Continuation The Electric Comet Theory Boogaloo (Part 2)
- Thread starter Sol88
- Start date
- Status
tusenfem
Illuminator
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 3,306
Okay, so now we finally know what the EDM is:
EDM = the concave-convex illusion
Thanks for clearing that up for us, Sol88!
It would have been so much easier for all of us if you had told us so in the OP six years ago.
EDM = the concave-convex illusion
Thanks for clearing that up for us, Sol88!
It would have been so much easier for all of us if you had told us so in the OP six years ago.
Sol88
Philosopher
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2009
- Messages
- 8,437
That would be of no fun at all Tusenfem!
Now we can see the scalloped edges, pitted terrain and terraced flat bottom craters, the gigs up Holger Seirks.
The lowly Navcam beat you too it!
Seems the deep-fried dirty snowball is dead in the water
Jrrarglblarg
Unregistered
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,673
False. The item you indicate with arrow and question is not a crater. It is a convex item. Compare the shadow of the indicated item with the shadows of every single other feature in the image. Your photo analysis is wrong.
But hey! Thanks for bumping the thread! That's useful too!
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Sol88 shows his inability to understand a comet image
A knowledgeable person would look at the entire image and note the directions of the shadows on the cliffs, etc. It is a boulder.
A knowledgeable person would not be so deluded to think that an object on an image is both a boulder and a crater simultaneously. Or that just rotating an image would turn a boulder into a crater and vice versa.
A knowledgeable person would read what experts in interpreting astronomy images say the images contain - a boulder
! That person would even read what they are cited!
CometWatch 14 February – flyby special
A knowledgeable person would not have the delusion that this boulder is evidence of electrical discharge machining on a comet that is a rock because that is physically impossible.
But then a knowledgeable person would know that the electric comet is a delusion cubed and not make it into a delusion to the 4th power, Sol88.
Can you recognize delusion cubed Sol88?
The answer seems to be: not since 6th July 2009
!
Wow, it is getting close to 6 years of blind belief in the electric comet delusion on the Thunderbolts book advertisement web site!
Only if someone were stupid enough to only look at this one boulder, Sol88.
A knowledgeable person would look at the entire image and note the directions of the shadows on the cliffs, etc. It is a boulder.
A knowledgeable person would not be so deluded to think that an object on an image is both a boulder and a crater simultaneously. Or that just rotating an image would turn a boulder into a crater and vice versa.
A knowledgeable person would read what experts in interpreting astronomy images say the images contain - a boulder
! That person would even read what they are cited!CometWatch 14 February – flyby special
(my emphasis added)
A knowledgeable person would not have the delusion that this boulder is evidence of electrical discharge machining on a comet that is a rock because that is physically impossible.
But then a knowledgeable person would know that the electric comet is a delusion cubed and not make it into a delusion to the 4th power, Sol88.
Can you recognize delusion cubed Sol88?
The answer seems to be: not since 6th July 2009
!Wow, it is getting close to 6 years of blind belief in the electric comet delusion on the Thunderbolts book advertisement web site!
Last edited:
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
It looks like Thornhill-talk
!It is Wal Thornhill that has the delusion that "scalloped edges, pitted terrain and terraced flat bottom" can only come from electrical discharges.
Sol88 is merely parroting the Thunderbolts dogma. Luckily Sol88 has merely exposed his total incompetence in interpreting astronomy images so we can treat any further "interpretations" as lies about the images to further his blind belief in the electric comet idea based on Velikovsky's delusion.
Last edited:
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
The ignorance, delusions and lies in the Thunderbolts web site and videos
The 17 items
eek in The ignorance, delusions and lies in the Thunderbolts web site and videos need updating.
18. 19 February 2015: Thunderbolts ignorance, delusions and lies in 67P's Mysterious Water Production video
Actually it is quite hard to find any Thunderbolts web page or video that is not full of ignorance, delusions or even lies. All I have seen is some pages on plasma science where only the delusion that anything they think looks like a Birkeland current is a Birkeland current raises its ugly head.
Haig or Sol88 - care to point out more ignorance, delusions or even lies contained in the Thunderbolts source that you are so obsessed with?
The 17 items
eek in The ignorance, delusions and lies in the Thunderbolts web site and videos need updating.18. 19 February 2015: Thunderbolts ignorance, delusions and lies in 67P's Mysterious Water Production video
Actually it is quite hard to find any Thunderbolts web page or video that is not full of ignorance, delusions or even lies. All I have seen is some pages on plasma science where only the delusion that anything they think looks like a Birkeland current is a Birkeland current raises its ugly head.
Haig or Sol88 - care to point out more ignorance, delusions or even lies contained in the Thunderbolts source that you are so obsessed with?
Last edited:
LSSBB
Devilish Dictionarian
What was predicted? Why doesn't the common scientific model explain that surface? What a completely contentless quibble.
Jrrarglblarg
Unregistered
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,673
Could you be bothered to specifically detail what it is you think you see here?
tusenfem
Illuminator
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 3,306
Care to explain in full detail what exactly is being shown here, except for a visual convex-concave illusion?
How is this illusion explained by the electric comet?
Oh wait no, the electric comet IS the illusion, I forgot.
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 64,413
What a monumentally stupid statement.
Do you know why "A chunk of ice melting in the Sun loses its sharp relief"? Because the surface tension of water acts to minimize surface area.
Does ice on a comet melt?
No, Sol, it does not melt. It sublimates. At no point is it ever in a liquid phase. As such, the dynamics of liquid phase surface tension are completely irrelevant.
Dancing David
Penultimate Amazing
Somebody has never cared to go someplace where snow and ice drifts and melts, they are just trolling
these pictures are all proof of EDM on glaciers
http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/eij/article/the_dying_glaciers_of_california/
Last edited:
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Sol88: A lie about the model of comets not being able to explain strata
The stupidity of rotating images as if that showed anything except your ignorance about which way up the image should be!
More delusions about the ELECTRIC COMET DELUSION explaining anything.
A lie about the electric comet delusion explaining strata.
A lie and incoherent gibberish. The scientific model of comets is able to explain strata. And if I thought that you were willing to learn it I would explain it to you (hint: sublimation + depositing of new material).
Yes, Sol88,you are certainly spewing a lot of repeated ignorance.
The stupidity of rotating images as if that showed anything except your ignorance about which way up the image should be!
More delusions about the ELECTRIC COMET DELUSION explaining anything.
A lie about the electric comet delusion explaining strata.
A lie and incoherent gibberish. The scientific model of comets is able to explain strata. And if I thought that you were willing to learn it I would explain it to you (hint: sublimation + depositing of new material).
Last edited:
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
Sol88 still believes in the Thunderbolts ignorance, delusions and lies
!
Sol88 cannot even understand the Thunderbolts web site- this page is a set of lies and fantasies about Deep Impact and Tempel 1.
Other than the mythologist David Talbot's nonsense that he thought were predications, I have not seen any 67P predictions on the Thunderbolts web site.
Sol88 quoting a lie from that web page is even worse!
Lying about glow discharges in images you cannot comprehend is not good either, Sol88. What you see is pixel saturation from bright sources, e.g. surface ice.
The ignorance, delusions and lies in the Thunderbolts web site and videos and yet Sol88 still believes in the Thunderbolts ignorance, delusions and lies
!Sol88 cannot even understand the Thunderbolts web site- this page is a set of lies and fantasies about Deep Impact and Tempel 1
.Other than the mythologist David Talbot's nonsense that he thought were predications, I have not seen any 67P predictions on the Thunderbolts web site.
Sol88 quoting a lie from that web page is even worse!
Lying about glow discharges in images you cannot comprehend is not good either, Sol88. What you see is pixel saturation from bright sources, e.g. surface ice.
Last edited:
- Status