JREF Exclusive: Mark Cuban update

MarkyX · 12th April 2007, 08:31 AM

Since the announcement of Mark Cuban's endorsement of the fictional movie, Loose Change, a lot of people from both sides pondered on Cuban's motivation in all of this. The local media to everyone's least favorite loud mouth Bill Reilly, questioned as to why someone would promote a video they didn't believe in. Cuban's reasons are freedom of speech and expression, even if it's false. He even claimed to welcome a rebuttal. The response from many debunkers, including myself, called BS.

Good news, a representive of Mark Cuban contacted me earlier this week about a Screw Loose Change tie-in with Loose Change. In other words, opposing forces at work. Obviously one cannot sell a movie with subtitles over original footage as a "debate", but I wouldn't have been contacted by Mark Cuban if he wasn't interested in hearing the what "other side" has to say.

I can't give much details, mainly because nothing has really developed yet, but I just want to inform you all that Mark Cuban is well-aware of Screw Loose Change's existence.

Arkan_Wolfshade · 12th April 2007, 08:40 AM

This seems consistent with his statements that he is just looking to publish all angles of a controversial subject and has no personal vested interested (other than profit).

MarkyX · 12th April 2007, 08:44 AM

I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one.

Arkan_Wolfshade · 12th April 2007, 08:47 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one.

Perhaps he is planning a Grindhouse style double-feature.

The Doc · 12th April 2007, 08:50 AM

Get a bunch of professionals, interview them and refute the claims that way I'm guessing. Kind of like FahrenHYPE 9/11 or the BBC documentary on 9/11 CT's.

Pardalis · 12th April 2007, 08:52 AM

Wait, what is true and what is not about the OP?

Gravy · 12th April 2007, 08:53 AM

None true, apparently.

MarkyX · 12th April 2007, 08:59 AM

Originally Posted by Gravy

None true, apparently.

Sorry I meant something else and it came out as a nasty typo. This is all true.

chran · 12th April 2007, 09:00 AM

He looks like a really hip, together guy. Mark Cuban, that is.

The Doc · 12th April 2007, 09:01 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

Sorry I meant something else and it came out as a nasty typo. This is all true.

That's what I was thinking. Sort of didn't make sense though lol.

This is pretty good news.

defaultdotxbe · 12th April 2007, 09:04 AM

i always figured cuban was just interested in capitalizing on what he sees as a viable market (im honestly suprised no one did before)

by offering to distribute a rebuttal film as well he will be making money off both sides of the argument, a rather brilliant move, from a financial point of view, with a bit of delicious irony in that the savior who was to bring 9/11 truth to the mainstream may very well bring debunking there as well, lol

MarkyX · 12th April 2007, 09:05 AM

Yep, and the conversation with the gentleman was pretty entertaining. I've managed to plug in a few things, including Gravy's Loose Change guide and the JREF forums to the representative.

All we have to do is wait.

The Doc · 12th April 2007, 09:08 AM

I bet Dylan is real happy about this

MarkyX · 12th April 2007, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by The Doc

I bet Dylan is real happy about this

Yeah, I'm rather curious about their reaction

The Doc · 12th April 2007, 09:12 AM

Actually, at the end of the day they still get their money. So I guess it won't be that big of a deal for Dylan, but a lot of the truthers sure will be pissed.

TraitorBasher · 12th April 2007, 09:16 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

Yeah, I'm rather curious about their reaction

Are you going to be making money from this?

Gravy · 12th April 2007, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

Sorry I meant something else and it came out as a nasty typo. This is all true.

Okay, thanks for removing the "I lied" part. I don't have enough hair on my head to afford scratching like that.

uk_dave · 12th April 2007, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

Yeah, I'm rather curious about their reaction

I would suspect that avery already knows about this..... and if he doesn't....

...crikey!

The Doc · 12th April 2007, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by ERichardson

Are you going to be making money from this?

Ok I don't know who is making this, if it is being made, or if money will be made from it. But...

Double standards anyone?

uk_dave · 12th April 2007, 09:18 AM

Originally Posted by ERichardson

Are you going to be making money from this?

shhhhhhhh

If he does I've no doubt he'll donate it to the NWO Widows & Orphans fund.

We need more widows and orphans!

JamesB · 12th April 2007, 09:22 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

Since the announcement of Mark Cuban's endorsement of the fictional movie, Loose Change, a lot of people from both sides pondered on Cuban's motivation in all of this. The local media to everyone's least favorite loud mouth Bill Reilly, questioned as to why someone would promote a video they didn't believe in. Cuban's reasons are freedom of speech and expression, even if it's false. He even claimed to welcome a rebuttal. The response from many debunkers, including myself, called BS.

Good news, a representive of Mark Cuban contacted me earlier this week about a Screw Loose Change tie-in with Loose Change. In other words, opposing forces at work. Obviously one cannot sell a movie with subtitles over original footage as a "debate", but I wouldn't have been contacted by Mark Cuban if he wasn't interested in hearing the what "other side" has to say.

I can't give much details, mainly because nothing has really developed yet, but I just want to inform you all that Mark Cuban is well-aware of Screw Loose Change's existence.

Cool, I knew we should have copyrighted the name.

Let us know what happens.

Pardalis · 12th April 2007, 09:26 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

Yeah, I'm rather curious about their reaction

probably like this:

How childish of me!

Spindrift · 12th April 2007, 09:32 AM

Originally Posted by JamesB

Cool, I knew we should have copyrighted the name.

Let us know what happens.

I think you mean trademark and you probably could.

defaultdotxbe · 12th April 2007, 09:33 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

Yep, and the conversation with the gentleman was pretty entertaining. I've managed to plug in a few things, including Gravy's Loose Change guide and the JREF forums to the representative.

All we have to do is wait.

they should package a copy of the guide with everyloose change dvd, lol

chipmunk stew · 12th April 2007, 09:37 AM

I think there's good potential for an entertaining documentary, not so much about 9/11 itself, but about the evolution of the conspiracy theories and the Truth Movement and the emergence of debunking communities that rose up in response.

I think such a meta documentary would be much more informative and watchable. I hope he decides to go at it from this angle.

JamesB · 12th April 2007, 09:44 AM

Originally Posted by Spindrift

I think you mean trademark and you probably could.

Nah, that would involve too much paperwork, plus it has been used so much I think it is in the public domain now. We have a SLC blog, video, forum, myspace page, all by different people, some guy even squatted on screwloosechange.com. I have no problem with people using the name, although it can be a bit confusing on occassion.

A W Smith · 12th April 2007, 09:44 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one.

No problem. Dylan is not a film maker either

Shrinker · 12th April 2007, 10:54 AM

Make the film. Donate ALL profits to recognized 9/11 charities.

Then watch Avery implode as he chooses between the moral low ground, or giving away all that money he's hoping to make.

Triterope · 12th April 2007, 11:08 AM

Originally Posted by MarkyX

A representive of Mark Cuban contacted me earlier this week about a Screw Loose Change tie-in with Loose Change. I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one.

maccy · 12th April 2007, 11:10 AM

I think the way to do this would be to involve a professional documentary maker and act as a consultant/researcher on the project. If you can get a rough idea of a budget, I'm sure there would be plenty of filmakers out there who would want to participate. It wouldn't do any harm to contact some people to ask for advice, I'd suggest:

1. Penn and Teller, or the main P&TBS! production company, The Wolper Organization (address can be found here and here)
2. Mike Rudin, series producer of "The Conspiracy Files", via the BBC (possibly leave a comment on his blog)
3. Jon Ronson - via PM (he's a member of this forum)
4. Savage Pictures - who made Farenhype 9/11.

Good luck!

JamesB · 12th April 2007, 11:18 AM

I will volunteer to help with the alternate soundtrack commentary. Get MarkyX, Brainster, Gravy and I into the studio together, I am sure we could come up with something to say.

It would be more interesting than most of the commentary tracks, where you get to hear directors discuss how they decided to frame shots for 2 hours.

uk_dave · 12th April 2007, 11:43 AM

Originally Posted by JamesB

I will volunteer to help with the alternate soundtrack commentary. Get MarkyX, Brainster, Gravy and I into the studio together, I am sure we could come up with something to say.

It would be more interesting than most of the commentary tracks, where you get to hear directors discuss how they decided to frame shots for 2 hours.

You could do it in Iambic Pantameter.

Well, it was just a thought

Yurebiz · 12th April 2007, 11:48 AM

Isn't this really really a joke?

Shrinker · 12th April 2007, 12:03 PM

Citizen Merc had the gall to bring this news to the attention on the Losers for Truth. The threads gone already though. I guess Dylan didn't want the surprise spoiled.

Here's all I saw before it vanished. (The OP was just a repost of the OP here)

Originally Posted by LUCUS

How did I just know he was up to something...?

Originally Posted by thehighwaymanq

oh thats just terrific!

there we go mark!

Originally Posted by Reggie_perrin

Erm if the official story is so air tight and nothing in it suggests foul play, why would anyone need to do a rebuttal ? shouldn't the rebutal already be out there in the shape of the 9/11 comission report and the other "investigations" like NIST.Why not just point people towards the 9/11 comission report ?

Mark Cuban is a bussines man, do you think there is a big market for films which "de-bunk" a conspiracy theory ?, i can't see it myself, not the way most people wanna spend a night at the cinema watching imo, particualrly to see a film you've already seen but with subtitles in it with strawman responses.

why not let the government do the rebutal ?

p.s

these are some very sad individuals were dealing with.People have seen the governments account, they've seen the corporate medias hit pieces and documantaries, there is no need for some idiots who call family member who quetion the governments account "9/11 deniers" to get involved here in an attempt to jump on the coat tails of the loose change guys success.

Originally Posted by dylan avery

You're pathetic, Aldo. You really are.

SLC will have a 10 minute extra on the DVD, if they're lucky. Just because they got contacted doesn't mean it will happen.

Originally Posted by Citizen Merc

I am pathetic because I posted relevent news about Mark Cuban?

Please elaborate.

Originally Posted by dylan avery

I don't need to. I see through your ************.

Yurebiz · 12th April 2007, 12:05 PM

HAHAHa I gotta say as a truther, thats hilarious.

chipmunk stew · 12th April 2007, 12:07 PM

Originally Posted by uk_dave

You could do it in Iambic Pantameter.

Well, it was just a thought

How 'bout a Greek chorus?

Arus808 · 12th April 2007, 12:14 PM

Originally Posted by Triterope

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...e75405567a.gif

HAHA THAT IS so perfect!!!
I nominate Gravy, MarkyX and TheDoc

T.A.M. · 12th April 2007, 12:17 PM

Originally Posted by Yurebiz

HAHAHa I gotta say as a truther, thats hilarious.

please explain, or just stop being childish.

TAM

Oliver · 12th April 2007, 12:18 PM

So Mark Cuban subreptitious reaches for the rights of
Loose Change 3 just to distribute the follow up rebutting
Dylan's movie. And he forbids to spread the movie on
YouTube, Google and Torrent's...

This is brilliant!

Shrinker · 12th April 2007, 12:20 PM

Originally Posted by Yurebiz

HAHAHa I gotta say as a truther, thats hilarious.

Hilarious is a bit strong. Funny maybe. Funny that Dylan admits he has no control over the DVD contents.

12th April 2007, 08:31 AM	#1
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	JREF Exclusive: Mark Cuban update Since the announcement of Mark Cuban's endorsement of the fictional movie, Loose Change, a lot of people from both sides pondered on Cuban's motivation in all of this. The local media to everyone's least favorite loud mouth Bill Reilly, questioned as to why someone would promote a video they didn't believe in. Cuban's reasons are freedom of speech and expression, even if it's false. He even claimed to welcome a rebuttal. The response from many debunkers, including myself, called BS. Good news, a representive of Mark Cuban contacted me earlier this week about a Screw Loose Change tie-in with Loose Change. In other words, opposing forces at work. Obviously one cannot sell a movie with subtitles over original footage as a "debate", but I wouldn't have been contacted by Mark Cuban if he wasn't interested in hearing the what "other side" has to say. I can't give much details, mainly because nothing has really developed yet, but I just want to inform you all that Mark Cuban is well-aware of Screw Loose Change's existence.
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	__________________ MarkyX's Haunted Bloghouse - Read my boredom Last edited by MarkyX; 12th April 2007 at 09:00 AM.

12th April 2007, 08:44 AM	#3
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one.
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	__________________ MarkyX's Haunted Bloghouse - Read my boredom

12th April 2007, 08:52 AM	#6
Pardalis Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 25,817	Wait, what is true and what is not about the OP?
Pardalis Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 25,817

12th April 2007, 08:53 AM	#7
Gravy Downsitting Citizen Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 17,078	None true, apparently.
	__________________ "Please, keep your chops cool and don’t overblow.” –Freddie Hubbard

12th April 2007, 08:59 AM	#8
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	Originally Posted by Gravy None true, apparently. Sorry I meant something else and it came out as a nasty typo. This is all true.
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	__________________ MarkyX's Haunted Bloghouse - Read my boredom

12th April 2007, 08:40 AM	#2
Arkan_Wolfshade Philosopher Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 7,154	This seems consistent with his statements that he is just looking to publish all angles of a controversial subject and has no personal vested interested (other than profit).

12th April 2007, 08:47 AM	#4
Arkan_Wolfshade Philosopher Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 7,154	Originally Posted by MarkyX I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one. Perhaps he is planning a Grindhouse style double-feature.

12th April 2007, 08:50 AM	#5
The Doc Curing Stupidity Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,158	Get a bunch of professionals, interview them and refute the claims that way I'm guessing. Kind of like FahrenHYPE 9/11 or the BBC documentary on 9/11 CT's.

12th April 2007, 09:00 AM	#9
chran Muse Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Denmark, yo Posts: 629	He looks like a really hip, together guy. Mark Cuban, that is.
	Last edited by chran; 12th April 2007 at 09:04 AM. Reason: yeah

12th April 2007, 09:01 AM	#10
The Doc Curing Stupidity Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,158	Originally Posted by MarkyX Sorry I meant something else and it came out as a nasty typo. This is all true. That's what I was thinking. Sort of didn't make sense though lol. This is pretty good news.

12th April 2007, 09:04 AM	#11
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 7,474	i always figured cuban was just interested in capitalizing on what he sees as a viable market (im honestly suprised no one did before) by offering to distribute a rebuttal film as well he will be making money off both sides of the argument, a rather brilliant move, from a financial point of view, with a bit of delicious irony in that the savior who was to bring 9/11 truth to the mainstream may very well bring debunking there as well, lol
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein

12th April 2007, 09:05 AM	#12
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	Yep, and the conversation with the gentleman was pretty entertaining. I've managed to plug in a few things, including Gravy's Loose Change guide and the JREF forums to the representative. All we have to do is wait.
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	__________________ MarkyX's Haunted Bloghouse - Read my boredom

12th April 2007, 09:08 AM	#13
The Doc Curing Stupidity Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,158	I bet Dylan is real happy about this

12th April 2007, 09:10 AM	#14
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	Originally Posted by The Doc I bet Dylan is real happy about this Yeah, I'm rather curious about their reaction
MarkyX Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 2,157	__________________ MarkyX's Haunted Bloghouse - Read my boredom

12th April 2007, 09:12 AM	#15
The Doc Curing Stupidity Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,158	Actually, at the end of the day they still get their money. So I guess it won't be that big of a deal for Dylan, but a lot of the truthers sure will be pissed.

12th April 2007, 09:16 AM	#16
TraitorBasher Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 259	Originally Posted by MarkyX Yeah, I'm rather curious about their reaction Are you going to be making money from this?
TraitorBasher Banned Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 259

12th April 2007, 09:17 AM	#17
Gravy Downsitting Citizen Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 17,078	Originally Posted by MarkyX Sorry I meant something else and it came out as a nasty typo. This is all true. Okay, thanks for removing the "I lied" part. I don't have enough hair on my head to afford scratching like that.
	__________________ "Please, keep your chops cool and don’t overblow.” –Freddie Hubbard

12th April 2007, 09:17 AM	#18
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,154	Originally Posted by MarkyX Yeah, I'm rather curious about their reaction I would suspect that avery already knows about this..... and if he doesn't.... ...crikey!
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,154

12th April 2007, 09:17 AM	#19
The Doc Curing Stupidity Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,158	Originally Posted by ERichardson Are you going to be making money from this? Ok I don't know who is making this, if it is being made, or if money will be made from it. But... Double standards anyone?

12th April 2007, 09:18 AM	#20
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,154	Originally Posted by ERichardson Are you going to be making money from this? shhhhhhhh If he does I've no doubt he'll donate it to the NWO Widows & Orphans fund. We need more widows and orphans!
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,154

12th April 2007, 09:22 AM	#21
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	Originally Posted by MarkyX Since the announcement of Mark Cuban's endorsement of the fictional movie, Loose Change, a lot of people from both sides pondered on Cuban's motivation in all of this. The local media to everyone's least favorite loud mouth Bill Reilly, questioned as to why someone would promote a video they didn't believe in. Cuban's reasons are freedom of speech and expression, even if it's false. He even claimed to welcome a rebuttal. The response from many debunkers, including myself, called BS. Good news, a representive of Mark Cuban contacted me earlier this week about a Screw Loose Change tie-in with Loose Change. In other words, opposing forces at work. Obviously one cannot sell a movie with subtitles over original footage as a "debate", but I wouldn't have been contacted by Mark Cuban if he wasn't interested in hearing the what "other side" has to say. I can't give much details, mainly because nothing has really developed yet, but I just want to inform you all that Mark Cuban is well-aware of Screw Loose Change's existence. Cool, I knew we should have copyrighted the name. Let us know what happens.
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	__________________ I said lots of things in NPH that I would not say today and that I did not repeat in NPHR, where I specifically corrected at least some of the errors I had made in that earlier book, written 5 years ago. -David Ray Griffin-

12th April 2007, 09:26 AM	#22
Pardalis Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 25,817	Originally Posted by MarkyX Yeah, I'm rather curious about their reaction probably like this: How childish of me!
Pardalis Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 25,817

12th April 2007, 09:32 AM	#23
Spindrift Time Person of the Year, 2006 Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Right here! Posts: 19,246	Originally Posted by JamesB Cool, I knew we should have copyrighted the name. Let us know what happens. I think you mean trademark and you probably could.
	__________________ I've always believed that cluelessness evolved as an adaptation to allow the truly appalling to live with themselves. - G. B. Trudeau A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. - Kay, Men in Black. Enjoy every sandwich. - Warren Zevon

12th April 2007, 09:33 AM	#24
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 7,474	Originally Posted by MarkyX Yep, and the conversation with the gentleman was pretty entertaining. I've managed to plug in a few things, including Gravy's Loose Change guide and the JREF forums to the representative. All we have to do is wait. they should package a copy of the guide with everyloose change dvd, lol
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein

12th April 2007, 09:37 AM	#25
chipmunk stew Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,448	I think there's good potential for an entertaining documentary, not so much about 9/11 itself, but about the evolution of the conspiracy theories and the Truth Movement and the emergence of debunking communities that rose up in response. I think such a meta documentary would be much more informative and watchable. I hope he decides to go at it from this angle.

12th April 2007, 09:44 AM	#26
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	Originally Posted by Spindrift I think you mean trademark and you probably could. Nah, that would involve too much paperwork, plus it has been used so much I think it is in the public domain now. We have a SLC blog, video, forum, myspace page, all by different people, some guy even squatted on screwloosechange.com. I have no problem with people using the name, although it can be a bit confusing on occassion.
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	__________________ I said lots of things in NPH that I would not say today and that I did not repeat in NPHR, where I specifically corrected at least some of the errors I had made in that earlier book, written 5 years ago. -David Ray Griffin-

12th April 2007, 09:44 AM	#27
A W Smith Philosopher Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 7,032	Originally Posted by MarkyX I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one. No problem. Dylan is not a film maker either
A W Smith Philosopher Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 7,032	__________________ 911 resource site by Mark Roberts http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home Gravy: Christopher7; You are a Basking Shark in a sea of ignorance. Galileo:The jury said I didn't have any mental defects or diseases, they declared me 100% sane. Has a jury ever declared you sane? Don’t get me lol’n off my chesterfield dude.

12th April 2007, 10:54 AM	#28
Shrinker Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,139	Make the film. Donate ALL profits to recognized 9/11 charities. Then watch Avery implode as he chooses between the moral low ground, or giving away all that money he's hoping to make.

12th April 2007, 11:08 AM	#29
Triterope Muse Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 916	Originally Posted by MarkyX A representive of Mark Cuban contacted me earlier this week about a Screw Loose Change tie-in with Loose Change. I'm really curious on how they will do this, considering the fact that I am not a film maker and I don't plan to be one.
Triterope Muse Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 916

12th April 2007, 11:10 AM	#30
maccy Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 2,094	I think the way to do this would be to involve a professional documentary maker and act as a consultant/researcher on the project. If you can get a rough idea of a budget, I'm sure there would be plenty of filmakers out there who would want to participate. It wouldn't do any harm to contact some people to ask for advice, I'd suggest: 1. Penn and Teller, or the main P&TBS! production company, The Wolper Organization (address can be found here and here) 2. Mike Rudin, series producer of "The Conspiracy Files", via the BBC (possibly leave a comment on his blog) 3. Jon Ronson - via PM (he's a member of this forum) 4. Savage Pictures - who made Farenhype 9/11. Good luck!
maccy Master Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 2,094	Last edited by maccy; 12th April 2007 at 11:12 AM. Reason: Added a link to the bbc.

12th April 2007, 11:18 AM	#31
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	I will volunteer to help with the alternate soundtrack commentary. Get MarkyX, Brainster, Gravy and I into the studio together, I am sure we could come up with something to say. It would be more interesting than most of the commentary tracks, where you get to hear directors discuss how they decided to frame shots for 2 hours.
JamesB Master Poster Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,152	__________________ I said lots of things in NPH that I would not say today and that I did not repeat in NPHR, where I specifically corrected at least some of the errors I had made in that earlier book, written 5 years ago. -David Ray Griffin-

12th April 2007, 11:43 AM	#32
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,154	Originally Posted by JamesB I will volunteer to help with the alternate soundtrack commentary. Get MarkyX, Brainster, Gravy and I into the studio together, I am sure we could come up with something to say. It would be more interesting than most of the commentary tracks, where you get to hear directors discuss how they decided to frame shots for 2 hours. You could do it in Iambic Pantameter. Well, it was just a thought
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,154

12th April 2007, 11:48 AM	#33
Yurebiz Thinker Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 215	Isn't this really really a joke?
Yurebiz Thinker Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 215

12th April 2007, 12:03 PM	#34
Shrinker Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,139	Citizen Merc had the gall to bring this news to the attention on the Losers for Truth. The threads gone already though. I guess Dylan didn't want the surprise spoiled. Here's all I saw before it vanished. (The OP was just a repost of the OP here) Originally Posted by LUCUS How did I just know he was up to something...? Originally Posted by thehighwaymanq oh thats just terrific! there we go mark! Originally Posted by Reggie_perrin Erm if the official story is so air tight and nothing in it suggests foul play, why would anyone need to do a rebuttal ? shouldn't the rebutal already be out there in the shape of the 9/11 comission report and the other "investigations" like NIST.Why not just point people towards the 9/11 comission report ? Mark Cuban is a bussines man, do you think there is a big market for films which "de-bunk" a conspiracy theory ?, i can't see it myself, not the way most people wanna spend a night at the cinema watching imo, particualrly to see a film you've already seen but with subtitles in it with strawman responses. why not let the government do the rebutal ? p.s these are some very sad individuals were dealing with.People have seen the governments account, they've seen the corporate medias hit pieces and documantaries, there is no need for some idiots who call family member who quetion the governments account "9/11 deniers" to get involved here in an attempt to jump on the coat tails of the loose change guys success. Originally Posted by dylan avery You're pathetic, Aldo. You really are. SLC will have a 10 minute extra on the DVD, if they're lucky. Just because they got contacted doesn't mean it will happen. Originally Posted by Citizen Merc I am pathetic because I posted relevent news about Mark Cuban? Please elaborate. Originally Posted by dylan avery I don't need to. I see through your ************.

12th April 2007, 12:05 PM	#35
Yurebiz Thinker Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 215	HAHAHa I gotta say as a truther, thats hilarious.
Yurebiz Thinker Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 215