• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

wrongful termination

~enigma~

Banned
E
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
7,923
From http://www.ultruth.com/


By all accounts, the unprecedented events of September 11th, 2001 “changed everything”...To help ensure this accountability, I've filed a lawsuit against UL for wrongful termination. My attorneys and I hope to gain more information about UL’s role in the testing of the WTC steel assemblies, and any other involvement UL has had with the WTC towers or the NIST investigation. Since this lawsuit represents a critical need for information about public safety, we invite the public to contribute to our legal defense fund.
[FONT=&quot]Thanks for your help. Kevin Ryan[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
Can someone please explain why this woowoo thinks he was wrongfully terminated and what type of misinformed lawyer will take the case. Last time I checked, Iowa was and still is an at will state so how could the waterboy's termination have been wrongful?[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
​
 
Just like there is a Quack claiming to be able to heal what ever ill you have, for every nut with a cause, there is a Quack that will take the case.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Just like there is a Quack claiming to be able to heal what ever ill you have, for every nut with a cause, there is a Quack that will take the case.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

The new motto for the woowoos should be...


There's one born every minute...

:dl:
 
I just want to know how anyone can claim that his firing was wrongful. But then again Mcdonalds did lose because they had sold hot coffee.

ETA - Now this is an interesting website about the Mcdonalds coffee caper.
http://lawandhelp.com/q298-2.htm
 
Last edited:
What I love is that he claims it's a defense fund when he's the one suing for damages. Should be entertaining to watch though.
 
So... This is a website from a known nutter asking the public to give him money to fight some legal case that has yet to proceed and has every indication of being tossed as a NON-case, without actually providing any details as to what the money is going to be used for.

In short, it's cyber-panhandling, no?
 
Zep said:
So... This is a website from a known nutter asking the public to give him money to fight some legal case that has yet to proceed and has every indication of being tossed as a NON-case, without actually providing any details as to what the money is going to be used for.

In short, it's cyber-panhandling, no?
Click to expand...

Maybe he should sell his computer :D
 
What makes you think he has one of his own? Internet cafes and back-street dope seem to fit right in to this scenario...

;)
 
Well, as a woo was quick to point out over at DU, lots of organizations use "legal defense funds" to start lawsuits. But it is pretty audacious of the LIAR Kevin Ryan to find yet another way to roll the suckers.
 
I know what our US cousins mean by "wrongful termination", but it really sounds much more terminal than "unfair dismissal", doesn't it! :p
 
Architect said:
I know what our US cousins mean by "wrongful termination", but it really sounds much more terminal than "unfair dismissal", doesn't it! :p
Click to expand...

Actually, I think "wrongful termination" sounds like they actually killed the wrong guy. :boxedin:
 
Chaos said:
Actually, I think "wrongful termination" sounds like they actually killed the wrong guy. :boxedin:
Click to expand...
That's a big problem for America, too. When it comes to executions, we're not too picky.

I wonder why this guy sprung into action so quickly with his lawsuit. Maybe it took that long to find a lawyer who was sufficiently insane.
 
Last edited:
Such chutzpah,

Given the circumstances, Kevin is lucky UL doesn't sue him for misrepresentation and messing with their reputation.

Here's hoping for a nice tongue lashing from the judge, right before dismissal.
 
He's too nuts to realize he's nuts, but that's what makes it so funny.

Seriously, though, my father had to fire an employee for writing an editorial to a local newspaper as a "representative of [company X]." The editorial appeared in the morning paper, and the guy was gone by noon. Every large corporation in the country has similar rules and practices, and it's moronic to think that you can destroy company credibility while they're still paying you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom