Hilarious you should say this when you don't even know the figure yourself. Bjarne, if our lack of precise knowledge of the floor heights invalidates my calculations, they also invalidate yours. Fine, let's call the result inconclusive, and wait for the measurements.
But spare me the nonsense of you having proved anything.
There is 2 options...
The green and yellows column or something between.
We are hence CLOSE and 10 times closer than the nonsense in yours julekalender.
Are you claiming that there is increased gravity caused by a cavity around the COG?? That's bizarro even for you.
I am keeping this possibility open, that there is an increasing ADG towards to the center instead of a stable ADG. ( As you know this was what I climbed first). But I expect a stable ADG.
So, - I have also not completely given up the idea that ADD could be increasing towards the center, and even also after matter have been left behind.
I know these sounds a “strange” or “bizarre” if you like, but only if you ignore the “magic” of the center.
It is hard to put word on what I mean, - which role the center actually plays,- and off course this must be measure, in several different measurements experiments.
I suspect that:
1.) Gravity must properly be understood as unity.
2.) The pull on the center must always be proportional to the total overall magnitude of the sourrounding overall gravitational field; simply because of
gravity always is a unity.
3.)
For example;
A big ball shaped “hole” in the center, of a homogeneous ball shaped mass (for example inside the earth, or inside a cluster of galaxies, could probably give (almost) the exact same (inner measurement) result as if there was mass close/all around the center. – THIS would not surprise me. ( This can relative easuy be tested here on the earth).
This is build on the idea (simple math) that whether you pulls space from the direction of outwards “infinity” or if you pull it from the inwards “infinity” –require the exact same force.
Space can “give” from both directions.
Hence the pull from inwards and outwards space is always “shared" based on distance and mass-balance.
And this is where the “unity” idea emerges.
This mean you can not get stronger outwards effect that inwards effect.
This is off course difficult to know how must and how easy you can pull space from the inwards “infinity” direction, unless testing this, by measuring, - by several more special constructed measurements experiments.
BUT - THIS – seems what we can expect, since it already seams to be what is written everywhere on the sky.
I simply do not believe in huge mass so heavy like billion of stars, - in a small point.
This is a sick idea.
The truth is that space pulls from all directions, also from an inwards direction.
Very compact mass = BANG >>> Supernova and that is ALWAYS it , - BEFORE a mass can get “huge”.
The local gravity has nothing to do with the FAG, as you noted yourself just recently.
No of course not, but the local gravity is not so strange that it should could steel the picture underlaying picture from you.
Nice that you do some research. Too bad it's not so relevant. That article is about the sealing layer over the ground water,
but of course, when we talk gravity we need to take far greater depths into account.
Anyway, we really need not discuss this. The local variability of gravity is a fact.
Ground water beneath large cities are fetched from very deep beneath, I think an all right research have been done.
But off course based on the the measurement so far, people can always invent doubts.
This is why I am allready focusing on completely well defined projects where we exactly know what we talk about.
Off course this is necessary. - You know I do not like unnecessarily violence, - , then better use the sledge hammer one time, - to kill the old thesis, - and then a single final time to kill the dark matter idea, - one time for all.
But anyway I am prepared that the scientific community will require these experiments repeated at least 10.000 times, before the language of even a sledge hammer is completely understood.
.
! 
