I knew it would be a long wait. As in, forever.
I responded with two different links to map programs that sow clearly the distance. Yet not a word from anyone about this factual matter, much less acknowledging the obvious error.
Are you talking about the way the heartland is being treated? The bad soil management issue?
Obfuscating? Are you serious? About what? Give me an example.
Note that nobody responded to that either.
It's very very funny when somebody is trying, so very hard, to place the burden of proof on the skeptic, rather than the claimant. If somebody makes a claim, and the data, easily accessible data, shows they are wrong, then the skeptic isn't the one under the gun. It's the claimants. They of course never provided any evidence at all to support their claim, which is obviously a false claim. But instead of realizing this simple fact, the true believer wants the skeptics to actually prove a negative.
You see? Not only do the Berkely experts never name the station, but the believers want somebody to "attach the official records of the actual weather station", which is just too funny to describe.
It's like somebody claimed there were UFOs over New York City, they even landed in Central Park. When a skeptic notes there is no evidence of this happening, the believers insist the skeptic has to "attach 24 hour video of the Park for the day in question", because that is the only way they will accept it wasn't true.
It's so woo woo, it boggles the mind. Except in the above example, the claimant didn't actually say which park it was, so you have to attach 24 hours of video for every park in New York City, because if not the skeptics are liars.
And you must believe the UFOs actually landed.
Priceless.
