The Oklahoma City Bombing Coverup

Originally Posted by fowlsound :
Which terrorist was that purchased for, was the plane ticket for one of the 9/11 flights? Were there any indications this terminal was anything but one fo the public terminals available in the library or computer lab? Is there independant verifacation of this other than that news report?

It would seem if Moussouoi lived in Oaklahoma and needed a public computer to do work difficult to trace the university is a good choice. That someone used it isn't evidence of anyone at the university being complicit in the conspiracy. What account login was used on that machine when it was purchased? Does the University keep those records in log files on teh server?

This seems like a game of telephone casting suspicion but no real evidence of anythiing other than a computer terminal being used (reportedly) to purchase a plane ticket.
Still waiting for a response to this Huntster.

I'm not a federal investigator involved in the 9/11 events, so I don't know.

...Is there independant verifacation of this other than that news report?...

Again, I don't know. There were plenty of reports in various newspapers about Moussaoui using Berg's laptop. I assume it was a newswire story.

I was struck by the "coincidences" of Moussaoui using Berg's laptop in Oklahoma, then Berg getting his head sawed off in Baghdad later, and I've always been wondering about why the federal investigation pooh-poohed all links to foreign nationals reportedly involved in the OKC bombing (especially Andreas Strassmeir).

Would you lend your laptop to a stranger like Moussaoui?
 
Originally Posted by Huntster :
I'm sorry, but if Carol Howe informed SA Finley of the group's intention to bomb federal buildings, she wasn't wrong, was she?



Yet, again, that is my point.

Somebody within the field office decided not to.

BOOM!

Now, what do you do?

Do you have any idea how often these people claim they'll blow up building X, Y or Z?....

Yes, I do.

...The trouble is sorting out the credible ones...

Correct.

And do you know what many agencies do when they get it wrong, people die, and it becomes a national story (especially when that agency is already in "hot water")?
 
I'm not a federal investigator involved in the 9/11 events, so I don't know.

Yet you're confident enough in your information to put forth the idea that Oaklahoma City an 9/11 are connected?

Again, I don't know. There were plenty of reports in various newspapers about Moussaoui using Berg's laptop. I assume it was a newswire story.

What newspapers? What reports? Give me a cite or I am forced to assume you're passing along urban legend.

I was struck by the "coincidences" of Moussaoui using Berg's laptop in Oklahoma, then Berg getting his head sawed off in Baghdad later, and I've always been wondering about why the federal investigation pooh-poohed all links to foreign nationals reportedly involved in the OKC bombing (especially Andreas Strassmeir).

You are struck by coincidences you can't verify are true? What foreign nationals are reported to be involved in OKC? Who reported this, and can we verify? It seems like you would take an awful lot on faith here just to hold on to a conspiracy theory.

Would you lend your laptop to a stranger like Moussaoui?

Irrelevant. I have yet to see actual evidence that Berg did lend his laptop. What I do see is alot of speculation and innuendo, but no substance.
 
Originally Posted by Huntster :
I'm not a federal investigator involved in the 9/11 events, so I don't know.

Yet you're confident enough in your information to put forth the idea that Oaklahoma City an 9/11 are connected?....

Before I begin, I must suspect your post. It's clear that you don't like me, and I don't think I like you much. I think you're just poking.

That said, I'm confident enough that there is plenty of information published to make me very, very suspicious that there is more to the OKC bombing than just Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols.

Before I post these links, I suggest that you Google up this information with the keywords BERG - MOUSSAOUI - LAPTOP.

I was certain you could do this. After all, you have professed being a pretty smart bird (fowl?). Now I'm forced to wonder if you truly are, or are you just screwing with me.

How about NewsMax?:

...Was executed American contractor Nicholas Berg's decision to share his computer password with alleged "20th hijacker" Zacarias Moussaoui during a 1999 encounter in Norman, Okla., just a coincidence, as Attorney General John Ashcroft assured the nation last week?
Or was there more to this bizarre development than meets the eye?
Oklahoma City bombing investigator, former NBC reporter Jayna Davis, has been exploring some of the more troubling aspects of the Berg-Moussaoui meeting, especially in light of the role the city of Norman played in events leading up to 9/11....

Will CNN do?:

...WEST CHESTER, Pennsylvania (CNN) -- When Nicholas Berg took an Oklahoma bus to a remote college campus a few years ago, the American recently beheaded by terrorists allowed a man with terrorist connections to use his laptop computer, according to his father....

I emboldened key words for those who have reading or comprehension problems.

...What newspapers? What reports? Give me a cite or I am forced to assume you're passing along urban legend....

Is that enough to get you started on your education (including a short lesson on Googling), or must I perform a complete investigation for you?

...You are struck by coincidences you can't verify are true?....

Yes.

A common trait of coverups is the difficulty of verifying the truth.

... What foreign nationals are reported to be involved in OKC?...

Andreas Strassmeir, commonly believed by many to be "John Doe II".

...Who reported this, and can we verify?...

Again, I first learned of "Andy" Strassmeir from James Pate's and Rick Sherrow's reporting in Soldier of Fortune magazine. Their work can only be verified by buying their past articles from SOF.

But there is plenty of info on Andy.

Use the keywords ANDREAS - STRASSMEIR in a Google search. (After you get the hang of that Google stuff, you may learn a lot).

...It seems like you would take an awful lot on faith here just to hold on to a conspiracy theory....

I'm not taking anything on faith, and I'm not holding on to "a" conspiracy theory. I'm keeping my eyes and ears open, and when new information is revealed (like the Berg-Moussaoui connection), I pay attention.

Try it sometime, instead of denying all possibilities.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Would you lend your laptop to a stranger like Moussaoui?


Irrelevant....

Gee, foul; may I borrow your laptop?

...I have yet to see actual evidence that Berg did lend his laptop. What I do see is alot of speculation and innuendo, but no substance.

Okay. Read up, perform some basic research, then formulate your next series of "skeptical" questions.
 
Last edited:
Because you're an ATF informant, not an informant for Customs, DoD, or the Secret Service.

I think the point was (this was before someone theorized it was a specific informant) why wouldn't the DoJ report this fact to the other agencies, including those under it's jurisdiction (DEA). I assume they all had phones.

It still has yet to be proven that the BATF didn't show up for work that day. There is circumstatial evidence to prove they did, as others have posted above. It is by no means irrifutable, but given the circumstances it's the best that can be hoped for. If there was a timeclock, it was probably destroyed, if there was a sign-in sheet for Bucars it was probaly lost. As I wrote before, the BATF offices were on the other side of the building from the explosion, so the chances of survival were greater. Just because no BATF agents died doesn't mean they were part of a conspiracy. No one from the Bureau of Indian Affairs died either. I don't expect anyone who survived that event to apologize for getting out alive, and I'm certainly not going to accuse them of causing it without more proof that they were involved.
 
I think the point was (this was before someone theorized it was a specific informant) why wouldn't the DoJ report this fact to the other agencies, including those under it's jurisdiction (DEA). I assume they all had phones.

It still has yet to be proven that the BATF didn't show up for work that day. There is circumstatial evidence to prove they did, as others have posted above. It is by no means irrifutable, but given the circumstances it's the best that can be hoped for. If there was a timeclock, it was probably destroyed, if there was a sign-in sheet for Bucars it was probaly lost. As I wrote before, the BATF offices were on the other side of the building from the explosion, so the chances of survival were greater. Just because no BATF agents died doesn't mean they were part of a conspiracy. No one from the Bureau of Indian Affairs died either. I don't expect anyone who survived that event to apologize for getting out alive, and I'm certainly not going to accuse them of causing it without more proof that they were involved.
Okay with that logic, you just failed CT100 - Basic Conspiracy Theorist Thinking
;)
 
Last edited:
BTW I don't think Fowlsound "hates" you. You may be frustrating to him, and vice-versa.

BIG HUG EVERYONE!!! Embrace your monitors.
 
Before I begin, I must suspect your post. It's clear that you don't like me, and I don't think I like you much. I think you're just poking.

If I remember correctly, you were the one warned by mods for appearing to make violent threats. I'm just asking questions.

That said, I'm confident enough that there is plenty of information published to make me very, very suspicious that there is more to the OKC bombing than just Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols.

And all I asked for was links telling me who what and where and a way to verify the info.

Before I post these links, I suggest that you Google up this information with the keywords BERG - MOUSSAOUI - LAPTOP.

Certainly you are aware of the burden of proof. I don't do anyone else's homework for them. You made the claims, you provide the evidence.

I was certain you could do this. After all, you have professed being a pretty smart bird (fowl?). Now I'm forced to wonder if you truly are, or are you just screwing with me.

Again, for as long as you have been on this forum you should understand burden of proof.

How about NewsMax?:



Will CNN do?:



I emboldened key words for those who have reading or comprehension problems.



Is that enough to get you started on your education (including a short lesson on Googling), or must I perform a complete investigation for you?

From the first link, the supposed berg/moussoui meeting was in 1999. How exactly does this relate to OKC? There is nothing stated that gives concrete connections to anything other than a meeting in Ok. How does this relate to the OKC bombing other than happening to be in the same state? McVeigh was in Fort Branning, Ga and Fort Riley, Kansas and had spent his planning time for his bombing in Michigan. That the bombing happened in OKC is simply where he chose to drive the truck, which he rented in Junction City Kansas. I don't see much of a connection here to any of these places and Berg, doing a cross serach of McVeigh and Berg on google.

Your CNN link doesn't establish this either. In fact, it says it was an aquaintance of Mousoui.

Government sources told CNN that the encounter involved an acquaintance of Zacarias Moussaoui -- the only person publicly charged in the United States in connection with the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.



A common trait of coverups is the difficulty of verifying the truth.

A common train of conspiracy theories is the unsurprising lack of evidence.



Andreas Strassmeir, commonly believed by many to be "John Doe II".

Doesn't seem to be mentioned here.



Again, I first learned of "Andy" Strassmeir from James Pate's and Rick Sherrow's reporting in Soldier of Fortune magazine. Their work can only be verified by buying their past articles from SOF.

But there is plenty of info on Andy.

Use the keywords ANDREAS - STRASSMEIR in a Google search. (After you get the hang of that Google stuff, you may learn a lot).

Second set of links don't cite any verifiable secondary sources.



I'm not taking anything on faith, and I'm not holding on to "a" conspiracy theory. I'm keeping my eyes and ears open, and when new information is revealed (like the Berg-Moussaoui connection), I pay attention.

You're not saying there is a conspiracy connecting these events? Then what have you been posting? Or are you now saying there is no connection?

You're connecting things based on facts not in evidence. There doesn't seem to be any connection to McVeigh. How does Berg figure into the OKC bombings? What evidence is there that he has anything to do with those?

Try it sometime, instead of denying all possibilities.

I am asking for evidence. I am not denying anything.



Gee, foul; may I borrow your laptop?

I've explained how tired and less than clever misspelling my moniker is.
 
Last edited:
I think the point was (this was before someone theorized it was a specific informant) why wouldn't the DoJ report this fact to the other agencies, including those under it's jurisdiction (DEA). I assume they all had phones......

I haven't found an answer to that, but it appears that Agent Finley turned over all the information that Howe gave her in the proper protocol. I think it may have been a simple, stupid case of poor communications, or dismissing the reports too eagerly.

...It still has yet to be proven that the BATF didn't show up for work that day. There is circumstatial evidence to prove they did, as others have posted above. It is by no means irrifutable, but given the circumstances it's the best that can be hoped for. If there was a timeclock, it was probably destroyed, if there was a sign-in sheet for Bucars it was probaly lost. As I wrote before, the BATF offices were on the other side of the building from the explosion, so the chances of survival were greater. Just because no BATF agents died doesn't mean they were part of a conspiracy. No one from the Bureau of Indian Affairs died either. I don't expect anyone who survived that event to apologize for getting out alive, and I'm certainly not going to accuse them of causing it without more proof that they were involved....

All true. No contest.
 
...Certainly you are aware of the burden of proof. I don't do anyone else's homework for them. You made the claims, you provide the evidence.....

Please; how long will this take? Are we going to have to go on another merry-go-round?

It's springtime. Time to get outdoors a bit more. I'm not interested in writing you a book (will it need pictures?).

......From the first link, the supposed berg/moussoui meeting was in 1999. How exactly does this relate to OKC?...

The motel.

...If this recollection is correct, the entire incident, and its absence from the public record, raises new questions about the FBI investigation of Moussaoui and even the 1995 destruction of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Already the FBI has endured a withering political and media critique for failing to aggressively investigate Moussaoui and his contacts during his four weeks in custody prior to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Some FBI officials have responded by characterizing Moussaoui as only a minor player. But the report from the motel owner, if proven, could change that. And it also could force the FBI to reopen its investigation of Middle Eastern connections to the 1995 Oklahoma City blast, because convicted bombers Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols reportedly stayed at the same motel, interacting with a group of Iraqis during the weeks before the bombing....


...There is nothing stated that gives concrete connections to anything other than a meeting in Ok. How does this relate to the OKC bombing other than happening to be in the same state?....

There are cells of both domestic and foreign terrorists, and they interact. Lots of patterns emerge.

...McVeigh was in Fort Branning, Ga and Fort Riley, Kansas and had spent his planning time for his bombing in Michigan. That the bombing happened in OKC is simply where he chose to drive the truck, which he rented in Junction City Kansas. I don't see much of a connection here to any of these places and Berg, doing a cross serach of McVeigh and Berg on google....

Google up ELOHIM - CITY.

...A common train of conspiracy theories is the unsurprising lack of evidence....

A common trait of yours is to question endlessly, forcing the teacher to abandon the class.

...Doesn't seem to be mentioned here....

Nope.

The name (again) was Andreas Straussmeir, not Timothy McVeigh. McVeigh was described as "John Doe I".

Try here.

...Second set of links don't cite any verifiable secondary sources....

"Secondary sources"?!

You demand that the links provide further links? How far deep must this extend?

Are we being reasonable here?

...You're not saying there is a conspiracy connecting these events? Then what have you been posting?...

Again, this is exactly what I have posted:

...I'm confident enough that there is plenty of information published to make me very, very suspicious that there is more to the OKC bombing than just Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols...

That's repeat #1 on that particular question.

...You're connecting things based on facts not in evidence....

No, I'm connecting things based on testimony (which is "evidence"), not facts.

...How does Berg figure into the OKC bombings? What evidence is there that he has anything to do with those?...

It doesn't........yet. So far, it connects Berg to Moussaoui (with the bus-laptop-email-event), and somehow it may be connected to Berg getting his head disconnected in Baghdad by al-Zarqawi.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Gee, foul; may I borrow your laptop?

I've explained how tired and less than clever misspelling my moniker is.

Gee; musta been a typo.
 
Please; how long will this take? Are we going to have to go on another merry-go-round?

It's springtime. Time to get outdoors a bit more. I'm not interested in writing you a book (will it need pictures?).

You made the claim.



The motel.



There are cells of both domestic and foreign terrorists, and they interact. Lots of patterns emerge.

I once recorded in the same studio Patti LaBelle did. So what? McVeigh was a known white supremacist and had ties to the Michigan Militia. I am from Michigan and have encountered the Militia folks. I have yet to hear any actual evidence they interact with Al Queda. Please provide this evidence.



Google up ELOHIM - CITY.

Again with the shifting burden of proof. Perhaps you could actually present your argument instead of telling others to do your work for you.



A common trait of yours is to question endlessly, forcing the teacher to abandon the class.

And yours is to throw adhoms around when cornered. Please provide the evidence that Al Queda has any connection whatsoever to OKC. This doesn't mean speculations on one possible meeting. This means show evidence that Al Queda and White Supremacists and the Michigan Militia interact. In fact, any evidence McVeigh and Al Queda interacted would do.



Nope.

The name (again) was Andreas Straussmeir, not Timothy McVeigh. McVeigh was described as "John Doe I".

Try here.

Why is it that no one in the courtroom brought this name up when McVeigh or Nichols was tried? Why is it that no one involved in the case has mentioned that name? McVeigh's brother was also described as John Doe 2. If you had read the wikipedia article you would have seen the speculations on who the other person was. How exactly are they less plausible than Straussmeir?



"Secondary sources"?!

You demand that the links provide further links? How far deep must this extend?

Are we being reasonable here?

I am asking for a way to verify those people aren't perpetuating urban myth. So yes, fact checking is reasonable. What is the source of their information?



Again, this is exactly what I have posted:

And your statement while bringing up Berg and Moussoui implies you are saying there is a connection. What connection did Berg have with McVeigh? Please provide that evidence.



That's repeat #1 on that particular question.

Perhaps you should answer it then.



No, I'm connecting things based on testimony (which is "evidence"), not facts.

Testimony is specious evidence when offered without cooberation.



It doesn't........yet. So far, it connects Berg to Moussaoui (with the bus-laptop-email-event), and somehow it may be connected to Berg getting his head disconnected in Baghdad by al-Zarqawi.

And once again, what does that have to do in the slightest with OKC?



Gee; musta been a typo.

That response was less clever.
 
Originally Posted by Huntster :
Please; how long will this take? Are we going to have to go on another merry-go-round?

It's springtime. Time to get outdoors a bit more. I'm not interested in writing you a book (will it need pictures?).


You made the claim.

Again, for the 2nd time (directly to you), my "claim":

......I'm confident enough that there is plenty of information published to make me very, very suspicious that there is more to the OKC bombing than just Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols...

Originally Posted by Huntster :
The motel.

There are cells of both domestic and foreign terrorists, and they interact. Lots of patterns emerge.

I once recorded in the same studio Patti LaBelle did. So what?...

Yeah; so what?

Who the hell is Patti LaBelle?

...McVeigh was a known white supremacist and had ties to the Michigan Militia. I am from Michigan and have encountered the Militia folks. I have yet to hear any actual evidence they interact with Al Queda. Please provide this evidence....

McVeigh was seen before the bombing with Middle Easterners, McVeigh was linked to Straussmeir, Straussmeir fled to Germany, money to pay for the Oklahoma flying school was paid for by Moussaoui with money wired from Germany, Nichols interacted extensively with known Islamic terrorists in the Phillipines, Moussaoui had well documented ties to the Oklahoma City area, he had ties to Berg, Berg showed up on international TV getting his head removed by al-Zarqawi, and on and on and on.

Please, read all the links I have provided (and was asked for).

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Google up ELOHIM - CITY.

Again with the shifting burden of proof. Perhaps you could actually present your argument instead of telling others to do your work for you.

There's the reference. You want me to read it for you?

Originally Posted by Huntster :
A common trait of yours is to question endlessly, forcing the teacher to abandon the class.

And yours is to throw adhoms around when cornered. Please provide the evidence that Al Queda has any connection whatsoever to OKC.

I have done so. Read it.

This doesn't mean speculations on one possible meeting. This means show evidence that Al Queda and White Supremacists and the Michigan Militia interact. In fact, any evidence McVeigh and Al Queda interacted would do.

This is a forum, not a courtroom. If I could *prove* something here, I wouldn't be presenting it to you.

You are trying to tie me on the merry-go-round again. I won't play that with you again.

...Why is it that no one in the courtroom brought this name up when McVeigh or Nichols was tried?...

It was.

...Why is it that no one involved in the case has mentioned that name?...

They did. You weren't listening.

Just like right now. (Links abound - Google can be your friend, if you'd just give it a try).

...McVeigh's brother was also described as John Doe 2. If you had read the wikipedia article you would have seen the speculations on who the other person was. How exactly are they less plausible than Straussmeir?...

Because of Howe's official reports to Finley.

(I did read the wikipedia article; and much, much more. Try it.......)

Originally Posted by Huntster :
"Secondary sources"?!

You demand that the links provide further links? How far deep must this extend?

Are we being reasonable here?


I am asking for a way to verify those people aren't perpetuating urban myth. So yes, fact checking is reasonable. What is the source of their information?

This is an example of your unreasonablness.

1) You refuse to read the links I provide,

2) You refuse to search google, even after I provide keywords,

3) And you bring up garbage like that even after multiple links are provided.

You are unreasonable, sir. I'm tired of fowling with you.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Again, this is exactly what I have posted:

And your statement while bringing up Berg and Moussoui implies you are saying there is a connection. What connection did Berg have with McVeigh? Please provide that evidence.

There are connections between McVeigh/Nichols and Islamic terrorists, there are other connections between Berg and Islamic terrorists, all are connected to the Oklahoma City area, and the Islamic terrorists continued operations for 6 years after the OKC bombing (learning how to fly in the OKC area) virtually unimpeded until Sept. 11th, 2001.

Those are the connections.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
That's repeat #1 on that particular question.

Perhaps you should answer it then.

Just how many times must I answer your silly, repeated questions?

Originally Posted by Huntster :
No, I'm connecting things based on testimony (which is "evidence"), not facts.

Testimony is specious evidence when offered without cooberation.

Proclaimed like a true sage.

Okay. Disregard the testimony.

Wait for another bomb..........

...............and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, until you're finally able to conquer your crippling case of denialism, and "connect dots".

(I'm sure glad you're not an FBI SA).
 
Did you have a link on that information?

RANT! I'm back, after bowing out earlier because I didn't see this debate going anywhere. I didn't see any willingness on Roxdog/conspiracybeliever's part to ANY fact-checking, which in my experience is normal for him and for other CTers.

And you know what? I hate doing their homework for them. Huntster, I have a question for you: why don't you have the information I'm about to give you, which took me 15 minutes to find and cull from two sources?

Why?

Pardon my French, but it's your G.D. conspiracy theory, so why do you expect others to do your homework? This is not my extraordinary claim to prove, it's yours. The whole "early warning" argument seems to be very important to OK City CTers. So wouldn't it be a good idea to find out if any BATF personnel were in the building when the bomb blew? You were given leads earlier: a phone call to the OK City BATF, and a snippet from a Salon article, both indicatiing that several BATF personnel were in the building when the bomb blew. There must be a several hundred CT websites that say otherwise. Isn't that important? Why didn't you follow up?

This is about the 30th time in the past 10 days that I've done fact checking for a CTer (I'm not really calling you a CTer, except in this case. I don't know you.) because they were adamant in their opinions but wouldn't do any research of their own. I'm having a hard time understanding what the mental block is. Why argue a point but not be willing to do the simplest fact checking to see if it's true?


I'm not some computer search wiz kid. It's Google.com, that's all. The same tool everyone has. Okay, i've vented enough.

Out of a staff of ten, there were five BATF personnel in the Murrah building when the bomb hit: one supervisor, one agent, two inspectors, and a secretary. Two agents had come and gone on normal business that morning. Most of the other agents were working outside the building. One was home with a bad back. Supervisor McCauley was in an elevator that fell 6 stories, but he wasn't injured. Inspectors Buster and Staggs were seriously injured. There are photos of Agent Franey inside the building, trapped on the 9th floor after the bomb blew. After being trapped for about an hour and a half, he and and BATF secretary Rowden escaped with minor injuries. So, if a warning was given to the ATF, it didn't get to these five. (or to the other two agents who had come and gone, unless they knew the exact minute the bomb would blow.)

Here's the transcript of the direct, cross and redirect examination of Agent Franey in the Timothy McVeigh trial. There is no disagreement between the prosecution and the defense on this issue. Franey describes where the other agents were, and no, they weren't all having coffee together.

I've bolded some of the more relevant text. The full transcript of that day is here.


THE COURTROOM DEPUTY: Thank you.
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MS. BEHENNA:
Q. Are you employed, Agent Franey?
A. Yes, I am.
Q. Where do you work?
A. The United States Treasury Department, the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
Q. And how long have you worked for the ATF?
A. Since July 5 of 1988.
Q. Where are you stationed, or where is your office located?
A. I work in the Oklahoma City field office.
Q. And how long have you been in that field office?
A. Since I hired on with ATF.
Q. Do you have college?
A. Yes, I do.
Q. Where did you attend college?
A. I attended Sam Houston State University in Huntsville,
Texas. I graduated in 1986 with a degree in criminal justice.
Q. After your graduation from college, did you go immediately
into the ATF, or did you have some other employment?
A. No, I did not. I worked for the Port Aransas Police
Department through '87. Then I was hired by the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector
General, which is their investigative branch. I worked there
until July of 1988, when I was hired by ATF.
Q. What is your job with the ATF?
A. As a criminal investigator or special agent assigned to the
Oklahoma City field office, I investigate crimes that come
under our jurisdiction that occur in the Western Judicial
District of Oklahoma, or the western half of the state, and a
small portion of the eastern part of the state.
Q. And those violations would include what?
A. They would include violations of the federal firearms laws,
explosive laws, arson laws.
Q. Where was the ATF located on April 19, 1995?
A. It was located in the alpha -- Alfred E. Murrah Federal



Luke Franey - Direct
Building at 200 N.W. 5th in Oklahoma City.
Q. On what floor was the ATF office located?
A. Our office was on the 9th floor, in Suite 965.
Q. Let me show you what's already been admitted as
Government's Exhibit 952.
MS. BEHENNA: And with the marshal's assistance, your
Honor, I would like to put the 9th floor up on the easel for
the ease --
THE COURT: All right.
We'll have to bring it forward enough so the jurors
can see it.
BY MS. BEHENNA:
Q. Agent Franey, you have in front of you --
MS. BEHENNA: Toward Luke?
MR. RYAN: Towards the witness.
MS. BEHENNA: Could you move it over to the witness
stand a little bit more.
THE COURT: Well, now the jury can't see it.
MS. BEHENNA: May I?
THE COURT: Yes.
BY MS. BEHENNA:
Q. Agent Franey, you have a light pen in front of you, if you
would like to use that, or there is a pen that you can actually
mark on the computer with. Can you describe for the jury the
ATF office space that was located there on the 9th floor of the



Luke Franey - Direct
Murrah Building.
A. Yes, ma'am. Our office here, which is highlighted in -- it
would be in the southeast corner of the 9th floor of the
building. I'll just touch it. There we go.
That would be the entrance to our office, which was
our outside waiting room.
If you enter through this door here, which came into
the secretary's bay as you proceeded down the hallway here, you
would find our supervisor's office, Alex McCauley at the time.
If you continue down the hall, you would come to Special Agent
Donald Gillispie's office. Continuing eastbound, you would hit
Special Agent Harry Eberhardt and Mark Michalic's office.
If you continue down again, the last office on the
southeast side would be the office of Special Agent Delbert
Canopp, Tim Kelly, and Karen Simpson. There were actually
three agents that worked out of that office.
If you go to the end of the hallway, there would be
our computer room, where our LAN system was set up.
Directly north of that in here would be our outer
vault and then our evidence vault.
If you went westward back down the hall, you would
come to my office right here, Special Agent Darrell Edwards'
office here. We had a large conference room here, and then
this last office would be our fingerprinting room and
refrigerator room.



Luke Franey - Direct
Q. I believe there is a button on that pen. If you will keep
pushing it, all those -- there you go.
Approximately how many employees worked at the ATF
office?
A. There were 10 employees in the law enforcement office and
there were three employees who were inspectors, and they worked
on the -- actually the east end -- or the west end of the
building down there on the other side of the Secret Service
office.
Q. Can you point that out for the jury?
A. Yes, down in here. They actually had three inspectors that
worked there: Vernon Buster, Jim Staggs and Bruce Anderson.
Q. Is that what's called the compliance section of ATF?
A. That's correct. They handled the licensing and compliance
for alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and explosives.
Q. And as criminal investigators of the ATF, agents like
yourself, you investigate criminal violations, much that you
described, or as you described earlier in our testimony?
A. That's correct.
Q. The compliance section does something different?
A. Yes, ma'am.
Q. Can you tell the jury what you were doing the evening of
April 18, 1995?
A. On April 18, 1995, myself and several other agents in our
office were working a joint investigation with the Norman
Police Department on an individual by the name of Anthony Wolf.
Anthony Wolf was a convicted felon, and we were at that time
making undercover purchases of firearms and narcotics from
Mr. Wolf. We worked late into the evening, actually into the
early morning hours of April 19, arriving back at home at about
1:30 that morning.
Q. Did you go into the office the morning of April 19?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. Do you remember what time you got to the office?
A. Yes. I got there early. The night before, I talked with
my supervisor, and he instructed me to obtain an arrest warrant
on Mr. Wolf; so I arrived at the ATF office at approximately
7:30 that morning.
Q. And you went in to work on the arrest warrant?
A. That's correct.
Q. Did you see any other ATF employees the morning of
April 19?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. Can you tell the jury who you saw?
A. That morning when I arrived at work, I was the first one
there. The first person I heard come to the office besides me
was our secretary, Valerie Rowden. I didn't actually see her
that morning until after the bombing, but she was surprised
that someone was there before she was. And she called out to
see who was in the office; and I, of course, was back in the
far east end and hollered that it was me, I was preparing an
arrest warrant. So she went on with her normal morning
procedures.
Shortly after that, my supervisor, Alex McCauley, came
in; and he and I were working around the office and discussing
me preparing and obtaining the arrest warrant.
Shortly after that, Harry Eberhardt came in the
office, and he and I had a brief conversation. He said he had
to run across the street because he had a jury out on an arson
trial and -- in the Federal Courthouse that was just south of
the Murrah Building; and he advised that he was going to run by
the credit union before he went.
And he left shortly before 9:00.
Q. Where was the credit union located?
A. The credit union was in the Murrah Building on the 3d
floor.
Q. Do you know where Don Gillispie was the morning of
April 19?
A. Yes, I do.
Q. Where was he?
A. He was in Ponca City, testifying at a state arson trial.
Q. What about Delbert Canopp?
A. Delbert Canopp was actually on his way back to Oklahoma
City. He had picked up a witness for the federal grand jury,
and he was on his way back to the courthouse with the witness.
Q. You didn't see either one of those guys in the office that
morning?
A. That morning, no, ma'am.
Q. What about Mark Michalic?
A. Mark Michalic worked late with me the evening before, and
he was on his way into the office.
Q. What about Karen Simpson?
A. Karen Simpson was actually in the Federal Courthouse just
south of the building. She was working with Delbert Canopp on
the investigation where they were presenting witnesses to the
federal grand jury.
Q. Tim Kelly?
A. Tim Kelly was in Ponca City working with Agent Gillispie
doing the state arson trial.
Q. Vernon Buster: Who was he?
A. Vernon Buster was in the ATF compliance office, which is on
the west end of the 9th floor.
Q. What about Jim Staggs?
A. Jim Staggs was also in the compliance office.
Q. Bruce Anderson?
A. Bruce Anderson was -- he was not in the office. He was on
his way to do a compliance inspection.
Q. What about Darrell Edwards?
A. Darrell Edwards was at home. He had worked late with me
the night before. And he was shot in the line of duty several
years ago and has a lot of problems with his neck. And I had
called him on the phone right before 9:00 to tell him he needed
to get in there because we were going to arrest Mr. Wolf if I
obtained the arrest warrant.
Q. And you stated that you called him just before 9:00 on the
morning of April 19.
A. Yes, ma'am.
Q. Can you tell the jury what happened shortly after 9:00?
A. I was talking to Agent Edwards on the phone, sitting at my
desk, which is going to be right in that area right there. My
desk actually abutted up to the common wall with DEA. I was
talking with Darrell about executing the arrest warrant on
Mr. Wolf, if we obtained it.
We were having a conversation relating to that when I
heard an explosion or a loud bang. I heard the girls in the
DEA office scream.

Q. What girls are you referring to?
A. The employees, the female support staff that worked for
DEA.
Q. Did you know them?
A. Yes, I did.
Yeah, you know, most of the agencies in Oklahoma City
are field offices, they're not division offices; and on the 9th
floor, we all worked together on various occasions, and we also
celebrated together holidays and whatnot. Everybody was a
small outpost (sic), so we all knew each other fairly well on
the 9th floor. And I know Carol was in there. Her desk was
basically right across the wall from me. And we could beat on
the wall back and forth and talk; so I knew -- I could hear
them that morning when I was at my desk preparing the
warrant -- I could hear people in there talking. Specifically,
I didn't know who it was; but I could hear the conversation
through the wall. They were laughing and joking. But I heard
the loud bang, I heard all the girls scream; and then I heard a
loud rumbling sound.
At that point, I didn't know what was going on. And
it happened so fast, but I remember the three distinct actions.
Q. What happened to the phone?
A. I was talking on the phone with Darrell. After the
rumbling noise, that's when everything came apart. I remember
the walls coming in, the ceiling falling down. My most
distinct memory is the fluorescent lighting fixture above my
desk falling at me, and I threw up my arm to attempt to block
it.
The next thing I remember is just being hit with a
very strong gust of wind or a pressure blast. And the next
thing I remember, I ended up back in this hallway, in this area
right here, kind of halfway in my office and halfway in the
hallway, covered with some rubble.
I really didn't know what happened at that point. I
looked around, clouds of dust and smoke in the office.
I could hear people yelling and screaming. I had no
idea what had happened.
Q. So what did you do? Did you stay there? Did you get up?
A. First thing I did -- I still had the phone in my hand, what
was left of it, the phone and the cord -- and you know, I mean,
there was nothing on there -- calling for Darrell on the phone.
I didn't know what had happened.
I threw that down, and I jumped up. And I could run
to about this point right here, you know, about three or four
steps; and that's where the building collapsed, basically.
Q. You could see that it was gone?
A. Oh, yes. I could see the drop-off straight down to the
rubble. At that point, I could see out the north side of the
building.
Q. What did you see as you looked out the north side of the
building?
A. What I remember the most was a big wall of orange flame
that was coming out from where the Athenian Building was across
the street.
Q. What else did you do?
A. At that point, I mean I didn't think I could get out of the
building because the -- the way it kind of ended like --
Q. Are you drawing where the floor was?
A. Yes, ma'am. I'm drawing on here where I could get to; and
at that point, I couldn't get out of the building. The floor
basically dropped off to all the way to the south retaining
wall; so I just had kind of had like a little area I could get
in.
Q. And the little area is that east end of the building that
you're --
A. Yes, ma'am. That's correct.
Q. Why don't you go ahead and take all those dots off, Agent
Franey, and we'll do it again.
A. Okay.
Q. Go ahead and just mark again where you remember the
building -- the floor was.
A. Okay. At the time, that's what I could see right there,
was this was my position in this area back here, was where I
could walk around in.
Q. Did you see Alex McCauley?
A. At that time, I did not.

Q. What about Valerie Rowden?
A. No, ma'am, I did not see them.
Q. I assume you attempted to get out of the building and you
could not. What did you do next?
A. At that point, I was confused to really what had happened.
I performed a -- just checking myself, you know. I didn't know
if I was injured or not. I had some minor scrapes and cuts but
no major injuries. I walked around. I looked out the south
side of the building. I could see people running up to the
building, you know; and there were people down on the bottom
floor.
I really couldn't tell what had happened or how bad it
was at that point.
I found in the rubble in the office a handheld radio
that we utilize; and I turned the radio on, and I began calling
for help, see if I could get anybody to respond.
Q. What did you say?
A. I said that somebody blew up the building and if anybody
can hear this, they needed to get in there because we needed
help. There was a lot of people hurt. I could hear people
screaming.
At that time, I didn't know how bad it was.
Agent Michalic was coming into work, and he was right
at the point work where our radios were just kind of --
sometimes he could hear me, sometimes he couldn't. And he kept
saying, you know, What are you saying, what are you saying?
Okay, somebody, the building is gone, it's destroyed;
you guys need to get in here.
And I think at that point, he started realizing just
through my voice about how urgent was.
Agent Canopp came in -- he was on the radio. He was
on the way bringing a witness over to the grand jury, and he
asked me what was going on. And I told him something bad
happened at the building and he needed to get down there.
Q. After you made the call on the radio, did you continue to
walk around the office, what was left of the ATF office?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. What did you do next?
A. I found an evidence poster board, something similar to
that, that we had used at a previous trial. And I flipped it
over on the back and wrote "ATF trapped, 9th floor," put it in
the window, over here in this office looking out over the front
side of the building, which is the south side of the building.
Q. Agent Franey, would you mind clicking the pen and getting
those lines off; and let me show you a photograph that I don't
believe has been introduced. This won't go to the jury.
THE COURTROOM DEPUTY: What's the number?
BY MS. BEHENNA:
Q. Let me show you Government's Exhibit 1012 and ask you if
you can identify that.
A. Yes, I can.
Q. And what is that?
A. That is a photograph of the south side of Alfred E. Murrah
Building that -- after the bombing.
Q. That's the plaza level?
A. That is correct.
MS. BEHENNA: I move for the admission of Government's
Exhibit 1012, your Honor.
MR. JONES: No objection your Honor.
THE COURT: 1012 is received.
BY MS. BEHENNA:
Q. Let me show you a closeup. In particular, let me have you
look to the window section. And can you tell the jury what
that is?
A. Yes, ma'am. That appears to be a photograph of the top
three floors of the southeast portion of the Murrah Building;
and that white sign there appears to be the sign that I placed
in the window.
Q. That is the ATF space, the south side of the ATF space?
A. That's correct. This top floor here is.
Q. Let me have you look at Government's Exhibit 976. And I
don't believe this has been introduced.
Can you identify that?
A. Yes, I can.
Q. What is that?
A. That is photograph of me.
MS. BEHENNA: Your Honor, I move for the admission of
Government's Exhibit 976.
MR. JONES: No objection, your Honor.
THE COURT: 976 received.
BY MS. BEHENNA:
Q. Can you tell the jury what they're seeing?
A. That is a photograph that was taken the morning of the
bombing. I'm standing in the -- what's left of our offices
there looking out the back window.
Q. The south side?
A. I'm sorry. The south side of the building, looking over
the plaza level. The sign to the right there is the sign that
I made to put in the window, hoping that someone would be able
to get up there and get me out.
Looks like I'm either talking or yelling to people
down on the plaza level.
Q. Were some of your agents down to plaza level?
A. Yes. I mean at that time, I could see Alex McCauley, my
supervisor, and also Valerie Rowden. Prior to me being able to
see them on the plaza, I thought that they were killed or lost
in the explosion. I saw them down there. I also saw Agent
Michalic and Agent Edwards. I saw some of the agents from DEA
that were down there.
Q. Did you sometime that morning while you were waiting to be
rescued look for survivors?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. Can you tell the jury about that?
A. When I realized I couldn't get out and I was in there, and
I called on the radio and advised the agents that I could get
ahold of that we needed help. I remembered at that time
hearing the screams of the girls in DEA. I couldn't get out
the front way to get to their office; so I went back to our
evidence vault area, which is on the east end almost, where the
letter F is.
Q. Agent Franey, I went ahead and put up on the screen for you
the 9th floor floor plan. Go ahead. I'm sorry.
A. Okay. I came through here. I entered our outer evidence
vault. I climbed up through what was left of the ceiling on
some pipes and dropped down here into our evidence vault.
I proceeded to this wall right here and kicked the
shelves out and kicked a hole into what was left of the DEA
office.
When I got through, I realized that there wasn't
really a lot left of the DEA office. It -- best I can
remember, it was like this. There was just a very small
portion of the office there that I could get in.
You know, I looked for the girls and I called out a
little bit verbally to see if I could get any responses. I
thought at that time they might have been trapped in the rubble
there, but I realized that that wasn't the case.
Q. Couldn't find them?
A. No, ma'am.
Q. What did you do next?
A. I climbed back through the hole and into our evidence
vault, back into the little island I could get around on back
in here, and talked to Agent Michalic on the radio, advised him
that, you know, I didn't find anybody over in DEA and it looks
like they were all lost.
And he advised me to stay away from that portion of
the building at that time. On the ground, I guess they were
getting reports that it was very unstable, wanted me to stay
back in that corner.
So at that point, for an hour, hour and a half, I was
kind of stuck in that office. There were several escape plans
they were trying. They had tried to get a helicopter to come
in from the National Guard. It was going to sling-load me out
of the window, but they cancelled that due to the dangers, you
know, of knocking debris down on rescuers or hurting injured
people. They just kept on saying, Hang on, we're going to get
you out, we're going to get you out.
Q. How long were you in the Murrah Building?
A. Till approximately 10:30.

Q. Before we move on and talk about that, let me show you
Government's Exhibit 968, which I believe has already been
admitted. That's the north side of the Murrah Building.
A. That's correct.
Q. Do you see it?
A. Yes, ma'am.
Q. And can you with your pointer show the jury -- I mean,
you've drawn it on the floor plan. Can you show the jury where
you looked for the DEA girls?
A. It would be in this area here, behind that -- the tarp or
roof that is --
Q. Is that part of the roof that's hanging down?
A. Yes, ma'am. That's correct.
Q. You stated earlier that you were in the building for about
an hour and a half?
A. Yes, ma'am.
Q. What happened later that morning?
A. Well, I saw several people coming up to the 9th floor.
They were looking for survivors, and I talked to Larry Morgan
with IRS CID. He had come somewhere around 10:00. He had come
up to the 9th floor to the west side of the big crevice there.
I talked to him briefly; and he said, "Hang on, we're going to
try to get you out." You know, obviously, couldn't get across
the hole there; but they were working on things.
A short time after that -- I don't know exactly how
long -- I heard a bunch of loud screams coming from the south
side of the building out on the plaza level, ran to the window,
and looked. And I could see a large group of people, all the
rescuers and whatnot running from the building.
I became alarmed at that time. Obviously, it didn't
appear to be something good.
I got on the radio and I was calling to Michalic.
Q. Agent Michalic?
A. The agent on the ground that I had radio contact with, and
I asked him what the problem was.

Q. What did you learn?
A. I learned that some of the rescuers had believed they saw a
bomb and that they thought it was going to go off and that I
should find something sturdy to hang onto.
Q. What did you do?
A. I mean, I was -- the first -- when the bomb went off the
first time, it happened so fast, you didn't have time to get
scared.
When he told me that and I realized at that point I
didn't think I could go anywhere -- you know, I was at the one
little island I could get around on. And when he said that, I
mean, it was just like someone reaches in and grabs your heart
and squishes it, because I had nowhere to go if there was
another one. I didn't really think I could do anything about
it.
Q. Were you scared?
A. Oh, yes. Very scared.
Q. What did you do?
A. And at that point, you just -- I just made a decision that
I'd rather -- I'd rather die falling off the building than go
through something like that again; so I got as far as I could,
as close to the crevice as I could get, and started kicking a
hole in the wall and got through --
Q. Let me go back to the floor plan.
A. Okay.
Q. This is Government's Exhibit 952.
A. The crevice started -- the big crater started somewhere in
here. And I could get to about right here; so I kicked a hole
in that wall and got as far as I could till the floor stopped;
and then I crawled on the outside of the building onto the
window ledge and proceeded down the window ledge on the outside
of the building, holding onto the frames and whatnot, and came
down here till the floor started again, jumped in on the floor,
climbed over some rubble and got -- found this stairwell over
here.
When I got to that stairwell there -- I mean at that
time I was still under the impression that there was a bomb;
that it was going to go off. So I went as fast as I could down
the stairwell. I remember when I was running down the
stairwell holding onto the handrail and it being covered in
blood, the floor covered in blood -- sliding, going down some
of the landings and stairways -- from people that had been
carried out or made it out before me.
I got down to the bottom floor and came out; and at
that time, people had already started coming back up to the
building to resume the rescue effort.

Q. Agent Franey, I want to put up Government's Exhibit 1012,
which we previously talked about.
And can you just point for the jury where it is you
climbed on the outside of that window?
A. That would be this area right here.
Q. Is that ledge level?
A. No, ma'am, it's not.
Q. Can you tell the jury what it looks like?
A. It's at about 45 degree angle. It's pretty steep. Comes
at about like that.
Q. How did you stand on that?
A. As best as I could. I mean, I just realized -- I really
thought at that time that, you know, that obviously there was
another bomb. I mean, something happened the first time; so I
mean I was just going as fast as I could across that. I was
holding onto what was left of the window frames, you know, the
jagged glass and whatnot. I was just racing against the clock.
And I went across there as fast as I could. Didn't really
think about being how far up or how steep it was at that point.
I just tried not to look down.
Q. After you get down to the plaza level, do you realize that
you've been injured?
A. Yes. Some of the -- some of the marshals that were there
came up and grabbed me. I had some cuts on my head and my
hands. I was bleeding a little bit from the head, and they
brought me to the triage unit there and just wiped me up,
bandaged my hands there.
Q. Were there other ATF employees that were injured in that
building?
A. Yes, ma'am, there were.
Q. Do you know how many?
A. There were five employees in the building when the bomb
went off. Two of the employees were hurt severely, our two
compliance officers, Jim Staggs and Vernon Buster.
Jim Staggs received serious head wounds, bleeding very
badly. He was helped out of the building, as was Vernon
Buster, by DEA employee Regina Bonny. She got them downstairs.
They both spent extended periods of time in the hospital.
Our office manager, secretary, Valerie Rowden,
received fragmentation cuts from flying glass and
fragmentation; but she was not injured severely. I think she
just went to a triage unit down front, got Band-Aided up,
bandaged up, and went back to work.

MS. BEHENNA: Can I have just a moment, your Honor?
THE COURT: Yes.
MS. BEHENNA: That's all we have, your Honor.
THE COURT: Mr. Jones, do you have questions?
MR. JONES: A few, your Honor.



CROSS-EXAMINATION​
BY MR. JONES:
Q. Mr. Franey, I want to show you some photographs first
before I show them to the jury to see whether you can identify
them, because you and I have not met before, have we?
A. No, sir.
Q. You've not been interviewed by the defense?
A. No, sir.
Q. All right. So I simply want to show these and see if you
can identify them; and if you can, just tell me that you can
without further describing them.
A. Yes, sir.
Q. So this is just for you and the Government and myself and
the Court.
Do you recognize this picture?
A. Yes, sir, I do.
Q. All right. Do you recognize this one?
A. Yes, I do.
Q. And do you recognize this one?
A. Yes, I do.
Q. Now, if I may, let me go back to the first one; and I will
mark it and ask you to tell me what it is.
MR. JONES: If I could, your Honor, may I ask
Ms. Behenna what was the number of the photograph that you had
inside the ATF office?
MS. BEHENNA: 976.
MR. JONES: Then I'll just call this 976A.
You don't have a 976A, do you, Ms. Behenna?
MS. BEHENNA: No.
BY MR. JONES:
Q. I'll just call this Defendant's Exhibit 976A; and I'll show
it now to you, sir, first and ask if you can identify 976A.
And if so, would you tell me what it is.
THE COURT: 976, I think you said.
MR. JONES: I'm sorry. 976A.
BY MR. JONES:
Q. Can you identify this now?
A. This appears to be a photograph taken from the west side of
the ATF office after the bombing.
Q. All right. Are you sufficiently familiar with what's shown
in the photograph to show the jury on the chart where -- what
office this would be? By the chart, I mean the diagram behind
you, sir.
A. Yes, sir, I do.
Q. All right. Can you just take the pointer and show there on
the chart or floor plan?
THE WITNESS: May I get up, your Honor?
THE COURT: Yes, you may.
THE WITNESS: I believe it's a photograph that would
show a view from this area here, looking this way into the ATF
office.
MR. JONES: All right. Thank you, sir.
Your Honor, I ask to publish this exhibit. First I
ask for its admission.
MS. BEHENNA: No objection, your Honor.
THE COURT: 976A is received and may be published.
BY MR. JONES:
Q. Now, as I understand it, Mr. Franey, your office would be
back beyond this way; and then a little bit to the north?
A. That's correct.
Q. Now, let me ask you, please, if you can identify what we
will call as Defendant's Exhibit 976B. Can you identify that?
A. Yes, I can.
Q. What is 976B, sir?
A. That is also a photograph taken of the ATF office on the
9th floor after the bombing, taken from the west side, looking
eastward into the office.
Q. And 976B --
MS. BEHENNA: Your Honor, that's already being
published to the jury. I don't think it's been admitted.
MR. JONES: I'll move its admission.
BY MR. JONES:
Q. 976B is -- shows much of the same thing that's in 976A,
doesn't it, except it's taken from a little further back?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And you can see there, can you not, the hole where the
blast of the explosion had blown away the floor?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. All right.
MR. JONES: Has this been published to the jury, your
Honor?
THE COURT: No. It hasn't been offered.
MR. JONES: I'm sorry. I thought that I offered it.
I move its admission.
MS. BEHENNA: No objection, your Honor.
THE COURT: It's received and may be published.
BY MR. JONES:
Q. Now, this area here is where the floor has been blown away.
Is that right?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Thank you. Just to publish to me and to myself and the
Government and the Court, I have Defendant's Exhibit 976C and
ask if you can identify this.
A. Yes, sir, I can.
Q. And what is that, sir.
A. That is a photograph of the ATF office on the 9th floor of
the Murrah Building sometime after the bombing.
Q. And again, that's another picture of the same general area
as the first two except from a little different perspective.
Is that correct?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. All right.
MR. JONES: I move the admission of Defendant's
Exhibit 976C.
MS. BEHENNA: No objection.
THE COURT: It's received and may be shown.
MR. JONES: Mr. Franey -- with the Court's permission,
may I ask Ms. Behenna -- rather than to use another exhibit,
may I simply see your exhibit that's the same as this?
All right. Thank you.
BY MR. JONES:
Q. I'm going to go ahead and show first just you and the Court
and the Government and myself, Mr. Franey, this photograph, so
I won't publish it to the jury yet, and ask you if you
recognize what I have marked as Defendant's Exhibit 976D.
A. Yes, sir, I do.
Q. And that's you, isn't it?
A. That's correct.
MR. JONES: Your Honor, I move the admission of
Defendant's 976D.
MS. BEHENNA: No objection, your Honor.
THE COURT: Received.
BY MR. JONES:
Q. Mr. Franey, as I understand it, this is you in the window
and over here is the sign?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Now, are these the window ledges that you testified to that
you crawled on?
A. Yes, sir.

Q. So you came out of which window? This one? Or another
one?
A. Actually, no, that's not correct. The wall where I was
standing there, right next to me, had a hole kicked through it,
as did the next wall down to the -- moving westward. And after
that wall was kicked through is when I went out on the window
ledge.
Q. All right. So the wall here -- this wall right here, you
kicked a hole in?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And then this wall, you kicked a hole in. Is that correct?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And then some -- you went beyond this way?
A. Yes, sir, I did.
MR. JONES: And then if I may see . . .
BY MR. JONES:
Q. Let me show you Government's Exhibit 1012, which has
already been admitted. Do you remember this photograph?
A. Yes, sir, I do.
Q. Now, do I understand that you came out from the window
somewhere along here and walked across here to this area?
A. That's correct.
Q. All right. Now, that's at an angle of about 45 degrees on
the window ledge?
A. That's just an estimate; but yes, sir, that's what I
believe.
Q. And when you found this barrier or firewall, whatever we
want to call it, like right here -- do you see that?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Actually, the one you encountered was here, wasn't it?
A. That's correct.
Q. And were you able to go from this 45-degree approximate
slant across into here?
A. Yes, sir; but I went on the inside of the building, on the
inside, stepped around the wall to the inside.
Q. What do you mean on the inside step?
A. Well, it's difficult to show from this angle, but I was
going on the window ledge here holding onto what was left of
the window frames. When I came to that concrete retaining wall
or firewall, however you referred to it, I did not go on the
outside of that. I went on the inside of the building,
stepping across back to the outside of the window frame.
Q. All right. So did you come across -- if I may show you
again 976C -- did you come across this inside ledge here where
my finger is?
A. That's correct.
Q. All right. So how much of your journey was actually on the
inside, as opposed to how much was on the outside?
A. The only part where I came inside there, crossing the gape,
or the hole, was where that concrete retaining wall was.
Q. Can you -- you passed one of those?
A. To the best of my knowledge.
Q. All right, sir. Now, you have identified the names of the
agents and employees of the ATF and where they were on the
morning of the 19th; is that correct?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Do you remember the name of the arson trial in Ponca
City -- the name of the defendant?
A. I'm trying to recall.
No, sir, I can't recall it right now.
Q. It wasn't one of your cases, was it?
A. No, sir, it was not.
Q. Now, Mr. Franey, you indicated that you and perhaps other
agents had been out on the night of April 18 working on a joint
investigation with the Norman Police Department. Is that
correct?
A. That's correct.
Q. And this was an investigation concerning a man named Wolf?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Now, was the DEA in any way involved in that investigation
along with you and the Norman Police Department?
A. No, sir.
Q. And were your activities with respect to that investigation
also in Norman, or were part of them in Oklahoma City?
A. They were actually in Norman.
Q. So you weren't anywhere in Oklahoma City on the night of
the 18th working on that investigation except if you might have
gone to your office?
A. That's correct.
Q. Now, within the ATF office there or elsewhere in the
building, you indicated that there was an evidence locker over
on the -- would it be the east wall?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And is that that sort of long rectangular space there?
A. That's correct.
Q. What was stored in that room?
A. That room is going to be document evidence and firearm
evidence that was either seized or purchased or retained during
investigations.
Q. Were there any explosives stored in there?
A. No, sir, there were not.
Q. Did -- to your knowledge -- did the ATF have any explosives
stored anywhere in the building?
A. No. All explosive evidence by ATF is kept at the evidence
storage bunker, which is an explosive bunker shared with the
Oklahoma City Police Department's bomb squad, the highway
patrol, and the FBI, which is kept at the Oklahoma evidence
bunker at air depot, at I-240 in Oklahoma City.
Q. I'm sorry. And that's a considerable distance away from
the Alfred P. Murrah Building, isn't it?
A. That's correct.
Q. Now, when this alarm was sounded or you heard that there
might be another bomb in the building or what was thought to be
a bomb, were you ever able to find out or satisfy yourself what
might have caused that commotion?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And what was that, sir?
A. I believe at that time someone had either observed a box
with wires coming out of it, or it could have been an inert Law
rocket or a TOW missile that Customs had. I'm not sure exactly
which one it was.
Q. This was an inert missile that was not held by the ATF?
A. The TOW missile that was found? Yes, I believe so.
Q. It was held by another law enforcement agency?
A. That's correct.
Q. So far as you know, there was nothing in the ATF's
possession that could have contributed to the explosion.
A. No, that's correct. There was not.

Q. Now, these agents that you have identified here: Were any
of these individuals part of the ATF contingent at Mt. Carmel
outside Waco?
A. Yes, there was.
Q. Who were those?
A. Special Agent Mark Michalic and special Agent Harry
Eberhardt were involved in the execution of the search warrant
on February 28, 1993.
Q. Now, is Mr. Michalic still with the ATF?
Q. And is he in the Oklahoma City office?
A. He's actually assigned to Denver now.
Q. All right. And Mr. Eberhardt: Is he still with the ATF?
A. Yes, he is.
Q. And where is he assigned?
A. To the Oklahoma City field office.
MR. JONES: I don't believe I have any further
questions. Thank you, Mr. Franey.
THE COURT: Do you have any follow-up questions?
MS. BEHENNA: Just a couple.
THE COURT: All right.
MS. BEHENNA: Your Honor, if I could ask Mr. Jones for
the defense exhibits, since I didn't have copies of them. I
wanted to go over those pictures again.
THE COURT: Yes. All right.



REDIRECT EXAMINATION​
BY MS. BEHENNA:
Q. Agent Franey, let me show you Defense Exhibit 976A. Was
that board there from the morning of April 19, 1995?
A. No, ma'am.
Q. Let me show you Defendant's Exhibit 976B. Is that the hole
you observed that morning?
A. Yes, it is. It -- that photograph -- you know, that is
after the rescue efforts had come and they cleared a lot of the
rubble out. But after the explosion on the morning of the
19th, this area back in here was all covered with rubble,
fragmentation, things like that; so that is why at the time I
had to go on the outside of the building and on the ledge and
climbed back through.
Q. And there was no board there for you to leave the building?
A. That's correct.
Q. And if you could have left the building that morning, would
you have done so?
A. Yes, I would have.
Q. I mean, other than going outside the ledge, I mean.
A. Yes, ma'am.
Q. Let me show you Defendant's Exhibit 976D, I believe. Do
you remember that picture?
A. Yes, I do.
Q. Do you have a box in your hand in that picture, Agent
Franey? Do you see that?
A. Yes, I do.
Q. What do you have?
A. That is a lockbox that I kept in my desk.
Q. What's in it?
A. Savings bonds that I'm saving for my daughter's college --
college time.
MS. BEHENNA: That's all I have, your Honor.
THE COURT: Anything else of this witness?
MR. JONES: Nothing further. Thank you.
THE COURT: Is he to be excused?
MS. BEHENNA: Yes, your Honor.
THE COURT: Agreed.
You may step down. You're excused.
THE WITNESS: Yes, sir.


*********************

Finding heroes among the wreckage:
Five are hailed for actions
in Oklahoma City bombing aftermath
Source.

Many heroes emerged from the wreckage of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building bombing on April 19, 1995, that destroyed the structure, killing 167 people and injuring 675 more. The herculean efforts of five of them to prevent further loss of life without regard for their own safety were recognized recently by Parade magazine and the International Association of Chiefs of Police, which named them Police Officers of the Year.

This year’s honorees, who were formally presented with the awards at the IACP’s annual meeting in Phoenix in October, include: Midwest City police Cpl. Regina Bonny, 36; Drug Enforcement Administration Special Agent David Schickendanz, 46, and three members of the Oklahoma City Police Department, Det. Sgt. Robert Campbell, 39; Sgt. Rod Hill, 46; and Officer Jim Ramsey, 27.

It was the first time that joint awards have been bestowed since 1981, when four Secret Service agents were honored for saving the life of former President Ronald Reagan during an assassination attempt.

Bonny, an undercover narcotics officer, was in the doomed building that day because she had been assigned to work with the DEA on a case. She was with three female DEA agents gathered around Carrie Lenz, who was five months pregnant, looking at ultrasound images of Lenz’s baby. The bomb exploded as Bonny walked down the hall to her office. Bonny was knocked unconscious by the blast, but when she came to, she took action that saved the lives of several others trapped in the rubble.

Although suffering from serious injuries that left her with irreparable nerve damage, a brain injury and hand and shoulder wounds, Bonny pulled Vernon Buster, an inspector with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, from debris and removed a piece of metal from his arm. Then she went to the aid of Jim Staggs, also an ATF inspector, who was bleeding from a head wound. She tore off Staggs’ shirt and wrapped it around his head to stop the flow of blood. As dust and smoke began to swirl around them, Bonny, who is 5 feet, 4 inches tall, guided Buster and dragged Staggs, who weighed 205 pounds, over a pile of concrete and to a staircase.

But Bonny didn’t stop once she reached the street. She went back into the crumbling structure to search for her colleagues. But all she found was a gaping chasm where nine floors of the building, including the DEA office, used to be. She continued her fruitless search, and learned a few days later that everyone with her when the blast occurred had perished.

Schickedanz was in an elevator with ATF supervisor Alex McCauley when the blast’s shock wave jolted it loose and sent it hurtling six floors down. Once the elevator came to rest a few feet above the third floor, Schickedanz and McCauley used an emergency telephone and buzzer to summon help that never came.

The DEA agent used his body to wedge the door open so he and McCauley could scramble out and make their way to a third-floor exit door.
Schickendanz returned to the building to launch a futile search for his DEA colleagues. He went on to set up a command post in his car, tried to comfort shell-shocked survivors, and fielded telephone calls. Later, he went to a local hospital to have smoke from the blast pumped from his lungs. The blast left the now-retired agent with permanent partial hearing loss.

Hill was among several Oklahoma City police officers who rushed to the scene following the blast,. He was trying to rescue survivors when firefighters warned of the possibility of another explosion. Hill was about to flee with other rescuers when he saw two women on the seventh floor of the building. “Don’t leave us!” they pleaded. Hill decided to return to try to rescue the women, and was followed by Sgt. Campbell and Det. Sgt. Ramsey.

Hill reached the seventh floor, crawled through a blown-out window and came upon a 15-foot-wide pit. He could hear one of the two women, Rhonda Griffin, 44, trying to persuade her friend Glenda Riley, 50, to jump from the window. Before either could jump, Hill yelled out that he was there. “I’ll get you out!” he shouted.

Hill pulled himself up onto a window frame, then moved carefully over two blown-out windows to get closer to the women. He hoisted Griffin onto a window frame, as Campbell and Ramsey threw a piece of metal over a narrow strip of floor to give the women an extra foothold. Using the metal plate to regain his own footing, Campbell grabbed Griffin from the window frame and pulled her across as Hill and Ramsey returned to rescue Riley.

Ten other law enforcement officers earned honorable mentions from IACP and Parade. They include: Sgt. Maj. Al Campbell, 54, Anoka, Minn., Police Department; Det. Linda Erwin, 50, Dallas Police Department; Officer Edron Lonaberger Jr., University of Maryland at Baltimore Police Department; Special Agents Larry D. Salmon, 40, and Christopher W. Reilly, 49, both of the U.S. Department of State Diplomatic Security Service.

Also: Trooper Kenneth D. Mullen, 32, Illinois State Police; Officer Andrew M. Margiotta, 33, Henrico County, Va., Division of Police; Trooper Lee A. Sredniawa, 25, Ohio State Highway Patrol; Officer Mell Taylor, 32, Spokane, Wash., Police Department; and Sgt. Mark A. Wynn, 41, Metropolitan Nashville, Tenn., Police Department.

******************

Maybe someone will be good enough to pass this on to conspiracybeliever. He still hasn't apologized to me for his rudeness and immaturity on another thread, and I'm not dealing with him until he does.

(Edited for grammar)
 
Last edited:
Again, for the 2nd time (directly to you), my "claim":

Here is your statement from page three:

Where did this “coincidental” exchange between Berg and Moussaoui occur?
In Oklahoma. Moussaoui was reportedly trying to hack into the University of Oklahoma system by using Berg's email.

Here is your statement a couple posts after that:

You may be right. Note I wrote "reportedly" to hack into the university system.

But it may have been much simpler.............

Like, buy a plane ticket under a name that wouldn't raise flags with the FBI......

Followed by this on page 6:

There are cells of both domestic and foreign terrorists, and they interact. Lots of patterns emerge.

You most certainly ARE making a claim there is a connection between OKC and 9/11. That you did not flat out state it is irrelevant. Your inference is that these are related. I asked for proof, you have provided none. Not any of your links actually provide any evidence that McVeigh and 9/11 have any connection whatsoever.





Yeah; so what?

Who the hell is Patti LaBelle?

A several grammy winning recording artist and singer.


McVeigh was seen before the bombing with Middle Easterners, McVeigh was linked to Straussmeir, Straussmeir fled to Germany, money to pay for the Oklahoma flying school was paid for by Moussaoui with money wired from Germany, Nichols interacted extensively with known Islamic terrorists in the Phillipines, Moussaoui had well documented ties to the Oklahoma City area, he had ties to Berg, Berg showed up on international TV getting his head removed by al-Zarqawi, and on and on and on.

Please, read all the links I have provided (and was asked for).

I certainly have read them. I have seen NO evidence whatsoever other than eyewitness testimony that is specious at best that McVeigh had anything other than circumstantial contact with "middle eastern looking" men. Given that he is an ardent white supremacist I highly doubt he would consort with anyone from the middle east on his mission to avenge WACO.



There's the reference. You want me to read it for you?

Again, not my job to post your arguments for you. Telling someone "Go google this" doesn't cut it on this forum and you should well know that by now. If there is an argument on that search of yours, post it here.



I have done so. Read it.

Again, no you haven't. You have made fleeting inferences that 9/11 is related to Mcveigh's bombing. No evidence yet.

This is a forum, not a courtroom. If I could *prove* something here, I wouldn't be presenting it to you.

You should well know the burden of proof in regards to this forum and claims made. Do you need it explained again?

You are trying to tie me on the merry-go-round again. I won't play that with you again.

I am asking you to support your claims with evidence.




She mentions Robert Millar too. Why isn't he suspect?



They did. You weren't listening.

Just like right now. (Links abound - Google can be your friend, if you'd just give it a try).

I most certainly was reading what you posted. They do not support your inference that 9/11 and OKC were related in any way.



Because of Howe's official reports to Finley.

(I did read the wikipedia article; and much, much more. Try it.......)



This is an example of your unreasonablness.

1) You refuse to read the links I provide,

2) You refuse to search google, even after I provide keywords,

3) And you bring up garbage like that even after multiple links are provided.

1) You make suspect inferences of relationships between McVeigh and Al Queda, and you haven't provided any evidence of said relationship.

2) You shift burden of proof to have others go find your evidence for you. Post your evidence yourself.

3) You resort to snarky adhoms when cornered.

You are unreasonable, sir. I'm tired of fowling with you.

I am very reasonable. I require evidence and you have not given any, but you have shifted the goalposts, attempted to reverse the burden of proof and you seem to be rather upset about all of this. Check your blood pressure.



There are connections between McVeigh/Nichols and Islamic terrorists, there are other connections between Berg and Islamic terrorists, all are connected to the Oklahoma City area, and the Islamic terrorists continued operations for 6 years after the OKC bombing (learning how to fly in the OKC area) virtually unimpeded until Sept. 11th, 2001.

Those are the connections.

Evidence? So far all you have is whispering conspiracy theories based on tidbits of inconsequential.



Just how many times must I answer your silly, repeated questions?

However many you'd like to, except you're still not answering. Where is the evidence showing a conclusive link between OKC and Al Queda?



Proclaimed like a true sage.

Spoken like a true believer.

Okay. Disregard the testimony.

And again, testimony without supporting evidence is nothing more than a story.

Wait for another bomb..........

...............and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, and another, until you're finally able to conquer your crippling case of denialism, and "connect dots".

(I'm sure glad you're not an FBI SA).

non-sequiter.

Now, let me reiterate your words and claims:

Where did this “coincidental” exchange between Berg and Moussaoui occur?
In Oklahoma. Moussaoui was reportedly trying to hack into the University of Oklahoma system by using Berg's email.

I was struck by the "coincidences" of Moussaoui using Berg's laptop in Oklahoma, then Berg getting his head sawed off in Baghdad later, and I've always been wondering about why the federal investigation pooh-poohed all links to foreign nationals reportedly involved in the OKC bombing (especially Andreas Strassmeir).

McVeigh was seen before the bombing with Middle Easterners, McVeigh was linked to Straussmeir, Straussmeir fled to Germany, money to pay for the Oklahoma flying school was paid for by Moussaoui with money wired from Germany, Nichols interacted extensively with known Islamic terrorists in the Phillipines, Moussaoui had well documented ties to the Oklahoma City area, he had ties to Berg, Berg showed up on international TV getting his head removed by al-Zarqawi, and on and on and on.

Now your contention is that OKC and 9/11 are connected. Provide evidence this is the case. You've already admitted how testimony of interested parties alone is unreliable when you said this:

Anybody involved in such activities knows that informants, while necessary evils, can be reliable today and full of $hit tomorrow.

So again, please provide evidence. I've explained why the laptop situation is implausible as anything other than a coincidence, and I've pointed out that even one of your own links (cnn) about the laptop says:

Government sources told CNN that the encounter involved an acquaintance of Zacarias Moussaoui -- the only person publicly charged in the United States in connection with the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Which is it? Moussoui himself or an acquiantance?

So where is the evidence that OKC and 9/11 are connected in any way?
 
Last edited:
Aah, that feels better. So, are we all in agreement at least about these points regarding the Murrah building?
1) There were no additional bombs found in or near the building
2) There were at least five BATF personnel in the building when the bomb went off.
 
...Huntster, I have a question for you: why don't you have the information I'm about to give you, which took me 15 minutes to find and cull from two sources?

Why?....

Well, I suspect it's because I'm not as good as you are at finding information.

That post and links are a pretty impressive show.

...I'm not some computer search wiz kid....

Maybe not in your opinion, but I think you found great links, and presented them perfectly.

...Pardon my French, but it's your G.D. conspiracy theory, so why do you expect others to do your homework?...

I'm not forming a "conspiracy theory". Others have. I've provided links to their sites. I'm not happy about what I read there. I'm a Fed.

But what I've been reading over the past 11 years (just in passing; not fervently researching) makes me "confident enough that there is plenty of information published to make me very, very suspicious that there is more to the OKC bombing than just Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols".

...This is not my extraordinary claim to prove, it's yours....

No, it's not.

It's other people's "extraordinary claim", I've mentioned it to you folks, I've provided links for anyone to review, and it's the courts, law enforcement, or the intelligence community to "prove".

...The whole "early warning" argument seems to be very important to OK City CTers. So wouldn't it be a good idea to find out if any BATF personnel were in the building when the bomb blew? You were given leads earlier: a phone call to the OK City BATF, and a snippet from a Salon article, both indicatiing that several BATF personnel were in the building when the bomb blew. There must be a several hundred CT websites that say otherwise. Isn't that important?...

Since April, 1995, (like you mention) there have been hundreds of CT claims of "no ATF in the building". I suspect those claims grew from the fact that no ATF SA's were killed, and (because of the nature of a criminal investigation) evidence is withheld until trial. This allows "rumors" to grow, and contributes to CTs. You have cited McVeigh trial records, like I have in a previous post regarding Carol Howe during the Nichols trial (since I am now actually "researching").

The trials continue as we pound away at our keyboards here. Moussaoui is on trial, and information is being revealed daily.

I also need to point out that while "official", and as you may well know, trial records do not record all available evidence. Only that evidence allowed by the judge is recorded, including testimony.

The "phone call to the OK City BATF, and a snippet from a Salon article" didn't refute the evidence that indicated that McVeigh and Nichols weren't the only people involved in the OKC bombing, and that they had ties to Islamic terrorists.

I need to also point out that, even though your research in the McVeigh trial record provides sworn testimony that there were 5 of 10 ATF personnel in the building at the time of the attack, that doesn't answer the question of what happened to Howe's informant reports to SA Finley, and SA Finley's reports to SAC Lester Martz (why other offices in the Murrah Bldg. weren't warned; now even including the rest of the ATF office - this would strongly indicate that the Howe reports were simply ignored, strengthening the scenario of a bungling cover-up).

...This is about the 30th time in the past 10 days that I've done fact checking for a CTer (I'm not really calling you a CTer, except in this case. I don't know you.)...

Thanks. I don't consider myself a "CTer". I'm just adding pieces as they become available.

No "conspiracy theory" here; just growing suspicions.
 
Aah, that feels better. So, are we all in agreement at least about these points regarding the Murrah building?
1) There were no additional bombs found in or near the building
2) There were at least five BATF personnel in the building when the bomb went off.

I can agree with that.

Now, unfortunately (because it is so late here), please stand by while I ride the merry-go-round with the bird again for a while................
 
.....You most certainly ARE making a claim there is a connection between OKC and 9/11. That you did not flat out state it is irrelevant. Your inference is that these are related....

I "claim" this:

1) There are media reports (including CNN) that Moussaoui used either Nick Berg's email password or his laptop computer somewhere in Oklahoma.....

2) There are media reports that Nick Berg was later beheaded in Bagdhad by terrorists associated with al-Zarqawi......

3) There are media reports that McVeigh was seen at a motel on I-40, near both Elohim City and Oklahoma City, with people of Mid-Eastern appearance.....

4) There are reports that Terry Nichols made several trips to the Phillipines, and that he was seen with Islamic terrorists who were associated with the WTC bombing.....

5) There are reports associating Moussaoui with the Oklahoma City area, where he attended some flight school training.......

6) There are reports that Carol Howe informed ATF SA Finley that people associated with Elohim City were talking of bombing federal buildings......

7) There are reports that SA Finley duly submitted a written report of Howe's reports to the regional ATF office in Dallas, and Finley's report was duly endorsed by appropriate OKC and Tulsa ATF officials...........

8) There is no record of Carol Howe in the McVeigh trial record, but there is in the Nichols trial record......

9) James Pate and Rick Sherrow reported most of the OKC events in accordance with what I have listed above in SOF magazine within two years after the bombing.............

10) The ATF and FBI at that time were heavily engaged in infiltrating right-wing, anti-government groups, and had both been heavily criticized after the Ruby Ridge and Waco events.............

11) It is my suspicion that the ATF was not aware of much information regarding FBI and CIA operations investigating Al Qaeda when the OKC attack took place, or afterwards............

...I asked for proof, you have provided none....

What's more, I informed you that if I did indeed have proof, I wouldn't be bothered presenting it to you.

I'd be dealing directly with federal prosecutors.

....Not any of your links actually provide any evidence that McVeigh and 9/11 have any connection whatsoever....

Correct.

Once again, they provide evidence that Moussaoui was connected to Berg, Berg was connected to al-Zarqawi, McVeigh was linked to Straussmeir, Straussmeir fled to Germany, money to pay for the Oklahoma flying school was paid for by Moussaoui with money wired from Germany, Nichols interacted with known Islamic terrorists in the Phillipines, and Moussaoui had well documented ties to the Oklahoma City area.

Originally Posted by Huntster :.......Please, read all the links I have provided (and was asked for).

I certainly have read them. I have seen NO evidence whatsoever other than eyewitness testimony that is specious at best that McVeigh had anything other than circumstantial contact with "middle eastern looking" men.

So, an OKC/9-11 connection can only be established between McVeigh, and not Moussaoui connected to Berg, Berg connected to al-Zarqawi, McVeigh linked to Straussmeir, etc.........?

...Given that he is an ardent white supremacist I highly doubt he would consort with anyone from the middle east on his mission to avenge WACO....

The white supremicists and Islamic terrorists share two major affinities:

1) They both hate Jews, and

2) They both hate the United States Government.

And McVeigh spent time in Iraq, just as Moussaoui has been spending time here.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
This is a forum, not a courtroom. If I could *prove* something here, I wouldn't be presenting it to you.

You should well know the burden of proof in regards to this forum and claims made. Do you need it explained again?

Yes, actually I do.

Are these "burdens" published on the forum as part of the "rules"?

Do you have an authority on such things here?

Originally Posted by Huntster :
You are trying to tie me on the merry-go-round again. I won't play that with you again.

I am asking you to support your claims with evidence.

I have done so repeatedly.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
It was.

She mentions Robert Millar too. Why isn't he suspect?

He should be.

That's part of the mystery.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
They did. You weren't listening.

Just like right now. (Links abound - Google can be your friend, if you'd just give it a try).

I most certainly was reading what you posted. They do not support your inference that 9/11 and OKC were related in any way.

You either have a reading problem, a comprehension problem, a problem differentiating proof from evidence, or a problem with me.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
You are unreasonable, sir. I'm tired of fowling with you.

I am very reasonable. I require evidence and you have not given any, but you have shifted the goalposts, attempted to reverse the burden of proof....

Highlights are to illustrate your difficulty differentiating evidence from proof.

...and you seem to be rather upset about all of this. Check your blood pressure....

It's high, and likely rising.

Funny, it happens regularly when interacting with you.

One of my physical impairments is high blood pressure. I'm medicated to regulate it.

Perhaps when I see one of your posts, I should pop a supplemental dose?

Originally Posted by Huntster :
There are connections between McVeigh/Nichols and Islamic terrorists, there are other connections between Berg and Islamic terrorists, all are connected to the Oklahoma City area, and the Islamic terrorists continued operations for 6 years after the OKC bombing (learning how to fly in the OKC area) virtually unimpeded until Sept. 11th, 2001.

Those are the connections.

Evidence? So far all you have is whispering conspiracy theories based on tidbits of inconsequential.

I have provided links.

You have provided nothing but the same, lame questions.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Just how many times must I answer your silly, repeated questions?

However many you'd like to....

I won't "like to" much longer.

...except you're still not answering. Where is the evidence showing a conclusive link between OKC and Al Queda?...

There you go again. You'll never know the difference between evidence and proof.

You know, I even think I provided you with definitions of the two words somewhere back in our short history.


...Now your contention is that OKC and 9/11 are connected....

Please do not proclaim my contention. See the numbered list above.

...Provide evidence this is the case. You've already admitted how testimony of interested parties alone is unreliable when you said this:

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Anybody involved in such activities knows that informants, while necessary evils, can be reliable today and full of $hit tomorrow...

How did you miss it?:

...informants, while necessary evils, can be reliable today and full of $hit tomorrow...

When the day after tomorrow comes, and the informant's report had merit, it was reliable, wasn't it?

You know; hindsight?

...So again, please provide evidence. I've explained why the laptop situation is implausible as anything other than a coincidence, and I've pointed out that even one of your own links (cnn) about the laptop says:

Government sources told CNN that the encounter involved an acquaintance of Zacarias Moussaoui -- the only person publicly charged in the United States in connection with the September 11, 2001, terror attacks...

Which is it? Moussoui himself or an acquiantance?...

I don't know. The reports also state email password and borrowed laptop.

The "implausible as anything other than a coincidence" concluded with the fact that this took place in the OKC area, and that Berg ended up loosing his head in Baghdad.

...So where is the evidence that OKC and 9/11 are connected in any way?...

Now, all around you.

No proof, but plenty of evidence.
 
A common trait of coverups is the difficulty of verifying the truth.

A common trait of coverups is also the difficulty of verifying that there actually is one. Since there is little information supporting a conspiracy theory, how can one be convinced that there IS a conspiracy ? Or a coverup ? And if there is evidence, then verifying the truth shouldn't be that difficult.

Just my CDN0.02$
 
I "claim" this:

1) There are media reports (including CNN) that Moussaoui used either Nick Berg's email password or his laptop computer somewhere in Oklahoma.....

Already addressed. Below you can't verify what those reports are confirming as to whether it was Moussoui or an acquaintance. Hardly evidence or proof. More like speculation.

2) There are media reports that Nick Berg was later beheaded in Bagdhad by terrorists associated with al-Zarqawi......

ok.

3) There are media reports that McVeigh was seen at a motel on I-40, near both Elohim City and Oklahoma City, with people of Mid-Eastern appearance.....

"appearance." Often my native american friend is asked if he is mexican. Eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable. Once again eyewitness accounts, and not verified with evidence. Not a whole lot here but more speculation.

4) There are reports that Terry Nichols made several trips to the Phillipines, and that he was seen with Islamic terrorists who were associated with the WTC bombing.....

Nichols reportedly had a wife there. So what? Still more speculation. Other than someone saying they saw something, do you have any evidence to cooborate this story?

5) There are reports associating Moussaoui with the Oklahoma City area, where he attended some flight school training.......

So?

6) There are reports that Carol Howe informed ATF SA Finley that people associated with Elohim City were talking of bombing federal buildings......

Again, ground covered.

7) There are reports that SA Finley duly submitted a written report of Howe's reports to the regional ATF office in Dallas, and Finley's report was duly endorsed by appropriate OKC and Tulsa ATF officials...........

Once again, no cooberating evidence.

8) There is no record of Carol Howe in the McVeigh trial record, but there is in the Nichols trial record......

If she had nothing the prosecution or defense could use, this isn't surprising. they were two seperate trials.

9) James Pate and Rick Sherrow reported most of the OKC events in accordance with what I have listed above in SOF magazine within two years after the bombing.............

Your cites didn't show this. Provide the cite please.

10) The ATF and FBI at that time were heavily engaged in infiltrating right-wing, anti-government groups, and had both been heavily criticized after the Ruby Ridge and Waco events.............

Do you have a cite to back that up? While that statement is not implausible, I don't see you supporting your assertions with anything but your contention that you are correct.

11) It is my suspicion that the ATF was not aware of much information regarding FBI and CIA operations investigating Al Qaeda when the OKC attack took place, or afterwards............

Speculation. Even so, this doesn't provide evidence of anything. Does the ATF have a long history of communication with the CIA? It has been shown the FBI doesn't like to share information. So what?



What's more, I informed you that if I did indeed have proof, I wouldn't be bothered presenting it to you.

I'd be dealing directly with federal prosecutors.

That certainly says alot to the validity of your theory then. With all this underground scheming and planning and contacts and connections between OTC and 9/11 I am amazed there is no actual evidence other than some speculation and unsupported testimony.




Once again, they provide evidence that Moussaoui was connected to Berg, Berg was connected to al-Zarqawi, McVeigh was linked to Straussmeir, Straussmeir fled to Germany, money to pay for the Oklahoma flying school was paid for by Moussaoui with money wired from Germany, Nichols interacted with known Islamic terrorists in the Phillipines, and Moussaoui had well documented ties to the Oklahoma City area.

That's a great train ride, but you have no evidence that there is any actual links there. You have two events you are connecting with a german named Strausser (the validity of that connection is still in question) and that Islamic terrorists used german banks to funnel money. That's not conclusive, and you haven't shown any evidence of correlation there. Your conclusion is inductive, and logically unsound. Of course, if you were to provide evidence...



So, an OKC/9-11 connection can only be established between McVeigh, and not Moussaoui connected to Berg, Berg connected to al-Zarqawi, McVeigh linked to Straussmeir, etc.........?

No, but theres no evidence any way you slice your theory that there is a connection.



The white supremicists and Islamic terrorists share two major affinities:

1) They both hate Jews, and

2) They both hate the United States Government.

True, but they also hate each other just as much.

And McVeigh spent time in Iraq, just as Moussaoui has been spending time here.

Evidence? Have you actually compared the timeline to McVeigh being in Iraq and Moussoui being here? McVeigh was in Gulf War 1 and was back in the states before 1994. When did Moussoui get to the states?



Yes, actually I do.

Are these "burdens" published on the forum as part of the "rules"?

Do you have an authority on such things here?

CFLarsen has certainly lectured us all on the fact that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that it is the burden of the claimant to provide that evidence. It is a well known part of the culture of this forum.



I have done so repeatedly.

Speculation is not evidence.




You either have a reading problem, a comprehension problem, a problem differentiating proof from evidence, or a problem with me.

You seem to have a problem understanding that speculation is not evidence.



Highlights are to illustrate your difficulty differentiating evidence from proof.

Loosely used interchangably as an informal statement. If you would prefer to adhere strictly to formal logic that's fine with me. I'd be happy to list how many fallacies of induction and appeal to ignorance you've used.



It's high, and likely rising.

Funny, it happens regularly when interacting with you.

One of my physical impairments is high blood pressure. I'm medicated to regulate it.

Perhaps when I see one of your posts, I should pop a supplemental dose?

perhaps you should not get so worked up that you have no evidence.



I have provided links.

And I have provided critique on why they aren't "evidence"

You have provided nothing but the same, lame questions.

Maybe you should answer them then.



I won't "like to" much longer.

You can admit you have no evidence to support your theory at any time.



There you go again. You'll never know the difference between evidence and proof.

You know, I even think I provided you with definitions of the two words somewhere back in our short history.

See above. And no, that wasn't me you provided those definitions to. It seems you've been vitriolic with so many on this forum you are confusing discussions.




Please do not proclaim my contention. See the numbered list above.

Your contention is obvious. Your lack of evidence is also.




When the day after tomorrow comes, and the informant's report had merit, it was reliable, wasn't it?

You know; hindsight?

And when no supporting evidence shows itself after looking into that story, then the reliability of their statements are shown.



I don't know. The reports also state email password and borrowed laptop.

Already addressed.

The "implausible as anything other than a coincidence" concluded with the fact that this took place in the OKC area, and that Berg ended up loosing his head in Baghdad.

Why not? If it happened in Michigan, I am sure you would think it was related to McVeigh's ties to the Michigan Militia. Like I said before (and a point you sorely missed) I once was in the recording studio Patti LaBelle recorded in. That doesn't mean Patti and I know each other or have anything to do with each other.



Now, all around you.

No proof, but plenty of evidence.

No, but plenty of speculation.
 
Last edited:
Well, Hell, Belz; what took you so long? I knew you'd show up eventually.

A common trait of coverups is also the difficulty of verifying that there actually is one....

Yup. That's why they call them "coverups".

... Since there is little information supporting a conspiracy theory, how can one be convinced that there IS a conspiracy?...

There's plenty of information. It's just that only little of it has been "confirmed" by sworn statements, physical evidence, etc.

Therefore, one shouldn'tbe convinced yet.

But I'll keep my eyes and ears open for more, anyway.

I've seen a$$-covering exercises and courtroom evidence suppression before. There may be something to this.

Maybe more trials, complete with "swearing in" might shed some light.

... Or a coverup? And if there is evidence, then verifying the truth shouldn't be that difficult....

Suggest that to Marsha Clark........
 
Originally Posted by Huntster :
I "claim" this:

1) There are media reports (including CNN) that Moussaoui used either Nick Berg's email password or his laptop computer somewhere in Oklahoma.....

Already addressed. Below you can't verify what those reports are confirming as to whether it was Moussoui or an acquaintance. Hardly evidence or proof. More like speculation....

Confirmation is proof, not evidence.

What I provided were reports.

If you don't like it, take it up with CNN and the others.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
2) There are media reports that Nick Berg was later beheaded in Bagdhad by terrorists associated with al-Zarqawi......


ok.

(Turnabout is fair play):

"You can't verify that those reports are confirming as to whether it was al-Zarqawi's or a rival's terror network that beheaded Berg. Hardly evidence or proof. More like speculation"

Originally Posted by Huntster :
3) There are media reports that McVeigh was seen at a motel on I-40, near both Elohim City and Oklahoma City, with people of Mid-Eastern appearance.....

"appearance." Often my native american friend is asked if he is mexican. Eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable. Once again eyewitness accounts, and not verified with evidence. Not a whole lot here but more speculation.

Okay. That's weak.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
4) There are reports that Terry Nichols made several trips to the Phillipines, and that he was seen with Islamic terrorists who were associated with the WTC bombing.....

Nichols reportedly had a wife there. So what? Still more speculation. Other than someone saying they saw something, do you have any evidence to cooborate this story?

This:

...Kelly Patricia O'Meara, among others, of Insight Magazine, reported that Terry Nichols was witnessed attending a meeting on that island and that also present in that meeting were Ramzi Yosef, Abdul Hakim Murad and Wali Khan Amin Shah. Ramzi Yosef was the mastermind behind the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, , while Murad and Shah, also involved in the 1993 bombing, were convicted in 1996, for conspiring to blow up 12 airline jets. It was reported that the subject of the meeting centered around bombing activities and building bombs...

Originally Posted by Huntster :

5) There are reports associating Moussaoui with the Oklahoma City area, where he attended some flight school training.......


So?

He was there.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
6) There are reports that Carol Howe informed ATF SA Finley that people associated with Elohim City were talking of bombing federal buildings......

Again, ground covered.

By me, repeatedly, yes.

You?

Originally Posted by Huntster :
7) There are reports that SA Finley duly submitted a written report of Howe's reports to the regional ATF office in Dallas, and Finley's report was duly endorsed by appropriate OKC and Tulsa ATF officials...........


Once again, no cooberating evidence.

Here.

...In the year from mid 1994 to April, 1995, Carol Howe made at least 70 reports to the ATF along with 38 audio cassettes and 2 video tapes. That Elohim City and all those who resided and visited was under the closest scrutiny is undeniable.

Howe was designated as ATF's Confidential Informant #53270-183, or informally as "CI-183." Some of her neo-Nazi comrades referred to her as "Freya" and "Lady MacBeth." In her preliminary report to the ATF, submitted through Agent Anglea Finley, the following information was provided by Howe, as reported in "The New American:"

"W.A.R. is a white supremacist organization that is described briefly as being radical, paramilitary, neo-Nazi, anti-government and violent. W.A.R. has national and international affiliates to include the KKK and a racist following in Germany. W.A.R. affiliates with John Metzger, who is a widely known white supremacist with the KKK. W.A.R. has approximately 20-25 active, 50 non-active, and 200 underground members locally. When a group of "legals" reaches a membership of 5 to 15 people, it will separate to form another group. This is done to protect the members from any government action such as search warrants and infiltration.

Agent Finley's report also notes that "W.A.R. has several training sites in Oklahoma. The primary training location is called Elohim City which is in a rural area near the border of Oklahoma and Arkansas." Finley concludes this initial report by recounting that CI-183 provided her with a videotape of Mahon making statements "that he was a member of the Klan; that violence is the only answer; that violence does work; and that he supports violence against politicians."

Of particular significance is the fact that this report was directed to Special Agent In Charge of the Dallas Field Division, Lester D. Martz. It was signed by Agent Finley, David E. Roberts, the Resident Agent in Charge of the Tulsa Field Office and by Tommy Wittman for SAC Lester Martz in Dallas. The report was specifically designated "sensitive" and "significant" rather than routine, and that the investigation was specified as one concerning "terrorist/extremist" individuals and groups....

Originally Posted by Huntster :
8) There is no record of Carol Howe in the McVeigh trial record, but there is in the Nichols trial record......

If she had nothing the prosecution or defense could use, this isn't surprising. they were two seperate trials.

For the same crime, which clearly involved others.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
9) James Pate and Rick Sherrow reported most of the OKC events in accordance with what I have listed above in SOF magazine within two years after the bombing.............

Your cites didn't show this. Provide the cite please.

Yes, I provided both the reference and a linK (#243):

...Again, I first learned of "Andy" Strassmeir from James Pate's and Rick Sherrow's reporting in Soldier of Fortune magazine. Their work can only be verified by buying their past articles from SOF....


Originally Posted by Huntster :
10) The ATF and FBI at that time were heavily engaged in infiltrating right-wing, anti-government groups, and had both been heavily criticized after the Ruby Ridge and Waco events.............

Do you have a cite to back that up? While that statement is not implausible, I don't see you supporting your assertions with anything but your contention that you are correct.

Oh, PLEASE!

Surely you can't be that far in the dark!

Does anybody else see the unreasonableness of this man?


Originally Posted by Huntster :
11) It is my suspicion that the ATF was not aware of much information regarding FBI and CIA operations investigating Al Qaeda when the OKC attack took place, or afterwards............


Speculation....

Did the word "suspicion" give you a clue?

...Even so, this doesn't provide evidence of anything...

Are you practicing to become Matlock or something?

...Does the ATF have a long history of communication with the CIA?...

No. That's the point. If there was better inter-agency communication, this $hit would be minimized.

Wasn't that the complaint of those crying about the "intelligence failures" regarding "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq?


...It has been shown the FBI doesn't like to share information. So what?...

It leads to failure.

Failure tempts coverup.

I'm not much of an artist, but I'm getting desperate. I really, really need to draw you a picture, don't I?

Originally Posted by Huntster :
What's more, I informed you that if I did indeed have proof, I wouldn't be bothered presenting it to you.

I'd be dealing directly with federal prosecutors.

That certainly says alot to the validity of your theory then.

Yes, it does.

It says that "if there was proof, we could even convict the ham sandwich with the Fowl in the jury".

But there's no "proof". There's evidence.

Or, there's proof that the intelligence community doesn't want to compromise.

With all this underground scheming and planning and contacts and connections between OTC and 9/11 I am amazed there is no actual evidence other than some speculation and unsupported testimony....

With an attitude like yours, I'm not surprised that you're amazed.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Once again, they provide evidence that Moussaoui was connected to Berg, Berg was connected to al-Zarqawi, McVeigh was linked to Straussmeir, Straussmeir fled to Germany, money to pay for the Oklahoma flying school was paid for by Moussaoui with money wired from Germany, Nichols interacted with known Islamic terrorists in the Phillipines, and Moussaoui had well documented ties to the Oklahoma City area.


That's a great train ride, but you have no evidence that there is any actual links there....

Time for me to question YOU.

After reading the links I have provided, do you deny that Moussaoui used either Nick Berg's laptop computer or his email password? (No links, evidence, or proof requested; just your denial or fear of denial).

...You have two events you are connecting with a german named Strausser (the validity of that connection is still in question) and that Islamic terrorists used german banks to funnel money. That's not conclusive....

You know what's "conclusive"? The fact that you're not reading the links I provide.

You just criticized my links to Andreas Straussmeir as a "german named Strausser".

I call foul.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
So, an OKC/9-11 connection can only be established between McVeigh, and not Moussaoui connected to Berg, Berg connected to al-Zarqawi, McVeigh linked to Straussmeir, etc.........?

No, but theres no evidence any way you slice your theory that there is a connection.

There's no evidence if you refuse to read it.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
The white supremicists and Islamic terrorists share two major affinities:

1) They both hate Jews, and

2) They both hate the United States Government.

True, but they also hate each other just as much.

Evidence, Oh Great Skeptic?

Originally Posted by Huntster :
And McVeigh spent time in Iraq, just as Moussaoui has been spending time here.

Evidence?...

Do you deny that McVeigh was in Iraq during the 1st Gulf War?

...Have you actually compared the timeline to McVeigh being in Iraq and Moussoui being here?...

No.

So?

...McVeigh was in Gulf War 1 and was back in the states before 1994. When did Moussoui get to the states?...

That's not relevant.

What's relevant is that Moussouai was Al Qaeda, they hate the U.S. Government, so did McVeigh, both were deeply involved in U.S. policy in Iraq, both have ties to Oklahoma, and both have ties to terrorist activities in the United States.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Yes, actually I do.

Are these "burdens" published on the forum as part of the "rules"?

Do you have an authority on such things here?

CFLarsen has certainly lectured us all on the fact that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that it is the burden of the claimant to provide that evidence....

Who is CFLarsen, and does he/she have anything to do with the forum regulations?

...It is a well known part of the culture of this forum....

As you may be able to tell, I don't have much knowledge or conformance with the "culture" of this forum.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
I have done so repeatedly.

Speculation is not evidence.

Media reports are, even if you don't like it.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
You either have a reading problem, a comprehension problem, a problem differentiating proof from evidence, or a problem with me.

You seem to have a problem understanding that speculation is not evidence.

And you seem to have a problem understanding that evidence is not proof.

Further, I'm wondering if you can differentiate between evidence and speculation.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
It's high, and likely rising.

Funny, it happens regularly when interacting with you.

One of my physical impairments is high blood pressure. I'm medicated to regulate it.

Perhaps when I see one of your posts, I should pop a supplemental dose?

perhaps you should not get so worked up that you have no evidence.

A lack of "evidence" isn't my problem. Actually, I shouldn't get worked up when interacting with you.

I guess you just bring out the high pressure in me.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
I have provided links.

And I have provided critique on why they aren't "evidence"

And that critique sucks.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
You have provided nothing but the same, lame questions.

Maybe you should answer them then.

I have. Repeatedly.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
I won't "like to" much longer.

You can admit you have no evidence to support your theory at any time.

I cannot.

Because I have no "theory", but there is plenty of evidence to support the possibility that McVeigh and Nichols didn't act alone in the OKC attack, and that there are links to international terrorists.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
There you go again. You'll never know the difference between evidence and proof.

You know, I even think I provided you with definitions of the two words somewhere back in our short history.


See above. And no, that wasn't me you provided those definitions to.

Well, then, I'm sorry I left you out:

Evidence:

A thing or things helpful in forming a conclusion or judgment: The broken window was evidence that a burglary had taken place. Scientists weigh the evidence for and against a hypothesis.
Something indicative; an outward sign: evidence of grief on a mourner's face.
Law. The documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as testimony in a court of law.

Proof:

The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.

The validation of a proposition by application of specified rules, as of induction or deduction, to assumptions, axioms, and sequentially derived conclusions.
A statement or argument used in such a validation.

Convincing or persuasive demonstration: was asked for proof of his identity; an employment history that was proof of her dependability.
The state of being convinced or persuaded by consideration of evidence.
Determination of the quality of something by testing; trial: put one's beliefs to the proof.
Law. The result or effect of evidence; the establishment or denial of a fact by evidence.
The alcoholic strength of a liquor, expressed by a number that is twice the percentage by volume of alcohol present.
Printing.
A trial sheet of printed material that is made to be checked and corrected. Also called proof sheet.
A trial impression of a plate, stone, or block taken at any of various stages in engraving.

A trial photographic print.
Any of a limited number of newly minted coins or medals struck as specimens and for collectors from a new die on a polished planchet.
Archaic. Proven impenetrability: “I was clothed in Armor of proof” (John Bunyan).

...It seems you've been vitriolic with so many on this forum you are confusing discussions....

I guess my avatar, my open faith in God and Christ, and my willingness to accept and look into possibilities may have something to do with my responses to many on this forum. Vitriolic? You bet. I've returned hostility when hostility was presented.

I grant that you haven't been hostile.

But you're damned frustrating............

Originally Posted by Huntster :
The "implausible as anything other than a coincidence" concluded with the fact that this took place in the OKC area, and that Berg ended up loosing his head in Baghdad.


Why not? If it happened in Michigan, I am sure you would think it was related to McVeigh's ties to the Michigan Militia....

Who says that the Michigan Militia won't be tied into this at some time?

The FBI and ATF were infiltrating them, as well.

There's no evidence of that now that I know of, but I'm willing to see what you've got.

Huntster-Do not use creative spelling to get around the filter.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, Hell, Belz; what took you so long? I knew you'd show up eventually.

Don't worry. As long as religion doesn't come up we shouldn't clash so much ;)

Yup. That's why they call them "coverups".

Well, what I meant is that, since there's little of no evidence to support their existence (in some cases, that is), it's difficult to confidently say "there's a coverup" without resorting to gut feelings or conjecture.
 
Do you have any idea how often these people claim they'll blow up building X, Y or Z? They get these tips constantly. The trouble is sorting out the credible ones.
I'm reminded of an episode of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Along Complex: Second Gig. Revolved around this pilot for some public official. He kept fantasizing about killing that official and dying in the process. Apparently Section 9 was investigating him and concluded that he was too much of a coward to go through with his fantasies or something.
 
Well, what I meant is that, since there's little of no evidence to support their existence (in some cases, that is), it's difficult to confidently say "there's a coverup" without resorting to gut feelings or conjecture.
It's like that ninja in Huntster's house.
 
Don't worry. As long as religion doesn't come up we shouldn't clash so much ;)......

Oh, okay.

So, how long before you think somebody on this thread will bring up the extreme right-winger's religion thing?

Oh! I just did it!

Okay. How long before you think somebody will try to use that against me?
 
Okay. How long before you think somebody will try to use that against me?

Well, _I_'m not going to. I'd rather discuss the issue for what it is. Now, whether we agree on other subjects or whether we think that the other's opinion on that other subject means anything in THIS thread, is irrelevant. Agreed ?
 
So many long posts, relevance gets lost quickly, but...


From Huntsman:
3) There are media reports that McVeigh was seen at a motel on I-40, near both Elohim City and Oklahoma City, with people of Mid-Eastern appearance..

The article you provided the link for:

http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/the-terrorist-motel/3728/

States very clearly that McVeigh was meeting with "a group of Iraqis who worked in Oklahoma City."

Exact quote: "According to the motel owner and other witnesses and investigators interviewed by the Weekly, McVeigh and several of these Iraqis were motel guests in the months preceding the 1995 bombing."

Is there a place to check the nationalities of the 9-11 hijackers? If I recall, (And I'd do my research if I weren't posting from work), There weren't a lot of Iraqi's as part of the plot.
_______________________________

Also, the obvious next step would be to look into Berg's background. From what I've understood, there really wasn't a reason to think that the meeting was other than cooincidence - Was there anything Special About Berg that a terrorist would seek him out specificly, or was he just the guy he was sitting next to at the time? If he was a college student, (Wich I would hazzard a guess he was, if the speculation that they were trying to use his credentials to hack U of O. ) he probably didn't have enough resources to be worth being sought out by a terrorist.
_______________________________

If you argue that Carol Howe's Information is credible, and the FBI knew about the OKC bombs, Then you can't argue that it WASN'T McVeigh and the White supremisists, since that was the group she infiltrated to get the information. As this thread is getting bigger, I can't recall if thats actually happened, but I want it in there for the record. ;-)

Okay. carry on.

Trif
 
I guess my avatar, my open faith in God and Christ, and my willingness to accept and look into possibilities may have something to do with my responses to many on this forum.
You're blaming your behavior on Christianity?

But there are so many Christians who aren't complete jerks. How do you explain that?
 
Last edited:
I don't think anything Huntster says in any way involves a willingness to look into possibilities.

I also think he missed the point behind my ninja link. The analogy applies to more than just ramenic deities.
 
Is there a place to check the nationalities of the 9-11 hijackers? If I recall, (And I'd do my research if I weren't posting from work), There weren't a lot of Iraqi's as part of the plot.

15 of the 19 were Saudi nationals. I'm not sure where the rest were from but I am very certain that they were not from Iraq.
 
[I guess my avatar, my open faith in God and Christ ... may have something to do with my responses to many on this forum. Vitriolic? You bet. I've returned hostility when hostility was presented.
Could I just check?

When you say "Christ", you're talking about Jesus Christ, yes?

Not just someone with the same surname, but the guy who said:

But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment ... anyone who says, 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell.
You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Perhaps you should choose another religion more in line with your rather specialized spiritual needs.
 
Confirmation is proof, not evidence.

What I provided were reports.

If you don't like it, take it up with CNN and the others.

Sounds like you should call some prosecutors if you have such proof.



(Turnabout is fair play):

"You can't verify that those reports are confirming as to whether it was al-Zarqawi's or a rival's terror network that beheaded Berg. Hardly evidence or proof. More like speculation"

Sorry, I'm not making that claim.



Okay. That's weak.

Eyewitness testimony is weak. Where's your evidence?




Still not evidence. More eyewitness speculation.





He was there.

Still not a link to McVeigh.



By me, repeatedly, yes.

You?

Again, not evidnec of anything between OKC and 9/11.





Still waiting for the link between 9/11 and OKC. that doesn't provide it.





For the same crime, which clearly involved others.

Then clearly you have evidence other than speculation and conspiracy theories. Provide it.



Yes, I provided both the reference and a linK (#243):

Which doesn't show a link between 9/11 and OKC. Again, you have nothing but induction to attempt to link a german that is reported to have some connection to the fact that german banks were used to funnel money. That's not a connection, that's speculation.






Oh, PLEASE!

Surely you can't be that far in the dark!

Does anybody else see the unreasonableness of this man?


You seem to not be willing to back up your statements with cites. Provide one and stop complaining when asked, or admit you have no evidence.




Did the word "suspicion" give you a clue?

Which isn't evidnece.



Are you practicing to become Matlock or something?

Whatever.



No. That's the point. If there was better inter-agency communication, this $hit would be minimized.

Wasn't that the complaint of those crying about the "intelligence failures" regarding "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq?

non-sequiter. Still not evidence 9/11 and OKC are connected.


It leads to failure.

Failure tempts coverup.

I'm not much of an artist, but I'm getting desperate. I really, really need to draw you a picture, don't I?

Providing evidence would be a nice start. So far you have nothing but speculation.



Yes, it does.

It says that "if there was proof, we could even convict the ham sandwich with the Fowl in the jury".

But there's no "proof". There's evidence.

I thought you said at the beginning of your post that confirmation is proof? You're waffling here. Tell you what, simply provide anything other than speculation as evidence.



With an attitude like yours, I'm not surprised that you're amazed.

Still not evidence.



Time for me to question YOU.

After reading the links I have provided, do you deny that Moussaoui used either Nick Berg's laptop computer or his email password? (No links, evidence, or proof requested; just your denial or fear of denial).

Considering you admitted you don't know that happened and seeing discreprncies in the CNN report vs. the others I have no reason to think it did until I see some actual evidence. Otherwise it is nothing but conflicting speculation.

You know what's "conclusive"? The fact that you're not reading the links I provide.

You just criticized my links to Andreas Straussmeir as a "german named Strausser".

No, I criticized your inductive reasoning without evidence that there is a german connection between Al Quaeda and OKC. You have not shown evidence to back it up. Merely speculation.

Phuck you, fowl. I call foul.

Careful of your blood pressure.



There's no evidence if you refuse to read it.

I've read everything you posted. You have not provided any evidence other than unreliable eyewitness testimony and speculation. This is not conclusive evidnece of anything.


Evidence, Oh Great Skeptic?

Here, I'll do your work for you, since you'd prefer to throw insults and whine that I want evidnece. If you wanted to show that White Supremacists and Muslim trerrorists could have a connection you could have posted this.

However instead of doing a simple google you resorted to more vitriol. Now, my links explaining why that is an exception and why white supremacists hate arabs just as much as jews is here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_supremacists

Evidence that fundamentalist muslims hate anyone not a muslim is here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Muslim

Take a read.



Do you deny that McVeigh was in Iraq during the 1st Gulf War?

I didn't say that, and you're throwing up a straw man. I asked when Moussoui came to the US. You claimed they had overlapping timelines and I asked for evidence.




Then your statement of "And McVeigh spent time in Iraq, just as Moussaoui has been spending time here." is wholly unsuppoerted.



That's not relevant.

What's relevant is that Moussouai was Al Qaeda, they hate the U.S. Government, so did McVeigh, both were deeply involved in U.S. policy in Iraq, both have ties to Oklahoma, and both have ties to terrorist activities in the United States.

You made the statement inferring it was relevant above. Now you're just shifting your story.



Who is CFLarsen, and does he/she have anything to do with the forum regulations?

He currently holds the #1 spot for number of posts. Most of which are probably only the word "Evidence?" No he does not have anything to do with forum regulations. However that humor is lost on you I can see.



As you may be able to tell, I don't have much knowledge or conformance with the "culture" of this forum.

You've certainly been here long enough to learn.



Media reports are, even if you don't like it.

No, media reports are media reports.



And you seem to have a problem understanding that evidence is not proof.

Further, I'm wondering if you can differentiate between evidence and speculation.

Indeed. You've made alot of speculation. You've presented almost no evidence other than unreliable witness testimony and circumstantial speculation.



A lack of "evidence" isn't my problem. Actually, I shouldn't get worked up when interacting with you.

I guess you just bring out the high pressure in me.

You've admitted it is, and in the same post you say that confirmation is proof.



And that critique sucks.

That's your refutation of my critique? Hardly compelling discourse.



I have. Repeatedly.

When asked for evidence you have thrown around insults and generally thrown a tantrum. Perhaps providing evidence is the answer.



I cannot.

Because I have no "theory", but there is plenty of evidence to support the possibility that McVeigh and Nichols didn't act alone in the OKC attack, and that there are links to international terrorists.

You're backpedalling here. You've stated that international terrorist groups work together. You've yet to show any conclusive evidence of this.



Well, then, I'm sorry I left you out:

Evidence:



Proof:

All that trouble to find that link and you couldn't find the link I provided for your argument above?



I guess my avatar, my open faith in God and Christ, and my willingness to accept and look into possibilities may have something to do with my responses to many on this forum. Vitriolic? You bet. I've returned hostility when hostility was presented.

I grant that you haven't been hostile.

But you're damned frustrating............

And you've admitted to being a violent person. You're still not providing anything conclusive to support your thoery.



Who says that the Michigan Militia won't be tied into this at some time?

The FBI and ATF were infiltrating them, as well.

You're just willing to throw everyone into this conspiracy aren't you? There is no evidence of the Michigan Militia doing anything but running around feilds in Michigan pretending to be soldiers since OKC.

There's no evidence of that now that I know of, but I'm willing to see what you've got.

I didn't present a theory requiring evidence. But thanks, that admission of lack of evidence is exactly my point. You've got none. Please read Trifikas' post regarding logical inconsistencies with your theory. They bring up very good points.
 
Could I just check?

When you say "Christ", you're talking about Jesus Christ, yes?

Not just someone with the same surname, but the guy who said:



Perhaps you should choose another religion more in line with your rather specialized spiritual needs.

Could we please keep this on topic, people ?
 
Oh, okay.

So, how long before you think somebody on this thread will bring up the extreme right-winger's religion thing?

Oh! I just did it!

Okay. How long before you think somebody will try to use that against me?

hmmm...mmmph? Oh, hey, that's my cue, right?

Ah, heck with it. Too tired.

Besides... I personally don't think it's unlikely that McVeigh and Nichols had some vague connection with Islamic terrorists, nor that it's unlikely that OKC and 9/11 were related. I just think neither had jack squat to do with 'insider work' by our own evil gub'ment (I mean, aside from Bush Sr. pissing off the terrorists in both camps during his reign).

Oh, here - half-hearted try:

"See? This is the religious freakazoid nutjob who thinks that Christ's murder was an inside job, too..."

blah.

Faggedaboudit...
 

Back
Top Bottom