Studies challenge legitimacy of speed reading

Dustin Kesselberg

Illuminator
Joined
Nov 30, 2004
Messages
4,669
When you read, your eyes act like spotlights on a stage. The construction of your eyes only allows them to focus on one small area on the page at a time, so the idea of speed reading is bunk, according to several studies published in the Journal of Vision this month.

Link
 
Don't agree

Sounds to me like these people are relying too much on theoretical experiment, and not enough on practical reality. Nowhere in this article does it mention actually testing people who have taken speed reading courses, to see if they are actually able to read (and comprehend) as fast as they claim.

I took a speed reading course myself when I was younger; while I don't claim the super-fast speeds some claim (I do think that those who claim to read an entire page in one glance are bunk), I can certainly read faster than this article claims.

A simple example; one of the tools that I used to learn to speed read was a simple little device which had a variable speed shutter, that would reveal a word, phrase, or sentence for a brief period of time. You could set it as low as 1/2 second, as fast as 1/25 second. By the time I was finished, I could read an entire sentence (25-40 letters) at the fastest setting.

Compare this with the claim in the article:
People typically make four eye movements per second, picking up about four or five words per second and 250 to 300 words per minute. That's a typical estimate for normal reading speed, Legge said. Because of the constraints of the visual span, reading more than 300 words per minute is almost impossible.
In regards to the claim that "reading more than 300 words per minute is almost impossible", I routinely read at at least twice that speed (without pushing myself, this is a comfortable speed for me), and if I really concentrate, I can do it even faster (although this would not be a comfortable practice for simply reading and enjoying a book).

I'm not talking about scanning here (just running your eyes over the text, picking out key words/phrases/concepts); I read and comprehend every word. But I quite certainly can read faster than this article claims is possible; and so do quite a few other people I know.

Sounds to me like people who have come up with neat theoretical data, and consider that superior to actual observed fact.
 
Sounds to me like these people are relying too much on theoretical experiment, and not enough on practical reality. Nowhere in this article does it mention actually testing people who have taken speed reading courses, to see if they are actually able to read (and comprehend) as fast as they claim.

I took a speed reading course myself when I was younger; while I don't claim the super-fast speeds some claim (I do think that those who claim to read an entire page in one glance are bunk), I can certainly read faster than this article claims.

A simple example; one of the tools that I used to learn to speed read was a simple little device which had a variable speed shutter, that would reveal a word, phrase, or sentence for a brief period of time. You could set it as low as 1/2 second, as fast as 1/25 second. By the time I was finished, I could read an entire sentence (25-40 letters) at the fastest setting.

Compare this with the claim in the article:

In regards to the claim that "reading more than 300 words per minute is almost impossible", I routinely read at at least twice that speed (without pushing myself, this is a comfortable speed for me), and if I really concentrate, I can do it even faster (although this would not be a comfortable practice for simply reading and enjoying a book).

I'm not talking about scanning here (just running your eyes over the text, picking out key words/phrases/concepts); I read and comprehend every word. But I quite certainly can read faster than this article claims is possible; and so do quite a few other people I know.

Sounds to me like people who have come up with neat theoretical data, and consider that superior to actual observed fact.


Or maybe you're deluding yourself?
 
I have heard it said (no, I cannot recall the source) that speed reading is 100% useless for technical material (especially that which is new to the reader) -- in other words, material requiring deeper comprehension than what's needed to simply store facts.
 
Last edited:
I have heard it said (no, I cannot recall the source) that speed reading is 100% useless for technical material (especially that which is new to the reader) -- in other words, material requiring deeper comprehension than what's needed to simply store facts.
If I'm reading technical stuff, then it's usually because I need a particular piece of information. Speed read to find the correct spot, slow down and cross coordinate that info with stuff already in my head to settle the new stuff into its relationship to what I already know.

Speed read to blast by the chaff that fills large swatches of the text, then read more slowly for comprehension of the passages that are informative.
 
Speed read to blast by the chaff that fills large swatches of the text, then read more slowly for comprehension of the passages that are informative.

Yes ... that's pretty much what I posted -- one cannot speed through that which requires much thought or analysis. The fluff is ... well, pretty much that, fluff.
 
Because of the constraints of the visual span, reading more than 300 words per minute is almost impossible.

I beg to defer with that statement. I've never been seriously tested on it but even with junk like this : reading speed. Seems I read over 400 words per minute with 85% "comprehension". I guess that ruins the statement above? I was also slowed down by the math they had in their which takes more time for my brain to process. I would have gone even faster if they had left out the numbers.

Lets try another online test... http://www.turboread.com/Ok on this poorly written titanic one I got 432 words per minute. Now give me a common novel and I'll pass over 600 I bet.

Both websites designed to sell a product so take that for what it's worth. I shouldn't have been able to do well on their test but I did. I don't know whether speed reading is bunk or not and I don't really care.
 
343 wpm, 91%. Without my reading glasses. Which have prism in them, as I tend to be wall-eyed. So I see a wider field, but have to shift my 'master eye' back and forth. Like I'm constantly changing the camera angle. So I don't know whether I would prove or disprove this guy's theory.

My GED test said I'm 98th percentile on comprehension, and I was first to turn in my test paper. But this is the first speed test I've taken. No classes.
 
i've seen articles, tv documentaries on the autistic savant kim peek in which it was claimed that he could memorize an entire page in a couple of seconds....now that's speed reading :)

i'm sure his abilities have been scientifically studied so there should be some verification of that feat somewhere on t'web.
 
Not enough detail to properly judge the research but what were the materials? For instance, it's common for many people to miss typos in words like "the" because you don't read "the" you recognise the general shape of the whole word. The researcher seems to assume a very naive model of reading where words are read one at a time instead of the complex of hueristic algorithms that we seem to develop as experienced readers. Shame that Sandford and Garrod's "Understanding written language" is out of print as it was one of my textbooks at Uni in the Late Mediaeval.
 
I'd say the technique of not subvocalizing can be useful to scan through when you're looking for a small part (like a sentence or a paragraph) in something larger. Otherwise, I'm pretty skeptical.

Ever heard a blind person scan through a digital recording (like messages or audio books--not music)? It's definitely a skill.
 
Well, let's start with a list of the top studies and researchers in this field. What are they?
 
I am not a speed reader by any means. I do, however, read faster than many people I know (excepting Mrs. L, who just scares me), and I'm able to retain it. So, while I can't speak to actual speed reading, I do know some people can read faster than others.

Marc
 
Sounds to me like these people are relying too much on theoretical experiment, and not enough on practical reality. Nowhere in this article does it mention actually testing people who have taken speed reading courses, to see if they are actually able to read (and comprehend) as fast as they claim.

I took a speed reading course myself when I was younger; while I don't claim the super-fast speeds some claim (I do think that those who claim to read an entire page in one glance are bunk), I can certainly read faster than this article claims.

A simple example; one of the tools that I used to learn to speed read was a simple little device which had a variable speed shutter, that would reveal a word, phrase, or sentence for a brief period of time. You could set it as low as 1/2 second, as fast as 1/25 second. By the time I was finished, I could read an entire sentence (25-40 letters) at the fastest setting.

Compare this with the claim in the article:

In regards to the claim that "reading more than 300 words per minute is almost impossible", I routinely read at at least twice that speed (without pushing myself, this is a comfortable speed for me), and if I really concentrate, I can do it even faster (although this would not be a comfortable practice for simply reading and enjoying a book).

I'm not talking about scanning here (just running your eyes over the text, picking out key words/phrases/concepts); I read and comprehend every word. But I quite certainly can read faster than this article claims is possible; and so do quite a few other people I know.

Sounds to me like people who have come up with neat theoretical data, and consider that superior to actual observed fact.
You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........


ETA: the boy I worked with had already been tested on three of the ASAs collection ( that is the 78% figure as average. The low 80's one was my seperate test.
 
Last edited:
Or maybe you're deluding yourself?
ROTFLMAO

Yes, that's it. Forget silly things like actually testing the people who make these claims; just come up with some neat little theory, don't test anyone, and then simply state that anyone who claims otherwise is "deluding themselves"!

Alternate possibility -- you're one of those people who is quite happy drawing their own conclusions based on limited information, and then simply dismissing all other claims without bothering to test them, since they don't fit your personal theory and are therefore, by definition, "wrong".
 
You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........


ETA: the boy I worked with had already been tested on three of the ASAs collection ( that is the 78% figure as average. The low 80's one was my seperate test.

You claim you can read 10,000 words per minute with about 80% comprehension? Here is your post copied and pasted over and over until it reaches 10,000 words. This is the amount of material you claim you can read every minute...

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

You were trained with (or with a facsimile of) the Evelyn Wood method - There was at least one technique better developed by the American Speedreading Academy (though I have seen on TV -so rigged set up was possible - a gentleman in the late 50's early 60' who hit 10,000 or so who had been EW trained) as just one of the students using it - who I was working with during the time I started working with ASA about 30 years ago- also hit 10,000 with about 78% comprehension. Obviously this is anecdotal, and if Dustin is who I think he is (different avatar) then as soon as he saw my name he decided this is a lie. He's wrong, but for some reason he want's/need's to believe that high rates of reading are not possible. Anyway, we got the boy in because his parents were tired of his poor grades and decided to try this. His initial speed was 70 - 80 wpm with about 55% comp (and given the simplicity of what we were using - given age and info) it should have been higher on both . He was large (not fat, large), friendly and eager to please which meant he paid attention and followed the instructions and, fortunately, he did not tend to get upset when he had a little regression. Our program was designed for app 10 weeks - with the proviso that if you were not happy with your results, you could continue to come in with no further charge. At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try siomething new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. Now the book was a novel - on the level he could read and understand (not War and Peace or Moby Dick - a YA title so we are talking about a gigantic jump in speed and a reasonable jump in comprehension. Since I trained in the method, I know it ran my speed up - though he was faster (but then, I wear glasses). By the by, the one thing I dispute through personal knowledge anecdotal or not is that ridiculous 300 wpm limit. I was first tested in the fourth grade and had a slightly over 800 wpm rate. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, but I don't remember that) and finding small rocks stuck in the treads of his tires - the rocks turned out to be diamonds........

At the end of the ten weeks, since I had been working with him primarily, and the owners knew I had an interest in really determining how/whether the program worked, they let me try something new - Instead of using the reasonably large selection of books they had (with question sets already prepared), I brought in a book and question set of my own (for those who have not heard, I am a teacher - and am quite good at constructing test questions). No one had any idea what book I was bringing in and no one knew what the questions were. He read the book at an average rate of 10,ooo wpm and scored in the low 80's on comprehension. The article was about a man driving a jeep in desert country (probably South Africa, ….No one …


Wait, Don't tell me...Did you get your superpowers from a blast of gamma rays or martins?
 
I beg to defer with that statement. I've never been seriously tested on it but even with junk like this : reading speed. Seems I read over 400 words per minute with 85% "comprehension". I guess that ruins the statement above? I was also slowed down by the math they had in their which takes more time for my brain to process. I would have gone even faster if they had left out the numbers.


Well, with ``junk like that'', I got bored after skimming the first paragraph, scrolled down, clocked 1432 wpm for a speed, and managed a 91% ``comprehension'' just by guessing what they were after. So...
 
Well, let's start with a list of the top studies and researchers in this field. What are they?

I thought this is quite a good intro to a few issues; http://www.linguistics.rub.de/FallSchool/Courses/slides-psychol/01Bochum05Intro-2up.pdf

since it addresses a lot of the issues that I recall from over 20 years ago that this article fails to address. In fact if you read this book summary you'll see he's on one extreme of a range http://www.amazon.com/Movements-Information-Processing-during-Reading/dp/184169956X
You can try googling on "human information processing" and "psycholinguistics".
 
You can make all the suggestions you want, Dustin has made a decision - like the CTers and the Scooby/DJs- and all the counter data in the world is not going to change his/their minds. I ASSUME that someone over/important to him at some point in his life made fun of him for his reading or praised someone who he envied for their reading or even misapplied reading speed to intelligence to his detriment since this is not an area where there is normally much controversy, yet he has latched on to one study which shows something already known BUT does not go from that to what is also known that can quickly overcome that: yes, when most people learn to read they are concentrating on a very small area - but the eyes can actually see - at one time - about 170 degrees (including peripheral) and 90+degrees clearly. That is quite wide enough at normal reading distance to encompass a page or two and then it is just a matter of learning to make the brain work a bit better at processing what the eye sees (eliminating sub-vocalization is a BIG step towards that since sub v. almost forces the eyes to look at smaller groups of letters/words). I decided during the last run at this that it is pointless to argue with Dustin so I am just passing this on and otherwise won't bother - by the by there is an earlier thread on this where Dustin also printed out a thing or two to demonstrate what several thousand words looks like. If he is doing it for my sake, it is a waste of time. I know what several thousand word looks like - I have been reading since I was three (60 now) and teaching (for pay) about 35 years on and off. (Please feel free to tell me no three year old can read.)
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom