ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 10th July 2007, 11:57 PM   #1
MarcoPolo
Student
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 32
Human Remains at Pentagon

I just recently saw the chart (Thanks Gravy!) with all the blue ovals showing where the human remains were found in the Pentagon.

My question is, how do the CTers explain that?

It seems to me you can't argue that. How many people were searching for bodies? How many times did they stop once they found some remains to make sure they handled it all properly? How many people would have to be in on this conspiracy?

It boggles my mind.
MarcoPolo is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 12:03 AM   #2
jhunter1163
beer-swilling semiliterate
 
jhunter1163's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Connecticut, or King Arthur's Court. Hard to tell sometimes.
Posts: 24,915
The mind-boggling thing about this to me is, the remains of ALL of the passengers on Flight 77 (except one infant) were found IN THE PENTAGON. How can any sane person conclude anything other than that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

Lyte goes on about chain of custody for the DNA, yada yada yada.. how many more people would faking the DNA results add to the already Impossibly Vast Conspiracy? (apologies to Pomeroo)
__________________
A møøse ønce bit my sister
jhunter1163 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 12:37 AM   #3
Devil's Advocate
Critical Thinker
 
Devil's Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by MarcoPolo View Post
I just recently saw the chart (Thanks Gravy!) with all the blue ovals showing where the human remains were found in the Pentagon.

My question is, how do the CTers explain that?

It seems to me you can't argue that. How many people were searching for bodies? How many times did they stop once they found some remains to make sure they handled it all properly? How many people would have to be in on this conspiracy?

It boggles my mind.
Well, to play off my forum name....
Most of the bodies I've seen were people that were already in the Pentagon.
(One I recall even has a badge you can clearly see on his left chest.)

Ok, so you get the list of passenger names, call up family members for blood samples to be used for DNA matching. Take a blood sample of the family member, drop some of their blood into 'unknown sample vile #1', and what do you know...it matches!
I doubt there would be any record of the samples or DNA matching process that would not be text based only. So how would you ever know if there was not a cover up or manipulation of evidence?

Of course that opens up a lot more questions, like "why not just fly the plane into the building in the first place?".... but that was not your question.
Devil's Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 01:54 AM   #4
Gravy
Downsitting Citizen
 
Gravy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,072
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
Well, to play off my forum name....
Most of the bodies I've seen were people that were already in the Pentagon.
(One I recall even has a badge you can clearly see on his left chest.)
Please keep in mind, though, that reality does not equal the sum of the photos you've seen.

Quote:
"When Williams discovered the scorched bodies of several airline passengers, they were still strapped into their seats. The stench of charred flesh overwhelmed him.

'It was the worst thing you can imagine,' said Williams, whose squad from Fort Belvoir, Va., entered the building, less than four hours after the terrorist attack. 'I wanted to cry from the minute I walked in. But I have soldiers under me and I had to put my feelings aside.'
Rescue Commander U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Mark Williams

"I did see airplane seats and a corpse still strapped to one of the seats."
Capt. Jim Ingledue , Virginia Beach Fire Dept

Quote:
Ok, so you get the list of passenger names, call up family members for blood samples to be used for DNA matching. Take a blood sample of the family member, drop some of their blood into 'unknown sample vile #1', and what do you know...it matches!
I doubt there would be any record of the samples or DNA matching process that would not be text based only. So how would you ever know if there was not a cover up or manipulation of evidence?

Of course that opens up a lot more questions, like "why not just fly the plane into the building in the first place?".... but that was not your question.
No, you couldn't do that, and this time I'm not going to tell you why. If you're interested in learning about the forensics of 9/11, you'll find many resources at the forensics section of my site, linked in my signature.
__________________
"Please, keep your chops cool and don’t overblow.” –Freddie Hubbard

What's the Harm?........Stop Sylvia Browne........My 9/11 links
Gravy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 06:15 AM   #5
Anti-sophist
Graduate Poster
 
Anti-sophist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,542
and who collected those samples?!? THE FBI@??? AND THEY HAVE _NEVER_ LIED BEFORE HAVE THEY??

lol!!!!

---------

I bring up the passenger DNA problem to the truthers all the time when they want to talk flight 77 and they always have some variation on this particular line of circular logic. You need to assume a conspiracy exists a priori in order to be able to selectively remove evidence you don't like when trying to prove the conspiracy.
__________________
A witty saying proves nothing. -Voltaire

Last edited by Anti-sophist; 11th July 2007 at 06:17 AM.
Anti-sophist is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 06:56 AM   #6
beachnut
Penultimate Amazing
 
beachnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 24,788
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
Well, to play off my forum name....
Most of the bodies I've seen were people that were already in the Pentagon.
(One I recall even has a badge you can clearly see on his left chest.)

Ok, so you get the list of passenger names, call up family members for blood samples to be used for DNA matching. Take a blood sample of the family member, drop some of their blood into 'unknown sample vile #1', and what do you know...it matches!
I doubt there would be any record of the samples or DNA matching process that would not be text based only. So how would you ever know if there was not a cover up or manipulation of evidence?

Of course that opens up a lot more questions, like "why not just fly the plane into the building in the first place?".... but that was not your question.
Sad questions only a truther would find merit in. Sad event, disrespectful idoits and how did the education system fail, how can the few become so dumb? What is up?
beachnut is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 07:11 AM   #7
Alt+F4
diabolical globalist
 
Alt+F4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,997
Linky: http://www.afip.org/Departments/lega...2002/kelly.htm

Quote:
A multi-disciplinary team of more than 50 forensic specialists, scientists and support personnel from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) played a major role in one of the most comprehensive forensic investigations in United States history following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack at the Pentagon in Virginia, just outside Washington, DC.
Quote:

Code-named "Operation Noble Eagle," AFIP’s team of forensic pathologists, odontologists, a forensic anthropologist, DNA experts, investigators and support personnel worked for over two weeks at the Dover Air Force Base Port Mortuary at Dover, Delaware to identify the 188 victims of the attack. "Our staff represented every branch of the service," said AFIP Director Glenn N. Wagner, CAPT, MC, USN, who served as senior officer during the operation.

Why don't the conspiracy liars just contact a few of the folks mentioned in this report? Why not drop by any Metro D.C. fire house and interview a few of the firefighter that saw the bodies?

As for the FBI, why are they lying when they say they saw AA77 passenger bodies at the Pentagon but telling the truth when know the "real reasons" OBL isn't on the most wanted list?


__________________
"My folks touched a lot of kids." - Jerry Sandusky
Alt+F4 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 10:12 AM   #8
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
MarcoPolo:

What do you do when confronted with the body locations...

RATIONAL SANE PERSON:

FBI collected info, Processed by coroner and others with expertese in DNA, confirming the passengers and other victims.

IRRATIONAL (All of them) CTIST:

The bodies, if they even existed, were planted, after they were killed elsewhere. Or, all the info is fabricated as part of the NWO cover up.

Take your pick of which you believe.

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 10:14 AM   #9
Pardalis
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25,817
Originally Posted by MarcoPolo View Post
My question is, how do the CTers explain that?
They don't. They just avoid it altogether. I've never seen a Twoofer answer that question.
Pardalis is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 10:33 AM   #10
JamesB
Master Poster
 
JamesB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,152
I made a post on this months ago at SLC, but I have never got a direct response from a conspiracy theorist on the matter. They are very good at shutting up when the evidence is inconvenient.
__________________
I said lots of things in NPH that I would not say today and that I did not repeat in NPHR, where I specifically corrected at least some of the errors I had made in that earlier book, written 5 years ago.
-David Ray Griffin-
JamesB is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 10:38 AM   #11
Rahne Everson
Critical Thinker
 
Rahne Everson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 277
Originally Posted by jhunter1163 View Post
The mind-boggling thing about this to me is, the remains of ALL of the passengers on Flight 77 (except one infant) were found IN THE PENTAGON. How can any sane person conclude anything other than that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

Lyte goes on about chain of custody for the DNA, yada yada yada.. how many more people would faking the DNA results add to the already Impossibly Vast Conspiracy? (apologies to Pomeroo)
Merc and Lyte seem to believe that the only evidence of people on the Flight 77 was the passenger manifest. In my conversatins with them they don't even talk about the human remains. Hell I've seen the picures of them, c'mon.

Of course, Merc thinks the photos of plane wreckage aren't real, so why not the ones of body parts.
Rahne Everson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 02:04 PM   #12
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
If you can't find it on a google search, it must be planted or fabricated by the USG...right...right?

lol

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 02:30 PM   #13
Arus808
Philosopher
 
Arus808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,204
well lyte and merc both seem to dont care anyway. no amount of evidence will convince those frauds of anything.

they are still continuing to push their lies on the myspace forums. rearing their ugly heads to bump old threads in the News & Politics forums to promote their fraud film. just today they bumped a thread there that was "dead" from march of this year.


all they are , as has been demonstrated over and over by their insensitive antics, are attention seeking disturbed individuals. unfortunatley myspace is a meeting ground for the ignorant.


and Merc and Lyte have both stated that a list of names isn't evidence. Yes, that is their answer when you ask "What about the DNA evidence found".
__________________
Back home with a new sunburn...I look like a tomato.

“Life may begin at 30, but it doesn’t get real interesting until about 150.”
“Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.”
Arus808 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 02:44 PM   #14
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
like i said, these morons seem to think that the coroner should invite them in, teach them about PCR and DNA analysis, and then show them the results confirming the dead...otherwise, as far as they are concerned, it is falsified and planted...lame idiots.

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 02:45 PM   #15
Arus808
Philosopher
 
Arus808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,204
yup Lyte/Merc just replied to a post at Myspace concerning the DNA evidence:

Originally Posted by The PentaCon (the documentary)
Again, an article about DNA collection is not proof of anything. All "8000" of those people were easily fooled at the time, not complicit.
They never address the DNA found; they only address anything WRITTEN about the DNA found at the pentagon.
__________________
Back home with a new sunburn...I look like a tomato.

“Life may begin at 30, but it doesn’t get real interesting until about 150.”
“Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.”

Last edited by Arus808; 11th July 2007 at 02:48 PM.
Arus808 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 02:49 PM   #16
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
these little twirps are so egotistical as to think that they have the right to see DNA, or have the coroner call them and invite them over to see it...F&*King insane arrogant obnoxious idiots.

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 02:55 PM   #17
Arus808
Philosopher
 
Arus808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,204
Originally Posted by T.A.M. View Post
these little twirps are so egotistical as to think that they have the right to see DNA, or have the coroner call them and invite them over to see it...F&*King insane arrogant obnoxious idiots.

TAM
by their obtuse logic, they should be contesting EVERY court case that uses DNA evidence to prove or support what happened in a crime.

since all DNA reports are on paper and given to the court; the actual DNA is never presented.


their double standards is truly mind numbing.


funny how these reports were enough to help convict Moussaoui; yet not enough for lyte and merc.
__________________
Back home with a new sunburn...I look like a tomato.

“Life may begin at 30, but it doesn’t get real interesting until about 150.”
“Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.”
Arus808 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 03:01 PM   #18
T.A.M.
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 20,795
yes, but they also believe the judges, and all those concerned in that matter were "In on it".

TAM
T.A.M. is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 11th July 2007, 03:57 PM   #19
Thunder
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,918
CTist asks "how is that human remains survived the crash but most steel and aluminum parts of the plane did not?"
Thunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 12:21 AM   #20
Devil's Advocate
Critical Thinker
 
Devil's Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by Gravy View Post
Please keep in mind, though, that reality does not equal the sum of the photos you've seen.
No, you couldn't do that, and this time I'm not going to tell you why. If you're interested in learning about the forensics of 9/11, you'll find many resources at the forensics section of my site, linked in my signature.
Thanks for the link direction.
By the way, would you happen to know off hand how big the 'American' letters were on a 757? I've read 1.2 meters, but I only found one source, and it was questionable.
Devil's Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 12:35 AM   #21
Reality Believer
Muse
 
Reality Believer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 716
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
Thanks for the link direction.
By the way, would you happen to know off hand how big the 'American' letters were on a 757? I've read 1.2 meters, but I only found one source, and it was questionable.
BZZZT! Inscrutable detail alert!

Are you suggesting that the American Airlines logo, that you believe is on a piece of debris, is slightly out of scale?

This is the rabbit hole that truthers try to lead people down. Inscrutable detail after inscrutable detail without considering the big picture. It can be endless.

Please consider the big picture.
Reality Believer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 12:49 AM   #22
boloboffin
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,986
Something I just thought about - the two videos released by the Pentagon (the security cameras) prove that no one was planting debris on the lawn. When combined with the other pictures of the day taken just after the explosion, they show that no one had any time to plant any evidence.

DA, that large piece of airplane facade had to come from whatever crashed into the Pentagon.
boloboffin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:00 AM   #23
Devil's Advocate
Critical Thinker
 
Devil's Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by boloboffin View Post
Something I just thought about - the two videos released by the Pentagon (the security cameras) prove that no one was planting debris on the lawn. When combined with the other pictures of the day taken just after the explosion, they show that no one had any time to plant any evidence.

DA, that large piece of airplane facade had to come from whatever crashed into the Pentagon.
That is not the piece I was referring to. And I was not led to the observation by a 'truther' site. I made the observation in a link that Gravy provided.
(Flight 77 Pentagon section)
The only source of the size of the lettering led me to a truther site that is why I am asking for another source. (If there is one)

I wanted to know the scale of the letters because the 'C' against that wall looks only slightly bigger than a Ford Van's wheel. That seems odd to me.
I am not implying anything, but I would like to know the scale of the lettering.
Devil's Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:02 AM   #24
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,966
Originally Posted by boloboffin View Post
Something I just thought about - the two videos released by the Pentagon (the security cameras) prove that no one was planting debris on the lawn. When combined with the other pictures of the day taken just after the explosion, they show that no one had any time to plant any evidence.
That's because they think there are just 4 frames and don't bother looking any further.
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My Apollo Page.
PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:02 AM   #25
Pardalis
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25,817
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
I am not implying anything, but I would like to know the scale of the lettering.
Why?
Pardalis is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:12 AM   #26
Devil's Advocate
Critical Thinker
 
Devil's Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by Pardalis View Post
Why?
Because if the scale is correct I can move on to other things in the research. I am not going to just bypass something that seems out of place. That would be foolish.
Devil's Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:13 AM   #27
Pardalis
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25,817
We call that "anomaly hunting".
Pardalis is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:24 AM   #28
Devil's Advocate
Critical Thinker
 
Devil's Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by Pardalis View Post
We call that "anomaly hunting".
Ok, so....

I did not 'hunt' it, it kind of jumped out at me as I was looking at the photographs on Gravy's site.
Am I supposed to ignore it? If so, why should I ignore it?
Devil's Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:35 AM   #29
PhantomWolf
Penultimate Amazing
 
PhantomWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15,966
Pardalis, not all questions are asked with an ulterior motive.
__________________

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah
I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
My Apollo Page.
PhantomWolf is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:37 AM   #30
Pardalis
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25,817
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
Am I supposed to ignore it? If so, why should I ignore it?
Do as you please, waste your time for all I care. If you look closely, maybe you'll find craters on the moon suspicious...

But remember that the forensic and physical evidence overwhelmingly shows that flight 77 did crash there.
Pardalis is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 01:42 AM   #31
Devil's Advocate
Critical Thinker
 
Devil's Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by Pardalis View Post
Do as you please, waste your time for all I care. If you look closely, maybe you'll find craters on the moon suspicious...

But remember that the forensic and physical evidence overwhelmingly shows that flight 77 did crash there.

I am seriously at a loss for words.
Devil's Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 06:08 AM   #32
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
 
DGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,240
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
Because if the scale is correct I can move on to other things in the research. I am not going to just bypass something that seems out of place. That would be foolish.
The problem with trying to scale from that photo is perspective. The "C" is farther from the camera and the piece is bent. Being a 2 dimensional view it becomes difficult to get an accurate scale of the object.

Also for it to be out of place it would have had to been place there in plain view of lots of people (and security camera).
DGM is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 08:10 AM   #33
negativ
Graduate Poster
 
negativ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,904
Originally Posted by Pardalis View Post
Do as you please, waste your time for all I care. If you look closely, maybe you'll find craters on the moon suspicious...

But remember that the forensic and physical evidence overwhelmingly shows that flight 77 did crash there.
Actually, a drunken Kennedy crashed a golf cart into it, but 9/11 was fabricated to cover it up.

I mean, which is more of a stretch, that a Kennedy got drunk and wrecked something, or that a bunch of cavemen flew Blue Angels-style aerobatic maneuvers to kill themselves on purpose? Not one witness reported seeing any Arabs on flying carpets. Case closed.

/CTer
__________________
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals.
Eternal salvation or TRIPLE your money back!

Last edited by negativ; 12th July 2007 at 08:15 AM.
negativ is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 08:21 AM   #34
Devil's Advocate
Critical Thinker
 
Devil's Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by DGM View Post
The problem with trying to scale from that photo is perspective. The "C" is farther from the camera and the piece is bent. Being a 2 dimensional view it becomes difficult to get an accurate scale of the object.

Also for it to be out of place it would have had to been place there in plain view of lots of people (and security camera).
Yes, I understand that. (Being a 2 dimensional view it becomes difficult to get an accurate scale of the object)
But it still seems like it is nowhere near the size it should be.
Three to three and a half feet or so? Not even close.
That is why I want to know the dimension's of the letters to see if I am off with the dimensions I have seen. (From a source that is pushing agenda)

Some may believe it to be unimportant, but it is bugging me, and I am the type that gets hung on something until it is resolved. OCD?
Devil's Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 08:29 AM   #35
apathoid
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,918
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
I wanted to know the scale of the letters because the 'C' against that wall looks only slightly bigger than a Ford Van's wheel. That seems odd to me.
I am not implying anything, but I would like to know the scale of the lettering.
To my eyes, the "c" looks to be around 2.5-3 ft tall. Almost as tall as the door on the right is wide....

http://911myths.com/assets/images/db...Debris_171.jpg

Now let us off the hook and tell us you were joking.......please.

edit: just opened the above image in Photoshop and the "c" is around 5-10% wider than the door on the right, or about 35-40".

Last edited by apathoid; 12th July 2007 at 08:36 AM. Reason: added something
apathoid is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 08:37 AM   #36
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
 
DGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West of Northshore MA
Posts: 24,240
Originally Posted by Devil's Advocate View Post
Yes, I understand that. (Being a 2 dimensional view it becomes difficult to get an accurate scale of the object)
But it still seems like it is nowhere near the size it should be.
Three to three and a half feet or so? Not even close.
That is why I want to know the dimension's of the letters to see if I am off with the dimensions I have seen. (From a source that is pushing agenda)

Some may believe it to be unimportant, but it is bugging me, and I am the type that gets hung on something until it is resolved. OCD?
Maybe compairing to pictures of other American (757)jets might help.

Is this the picture in question? the "c" looks nearly folded in half.

DGM is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 08:38 AM   #37
Rahne Everson
Critical Thinker
 
Rahne Everson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 277
Originally Posted by Arus808 View Post
they are still continuing to push their lies on the myspace forums. rearing their ugly heads to bump old threads in the News & Politics forums to promote their fraud film. just today they bumped a thread there that was "dead" from march of this year.
Exactly, which is why I bumped the thread "Things that are better than another CT thread on the front page"

But yes, they're bonkers. Merc needs some serious professional help, I'd be frightened to be in thesame room as him.
Rahne Everson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 08:42 AM   #38
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles
 
Dave Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD
Posts: 24,720
Originally Posted by DGM View Post
Maybe compairing to pictures of other American (757)jets might help.

Is this the picture in question? the "c" looks nearly folded in half.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...64a356bf44.jpg
I'm no expert on photo interpretation, but if you look at the angle of the wall behind the Ford, it's clear that there's a lot of foreshortening in this shot, and the debris is actually significantly further away than the truck. Maybe that accounts for the size discrepancy, if there is one.

Dave
__________________
Me: So what you're saying is that, if the load carrying ability of the lower structure is reduced to the point where it can no longer support the load above it, it will collapse without a jolt, right?

Tony Szamboti: That is right
Dave Rogers is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 08:43 AM   #39
Devil's Advocate
Critical Thinker
 
Devil's Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by apathoid View Post
To my eyes, the "c" looks to be around 2.5-3 ft tall. Almost as tall as the door on the right is wide....

http://911myths.com/assets/images/db...Debris_171.jpg

Now let us off the hook and tell us you were joking.......please.

edit: just opened the above image in Photoshop and the "c" is around 5-10% wider than the door on the right, or about 35-40".
Yeah, see, that picture just makes it worse.
Let you off the hook? Not a chance. You will suffer as I do.
Wait a second....You're NWO! Moloch! I'm on to you!

Devil's Advocate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 12th July 2007, 08:45 AM   #40
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
 
twinstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,368
Originally Posted by Rahne Everson View Post
But yes, they're bonkers. Merc needs some serious professional help, I'd be frightened to be in thesame room as him.
Well, when I first read your post thesame looked just like threesome, and I remember stopping right there and thinking to myself "yea, that would be frightening, but what a weird thing to say...".

Then I reread it; I feel much better now.
twinstead is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:18 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014, TribeTech AB. All Rights Reserved.
This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.