• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

HI and Interpol.

stateofgrace

Unregistered
S
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
3,843
Based on this post

Homeland Insurgency said:
Interpol? Yeah right. Maybe they'll win the war on terror before the smurfs do.
Click to expand...

From this thread

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=123971&page=6


Rather than continue to derail the thread I would like to start a new thread and allow HI to be given the opportunity to explain what he is doing to bring to justice those responsible for 911.

Here is a very old thread I started; I never received a satisfactory answer to my questions.
Ok I am fed up with seeing remarks like this from truthers


So, my question is, are you (as americans?) happy with a report into the death of 3000 of your fellow countrymen that is vehemently dismissed by many of its progenitors? Are you happy with this?


Riiight... and why is the 911 inside job something that only engineers should be able to decipher?


I'm making you head sheep. You get a special bell. Well done!

Eyes on the sheep dip everyone!


It is a blatantly bungled inside job.

911 was an inside job

Click to expand...

So everybody that does not buy into the theory that 911 is so blatantly an inside job is a sheep? Right? Including these people

Before 9/11, fewer than 30 countries were committed to sharing information about the identities of suspected terrorists. Since 9/11, police agencies from more than 100 countries have worked together to identify over 10,000 suspected terrorists. This is nearly five times more than were known before 9/11. These terrorist suspects are now listed in INTERPOL's larger database of suspected criminals of all types. This is only one part of a secure global police communication system -- which did not exist before 9/11.


Since that day, police have conducted more than a million searches in this database, generating over 130,000 hits. Linking suspects to different types of crime is one of the most effective ways of discovering information that can help police disrupt potential terrorist plots. Terrorists connect with other international criminals in obtaining and transporting the material, funding, false passports, information and other devices they need for attacks. Finding these connections allSince 9/11, as more countries' police agencies have shared more information internationally, more international criminals have been identified and arrested, and more terrorist plots have been disrupted. Between 9/11 and today, the number of wanted persons annually sought for arrest through INTERPOL has more than doubled (to over 16,000 in 2005). The number of annual arrests of criminals wanted internationally has more than tripled (to over 3,000 in 2005). In total, more than 14,000 international criminals have been arrested in the last five years.


LYON, France (CNN) -- Interpol issued an arrest warrant Tuesday for an Egyptian-born surgeon reported to be Osama bin Laden's deputy, the international police organization said in a statement.
Interpol said it was posting the notice, the equivalent of an all-points bulletin, at the request of Egyptian police for Aiman al Zawahri, a leader of the al Jihad terrorist group.



September 11 has also brought about a refocusing of police duties and a re-alignment between federal and local policing. Federal agencies now devote more attention than ever before on counter-terrorist measures. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has some 4,000 working on terrorism


Counter-terrorist policing activities have been conducted in many countries, especially in Europe. In Italy, some 600 agents have been assigned to investigate the money trail of the al-Qaeda network. In November 2001, it was announced that foreign intelligence and police agencies in some 50 countries had arrested no less than 360 suspects with connections to the al-Qaeda network. Of these 360 arrests abroad, about 100 took place in Europe, the same number in the Middle East, 30 in Latin America, and 20 in Africa


Since Sept. 11, law enforcement agencies in 120 countries have joined in an unprecedented effort to track down alleged terrorists -- an effort that amounts to a global civilian front in the war.
This international police work stands in sharp contrast to earlier failed attempts to fight crime globally.



After the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon:

  • Hundreds of terrorist suspects were arrested or indicted by authorities in 24 countries, according to U.S. State Department sources. Nations that made arrests include Sudan and Syria, both of which have been identified by the State Department as sponsors of terrorist organizations.
  • The latest example: German authorities' arrest yesterday of Mounir El Motassadeq, suspected of funneling money to the Sept. 11 hijackers while they were learning to fly planes in the United States.
  • Law enforcement agencies around the world seized $56 million in suspected terrorist assets and froze accounts containing millions more, the Treasury Department says. Of the money seized, more than half -- $29 million --was taken by authorities outside the United States.
  • Even nations that have been zealous guardians of banking secrecy such as the Bahamas and Switzerland have played critical roles in the attempt to ferret out terrorists and their funds.
Click to expand...

This is called the international response and I have quoted from a few of the thousands of hits I got when I goggled Interpol and 911.

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=interpol+investigate+sept+11+attack s&meta=

So why does the international intelligence agencies not agree with the truthers? Are they sheep? Are Interpol in on it ? Does the US run them all ?

Is there a single intelligence agency, anywhere that agrees with truthers?
Why do they not get in touch with Interpol and share their evidence?
Click to expand...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89666


HI, the floor is yours.
 
stateofgrace said:
Based on this post



From this thread

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=123971&page=6


Rather than continue to derail the thread I would like to start a new thread and allow HI to be given the opportunity to explain what he is doing to bring to justice those responsible for 911.

Here is a very old thread I started; I never received a satisfactory answer to my questions.


http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89666


HI, the floor is yours.
Click to expand...

No Skippy. The floor is yours just as it was in the other thread.

How they were positively identified? The hijackers?

It shouldn’t take a lot of words.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
No Skippy. The floor is yours just as it was in the other thread.

How they were positively identified? The hijackers?

It shouldn’t take a lot of words.
Click to expand...

I take it, rather than actually debate you wish to simply dodge and derail every thread you post in, right?

My opening post stands, address it or leave.
 
Last edited:
I don't care how they were identified. I want to hear your answer to the OP. If you actually have one.
 
What am I doing to bring justice to those responsible for 9/11?

Asking for a real investigation. What are you doing? Apologizing for the whitewash?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
What am I doing to bring justice to those responsible for 9/11?

Asking for a real investigation. What are you doing? Apologizing for the whitewash?
Click to expand...



What you are NOT doing is debating. You are NOT addressing my OP. You are not doing anything other than dismissing everything and everybody that actually takes the time to debate you.

I have gone out of my way to give you the opportunity to explain why anybody should dismiss the international response; I have gone out of my way to show that this response was massive and unanimous. You on the other hand have simply dismissed it all; you have dismissed it in favour of accusing your fellow countrymen of mass murder. You do so with absolutely zero evidence. You are doing nothing other dismissing all the effort that as taken place to bring to justice all those involved. You are doing nothing, other than posting on internet forums and pretending that you see something that we all don't see.

160 countries adopted the resolution I quoted to you, they made a solemn pledge to bring to justice all those involved in this crime. This you dismiss, you dismiss it for reasons that are known only to yourself.

Shame on you. You was given the oportunity to deabte, to actaully swap opinions but you dismised it. As such your opinions and your posts are no longer welcome in this thread or any other thread, I choose to post in.

Good day, sir.

 
Last edited:
stateofgrace said:
What you are NOT doing is debating. You are NOT addressing my OP. You are not doing anything than dismissing everything and everybody that actually takes the time to debate you.

I have actually gone out of my way to give you the opportunity to explain why anybody should dismiss the international response; I have gone out of my way to show that this response was massive and unanimous. You on the other hand have simply dismissed it all; you have dismissed it in favour of accusing your fellow countrymen of mass murder. You do so with absolutely zero evidence. You are doing nothing other dismissing all the effort that as taken place to bring to justice all those involved. You are doing nothing, other than posting on internet forums and pretending that you see something that we all don't see.

160 countries adopted the resolution I quoted to you, they made a solemn pledge to bring to justice all those involved in this crime. This you dismiss, you dismiss it for reasons that are known only to yourself.

Shame on you. Your opinions and your posts are no longer welcome in this thread or any other thread, I choose to post in.

Good day, sir.
Click to expand...

Boo Hoo

I'm sorry I know more then you.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Boo Hoo

I'm sorry I know more then you.
Click to expand...
Really? So why don't you try to educate us? Or is being rude all you are capable of?

ETA: The word you were looking for is "than" not "then". Just to help your education.
 
Last edited:
HI is clearly a graduate of the LastChild School of Debate. NB: I am not making a sock accusation. I am stating that HI does nothing to advance any argument, and relies chiefly on playground insults as his/ her method. A waste of time.

ETA: and as part of that, he/ she regards others leaving in disgust at his/ her tactic as a victory. Again, what a waste.
 
Last edited:
Homeland Insurgency said:
What am I doing to bring justice to those responsible for 9/11?

Asking for a real investigation.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, a new investigation is unlikely to occur because you asked for one on an internet message board.

Perhaps you should ask somewhere else?

Try taking your evidence to the Hague, for example.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
What am I doing to bring justice to those responsible for 9/11?

Asking for a real investigation. What are you doing? Apologizing for the whitewash?
Click to expand...
You don't understand the many investigation done already; a new investigation is a waste; you will not understand it. You are not much of a terrorist apologist, but that is par for the truth movement.

Take your zero evidence and stop spaming threads with the massive evidence.

 
Last edited:
Homeland Insurgency said:
Just tell me and tell everyone here watching just how they were positively identified.

The floor is yours.
Click to expand...

There is a thread already started for this question. In that thread, I gave you multiple resources that provide you with all of the information you need to answer your questions about the hijackers. You chose to ignore the information provided. So why the HELL should anyone else provide you with information if you are going to choose to ignore it?

Anyways, stay on the topic of the OP. Your attempt to derail threads has been noted.
 
stateofgrace said:
This is called the international response and I have quoted from a few of the thousands of hits I got when I goggled Interpol and 911.

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=interpol+investigate+sept+11+attack s&meta=

So why does the international intelligence agencies not agree with the truthers? Are they sheep? Are Interpol in on it ? Does the US run them all ?

Is there a single intelligence agency, anywhere that agrees with truthers?
Why do they not get in touch with Interpol and share their evidence?
Click to expand...

Bump for Homeland Insurgency.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom