Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion.
- Thread starter Bjarne
- Start date
-
- Tags
- dark energy
- Status
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
This is wise Hans
Give it up
Science Fiction (conflicting with science itself) can NEVER be science.
It can NEVER even be a theory.
And even not a hypothesis, since science itself have disproven it's raison d'être
Don’t expect everyone to take your naïve picture of the Universe serious.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Why doesn't the Solar System expand if the whole Universe is expanding - Answered
What people have observed is the redshift. That means that either
The objective scientific method is
We do not measure an expanding universe locally (within the Local Group). The reason that we do not is that gravity dominates, .
The fact that blue shift from Andromeda is simple Doppler effect is because gravity dominates, i.e. is pulling Andromeda toward us (and us toward Andromeda).
Why doesn't the Solar System expand if the whole Universe is expanding - Answered
On 11 July 2011 and still not understood by Bjarne
This is not surprising since Bjarne has displayed an inability to understand the simplist sceience, e.g. from
The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked) :
The influence of the cosmological expansion on local systems, 1998, F. I. Cooperstock, V. Faraoni, D. N. Vollick (Astrophysical Journal)
Stop lying, Bjarne: I never said that anyone observed this.
What people have observed is the redshift. That means that either
- the energy is going somewhere (GR suggests that this is is into gravitational potential energy).
- the energy is just vanishing (that is Ok because it is not certain that energy is conserved globally in GR)
Science:
- if energy is conserved globally then the energy lost by cosmologically red-shifted photons goes into the gravitational field.
- if energy is not conserved globally then there is no problem - - the photons just lose energy!.
More of your ignorance. It is science:
The objective scientific method is
We do not measure an expanding universe locally (within the Local Group). The reason that we do not is that gravity dominates, .
That is the whole point: According to your ignorant delusion, the expansion of space always dominates. Thus is it impossible for any galaxy to approach any other galaxy.
The fact that blue shift from Andromeda is simple Doppler effect is because gravity dominates, i.e. is pulling Andromeda toward us (and us toward Andromeda).
Why doesn't the Solar System expand if the whole Universe is expanding - Answered
On 11 July 2011 and still not understood by Bjarne
This is not surprising since Bjarne has displayed an inability to understand the simplist sceience, e.g. from
The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked) :
Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)
First asked 23 October 2009
So far the answer is no
!
Two years, 9 months and counting!
And since tyou are too lazy or ignorant or whatever to follow links to the published science:First asked 23 October 2009
So far the answer is no
!Two years, 9 months and counting!
The influence of the cosmological expansion on local systems, 1998, F. I. Cooperstock, V. Faraoni, D. N. Vollick (Astrophysical Journal)
(my emphasis added)
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
The point that you are demonstrating is just that you are dumber than your grandmother. We have explained things in simple enough terms that your grandmother could understand it (unless she was a dumb as the cows in your cow fetish
).The real point is that you are trying to overturm GR with your invalid ideas without having any real knowledge of GR or for that matter physics in general.
P.S. Daylightstar's question is still unanswered:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=7236431#post7236431
5.6 * 603 = 1,209,600 ...
Could you walk us through your calculation and explain what the numbers mean?
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
I think you forgot; - 3.) - OR that the whole speculation is WRONG.
NO EVIDENCE that such CAN happen.
Energy CANNOT be lost, - this is basic physic.
Rubbish....
Only speculation
I mean can a ghost pull a cow ?
You don't know the nature of the so-called expanding Uiniverse, - how can you know that gravity CAN counteract ?
Can gravity also counteracts ghost's ? magnetism ? haleluja ? etc ?
Andromeda is approaching us YES.
All galaxies MOVES (PHYSICAL) in cluster of galaxies YES
This is NOT the point….
The point is; the Universe DO NOT expand.
EVERYTHING deforms due to the lost of gravity (dark matter is converted to dark energy).
THIS is what creates all the illusion you believe in.
The deformation is completely different; as you believe; - when gravity gradually is lost everything gets relative "smaller", - also the Sun, The Earth, the meter stick and you too, and distances to this and that, - as well as time is contracting (ticks faster) .......All with the same rate / factor....
The only way we can discover is when we recieve "time stamps" from the past.. This is what cosmologican redshift is about...
THIS is able to explain both cosmological redshift AND the illusion that the “expansion is accelerating” ...
IN FACT - IT IS NOT NECCESERRY TO INVENT OTHER SPACE DEFORMING PROPERTIES AS THE ONE ALLREADY KNOWN DUE TO GENERERAL RELATIVITY.
SO WHY INVENT THAT NEW SO CALLED EXPANDING PROPERTY OF SPACE, and all the nonsence as follows + ignoring 2 major conflicts with science it self ?.
Advise; -
ALL you should allow you self to understand it that Gravity is (relative slowly) changing dramatically before and after a BB.
The ignorance of that is the reason to all the rubbish that goes on in holy science books..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pkN1FbHLSc
Last edited:
Daylightstar
Philosopher
superscript by Daylightstar
Thanks Reality Check.
Just watch out for copy/pasting the superscript 3-value, copy/paste doesn't pick up the superscript.
Yes Bjarne, Could you walk us through your calculation and explain what the numbers mean?
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
There is no speculation but the third option would be
3) General Relativity is wrong despite the fact that it has been extensively tested and found to be correct.
Wrong: Gravitational redshift has been measured and is EVIDENCE that such CAN happen.
Wrong: We observe that energy is conserved, e.g. light redshifts in a gravitational field and its energy is converted into gravitational potential energy.
This is an observation. We have not detected any exceptions to this yet and so we have the law of conservation of energy.
General Relativity though is an exception. There is no evidence that energy is always conserved in GR.
Is Energy Conserved in General Relativity?
The point is: only a truly ignorant person would think that the universe was not expanding when the evidence is that it is.
It is not just redshift, Bjarne: What is the evidence for the Big Bang?
Another bit of evidence for an evolving universe is the Lyman-alpha forest. This shows that as you look further away (and so into the past) the percentage of neutral hydrogen in the universe increases. This is evidence that galaxies have not always existed since it is light from their stars that ionizes neutral hydrogen.
And then there are the usual questions about a non-expanding and thus eternal universe:
- Where are the infinitely old stars?
- For that matter where are the stars that are > 13.7 billion years old?
- Where are the infinitely heavy stars?
- Galaxies collide and get bigger - where the infinitely large galaxies?
- Why is there any neutral hydrogen in the universe when there has radiation ionizing it for infinity.
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
You cannot equalize redshift and relativity, - also not redshift and the idea that the Universe expands. Cows have known this in 13,4 billion years.
Crap from A to Z, - Photon Energy cannot be converted to gravity, the whole idea that photons gains mass due to "speed" is wrong. Photons do not interact with space, in the same way as particle; - you cannot equ8alize these 2 phenomena. - I know this is what many believe, but is misunderstood. Photons are always massless.
The idea that the Universe really expands is simply based on wrong interpretation of “signals” .
A deformation take place, - YES.’
But only a proportional equal deformation (of everything included time) happens.
The law responsible is already known from General Relativity.
It happens simply due to the Universe is gradually loosing gravity.
That’s it so simple is can possible be.
We do not need more as the knowledge already existing and understood.
This is the true cause of so called cosmological redshift.
Cosmological redshift is In fact 100 % identical to gravitational redshift, - there are no difference.
So what “we” really are doing is to inventing the deep plate twice.
RC, - now do you self a favor, try serious to figure out what we disagree - before attacking something you have not understood. .
I do NOT deny a BigBang had happen 13,7 billion years ago.
My version says; - the size of the Universe is always RELATIVE the same.
When the BB took place gravity was extreme, hence also EVERY SIZE OF EVERYTHING AS WELL AS DISTANCES was REALTIVE "bigger" and time was ticking extremely relative /propotional slower.
Even though gravity from time to time is changing extremely much, the universe ALWAYS looks the same, because EVERYTHING changes proportional, - both the size of all kind of matter, distances and time.
YOU believe distances to this and that is affected.
This bring you to a place of NOTHING when the BB took place.
How probable do you belive that REALLY is.
What technique could bring a cow as well as space inside the cow and time around the cow to a place of NOTHING ?
This idea is IMPOSSIBLE, - it do not happen.
THIS is where we disagrees.
RELATIVE, sizes of different matter, (stars, planets, cows) + distances, + time is deforming proportional due to background gravity, and that's it.
The extreme mass brainwashed idea that the Universe come out of NOTHING seems to be based on not only failure of logical coherence thinking, but such extreme lack of logic is IMPOSSIBLE to relate to.
How can NOTHING create everything?
This is utopia.
In physic as well as purely logical humans we are used to think; - there must have been a reason’s to everything.
- What was the cause of BigBang?
- If the Universe really comes out of nothing why did it happen?
- How could so much energy be brought together?
- Which force could keep the energy together until the BB went of?
- As you know the strong force did not work after the time when BB went of, - you know that right? – So WHAT force is left to blame ?
- What about gravity ?
- How was the “structure of space when BB went of?
- Even though mass from a previous universe is gone (in a split second) gravity will survive, - you know that, - right ?
The size of the Universe is always relative to everything else, - the same.
Gravity affects distances as well as matter and time, - which mean that stars, planets, cows etc. is always changing RELATIVE size from time to, - depending on how strong the background gravity is from time to time.
Responsible for the background gravity is SPEED of matter.
When speed of matter around that huge “galaxy” you call the Universe, goes mad, gravity does the same, and since gravity goes mad, speed of matter goes more mad, and because speed of matter mad goes more mad gravity goes more mad, and because …….etc...etc… BBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNGGGGGG.
The explosion did not happen from a central place, BUT a whole Universe was exploding.
THAT’S the difference between you NOTHING version, and my EVERYTHING version.
Not only cows are intelligent, many human’s are too.
Many scientists believe that a BigChunch can trigger a BigBang, and that this can go on forever. BUT THEY HAVE NO IDEAR HOW ...
It is easy to understand how this process is POSSIBLE.
Do you self the favor to ask question as for exsample; WHAT POSSIBLE could keep the extreme energy together, that caused the BigBang?
Be honest, you have no idea at all.
You are completely lost in the bush, - right?
Try to watch this video, - you can also learn (3th part) that if BB is like you believe it to be we MUST be able to detect a HUGE gravity wave.
But we are NOT.
Do you know why?
Answer; We have already detected that gravity wave, - the name for this is; Dark Energy.
Gravity is outplaying the strong force, - from time to time, - this = BAAAANNNNGG
Wake up RC. – Wake up.
Last edited:
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
How idiotic:
- Gravitaional redshift is a measured consequence of relativity.
- The measured redshift of galaxies and that it varies liearly with distance (the Hubble law) is evidenc ethat the universe is expanding.
Ignorance from A to Z: Photon energy is measured to be converted to gravitational potential energy.
There is no change in speed. The energy of a photon is related to its frequency.
Then your verioion is idiotic because the universe has been measured to be expanding.
What is the evidence for the Big Bang?
Wrong - gravity was the same as it is now.
The rest is just delusions.
An actual lie (or abysmal ignorance): The Big Bang was the whole Universe exploding.
Answer: You and the author of that video are totally ignorant.
The BB is predicted to have generated gravitational waves. Like all gravitational waves they are VERY VERY WEAK. But we have instruments that have the chance of detecting them.
Gravitational waves cannot cause the negative pressure that is a requirement of dark energy.
The idoicy of one crank linking to another crank's videos is obvious.
Also
Last edited:
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
Crap, General relativity was invented before someone claimed that Universe (apparently) was expanding.
Crap, - so-called cosmological redshift can be explained as (caused by); simply gravitionel redshift.
Crap, - you cannot measure such.
No... Cosmological redshift do NOT prove the expanding fantasy perspective of the Universe.
The fact that many believe in a lie, doesn’t make it true.
You believe that the apparently change of the photons frequency = expansion. – In fact the photon do NOT change it’s frequency, - change of time and distance over time will have exactly that influence.
The deformation of space according to the properties of general relativity is ENOUGH to explain that.
THIS is how to understand what really happens.
This is only evidence for how derailed the human race can get.
YES BigBang happens, - but it do not mean it size was (almost) nothing and also not that space expands.
The reason that things can go so wrong is for example that no one understood the basic coherent nature of space in the first place.
For exsample;.
- What curved space and its opposite gravity waves REALLY are ?
- What was causing BigBang ?
- How strong was gravity in that moment of BB?
The simple (overlooked) flexible nature of space, and how that affects and explain EVERTHING, is the true reason to that pathetic picture of the Universe we have today.
Much more pathetic is it when a world of blindfolded follower naïve believes that this is the road to the truth, ignoring that 2 BIG bell’s already has rung :
Bell1;
Blindfolded “scientist” overlooked that photon energy cannot disappeared, - there are NO EVIDENCE that photon energy goes unto gravity (also not that the energy is converted to cow dung or 1000 other silly pure fantasy suggestions.
Bell2;
Local distances are NOT affected of the so called expanding universe.
So we can IN FACT MEASSURE = The so-called expansion DOES NOT HAPPEN.
There are NO EVIDENCE that ghost’s or Ufo’s counteracts the fantasy (local) expansion.
There is also NO EVIDENCE that gravity does.
I don’t deny that BigBang have happened as well as it will happen again.
I only deny the expansion of anything the way you understand it.
All what happens is gravity is always changing, - this creates ONLY an optical illusion; that the Universe "apparently" expands. .
Right but the problems are:
That you believe the Universe was billion times smaller as an ant.
THIS is where the chain seriously went of for you.
The Universe have NEVER been that small.
The Universe did NOT pop up from nothing.
Nothing have brought the energy of the Universe together to a dot of NOTHING.
This idea is impossible and hence naive to accept.
The scenario is completely different.
Gravity will slowly and after billion years go mad (due to increasing speed), - as a consequence distances (and EVERYTHING) relative to everything else will change propotional.
This is a statement based on what CAN happen based on certain knowledge.
After a BigBang the deformation will reverse.
Such pulsation of distances and time, is what happens.
A pulsation between BigBang’s and BigChrunch MUST happen. Otherwise the cause of a BigBang is impossible.
ONLY speed of the Universe can trigger such extreme energy/explosion.
All what happen can be comprehended by GR.
It is NOT necessary and no basic to invent the nuts naïve idea that all expanded from nothing.
As I wrote, you should start to understand how extremely huge energy could be brought together to a small small small point billion times smaller as an ant.
No force in nature can do that.
You do ignore ; what possible CAN have caused the BigBang version you believe in..
The fact is NOTHING CAN CAUSE SUCH TO HAPPEN , in the way you believe it have happen.
BUT speed CAN cause gravity to go mad.
THIS can trigger a BigBang. This CAN happen.
Come on RC, nothing in nature is so extreme like this extreme brainwashed idea you believe in - even not Al-Qaeda . .
I am sorry to say it, but the truth is that many are a victim for holly authoritarian turbo fantasy.
I honestly feel sorry for all the million of peoples that are brainwashed with such creeds, billion of light-years from common sense.
Advise
Start to understand WHAT is really “curved space”
Next, WHAT is really a “gravitational wave”?
I hope we both agree that “curved space” as well as “a gravitational wave” is a property of space.
Do you self a favors, try to write to you self some few other words, as the already known, so that you better understand WHAT you are talking about.
When finish try to do the exact same with DARK ENERGY,.
WHAT is dark energy?
The apparently 3 different phenomena, - are in fact one.
THIS can wipe out all the gravity mysteries WE have created.
Last edited:
You don't know much about GR do you.
You don't know anything about redshifts.
Your inability to think is not the problem of real scientists.
Nice technical explanation there, I don't suppose you have anything even remotely resembling evidence?
Ah, that's sweet of you, stupidly arrogant crap, but sweet.
Not that you will take any notice, but you should do exactly what you have suggested for others.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Crap, you are right.
Crap, so what has this to do with the discovery that the universes is expand ind (Hubble's law etc).?
Crap, what has this to to with the fact GR original static universe was instable and that GR describes an expanding universe?
Crap - you have gone back be being ignorant again.
Cosmological redshift is called cosmological redshift because the only feasible mechanism for creating it is a cosmological expansion of the universe.
Gravitational redshift would require that matter in the unverse was arranged in a specific manner
- We are at the center of the universe.
Thsi is a rather dumb assumption given that there is nothing special about the Mlky Way. That we are not in a special place in the universe is known as the Copernican principle.
Interesting bit of science: Microwave study bursts Hubble bubble - The density of matter decreases with distance from us.
The actual measured density of matter in the universe is homogeneous (the same on large scales)
Crap, - you cannot measure such.
[/qupote]
Crap - it has been measured: Gravitational redshift.
Firstly you make the ignorant claim that cosmological redshift is gravitational redshift, now you seem to think that gravitational redshift does not exist!
Yes: Cosmological redshift DOES prove the expanding perspective of the Universe.
The fact that you are ignorant dabout the physics does not make the physics false.
That is more gibberish but....
In fact the photon does change its frequency. That is what redshift means. This is what is actually measured.
The change of time and distance over time has exactly that effect.
The expansion of space according to the properties of general relativity is ENOUGH to explain that.
You are still wrong: The evidence is that the size of teh uniervrse was almost nothing and that it expanded.
NOTHING can wipe oput all of the ignorance and delustions that YOU have demonstrated.
There are few mysteries about gravity, if someone can bother to try to understand it rather than stick with delusions pulled out from their stance of ignorance.
Why doesn't the Solar System expand if the whole Universe is expanding - Answered
On 11 July 2011 and still not understood by Bjarne
The influence of the cosmological expansion on local systems, 1998, F. I. Cooperstock, V. Faraoni, D. N. Vollick (Astrophysical Journal)
This is not surprising since Bjarne has displayed an inability to understand the simplist sceience, e.g. from
The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked) :
Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)
First asked 23 October 2009
So far the answer is no
Two years, 9 months and counting!
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
Einstein invented the cosmological constant, because otherwise gravity would pull all matter together, he believed.
Observation is not something you can use to confirm what really happen, for example to confirm whether the Universe is “collapsing” or not.
There are several reason for that;
- The parts of the Universe you can see 13,7 Billion LY, could be only a very small fragment of the real size.
- The Universe could have the same shape as a huge galaxy; - we would then be orbiting that mass. – To a certain extend that would prevent the Universe to collapse (RR would cause matter slowly to spin inwards).
Which of course mean the law is build on a optical illusion.
Redshift do not prove the Universe expands, but only that we are losing gravity.
So-called dark matter is converted to s-called dark energy. That’s all.
My friend the Universe is losing gravity, a lot since BigBang, and it continues. Hence time is also changing (ticking faster and faster & distances are getting relative / proportional longer and longer, doesn’t matter where in the Universe you are) – This is what is causing the so called cosmological redshift.
No they do not, -it is a sick idea, nothing else.
When you measure the "old " photon spectra today, - time and distances have change since these was created. The photons are still photons. Photon’s keeps there energy, there are no extremely slow lost of photon energy or change to gravity or other brainwashed creeds.
Exactly, finally you understood,- which mean that you now seems to have understood that; distances, gravity and time is changing proportional (since the BigBang) after (and due to) the release of absorbed space (so called dark energy)…
You should try to think a little serious about that silly idea.
I believe you and plenty other have just accepted that idea as the only possible answer (so far). (and in the meantime the concrete went hard).
The idea that all energy of the Universe possible can be forced inside a dot, billion times smaller like an ant, - is simply naïve, sick, mad and total impossible. Adult people should be more critical before accepting such load of rubbish.
Nothing , - no force in the Universe can bring so much energy to such a point.
The naked truth is that you have no idea what you are talking ( or rather dreaming about) and no one else have either.
So long that idea is so locked in concrete we will never even allow us to think; what could possibly have trigger a BigBang.
I have only left to say; - it is a shame science is so extreme orthodox and inflexible.
The alternative thesis I represent:
- Do not conflict with science itself, (so like the expanding space thesis does on 2 large areas).
- It can explain why BigBang happened, based on well knowb simple science, - - which your religion cannot.
- It can explain / comprehend / and solve all gravity mysteries; such as what is the curvature of space REALLY, what is dark matter REALLY what is dark energy REALLY.
- It can form a beautiful syntheses which give you a perfect coherent Universe, without billion of ton of dark this and that (rubbish), - no one knows where to bury.
Last edited:
Daylightstar
Philosopher
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7236431&postcount=3972 (31st may 2011)
So, Bjarne, finally walk us through your calculation from:
http://www.science27.com/english/IrregularMoonsNew.html
and explain what the numbers mean!
5.6 * 603 = 1,209,600
So, Bjarne, finally walk us through your calculation from:
http://www.science27.com/english/IrregularMoonsNew.html
and explain what the numbers mean!
Or, in order words, show us how you did not arbitrarily construct the 1,209,600 value as shown below.
5.6 * 603 = 1,209,600
Last edited:
I think this piece of comedy gold deserves highlighting.
Daylightstar
Philosopher
Bjarne doesn't observe, he fantasizes.
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Einstein added the cosmological constant because prevailing theory was that the universe was static. This was (as he put it) his 'greatest blunder' because he did not realize that led to an unstable universe in which any small change leads to a collapsing or expanding uniiverse.
The physcial evidence today is that the universe is expanding.
Any mention of your delusion of 'RR' makes this gibberish.
That is idiotic. Hubbles law is based on 2 measurements
- The distance of galaxies from us.
- Their redshift.
So-called dark matter is converted to s-called dark energy. That’s all.
[/qiouote]
That is all idiotic: Dark matter is matter. Dark energy is energy.
My friend you are ignorant: There is no evidence that universe is 'losing gravity'. It acts the same whereever we look at it.
Yes they do - your ignorance is very sick.
We measure the actual phoron spectra today and see that it is redshifted.
Gibberish.
GR means that space time has expanded.
GR means that gravity has not 'changing proportional'. The source of gravity is everything in the universe. That has not chnaged.
You are just being dumber than usual: The entire universe being within a dot is science. Adult people have been critical and have accepted this valid science.
Childish, ignorant people ignore the science and demonstrate their brains are a load of rubbish.
Gravity - your ignorance is showing again.
ETA
You mentioned your fantasies again so I need to point out your abysmal ignorance of science yet again:
Why doesn't the Solar System expand if the whole Universe is expanding - Answered
On 11 July 2011 and still not understood by Bjarne
The influence of the cosmological expansion on local systems, 1998, F. I. Cooperstock, V. Faraoni, D. N. Vollick (Astrophysical Journal)
This is not surprising since Bjarne has displayed an inability to understand the simplist sceience, e.g. from
The fatal flaws and basic ignorance in Bjarne's ideas in his threads
(original full list to which more points have been linked) :
Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)
First asked 23 October 2009
So far the answer is no
Two years, 9 months and counting!
Last edited:
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
You can see distances between galaxies, there is also distance between cows, but none of these observations proves that the universe expands.
The second point “cosmological redshift” only shows that “something happens” to the photon spektra – that "something" is; TIME that is changing during the history of the Universe.
You have no-where to hang you hat – RC…
Warm air is all you have.
You have no proves that so called dark matter is matter, - all you know is that gravity some places are stronger as you expect. – That’s all.
Try to define ; why you believe it is “energy” and which kind.
A cow is made of energy, and this is real energy.
Puuuhh, here smells from boasting,...
Ohh a little step forward...
But RC even extreme gravity cannot force all energy of the Universe into a small dot.
Adult people should for example THINK what happen all the time stars collapses. It is not possible to compress matter that much you believe….
The sky if full of proves that contradicts that silly idea.
But you know orthodox turbo science are doing big business cheating naïve student. Nothing can stop them, even not common sense.
Furthermore you cannot explain why gravity then should went mad and get so extreme.
Just one more load incoherent rubbish proving that you have no idea what you talk about when you take BB in you mouth.
The thing is that KE and M increases in the equation below - because of; RESISTANCE AGIANST MOTION. (RR)
KE = (y - 1) mc² - where γ = 1/√(1 - v²/c²)
The result is a factor , the way we normally use this equation (in this context) - that factor is unit less. YES, - Because it have to be..
But since the basic transformation process happens because of RR, - RR -increase MUST also be proportional to M and KE increase.
I have ask you many times how you would calculate RR (due to acceleration) ?
Well since you do not answer, here is how I would modify the old equation for that purpose.
RESISTANCE AGIANST MOTION. (RR) = (y – 1m/s) - where γ = 1m/s /√(1 - v²/c²)
Are you now happy?
Last edited:
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
How idiotic: You can measure distances between galaxies. You can measure their redshift. Hubble's law then means that the universe expands.
It is the combination of the measurements that shows that the universe is expanding.
Gibberish.
Of course TIME changes during the history of the universe. It changes by 1 second per second.
The measured spectra shows that the galaxies are moving away from us and thus the Doppler effect shifts the spectra to the red.
More ignorance.
We know that dark matter is matter because if acts like matter. It clumps up under the influence of gravity. It affects the motions of galaxies. It affects the motions of stars in galaxies. When two clumps collide it acts like a gas (see my signature).
Interesting bit of sceince for you and the cow you are obsessing about to ignore:
The Smallest Mini-Galaxy in the Universe! (so far)
Are you really unable of doing the simple act of clicking on a link or reading?
Dark energy.
Bjarne
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,087
So we are back where we started
All Hubble had wa; - cosmological redshift.
That is not enough to prove what you suggest comrade.
Muuuhhh
Time is also deforming propotional with gravity and distances.
In no way.... dreamer.
HEEELLP
PLEASE don’t mix Doppler shift into this again.
This is the dummest statement I ever have hear.
Dark matter acts as billion of cows, but this doesn’t mean there are so big cow spaceship out in space.
Nothing but pure gravity (deformation of space) left from a previously Universe.
How can they know when they even don’t know
- what dark energy is,
- what the cause is, and
- what gravity REALLY is.
But fools know that you or gravity cannot force the Universe into the stomach of an ant. - RC WAKE UP....
Rather ask what ”1” is doing in that equation in the first place.
Last edited:
- Status