Review of "Prophecy: What the Future Holds for You"

Yahya Sulaiman

Scholar
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
70
I thought you guys might appreciate reading my review of this book of Sylvia Browne's, since she and Randi are mortal enemies.

Review of "Prophecy: What the Future Holds for You", by Sylvia Browne and Lindsay Harrison

Opening note: I do not know who Lindsay Harrison is or how much she contributed to the writing of this book. For the sake of convenience, I will assume that Sylvia Browne is the author of every passage I will discuss.

One dead giveaway that a psychic is bogus is if his or her prophecies are pervasively and relentlessly optimistic, since while this isn’t very likely in terms of the real future of such a large and complex world as ours, any more than pervasive and relentless pessimism is, on the other hand it is exactly the kind of vision of the future which fraudulent psychics will offer. A large part of their job is to tell people what they want to hear. So it is with this book: on the rare occasion that Sylvia Browne predicts something negative, there’s always a reassurance that the bad thing is going to be temporary and in the end everything will work itself out to a spectacular extent.

I find it hard to tell whether Browne is a bogus psychic due to deliberate deception or mere delusion, or a strange mixture of both. After all, on page 224 of the first edition paperback (the printing from which I will be giving all of my page number references in this review) she says, “The last thing I need in this world is one more voice in my head that isn’t mine.” Not a good thing to be saying for someone who repeatedly expresses concern, as Sylvia does in this book, that people will think she’s psychotic. On page 237 she points out how schizophrenia is a condition where “the person might see visions and hear voices that he or she will never believe are imaginary....” You’d think she’d offer some justification of herself here, but the connection doesn’t seem to occur to her.

I would have to write a book of my own in order to point out everything wrong with this one, and I see no need to waste that much time. I won’t even bother with issues like her misunderstanding of some things about Islam. At least they’re tolerant misunderstandings of my religion rather than the kind of prejudiced misunderstandings that are much more common. Instead, for brevity’s sake I will discuss only my favorite flaws from the book.

I have to admit, though, that some of what Sylvia says is a little too truly incomprehensible for me to criticize it easily. For example, on page 77 she says, “The Other Side isn’t ‘out there somewhere,’ it’s right here among us, a mere three feet above our own ground level. It’s another dimension, operating at a much higher vibrational [sic] frequency than ours here on earth, and duplicating the earth’s topography almost identically.” I don’t know where to begin with that sentence. How about with the illogicality of the afterlife having a location that can be measured spatially in this life? I also find it kind of hard to picture there being a Romanesque building with a “scanning machine” there, as Sylvia avers on page 78, or how souls worthy of salvation in Sylvia’s Gnostic Christian worldview would be the sort who would gather to worship a bunch of “Akashic records”, as she avers on page 80.

My favorite part of the book is where Sylvia discusses the issue of how she reconciles her Christianity with the Bible, which warns of false prophets and says, “Do not turn to mediums” (Leviticus 19:31), and, “Harken [typo is from Sylvia's book] not to your prophets, nor to your diviners” (Jeremiah 27:9). Here she inadvertently pretty much admits that she is a false prophet. You see, she had just spent thirty-five pages giving anecdotal evidence about fulfilled prophecies by numerous famous people (including, of all folks, Winston Churchill and H.G. Wells) without citing a single source or even telling you where you can look to verify her stories—she just wants you to take her word for it that George Washington foresaw the American Civil War and et cetera. Now, on page 72, four pages after that section of the book, she says, “The only way a false prophet can take hold is in a vacuum where no other information but the prophet’s is allowed inside.” (She follows this up with, “Many false prophets will also find countless ways to separate you from your money at every possible opportunity.”)

In fact, this presenting-information-in-a-vacuum philosophy is her attitude throughout the entire book writ large. For example, on page 87 she says, “Tiresome skeptics say, ‘Prove it.’ I’ve finally started replying, ‘You prove we’re wrong. We’re busy.’” Or take Sylvia’s claim on pages 96-97 that she’s “been tested a bazillion times by a whole list of psychologists, scientists, paranormal researchers, psychiatrists, hypnotherapists and MD’s”. (Let’s forget for a moment that an MD is a kind of educational achievement, not a kind of person.) She continues: “According to the tests...my accuracy rate is somewhere between 87 and 90 percent if I’m recalling correctly.” Now if this list is real then why does she mention it but never give it to us, when doing so would only increase her credibility--not to mention making an otherwise pointless passage into a meaningful allusion?

Of course Sylvia never returns to those passages from Leviticus and Jeremiah telling us not to consult mediums at all; apparently she hopes you will have forgotten about them by the time she’s finished with the stuff about the other biblical reference she offers regarding false prophets. Keep that in mind when you consider how in the first chapter Sylvia the self-professed Christian cites the supposed Messianic prophecies of the Old Testament to support the idea of prophecy being important in Christianity, and then on page 72 she says, “False prophets tend to make up their own rules for their behavior at their own narcissistic whim, having nothing to do with God’s rules whatsoever, but then cite a message from God as their excuse when the need arises, as if God bends his own rules sometimes for their personal convenience.” I imagine that most Christians reading all this rich irony will probably laugh out loud.

Yet another of her own criterions for detecting a false prophet backfires on her, one she offers on pages 73-74: “Any prophet who believes he or she is exempt for [sic] the laws of God and society and somehow in a position of divine immunity from consequence is a false prophet.” There’s probably something to that, but this declaration is coming from the same woman who, during one reading on Larry King’s show, broke the law by giving professional advice on psychological medicine (specifically, Tegritol) even though she doesn’t have an MD and a PhD in psychology. As Sylvia says on page 209 of this book, “If there’s no medical degree and license among those credentials, run. I don’t care how much money you’re supposedly saving by nothing bothering with that pesky ‘doctor’ detail.” It also bears notice that on page 195 she says, “You’ll never hear me recommend any ‘medication’ that can’t be bought over the counter at your nearest health food store...I wouldn’t follow an idiotic suggestion like that myself, so why on earth would I ask you to?” Tegritol, of course, cannot be bought over the counter at any health food store.

Now you might be wondering about the prophecies which make up the thick of the book. Like I said, I won’t bother discussing everything, but here are a few favorites:

* On page 117 Sylvia says that “we may see a large new land mass emerging among the Hawaiian islands” because of Japanese tsunamis around 2026. She adds, “I’m sure you’d like something more absolute, but that’s as definite as I can get on that subject for now.” All I want here is something more definite than the word “may”. After all, I may end up winning the lottery someday, but saying so doesn’t really communicate anything, now does it?

* On pages 126-127 Sylvia says that aliens live among us disguised as humans, still hanging around even though they already learned everything they need to know about us thousands of years ago—maybe because they like the pizza here, I don’t know—and around 2018 they will, without any clearly stated motive, come “out of the closet” (Sylvia’s phrase) after spending thousands of years incognito.

* On page 159 she says that around 2020 no child will be able to graduate from sixth grade without being able to read and write. How many of them manage that now?

* On page 170 she says that in the bathrooms of the future, “when you’ve finished your shower, you’ll simply stay right where you are and be flash-dried by some combination of heat, lights and thermal energy. Including your hair. In ten seconds or less.” I think I’ll stick with towels. And is it just me or are heat and thermal energy the same thing, and also the only possible way for lights to dry something? How can heat be combined with heat and heat?

* On page 174 she says that sunglasses will someday “double as digital recorders, cameras and transmitters, as well as personal stereo systems, kind of the boombox or Walkman in designer sunglass form”. (On the previous page Sylvia assures us: “If some of [the prophecies here] sound suspiciously inspired by James Bond movies, let me assure you, any resemblance is completely coincidental.”) It’s a little strange for someone who’s predicting the future of music technology to be so behind on current music technology, but never mind that: the thing is, some people had already been putting micro-cameras on sunglasses by the time this book came out.

* Sylvia claims on page 185 that “databases of iris images as part of our overall identification profile will...make it even more difficult for criminals to find a place to hide”. Who agrees with me that she’s probably seen Minority Report?

* On page 190 she says, “To give law enforcement one more added edge, by 2015 their custom-designed high-speed vehicles will be atomically powered and capable of becoming airborne enough to fly several feet above other traffic.” Who agrees with me that she’s probably seen the Back to the Future movies?

* On pages 199-200 she says that cancer will be cured because scientists will feed the cancer cells addictive drugs which will cause them to eat each other up rather than the healthy cells (???). Oh, and you have to read this sentence from page 203, it’s just so classic: “And if we think the medical community is too riddled with fakes and charlatans now, just wait till those fountain-of-youth injections and surgeries hit the market.”

* On page 208 she says that childbirth in the future will consist of women being suspended by “strong, padded, comfortable straps” and the baby will drop down “into waiting soft, sterile pillows in the hands of the doctor and nurse in attendance”. Since Sylvia is herself a mother, I don’t understand why she wouldn’t know that, considering how fragile a head and how weak a neck a newborn has, it’s dangerous to drop one on his or her head even onto soft pillows.

Occasionally Sylvia will interject common sense into the midst of her bogus prophecies. For example, I strongly approve of her statement on pages 103-104 that “if you’re determined to be frightened about some kind of pervasive threat to the future of life on our planet, don’t waste another moment looking up, braced to duck from a killer asteroid. Instead, look around, or in the mirror, because we human beings are the most ruthless, relentless threat—and the greatest hope—earth has ever known.” If she would simply have written the whole book along those lines then it may very well have been worthwhile, but as it is, Prophecy: What the Future Holds for You is a waste of time even for a New Age book.
 
Thank you for a fine effort - it is always encouraging to see work such as yours.

Now for the bad news: Have you published (or do you intend publishing) your review (or a precis of it) at a bookseller's website, e.g. Amazon.com, that stocks Browne's book? If so, and I recommend that you do, you will very likely find yourself, as I have, quite unpopular with those who usually fawn over such material until the next woo-artist comes along.

'Luthon64
 
Did she say anything about briefcase cars? 'Cause the Jetsons were way cool.

(She follows this up with, “Many false prophets will also find countless ways to separate you from your money at every possible opportunity.”)

In fact, this presenting-information-in-a-vacuum philosophy is her attitude throughout the entire book writ large. For example, on page 87 she says, “Tiresome skeptics say, ‘Prove it.’ I’ve finally started replying, ‘You prove we’re wrong. We’re busy.’”

...finding countless ways to separate you from your money at every possible opportunity.
* On page 117 Sylvia says that “we may see a large new land mass emerging among the Hawaiian islands” because of Japanese tsunamis around 2026. She adds, “I’m sure you’d like something more absolute, but that’s as definite as I can get on that subject for now.”

Sylvia MAY one day get a clue. I'm sorry, but that’s as definite as I can get on that subject for now.
 
Thank you for a fine effort - it is always encouraging to see work such as yours.

Why, thank you very much!

Have you published (or do you intend publishing) your review (or a precis of it) at a bookseller's website, e.g. Amazon.com, that stocks Browne's book?

I haven't thought about it. I first posted my review on the Understanding Islam board as well as a Nightmare on Elm Street board I moderate. I remembered the furor over Sylvia's repeated refusal to take Randi's million dollar challenge, offering a different excuse each time, so I thought you people would like to see it, so I signed up here and posted it here. You make it sound hard to get something published at Amazon. Are there any extra steps you have to go through or do you just post a review there?
 
My review is up on Amazon

Yay! My review is up! What's more, I'm the first person on Amazon (oddly enough) to review the book.
 
Er, apologies for not responding sooner - time zones and all that.

It's not difficult in itself to post a review at Amazon (as you will know by now). The difficulty I had was in keeping it there. I, too, was the first to review a book, slating its baaad science. My review had been up for a day when five further reviews appeared, all five stars and rating the book the best thing since Aristotle, and my review was reported to be useful to 0 of 5 people. How oddly coincidental...

One day later my review disappeared without Amazon informing me accordingly, presumably on the strength of much fevered clicking on the "report this" link below the review. I challenged Amazon repeatedly for three days and was grudgingly informed that I had supposedly directed unacceptable remarks at the authors - like "crank" (x2) and "loopy" (x1), which were actually directed at the authors' ideas, not the authors themselves.

At my insistence (and accusations of unbridled censorship) Amazon did a hack surgery job and reposted the review, which as a result missed several of the key counterarguments I had presented. After deleting the hack job, I made my own revisions to the original and reposted it under the same title. It is now at the bottom of a pile of nine laudatory reviews, having been useful to 6 of 9 people.

At least it hasn't been removed again.

'Luthon64
 
Negative reviews impact sales. Don't expect Amazon to be "fair and balanced". :)


One dead giveaway that a psychic is bogus is if his or her prophecies are pervasively and relentlessly optimistic,

I have found psychics to be just the opposite. Negative about the future. For example, I have a 1975 People's Almanac. The very first chapter is psychic predictions. I posted some of them on here a while back, but it looks like that topic is gone. If I remember, I will get it when I am home and post some of the predictions for our current time.

And just look at the number of disasters psychics predict. Along with many other horrors.

ETA: Look here to see what I mean. Wars, earthquakes, terrorist attacks...

And it is popular these days to say the Earth is in planetary upheaval in preparation for some horrible end of the world scenario that is coming soon to your neighborhood.

Doom, doom, doom. The paranormal community is all about doom.
 
Last edited:
Negative reviews impact sales. Don't expect Amazon to be "fair and balanced". :)
I didn't think I had any illusions in this regard when I set out, despite being a regular and frequent customer. I was, however, stunned to discover just how apparently and overtly opposed to negative reviews Amazon has shown itself to be. The store only deigned to respond to my enquiries when I started making noises about censorship, their uneven application of their own rules, and the possibility of raising these issues in assorted discussion forums. Wonderful cudgel sometimes, the Internet.

'Luthon64
 
I have found psychics to be just the opposite. Negative about the future. For example, I have a 1975 People's Almanac. The very first chapter is psychic predictions. I posted some of them on here a while back, but it looks like that topic is gone. If I remember, I will get it when I am home and post some of the predictions for our current time.

And just look at the number of disasters psychics predict. Along with many other horrors.

ETA: Look here to see what I mean. Wars, earthquakes, terrorist attacks...

And it is popular these days to say the Earth is in planetary upheaval in preparation for some horrible end of the world scenario that is coming soon to your neighborhood.

Doom, doom, doom. The paranormal community is all about doom.

I think that Yahya might have been reflecting on Sylvia, since she bounces back and forth between predicting the future and reporting what the dead have said to her. Mediums are relentlessly optimistic, saying things like "The person I'm in contact with says not to worry, everything will be OK" or "Your dog says he's happy now". Psychics who predict things on a personal level are optimistic as well. They don't follow "You will meet a tall, handsome stranger" with "who will steal you blind and leave your broken body on the side of the road".

It's only when psychics extend beyond the personal that the doom comes in. So while they may predict an earthquake or a tsunami, they will never tell a resident of the affected area that they are going to be caught in it.
 
I think that Yahya might have been reflecting on Sylvia, since she bounces back and forth between predicting the future and reporting what the dead have said to her. Mediums are relentlessly optimistic, saying things like "The person I'm in contact with says not to worry, everything will be OK" or "Your dog says he's happy now". Psychics who predict things on a personal level are optimistic as well. They don't follow "You will meet a tall, handsome stranger" with "who will steal you blind and leave your broken body on the side of the road".

It's only when psychics extend beyond the personal that the doom comes in. So while they may predict an earthquake or a tsunami, they will never tell a resident of the affected area that they are going to be caught in it.

Indeed. The main distinction, I suppose, is whether the prophecy comes from the person himself or herself and is secular (in which case it will tend to be starkly roseate) or is usually the result of textual interpretation and preached to religious conservatives, in which case it will be gloom and doom to the nth, because for some insane reason that's more often what fundies (particularly conservative Protestant Christians) want to hear.
 
* On page 190 she says, “To give law enforcement one more added edge, by 2015 their custom-designed high-speed vehicles will be atomically powered and capable of becoming airborne enough to fly several feet above other traffic.”
emphasis added

I think I may be able to see into the future. I'm predicting what a news cast in 2015 will be like:

TV anchorman: Now to Ed with the traffic report.
Ed: Well I-84 is backed up several kilometers due to a giant mushroom cloud that resulted when a flying nuclear police car was rear-ended by some idiot talking on his cell-phone/sunglasses.


Originally Posted by Yahya Sulaiman :
One dead giveaway that a psychic is bogus is if his or her prophecies are pervasively and relentlessly optimistic,


I have found psychics to be just the opposite. Negative about the future.

For the doomday predicitions, the prophets are usually both negative and positive at the same time. Something truly, horribly, painfully bad will happen, but its going to happen to everyone who disagrees with the prophet/invisible flying man/unsupported philosphy in question. This makes the prophet (and the prophet's followers) very optimistic.
 

Back
Top Bottom