air and light office contents (paper, pulverized concrete, etc.) being forced out of windows as floors collapsed on each other.
- Please provide EVIDENCE that the building has that much ENERGY available to BLOW concrete in mid air into fine TINY particles. The building did NOT have that much KENETIC energy to do this on its own.
* Demolition firms had very sensitive seismographs operating at other sites in Manhattan on September 11. None recorded any explosions during the tower collapses.
- Could that be because perhaps the cores were taken out by THERMATE????? There is EVIDENCE that this happened. There were pictures of peices of the CORE standing in the middle of a pile of rubble with a 45 degree cut made to it. Your gonna try and tell me that the resuce workers worked their way through all that rubble just to cut a beam?
* Clean-up crews found none of the telltale signs of controlled demolitions that would have existed if explosive charges had been used.
- You mean like EVERYTHING being destroyed??? You mean like the concrete being pulverized into fine particles IN MID AIR??? You mean like not any substantial part of the building, of 3 buildings, not even still standing???? You mean like that type of sign??
* Cutting away walls, insulation, plumbing, and electrical conduits to place numerous charges on the towers’ structural columns in advance would not have gone unnoticed.
- You have to be kidding!!!! Thats what stairs and service elevators are for. Thats why several tenents heard unusual sounds coming from above them when there were no residents in that part of the floor??? You mean the fact that several tenents were shifted around just weeks before 9/11????
* For more information, see ImplosionWorld’s article on the WTC collapses, the National Institute of Science and Technology’s “Answers to Frequently Asked Questions,” and Popular Mechanics, parts 4 and 5.
- Popular Mechanics??? PLEASE! They are such a wite wash that they should call them selfs the 9/11 Commission Continued.
2) No plane hit the Pentagon on September 11. Instead, it was a missile fired by elements “from inside the American state apparatus.”
Conspiracy theorists making this claim ignore several facts:
* The remains of the bodies of the crew and passengers of American Airlines flight 77 were found at the Pentagon crash site, and positively identified by DNA.
- Sure! Let's see..... The government can't produce one strand of evidence that the plane hit the building, with the 80 plus video's, but you want the people to believe that they identified all of the victims???
* The flight’s black boxes were also recovered at the site.
- Yeah, and the pilots for 911 truth have analyzed the data and found the plane to be to the left and 400 ft above where YOU say it was. NTSB refuses to address this discrepency and will not talk about it.
* Numerous eyewitnesses saw the plane strike the Pentagon. Some saw passengers through the plane’s windows. Missiles don’t have windows or carry passengers.
- PLEASE! If the plane was going 560 MPH, as we are told, there is NO WAY ANYONE would be able to see people. They would have to of been watching the plane miles out, and most of the witnesses say they saw it fly over their vehicle. Nice try, next time try and make up something a little more believeable.
* Numerous photographs show airplane debris at the crash site, as was also witnessed by survivors and rescue personnel. See sections 4:57 to 6:00 of the “911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77” video for pictures of airliner debris.
- Most of the 911 truth movement people do not deny that "A" plane hit the Pentagon. Just not flight 77. The belief is that the plane fired a missle, which makes more sense by the destruction and holes left, just before the impact. Debris was not, has not, been 100% IDENTIFIED as being flight 77. The NTSB DID NOT identify the MANY traceable parts from the plane. There was ONLY ONE engine found, from a TWO engine plane.
* For more information, see “Did a Plane Hit the Pentagon?” and Popular Mechanics, part 6.
- See my previous comment on Popular Mechanics.
3) The planes that hit the World Trade Center towers were remotely controlled.
* Boeing, which manufactured the planes that struck the towers, stated that all its commercial jet transports are configured so that they can only be controlled from the flight deck of the aircraft.
- Notice how it says "configured".... This means that the plane can also be "configured" to be controlled from another source. It is software and software can be uploaded in a matter of minutes.
* Passengers onboard the flights made several phone calls. All reported that hijackers had commandeered the planes.
- And there is also voice morphing software that can simulate a persons voice. In a condition such as 9/11, people are going to ignore innomalies in a persons voice and contribute it to stress or distress.
* For more information, see “Did a Plane Hit the Pentagon?”
4) United Airlines flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was shot down by a missile.
* The cockpit voice recorder of this flight was recovered and showed that the passenger revolt caused the hijackers to deliberately crash the plane. The hijackers controlled the plane until its impact. See full transcript.
- The trasncript is MISSING 3 minutes of the recording. The plane is said to have crashed at 10:06, but the recording stops at 10:03. Again, the pilots for 911 truth have analyzed the data from the NTSB and prove that the debris feild is INCORRECT for a plane traveling at this speed and angle.
* The U.S. military did not learn that flight 93 had been hijacked until four minutes after it crashed, as recently released tapes demonstrate.
- I have to hold off on this, but I do recal reading that they were in fact informed.
* The military never gave interceptor pilots authorization to shoot down United flight 93. See article on tapes.
- Acording to one place I read, a high ranking military official states this is not the case!
* Listen to the 45-second message left by flight attendant CeeCee Lyles on her home answering machine. Click on the “Lyles” file or the phone icon in the bottom left corner of the flight 93 page.
- Nobody said that she did not leave a message.
* For more information, see The 9/11 Commission Report chapter 1, “We Have Some Planes,”pages 13-14.
- There is NO WAY that a pilot is going to give up control of his plane to someone who says they can fly. PERIOD!
5) World Trade Center building 7 was destroyed by a controlled demolition.
* This allegation was fueled by a comment by the WTC owner that, after WTC 7 was judged to be unstable, he recommended pulling a group of firefighters out of the building, using the phrase “pull it” in reference to the contingent of firefighters. For more details, see 9/11 Revealed?
- Sure...... Like Larry is in charge of the Firefighters!!! Like he gives the word as to whether or not the firemen should continue fighting a building fire. Like he does not know what the "term" means??? His whole life has been in realestate, and I am sure that in that time he has been witness to one and the termanology used in one.
* Conspiracy theorists have interpreted the “pull it” remark as slang for demolishing the building with explosives. But demolition experts say “pulling” a building means attaching long cables to a weakened structure and literally pulling it down with bulldozers and other powerful machinery – not using explosives.
- So now your stating that Larry does in fact know that the word "pull it" means to destroy a building!!! It does not matter the means to do it by! The word basically means to destroy the building.
* Seismographs recorded no telltale spikes or anomalies that would have indicated the use of explosives.
- There would not be any with THERMATE would there?
* For more information, see ImplosionWorld article, the National Institute of Science and Technology’s “Answers to Frequently Asked Questions,” and Popular Mechanics, part 5.
6) Insider trading in the stocks of United Airlines and American Airlines just before September 11 is evidence of advance knowledge of the plot.
* The 9/11 Commission investigated this issue in detail, concluding, “Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation.”
- BULL!!! There was NEVER a detailed investigation into this! They stated that "there is no need to follow the money", so what investigation did they do?
* For example, it stated, “much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American [Airlines stock] on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades.”
- Sure! What about those options that were placed Anonymously??? It cannot happen without being an "INSIDE SOURCE".
* For other examples, see The 9/11 Commission Report, “Notes” section, page 499, footnote 130.
- You mean the 911 Ommission Commission Report?
7) Four thousand Jews failed to show up for work at the World Trade Center on September 11.
* It appears from media reports that some 10-15% of WTC victims were Jewish, indicating there were no mass absences.
- No info here so no comment.
* The “4,000” figure apparently came from an early statement by the Israeli Foreign Ministry that some “4,000 Israelis” were believed to be in the New York and Washington areas, where the attacks occurred. This figure was apparently seized upon by conspiracy theorists, in an attempt to bolster the false rumor.
- Right, just like there were no text warnings to stay away from the building on 9/11?
* For more information, see “The 4,000 Jews Rumor.”
8) Al Qaida is not responsible for the September 11 attacks.
* Al Qaida leaders, including Osama bin Laden, have repeatedly confirmed that they planned and carried out the September 11 attacks.
- Sure, the "FATTY" OBL did. However, the real OBL stated just after the attacks that he had no part in it. This was the last CLEAR video from OBL. All other video's are grainy and distorted, HMMMMM.
* In an audiotape released on May 23, 2006, bin Laden stated, “I was responsible for entrusting the 19 brothers … with those raids ….”
- Like I believe an audio tape from this LYING administration.
* In a November 2001 tape, bin Laden said, “We calculated in advance the number of casualties … who would be killed …. I was the most optimistic of them all. … Due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above it only.”
- RIGHT! Here is where your story falls all apart! If their intentions are to kill as many as possible, then why not take a flight later in the day when the buildings would be completely full??? Instead of killing just 3,000 it could have been over 10,000. Very kind of the terrorists to be so concerned about keeping the death tolls to a minimum. You know what??? Only the government worries about death tolls and keeping destruction to a minimum, not terrorists.
* For more information, see “Al Qaeda and September 11th.”
- Being a VET, I know that there are planes fueled and waiting on a tarmac in many bases through out the US, and can be in the air in a minutes notice. The only way they would not be is if they were prevented by someone higher up.
Pretty strange how on this one day the government was performing so many of the samy types of exercises that were taking place that very day??? Odd that Cheney had one of the games moved from October to September 11th. HMMMMM.
Odd how that NOT ONE of the military protocals worked that day???
Odd how NO ONE was fired or demoted for the worst attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor.
Odd how the Secret Service did NOTHING that day for the president!!! It is SS protocal to remove the president from ANY possible threat. I would say that having planes in the air and not knowing how many or where they were is a threat! Oh and this "he did not want to scare the kids" is crap! If that was the case he would not have told the world on live TV that we were under attack in front of those kids. This surely scared them more then if he would have just gotten up and dealt with the situation.
Next time train your puppets better!
The truth is on the march and you people will be shot soon for TREASON!
Submitted by RemoveBush on Mon, 12/25/2006 - 12:20am.
The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories
This is a reply that I wrote to them....
I encourage everyone to do something similar.
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=pubs-english&y=2006&m=A...
This article is really a farce!!!
I can tear it appart peice by peice.... Here.... Alow me!
1) The World Trade Center (WTC) twin towers were destroyed by controlled demolitions.
This is how the collapses may have appeared to non-experts, but demolition experts point out many differences:
* Demolition professionals always blow the bottom floors of a structure first, but the WTC tower collapses began at the upper levels, where the planes hit the buildings.
- Sure, but that does not mean that a building CANNOT be destroyed in this fashion. In fact, there are SEVERAL instances where DEMOLITIONS have destroyed the top part first and then blew the bottom part.
* Non-experts claim that debris seen blowing out of windows was evidence of explosive charges, but experts identify this as air and light office contents (paper, pulverized concrete, etc.) being forced out of windows as floors collapsed on each other.
- Please provide EVIDENCE that the building has that much ENERGY available to BLOW concrete in mid air into fine TINY particles. The building did NOT have that much KENETIC energy to do this on its own.
* Demolition firms had very sensitive seismographs operating at other sites in Manhattan on September 11. None recorded any explosions during the tower collapses.
- Could that be because perhaps the cores were taken out by THERMATE????? There is EVIDENCE that this happened. There were pictures of peices of the CORE standing in the middle of a pile of rubble with a 45 degree cut made to it. Your gonna try and tell me that the resuce workers worked their way through all that rubble just to cut a beam?
* Clean-up crews found none of the telltale signs of controlled demolitions that would have existed if explosive charges had been used.
- You mean like EVERYTHING being destroyed??? You mean like the concrete being pulverized into fine particles IN MID AIR??? You mean like not any substantial part of the building, of 3 buildings, not even still standing???? You mean like that type of sign??
* Cutting away walls, insulation, plumbing, and electrical conduits to place numerous charges on the towers’ structural columns in advance would not have gone unnoticed.
- You have to be kidding!!!! Thats what stairs and service elevators are for. Thats why several tenents heard unusual sounds coming from above them when there were no residents in that part of the floor??? You mean the fact that several tenents were shifted around just weeks before 9/11????
* For more information, see ImplosionWorld’s article on the WTC collapses, the National Institute of Science and Technology’s “Answers to Frequently Asked Questions,” and Popular Mechanics, parts 4 and 5.
- Popular Mechanics??? PLEASE! They are such a wite wash that they should call them selfs the 9/11 Commission Continued.
2) No plane hit the Pentagon on September 11. Instead, it was a missile fired by elements “from inside the American state apparatus.”
Conspiracy theorists making this claim ignore several facts:
* The remains of the bodies of the crew and passengers of American Airlines flight 77 were found at the Pentagon crash site, and positively identified by DNA.
- Sure! Let's see..... The government can't produce one strand of evidence that the plane hit the building, with the 80 plus video's, but you want the people to believe that they identified all of the victims???
* The flight’s black boxes were also recovered at the site.
- Yeah, and the pilots for 911 truth have analyzed the data and found the plane to be to the left and 400 ft above where YOU say it was. NTSB refuses to address this discrepency and will not talk about it.
* Numerous eyewitnesses saw the plane strike the Pentagon. Some saw passengers through the plane’s windows. Missiles don’t have windows or carry passengers.
- PLEASE! If the plane was going 560 MPH, as we are told, there is NO WAY ANYONE would be able to see people. They would have to of been watching the plane miles out, and most of the witnesses say they saw it fly over their vehicle. Nice try, next time try and make up something a little more believeable.
* Numerous photographs show airplane debris at the crash site, as was also witnessed by survivors and rescue personnel. See sections 4:57 to 6:00 of the “911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77” video for pictures of airliner debris.
- Most of the 911 truth movement people do not deny that "A" plane hit the Pentagon. Just not flight 77. The belief is that the plane fired a missle, which makes more sense by the destruction and holes left, just before the impact. Debris was not, has not, been 100% IDENTIFIED as being flight 77. The NTSB DID NOT identify the MANY traceable parts from the plane. There was ONLY ONE engine found, from a TWO engine plane.
* For more information, see “Did a Plane Hit the Pentagon?” and Popular Mechanics, part 6.
- See my previous comment on Popular Mechanics.
3) The planes that hit the World Trade Center towers were remotely controlled.
* Boeing, which manufactured the planes that struck the towers, stated that all its commercial jet transports are configured so that they can only be controlled from the flight deck of the aircraft.
- Notice how it says "configured".... This means that the plane can also be "configured" to be controlled from another source. It is software and software can be uploaded in a matter of minutes.
* Passengers onboard the flights made several phone calls. All reported that hijackers had commandeered the planes.
- And there is also voice morphing software that can simulate a persons voice. In a condition such as 9/11, people are going to ignore innomalies in a persons voice and contribute it to stress or distress.
* For more information, see “Did a Plane Hit the Pentagon?”
4) United Airlines flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was shot down by a missile.
* The cockpit voice recorder of this flight was recovered and showed that the passenger revolt caused the hijackers to deliberately crash the plane. The hijackers controlled the plane until its impact. See full transcript.
- The trasncript is MISSING 3 minutes of the recording. The plane is said to have crashed at 10:06, but the recording stops at 10:03. Again, the pilots for 911 truth have analyzed the data from the NTSB and prove that the debris feild is INCORRECT for a plane traveling at this speed and angle.
* The U.S. military did not learn that flight 93 had been hijacked until four minutes after it crashed, as recently released tapes demonstrate.
- I have to hold off on this, but I do recal reading that they were in fact informed.
* The military never gave interceptor pilots authorization to shoot down United flight 93. See article on tapes.
- Acording to one place I read, a high ranking military official states this is not the case!
* Listen to the 45-second message left by flight attendant CeeCee Lyles on her home answering machine. Click on the “Lyles” file or the phone icon in the bottom left corner of the flight 93 page.
- Nobody said that she did not leave a message.
* For more information, see The 9/11 Commission Report chapter 1, “We Have Some Planes,”pages 13-14.
- There is NO WAY that a pilot is going to give up control of his plane to someone who says they can fly. PERIOD!
5) World Trade Center building 7 was destroyed by a controlled demolition.
* This allegation was fueled by a comment by the WTC owner that, after WTC 7 was judged to be unstable, he recommended pulling a group of firefighters out of the building, using the phrase “pull it” in reference to the contingent of firefighters. For more details, see 9/11 Revealed?
- Sure...... Like Larry is in charge of the Firefighters!!! Like he gives the word as to whether or not the firemen should continue fighting a building fire. Like he does not know what the "term" means??? His whole life has been in realestate, and I am sure that in that time he has been witness to one and the termanology used in one.
* Conspiracy theorists have interpreted the “pull it” remark as slang for demolishing the building with explosives. But demolition experts say “pulling” a building means attaching long cables to a weakened structure and literally pulling it down with bulldozers and other powerful machinery – not using explosives.
- So now your stating that Larry does in fact know that the word "pull it" means to destroy a building!!! It does not matter the means to do it by! The word basically means to destroy the building.
* Seismographs recorded no telltale spikes or anomalies that would have indicated the use of explosives.
- There would not be any with THERMATE would there?
* For more information, see ImplosionWorld article, the National Institute of Science and Technology’s “Answers to Frequently Asked Questions,” and Popular Mechanics, part 5.
6) Insider trading in the stocks of United Airlines and American Airlines just before September 11 is evidence of advance knowledge of the plot.
* The 9/11 Commission investigated this issue in detail, concluding, “Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation.”
- BULL!!! There was NEVER a detailed investigation into this! They stated that "there is no need to follow the money", so what investigation did they do?
* For example, it stated, “much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American [Airlines stock] on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades.”
- Sure! What about those options that were placed Anonymously??? It cannot happen without being an "INSIDE SOURCE".
* For other examples, see The 9/11 Commission Report, “Notes” section, page 499, footnote 130.
- You mean the 911 Ommission Commission Report?
7) Four thousand Jews failed to show up for work at the World Trade Center on September 11.
* It appears from media reports that some 10-15% of WTC victims were Jewish, indicating there were no mass absences.
- No info here so no comment.
* The “4,000” figure apparently came from an early statement by the Israeli Foreign Ministry that some “4,000 Israelis” were believed to be in the New York and Washington areas, where the attacks occurred. This figure was apparently seized upon by conspiracy theorists, in an attempt to bolster the false rumor.
- Right, just like there were no text warnings to stay away from the building on 9/11?
* For more information, see “The 4,000 Jews Rumor.”
8) Al Qaida is not responsible for the September 11 attacks.
* Al Qaida leaders, including Osama bin Laden, have repeatedly confirmed that they planned and carried out the September 11 attacks.
- Sure, the "FATTY" OBL did. However, the real OBL stated just after the attacks that he had no part in it. This was the last CLEAR video from OBL. All other video's are grainy and distorted, HMMMMM.
* In an audiotape released on May 23, 2006, bin Laden stated, “I was responsible for entrusting the 19 brothers … with those raids ….”
- Like I believe an audio tape from this LYING administration.
* In a November 2001 tape, bin Laden said, “We calculated in advance the number of casualties … who would be killed …. I was the most optimistic of them all. … Due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above it only.”
- RIGHT! Here is where your story falls all apart! If their intentions are to kill as many as possible, then why not take a flight later in the day when the buildings would be completely full??? Instead of killing just 3,000 it could have been over 10,000. Very kind of the terrorists to be so concerned about keeping the death tolls to a minimum. You know what??? Only the government worries about death tolls and keeping destruction to a minimum, not terrorists.
* For more information, see “Al Qaeda and September 11th.”
- Being a VET, I know that there are planes fueled and waiting on a tarmac in many bases through out the US, and can be in the air in a minutes notice. The only way they would not be is if they were prevented by someone higher up.
Pretty strange how on this one day the government was performing so many of the samy types of exercises that were taking place that very day??? Odd that Cheney had one of the games moved from October to September 11th. HMMMMM.
Odd how that NOT ONE of the military protocals worked that day???
Odd how NO ONE was fired or demoted for the worst attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor.
Odd how the Secret Service did NOTHING that day for the president!!! It is SS protocal to remove the president from ANY possible threat. I would say that having planes in the air and not knowing how many or where they were is a threat! Oh and this "he did not want to scare the kids" is crap! If that was the case he would not have told the world on live TV that we were under attack in front of those kids. This surely scared them more then if he would have just gotten up and dealt with the situation.
Next time train your puppets better!
The truth is on the march and you people will be shot soon for TREASON!
