November 2007 Stundie Nominations - Page 8

Cuddles · 15th November 2007, 08:25 AM

Originally Posted by Horatius

there is a traitorous undertone to "debunking" at this late stage of the process.[/url]

"Traitor: One who betrays one's country."
No matter how hard we try, I think many of us are going to struggle to do anything traitorous with regards to 11/9.

Originally Posted by Dr Adequate

Which is heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of lead?

Ah, but pounds of lead are non-migratory.

Unsecured Coins · 15th November 2007, 08:29 AM

are we talking African or European lead?

Dave Rogers · 15th November 2007, 08:32 AM

Originally Posted by Cuddles

Ah, but pounds of lead are non-migratory.

[OpPythonReference] OK, which is heavier, a pound of coconuts or a pound of lead? [/ObPythonReference]

Dave

ETA: Curse you, Unsecured Coins!

JimBenArm · 15th November 2007, 08:32 AM

Well, you could tie the feathers to the lead with string. Or maybe the lead could grip the feathers.

JonnyFive · 15th November 2007, 08:43 AM

I think the feathers would weigh less because of air pressure or something. Are the objects in a vacuum so as to negate gravity?

I will pass Twysics yet, goddammit!

Dave Rogers · 15th November 2007, 08:53 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

I think the feathers would weigh less because of air pressure or something.

I'm tempted to make some comment about "Net force equals zero", but I can't because in this case it would be true.

Dave

rwguinn · 15th November 2007, 09:50 AM

circular reasoning, inc:
From Christopher7
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...08#post3154908

Originally Posted by Christopher7

Funk

Do you understand the difference between 'evidence' and 'proof' ?

evidence: sign or proof

Every high rise building building that has ever imploded, before or since 9/11, was a CD.

WTC 7 imploded.
This is a sign this it could have been a CD.
It is therefore evidence of a CD.

JonnyFive · 15th November 2007, 09:59 AM

Originally Posted by rwguinn

circular reasoning, inc:
From Christopher7

Also, the WTC towers collapsed.

This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

JimBenArm · 15th November 2007, 10:00 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

Also, the WTC towers collapsed.

This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

Well, duh! It's obvious!

defaultdotxbe · 15th November 2007, 10:01 AM

Originally Posted by Dr Adequate

Which is heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of lead?

irrelevant, a pound of dust is lighter than both of them

Belz... · 15th November 2007, 10:03 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

Also, the WTC towers collapsed.

This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.

Of course. At least, if it happens in Tokyo, because no Japanese high-rise has ever collapsed except due to the action of giant monsters.

JonnyFive · 15th November 2007, 10:05 AM

Originally Posted by Belz...

Of course. At least, if it happens in Tokyo, because no Japanese high-rise has ever collapsed except due to the action of giant monsters.

Whereas in the United States it could potentially be due to the actions of King Kong... or possibly King Kongs (side note: Kind Kongs or Kings Kong?).

Originally Posted by JimBenArm

Well, duh! It's obvious!

It's tempting to actually engage C7 over that piece of mess, but I've read his threads before and I know he isn't changing his views for anything. He could have a magical time/space machine that lets him see every minute detail of 9/11 and still rail on about how building 7 was a controlled demolition.

JimBenArm · 15th November 2007, 10:09 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

It's tempting to actually engage C7 over that piece of mess, but I've read his threads before and I know he isn't changing his views for anything. He could have a magical time/space machine that lets him see every minute detail of 9/11 and still rail on about how building 7 was a controlled demolition.

Yeah, I should have known better, but he got under my skin this morning.

defaultdotxbe · 15th November 2007, 10:11 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

Whereas in the United States it could potentially be due to the actions of King Kong... or possibly King Kongs (side note: Kind Kongs or Kings Kong?).

i dont believe king kong ever destroyed any high rises, despite attacking the WTC directly in the mid-70s, therefore we can safely assume any destruction attributed to king kong is in fact controlled demolition

JonnyFive · 15th November 2007, 10:20 AM

Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe

i dont believe king kong ever destroyed any high rises, despite attacking the WTC directly in the mid-70s, therefore we can safely assume any destruction attributed to king kong is in fact controlled demolition

That's true. However, I'm pretty sure you can see King Kong planting charges on the WTC towers if you take some low-res YouTube video, freeze it at an arbitrary point, and run it through a couple random Photoshop filters.

Originally Posted by JimBenArm

Yeah, I should have known better, but he got under my skin this morning.

Completely understandable, especially given that he's essentially redefining a simple word to mean what he wants it to. I've gotten into protracted discussions with people who really aren't dealing with a full deck (ChristopherA, for example) and it's hard to disengage sometime.

After all, when debating it would normally be proper to point out errors of definition. However, in C7's world, he is right about everything, and everyone that disagrees is in denial or lying.

Belz... · 15th November 2007, 10:51 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

(side note: Kin[g] Kongs or Kings Kong?).

You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs.

JonnyFive · 15th November 2007, 11:09 AM

Originally Posted by Belz...

You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs.

What about having one King Kong for each country? Then they can all get together and have a party every year and wreck up the place.

What about a King Kong and a Prime Minister Kong, along with several Secretary and Undersecretary Kongs? This is to say nothing of the possibility of having a figurehead King Kong along with a President Kong.

I think we need to weigh such possibilities. The future of the world may depend on it.

defaultdotxbe · 15th November 2007, 11:09 AM

Originally Posted by Belz...

You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs.

i suppsoe you could have a king kong who holds no real political power, and a prime minister kong

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

What about a King Kong and a Prime Minister Kong

great (or warped) minds think alike

Horatius · 15th November 2007, 11:26 AM

Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe

i dont believe king kong ever destroyed any high rises,

You Kong-lovers are such total disinfo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoFDdmD2T6k

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

Unsecured Coins · 15th November 2007, 11:34 AM

the NWO got to your youtube video! panickz!!

defaultdotxbe · 15th November 2007, 11:39 AM

Originally Posted by Horatius

You Kong-lovers are such total disinfo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoFDdmD2T6k

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the ISF. The ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

TV FAKERY!!! CGI KONG!!!!!

(its funny cuz its true

)

Corsair 115 · 15th November 2007, 12:42 PM

Originally Posted by Belz...

You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs.

No, no, if he's a King, then we're talking about the hierarchy in royalty. Which if I recall correctly goes, from highest to lowest: king, prince, duke, marquis, earl, viscount, baron, schmuck. Not sure about that last one.

Belz... · 15th November 2007, 01:04 PM

You forgot the Regent Kong and Viceroy Kong.

uk_dave · 15th November 2007, 01:09 PM

And Major Kong.

.......

....I'll get me coat.

Hokulele · 15th November 2007, 05:09 PM

Deep44 seems to be using a new definition for "facts".

Originally Posted by deep44

See, since you don't actually have the facts on your side, you have to concentrate on coming up with excuses not to acknowledge certain evidence.

Blue Mountain · 15th November 2007, 10:04 PM

Originally Posted by Corsair 115

No, no, if he's a King, then we're talking about the hierarchy in royalty. Which if I recall correctly goes, from highest to lowest: king, prince, duke, marquis, earl, viscount, baron, schmuck. Not sure about that last one.

Reminds me so much of this quote from the British series "Chef!":

Quote:

Let me explain the order of things for you. There's the aristocracy, the upper class, middle class, working class, dumb animals, waiters, creeping things, head lice, people who eat packet soup, and then you.

JonnyFive · 16th November 2007, 06:51 AM

Originally Posted by Blue Mountain

Reminds me so much of this quote from the British series "Chef!":

What in the ever-loving hell is "packet soup?"

8den · 16th November 2007, 07:34 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

What in the ever-loving hell is "packet soup?"

Powered soup.

Work of the effing devil.

TriskettheKid · 16th November 2007, 10:41 PM

I don't think this should come as a surprise to anyone, considering the board I got it from.

Behold, the astronomical genius that is xxMarius:

Quote:

My god! Since when has the sun been the largest object in the solar system?

May we all learn from this genius.

http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/gen...topic=39573862

Alareth · 17th November 2007, 12:14 AM

What about Donkey, Diddy, Deedee and Cranky Kong?

8den · 17th November 2007, 05:32 AM

It has a certain purity to it, it is a typo, but it's on the actual credits of loose change final cut

Originally Posted by Dylan Avary

Writen by Dylan Avary

Gravy · 17th November 2007, 08:07 AM

Originally Posted by 8den

It has a certain purity to it, it is a typo, but it's on the actual credits of loose change final cut

Oh, please post a screen shot of that!

e^n · 17th November 2007, 08:13 AM

Originally Posted by Gravy

Oh, please post a screen shot of that!

Your wish is my contractual obligation.

(It's not entirely accurate)

Unsecured Coins · 17th November 2007, 09:13 AM

I'm just waiting for this quote.

Originally Posted by Dylan Avery

I will be the first to admit that our film definitely contains spelling errors, it still does contain some dubious claims, and it does come to some conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts.
*goes back to staring into space*

Gravy · 17th November 2007, 09:24 AM

Originally Posted by e^n

Your wish is my contractual obligation.

(It's not entirely accurate)
http://xs221.xs.to/xs221/07466/writtenby.jpeg

Thanks for doing that, but I thought from 8den's post that Avery's name was misspelled.

Kiosk · 17th November 2007, 09:58 AM

Yeah, that would be better - but come on, spelling "written" incorrectly is kind of delicious.

Especially in the credits of a "million dollar" movie...

Hokulele · 17th November 2007, 10:27 AM

Oh come on people. It was fact-checked by DRG, not spell-checked.

e^n · 17th November 2007, 10:37 AM

Originally Posted by Gravy

Thanks for doing that, but I thought from 8den's post that Avery's name was misspelled.

That's what I thought, but at least he can't spell "Written"

1337m4n · 17th November 2007, 12:40 PM

I found one! I found one!

This one's from the Myspace forums, by a regular Wooist there called YuvbinDuped:

8den · 17th November 2007, 02:22 PM

Originally Posted by Gravy

Thanks for doing that, but I thought from 8den's post that Avery's name was misspelled.

No only in my post. C'mon Dylan's ego would allow that?

15th November 2007, 08:25 AM	#281
Cuddles Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 18,709	Originally Posted by Horatius there is a traitorous undertone to "debunking" at this late stage of the process.[/url] "Traitor: One who betrays one's country." No matter how hard we try, I think many of us are going to struggle to do anything traitorous with regards to 11/9. Originally Posted by Dr Adequate Which is heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of lead? Ah, but pounds of lead are non-migratory.
	Last edited by Cuddles; 15th November 2007 at 08:26 AM.

15th November 2007, 08:29 AM	#282
Unsecured Coins Hoku-maniac Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 5,905	are we talking African or European lead?
	__________________ "If God wants 10% of my paycheck, he can get it himself. Or at least work for it -Kochanski "I may not be easy, but I am fast." - Hokulele "Oh CRAP... DQ!!" - Ol' Hokey, yet again

15th November 2007, 08:32 AM	#283
Dave Rogers Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD Posts: 33,605	Originally Posted by Cuddles Ah, but pounds of lead are non-migratory. [OpPythonReference] OK, which is heavier, a pound of coconuts or a pound of lead? [/ObPythonReference] Dave ETA: Curse you, Unsecured Coins!
	__________________ There is truth and there are lies. - President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021 Last edited by Dave Rogers; 15th November 2007 at 08:33 AM.

15th November 2007, 08:43 AM	#285
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459	I think the feathers would weigh less because of air pressure or something. Are the objects in a vacuum so as to negate gravity? I will pass Twysics yet, goddammit!
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459

15th November 2007, 08:53 AM	#286
Dave Rogers Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Cair Paravel, according to XKCD Posts: 33,605	Originally Posted by JonnyFive I think the feathers would weigh less because of air pressure or something. I'm tempted to make some comment about "Net force equals zero", but I can't because in this case it would be true. Dave
	__________________ There is truth and there are lies. - President Joseph R. Biden, January 20th, 2021

15th November 2007, 08:32 AM	#284
JimBenArm Based on a true story! Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 13,092	Well, you could tie the feathers to the lead with string. Or maybe the lead could grip the feathers.

15th November 2007, 09:50 AM	#287
rwguinn Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: 16 miles from 7 lakes Posts: 11,098	circular reasoning, inc: From Christopher7 http://www.internationalskeptics.com...08#post3154908 Originally Posted by Christopher7 Funk Do you understand the difference between 'evidence' and 'proof' ? evidence: sign or proof Every high rise building building that has ever imploded, before or since 9/11, was a CD. WTC 7 imploded. This is a sign this it could have been a CD. It is therefore evidence of a CD.
	__________________ "Political correctness is a doctrine,...,which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." "I pointed out that his argument was wrong in every particular, but he rightfully took me to task for attacking only the weak points." Myriad http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=6853275#post6853275

15th November 2007, 09:59 AM	#288
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459	Originally Posted by rwguinn circular reasoning, inc: From Christopher7 Also, the WTC towers collapsed. This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail. Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail.
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459

15th November 2007, 10:00 AM	#289
JimBenArm Based on a true story! Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 13,092	Originally Posted by JonnyFive Also, the WTC towers collapsed. This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail. Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail. Well, duh! It's obvious!

15th November 2007, 10:01 AM	#290
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 7,474	Originally Posted by Dr Adequate Which is heavier, a pound of feathers or a pound of lead? irrelevant, a pound of dust is lighter than both of them
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein

15th November 2007, 10:03 AM	#291
Belz... Fiend God Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: In a post-fact world Posts: 96,875	Originally Posted by JonnyFive Also, the WTC towers collapsed. This is a sign that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail. Therefore, this is evidence that Godzilla demolished the towers with his tail. Of course. At least, if it happens in Tokyo, because no Japanese high-rise has ever collapsed except due to the action of giant monsters.
	__________________ Master of the Shining Darkness "My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward Last edited by Belz...; 15th November 2007 at 10:03 AM.

15th November 2007, 10:05 AM	#292
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459	Originally Posted by Belz... Of course. At least, if it happens in Tokyo, because no Japanese high-rise has ever collapsed except due to the action of giant monsters. Whereas in the United States it could potentially be due to the actions of King Kong... or possibly King Kongs (side note: Kind Kongs or Kings Kong?). Originally Posted by JimBenArm Well, duh! It's obvious! It's tempting to actually engage C7 over that piece of mess, but I've read his threads before and I know he isn't changing his views for anything. He could have a magical time/space machine that lets him see every minute detail of 9/11 and still rail on about how building 7 was a controlled demolition.
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459

15th November 2007, 10:09 AM	#293
JimBenArm Based on a true story! Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 13,092	Originally Posted by JonnyFive It's tempting to actually engage C7 over that piece of mess, but I've read his threads before and I know he isn't changing his views for anything. He could have a magical time/space machine that lets him see every minute detail of 9/11 and still rail on about how building 7 was a controlled demolition. Yeah, I should have known better, but he got under my skin this morning.

15th November 2007, 10:11 AM	#294
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 7,474	Originally Posted by JonnyFive Whereas in the United States it could potentially be due to the actions of King Kong... or possibly King Kongs (side note: Kind Kongs or Kings Kong?). i dont believe king kong ever destroyed any high rises, despite attacking the WTC directly in the mid-70s, therefore we can safely assume any destruction attributed to king kong is in fact controlled demolition
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein

15th November 2007, 10:20 AM	#295
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459	Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe i dont believe king kong ever destroyed any high rises, despite attacking the WTC directly in the mid-70s, therefore we can safely assume any destruction attributed to king kong is in fact controlled demolition That's true. However, I'm pretty sure you can see King Kong planting charges on the WTC towers if you take some low-res YouTube video, freeze it at an arbitrary point, and run it through a couple random Photoshop filters. Originally Posted by JimBenArm Yeah, I should have known better, but he got under my skin this morning. Completely understandable, especially given that he's essentially redefining a simple word to mean what he wants it to. I've gotten into protracted discussions with people who really aren't dealing with a full deck (ChristopherA, for example) and it's hard to disengage sometime. After all, when debating it would normally be proper to point out errors of definition. However, in C7's world, he is right about everything, and everyone that disagrees is in denial or lying.
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459

15th November 2007, 10:51 AM	#296
Belz... Fiend God Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: In a post-fact world Posts: 96,875	Originally Posted by JonnyFive (side note: Kin[g] Kongs or Kings Kong?). You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs.
	__________________ Master of the Shining Darkness "My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward

15th November 2007, 11:09 AM	#297
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459	Originally Posted by Belz... You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs. What about having one King Kong for each country? Then they can all get together and have a party every year and wreck up the place. What about a King Kong and a Prime Minister Kong, along with several Secretary and Undersecretary Kongs? This is to say nothing of the possibility of having a figurehead King Kong along with a President Kong. I think we need to weigh such possibilities. The future of the world may depend on it.
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459

15th November 2007, 11:09 AM	#298
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 7,474	Originally Posted by Belz... You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs. i suppsoe you could have a king kong who holds no real political power, and a prime minister kong Originally Posted by JonnyFive What about a King Kong and a Prime Minister Kong great (or warped) minds think alike
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein Last edited by defaultdotxbe; 15th November 2007 at 11:11 AM.

15th November 2007, 11:34 AM	#300
Unsecured Coins Hoku-maniac Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 5,905	the NWO got to your youtube video! panickz!!
	__________________ "If God wants 10% of my paycheck, he can get it himself. Or at least work for it -Kochanski "I may not be easy, but I am fast." - Hokulele "Oh CRAP... DQ!!" - Ol' Hokey, yet again

15th November 2007, 12:42 PM	#302
Corsair 115 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 14,519	Originally Posted by Belz... You can't have more than one king kong. Otherwise you'd have to have an emperor kong and several governor kongs, or perhaps a number of senator kongs. No, no, if he's a King, then we're talking about the hierarchy in royalty. Which if I recall correctly goes, from highest to lowest: king, prince, duke, marquis, earl, viscount, baron, schmuck. Not sure about that last one.
	__________________ "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win."

15th November 2007, 01:04 PM	#303
Belz... Fiend God Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: In a post-fact world Posts: 96,875	You forgot the Regent Kong and Viceroy Kong.
	__________________ Master of the Shining Darkness "My views are nonsense. So what?" - BobTheCoward

15th November 2007, 01:09 PM	#304
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,154	And Major Kong. ....... ....I'll get me coat.
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 8,154

15th November 2007, 05:09 PM	#305
Hokulele Deleterious Slab of Damnation Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: The Biggest Little City in the World Posts: 29,577	Deep44 seems to be using a new definition for "facts". Originally Posted by deep44 See, since you don't actually have the facts on your side, you have to concentrate on coming up with excuses not to acknowledge certain evidence.
	__________________ "Oh god...What have you done, zooterkin? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?!?!" - Cleon

15th November 2007, 10:04 PM	#306
Blue Mountain Resident Skeptical Hobbit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Waging war on woo-woo in Winnipeg Posts: 7,167	Originally Posted by Corsair 115 No, no, if he's a King, then we're talking about the hierarchy in royalty. Which if I recall correctly goes, from highest to lowest: king, prince, duke, marquis, earl, viscount, baron, schmuck. Not sure about that last one. Reminds me so much of this quote from the British series "Chef!": Quote: Let me explain the order of things for you. There's the aristocracy, the upper class, middle class, working class, dumb animals, waiters, creeping things, head lice, people who eat packet soup, and then you.
	__________________ The social illusion reigns to-day upon all the heaped-up ruins of the past, and to it belongs the future. The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Gustav Le Bon, The Crowd, 1895 (from the French)

16th November 2007, 06:51 AM	#307
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459	Originally Posted by Blue Mountain Reminds me so much of this quote from the British series "Chef!": What in the ever-loving hell is "packet soup?"
JonnyFive Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,459

16th November 2007, 07:34 AM	#308
8den Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 1,293	Originally Posted by JonnyFive What in the ever-loving hell is "packet soup?" Powered soup. Work of the effing devil.
8den Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 1,293	__________________ “If every trace of any single religion were wiped out again and nothing was passed on, it would never be created exactly that way again. If all of science were wiped out, it would still be true and someone would find a way to figure it out again." - Penn Jillette in God, No!

16th November 2007, 10:41 PM	#309
TriskettheKid Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,431	I don't think this should come as a surprise to anyone, considering the board I got it from. Behold, the astronomical genius that is xxMarius: Quote: My god! Since when has the sun been the largest object in the solar system? May we all learn from this genius. http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/gen...topic=39573862

17th November 2007, 12:14 AM	#310
Alareth Philosopher Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Jacksonville, FL Posts: 7,682	What about Donkey, Diddy, Deedee and Cranky Kong?

17th November 2007, 05:32 AM	#311
8den Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 1,293	It has a certain purity to it, it is a typo, but it's on the actual credits of loose change final cut Originally Posted by Dylan Avary Writen by Dylan Avary
8den Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 1,293	__________________ “If every trace of any single religion were wiped out again and nothing was passed on, it would never be created exactly that way again. If all of science were wiped out, it would still be true and someone would find a way to figure it out again." - Penn Jillette in God, No!

17th November 2007, 08:07 AM	#312
Gravy Downsitting Citizen Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 17,078	Originally Posted by 8den It has a certain purity to it, it is a typo, but it's on the actual credits of loose change final cut Oh, please post a screen shot of that!
	__________________ "Please, keep your chops cool and don’t overblow.” –Freddie Hubbard

17th November 2007, 08:13 AM	#313
e^n Muse Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 810	Originally Posted by Gravy Oh, please post a screen shot of that! Your wish is my contractual obligation. (It's not entirely accurate)
e^n Muse Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 810

17th November 2007, 09:13 AM	#314
Unsecured Coins Hoku-maniac Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 5,905	I'm just waiting for this quote. Originally Posted by Dylan Avery I will be the first to admit that our film definitely contains spelling errors, it still does contain some dubious claims, and it does come to some conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts. goes back to staring into space
	__________________ "If God wants 10% of my paycheck, he can get it himself. Or at least work for it -Kochanski "I may not be easy, but I am fast." - Hokulele "Oh CRAP... DQ!!" - Ol' Hokey, yet again

17th November 2007, 09:24 AM	#315
Gravy Downsitting Citizen Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 17,078	Originally Posted by e^n Your wish is my contractual obligation. (It's not entirely accurate) http://xs221.xs.to/xs221/07466/writtenby.jpeg Thanks for doing that, but I thought from 8den's post that Avery's name was misspelled.
	__________________ "Please, keep your chops cool and don’t overblow.” –Freddie Hubbard

17th November 2007, 09:58 AM	#316
Kiosk He Thinks He's People Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 349	Yeah, that would be better - but come on, spelling "written" incorrectly is kind of delicious. Especially in the credits of a "million dollar" movie...
	__________________ Many of the medical profession are sceptical about my work. They point to my record of treatment of athlete's foot sufferers - 84 dead, 65 severely wounded, and 12 missing believed cured. But then, people laughed at Bob Hope. People laughed at my wife when she wrapped herself up in greaseproof paper and hopped into the Social Security office - but that doesn't mean that Pasteur was wrong.

17th November 2007, 10:27 AM	#317
Hokulele Deleterious Slab of Damnation Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: The Biggest Little City in the World Posts: 29,577	Oh come on people. It was fact-checked by DRG, not spell-checked.
	__________________ "Oh god...What have you done, zooterkin? WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?!?!" - Cleon