January Stundie Nominations

Travis

Misanthrope of the Mountains
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
24,133
It's a new year and we also need some new Stundie nominations.

1) Posts must be about Conspiracy Theories and not just nutty things in general.

2) Posts must exhibit ignorance, faulty logic or stupendous arrogance mixed with an ironic mistake.

3) No spelling errors, typos, grammar issues or math mix-ups unless they are deliciously ironic.

4) Posts must be humorous and not just something you disagree with.

5) All nominated posts must have some sort of link or screenshot to prove the reality of the post and it's source.

6) Keep the introductions short and sweet as Stundies should not need too much background.

7) Nominated posts should be cut down to the nominated part which should be concise and stand on its own.

8) This is not the place for ad hominems so a post should be funny independent of knowing who it is that said it.

9) Pictures are not allowed on their own but descriptions of pictures, provided they meet all other previously stated requirements, are allowed.

10) Videos are not allowed on their own but transcripts of videos, provided they meet all other previously stated requirements, are allowed even if you personally did the transcribing.


So, have at it folks.
 
More importantly, can we have a Lifetime Acheivement Award category?
 
I just love the paranoia

My mum just rang Parliament House and there was a recorded message saying that they couldn't answer the call because Parliament House was undergoing an emergency evacuation exercise. Sounds like they're could be a false-flag attack in the works.

ww. reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/7mr06/breaking_australian_parliament_house_could_be_in/7zm6
 
I guess these means every time an elementary school runs a fire drill the janitor's getting ready to throw Molotov cocktails into the teacher's lounge. :D
 
Will there be an über-Masta-Ultimate-Stundie of the year ? :D

I don't know. I'm nursing a huge headache today so the Stundie Finals for December might be a day late......and no I did not do any drinking for New Years.

More importantly, can we have a Lifetime Acheivement Award category?

Got anyone in mind?

Do they not do fire drills in Australian schools? :confused:

Clearly if the government never does disaster exercises they're priming things for an extra bad false flag and if they do run disaster exercises then that also means they're preparing for a false flag. Obviously the only way a government is not about to execute a false flag attack is to simply not exist.
 
Got anyone in mind?

Good lord. The possibilities are endless. Are we limiting this to JREF Forum members? Cos if not, I'd handily nominate David Icke. Or Hal Lindsey. Or Jack Van Impe. Or Alex Jones..or...or...OVERLOAD! OVERLOAD!
 
I guess these means every time an elementary school runs a fire drill the janitor's getting ready to throw Molotov cocktails into the teacher's lounge. :D

I think that is how the Janitor's Union in Brooklyn negotiates.
 
And Heiwa strikes again:

YES - a rigid , i.e. r i g i d, structure would resist a plane crash (the plane would bounce against it) and would also resist fire, i.e. a rigid structure is also fire proof. Nothing can destroy a rigid structure.
 
Back from suspension?;)

LOL, I wish I even knew why I got suspended.

As to the nom....I'm beginning to suspect Heiwa is some sort of performance artist.

Very possible, which is why I've asked him on plenty of occasions if he is actually crazy or just messing with us.
 
From the link in RedIbis' post:

Courtesy of speakingup at 911blogger:

I wondered about the object on the corner of the tower - it looks like an exterior building maintenance / window cleaner's hoist. Interestingly, it seems to be at the same level as the impact site.

Maybe emergency services were using the hoist to try to rescue people after the crash occurred? If not, it seems to be a coincidence that the object should be on the corner between the aircraft's entry and exit points at the same height.

Maybe there's a simple explanation?

Yes, you dolt! It's a piece of the aluminum siding.

Or... maybe not?

Sorry, should have mentioned that it first appears clearly at around 34 seconds and then it’s shown several times throughout the film. I note also that Betsy had mentioned this as point 2.

The object may well just be a maintenance elevator making a rescue attempt, but the reason I think it is interesting is as follows.

It's intriguing to imagine the events from the perspective of the demolition team. The demolition charges may have been connected wirelessly (so it would not matter if a few cables were severed during the aircraft crash) and the collapse sequences would have been meticulously modelled, yet the exact location of the aircraft impact would have remained a key unknown factor.

I would be surprised if they would accept aircraft strikes at random heights / locations. If the hits were remotely guided, then why not use as many aids as possible? Therefore, did this object act as a visual aid for targeting of the aircraft? I must admit that it would seem a bit obvious, considering the remarkable competence exhibited by the demolishers...

Considering the collapse itself, the North tower started to collapse whilst the upper section was still relatively intact. If this was an intentional act, to give the appearance that the building 'broke' at the height corresponding to the impact site, then demolition team would have needed to design the charges specifically to make this 'slice' across the building at that point. Since the precise point of impact (though partially controllable) may have been unknown, then it seems likely that a 'survey' would have been required in the minutes after impact. In this way, the team could configure the demolition sequence to shear the building at the impact point, before the rest of the building became pulverised. Was this object part of surveying operation in the minutes following the impact?

Just a thought.

Think again!
 
Heiwa said:
So if I say, exploded a nuclear weapon, on a rigid structure, it would not be destroyed?

Well, if you have a nuke in your wardrobe and want to destroy a rigid structure with it, have a try. The rigid structure is indestructible (by definition) and thus remains intact. That's why NIST, Bazant, Seffen & Co assume WTC1/2 upper parts are rigid in their various (NWO) theories of the collapses of the structure below.

So Heiwa's rigid structure will survive nuclear blast?Good I think we have solution to Russia's nukes...
Mine bolding....
 
Back from suspension?;)

As to the nom....I'm beginning to suspect Heiwa is some sort of performance artist.

LOL, I wish I even knew why I got suspended.



Very possible, which is why I've asked him on plenty of occasions if he is actually crazy or just messing with us.

I have decided it is some sort of degenerative disorder (korsakoff's?), to take pity on him, and leave him well enough alone.
 
I'm thinking the DOD would be very interested in Heiwa's nuclear proof buildings.
 
Klimax said:
I nominate Heiwa:
Heiwa said:
So if I say, exploded a nuclear weapon, on a rigid structure, it would not be destroyed?

Well, if you have a nuke in your wardrobe and want to destroy a rigid structure with it, have a try. The rigid structure is indestructible (by definition) and thus remains intact. That's why NIST, Bazant, Seffen & Co assume WTC1/2 upper parts are rigid in their various (NWO) theories of the collapses of the structure below.

So Heiwa's rigid structure will survive nuclear blast?Good I think we have solution to Russia's nukes...
Mine bolding....

Damn it,I forgot to say "I nominate Heiwa!"
And cannot be sure it was noted.
So requoting with proper words... ;)
 
I can't believe this one hasn't been nominated yet.

Roundhead is hot on the trail of a new theory that there was not one, but two United flight 175's. He evidence is the fact that there are two different recorded times for its takeoff. When presented with rational reasoning as to why there might be a difference, he responds:

Clocks vary, but vary as they might, that has nothing to do with two planes leaving at different times, that are both called 175. Whatever clock you want to use will still be in error equally regading both "planes"
In other words, your arguemnt has zero merit, it merely affect both planes equally.
 
Just because everything that has ever happened, does happen or will happen, has allways happened before. Everything!


Conversely: Nothing exists. Not me, not you, not this forum, not this post... :eye-poppi
 
Well... in his defense, he did clarify his statement after the fact... needless to say though that the initial response left me speechless.....
 
This is a nice one from ATS from a thread questioning the idea that aliens created mankind. For some people this is a known fact.

Because according to some people we are a cross between homo erectus and alien beings. Some attributes from the homo erectus like the appendix will be transfer to humans, so this means we also share a common ancester on Earth as well and alien. It's just that we skip a large chunk of evolution. The main reason why there is a gap in the evolution of man.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread424477/pg1
 
As far as I can tell, this guy's being serious:

polvierbecker said:
The Manipulation of Orgasms

Does anyone like me believe that Orgasms are manipulated by the elite so that they are now nothing but the climax of a sexual encounter?


Maybe they is some secret power in orgasms – an energy. An energy that is long forgotten and once possible made everywhere joyful world over?

If we all found out the secret of Orgasms (if they is one) then maybe we can rebuild the world that it once was.
 
"Baby I'm so sorry you didn't get off but you see the NWO is controlling orgasms and are limiting them. I guess they hate women since they have targeted every one I've ever slept with. They don't want you to be happy so we should fight them. Join me and maybe you'll experience one some day."

She eventually does experience one........with another man.

This is looking to be a good month already.
 
Finally we have the exact structure of the NWO!!!

The structure is like this . . .

-Draco race.

-Illuminati - The Draco's operate through this group.

-All the secret societies.

-All the financial/credit systems and banks.

-The Round table network, NATO and all the other organizations.

-ect

-ect

-ect

-ect

-ect

-ect

- The people

I knew the ect were in on it.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread127429/pg1
 
We got two pretty good ones on a post that discussed (tangentially) that the Payne Stewart inteception took 81 minutes or so. When a Truther commenter claimed it was only 20 minutes, I pointed out that the initial problem was reported at 9:33 EDT and the intercept took place around 9:54 CDT, which of course means that the plane crossed over into another time zone and took a total of 81 minutes. And Original Woo, a longtime commenter jumped all over it:

physically, the intercept still took 20 minutes, your time zone **** doesn't mean anything, than you AGAIN playing with words...

And regular commenter Anonymous chimed in:

Time zone change... so Pat... if a jet takes 10 seconds to fly 1 mile, passes over a timezone, takes another 10 seconds to fly another mile... because they crossed over a timezone, that took an hour and 20 seconds?

Yes, it's tedious to explain, but it does show why we cannot get the Troofers to abandon even hopelessly ridiculous arguments like the famed 20-minute Payne Stewart Interception.
 
We got two pretty good ones on a post that discussed (tangentially) that the Payne Stewart inteception took 81 minutes or so. When a Truther commenter claimed it was only 20 minutes, I pointed out that the initial problem was reported at 9:33 EDT and the intercept took place around 9:54 CDT, which of course means that the plane crossed over into another time zone and took a total of 81 minutes. And Original Woo, a longtime commenter jumped all over it:



And regular commenter Anonymous chimed in:



Yes, it's tedious to explain, but it does show why we cannot get the Troofers to abandon even hopelessly ridiculous arguments like the famed 20-minute Payne Stewart Interception.

EDT, CDT it's all the same thing apparently.

The Draco race?

That sounds like the Draka Race from the series of novels by SM Stirling.

I just don't want to run into one of those etc's they look way numerous.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it's tedious to explain, but it does show why we cannot get the Troofers to abandon even hopelessly ridiculous arguments like the famed 20-minute Payne Stewart Interception.
to me this indicates not a lack of understanding (clearly anonymous understands the concept of traveling westward across a time zone change) this is clearly willful ignorance
 
http://notalwaysright.com/conspiracy-weary/1422

Customer: “I have a complaint about my order.”
Me: “Yes, sir?”
Customer: “When the woman called me, she said the title of my book in the message.”
Me: “I’m sorry, sir, is that a problem?”
Customer: “Well, you see, the government’s tapping my phone. I don’t want them to know that I know what they’re up to.”
Me: “Um…Ok, sir. I’m sorry about that. I’ll make sure it doesn’t happen again.”
Customer: “Thanks.”
Me: “…would you like a bag, sir?”
Customer: *starts laughing* “No thanks. I’m not that paranoid!”
 

Back
Top Bottom