Former Rooski Nucular Intelligence Officer To Blow the Reveal Entire 911 Plot

Foolmewunz

Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
Foolmewunz
Joined
Aug 11, 2006
Messages
41,468
Location
Pattaya, Thailand
(Some tagger may want to change the tags before I get another write up.)

Normally I don't share my toys real well, but you guys deserve a new treat now and then.

How's this? Fresh meat, guys, and it isn't from a lunatic conspiracy site site. Let's all give a resounding welcome to the uh, .... interesting.... yeah, interesting ideas of 911thology. He says he'll be happy to elaborate, so here's your chance to get all the answers you've been so sorely missing.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5769849#post5769849

Hi to everyone. I found this Forum because of my search for a place where ideas about the 9/11 could be exchanged. I registered here sometime ago, but was an 'inactive' member ever since. This one is my first post. About myself - I am a serious 9/11 researcher because of 2 different reasons. Firstly, I am a former commissioned officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence, so I understand quite well about nuclear explosions, their properties, effects, and I know very well about their actual relevance to the WTC -1, -2, and -7 demolitions. Secondly, because I was somehow acquainted with certain real 9/11 planners, which even resulted in the American FBI's attempt to arrest me and to obtain my extradition to the United States in 2003. Recently I have published my video documentary on YouTube where I explained a lot of details about the WTC Twins and the WTC-7 so far unexplainable pulverizations and about many other aspects of the 9/11, the Pentagon's missile name, the Doomsday plane's mystery and the Sears Tower's evacuation inclusive. So far most of visitors found this extremely interesting. Anyone is welcome to watch the documentary and to ask me questions, if any. I will be pleased to answer them. Because as a new user I have no right to post links here, I can’t give any direct links to YouTube. However, all 26 parts of my documentary could be easily found by searching for '911thology' keyword on YouTube search or on Google search. Thanks.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Dang, I just realized I didn't edit my title completely. Oh, well.... it's not "realistice", but it'll do. This guy deserves a whacked out title to his thread, anyway. (Just seems fitting.)
 
It's comforting to know there are people out there who are so passionate about The Truth that they're willing to lie through their teeth to disseminate it. Also a little ironic.
 
Ok.

... so I understand quite well about nuclear explosions, their properties, effects, and I know very well about their actual relevance to the WTC -1, -2, and -7 demolitions.
Click to expand...

Well... either he means:
  • He knows enough to understand that nuclear explosions aren't relevant to the World Trade Center buildings. In which case:
    thumbs.gif
  • He's trying an appeal to authority to make it sound as if the whole "nukes at the WTC" proposal has merit. In which case:
    cuckoo-1.gif
 
Hi to everyone. I found this Forum because of my search for a place where ideas about the 9/11 could be exchanged. I registered here sometime ago, but was an 'inactive' member ever since. This one is my first post. About myself - I am a serious 9/11 researcher because of 2 different reasons. Firstly, I am a former commissioned officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence, so I understand quite well about nuclear explosions, their properties, effects, and I know very well about their actual relevance to the WTC -1, -2, and -7 demolitions.
Click to expand...

Self debunked in his first post.

While that's not a record here, it is unusual. Most of them don't self-destruct until they reach double digits.
 
Well, he's posted on Youtube. That's all I need to give his "ideas" complete credence.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
What's amazing is that he put "911" in his forum nickname, wrote a very first post bragging up on 9/11 mythology, then went... straight to Religion and Philosophy to talk about the soul.

I'm sorry, but that deserves a special smiley:

[qimg]http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n94/elmondohummus/smileys_wtf.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

That's... odd.

I don't know if he's an intelligence officer (I'd bet money that he isn't) or even "rooski". But his appearant hostility against paragraph breaks indicates "english as a second language".
 
No, he is quite likely not a Rooski. I know several Russians who speak english well, they share some peculiarities of wording and phrasing that I don't notice in 911thology's post.
 
Mancman said:
I'm watching his video now.

He's a no planer.

LOL.
Click to expand...

All the micro-nukers (and space-beamers) are.

It's weird. It's like there's an unwritten law that when you take the stupidest possible option from column 'A', you are automatically locked into the stupidest option from column 'B' as well.
 
scissorhands said:
Looks like hes been trying to pimp his book,The Third Truth, on various ct forums for a while now.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread470592/pg1

At a price of $ 51.74, it sounds like a bargain.

This bozo actually pmed me on youtube to spam his videos, thats dedicated marketing.
Click to expand...

$51.74?? :jaw-dropp OMG... Who's this guy kidding?

Barnum's quote about suckers being born every minute might be apocryphal, but I'll be damned if it doesn't ring true sometimes. All it takes is one actual believer to buy the book to prove it (I'm of course excluding certain academics - say, psychology researchers researching paranoia. That would be a legitimate and sane buyer who's not forwarding that conspiracy fantasy with a purchase).
 
Mancman said:
I'm watching his video now.

He's a no planer.

LOL.
Click to expand...

Has he got any unique arguments, or is he just spouting the standard truther canon?

As an aside, I'm telling you all, I'm damn disappointed with YouTube/Google Video and all the other vid hosting services. So much on there is so repetitious it's insane, and I'm even talking non-truther stuff. When you get to the conspiracy peddling stuff, that is practically nothing but repeats, so much so that it makes each of the 30 billion "different" captures of some actresses nude scene look unique.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Has he got any unique arguments, or is he just spouting the standard truther canon?
Click to expand...

A summary of the first half hour:

Aluminium can't penetrate steel

WTC steel was as thick as tank armour

Repeat of September Clues nonsense about nose out and fade to black on chopper 5 footage

Claims the flightpaths of UA175 contradict in different videos - ('proves' this by comparing a shot showing the last second of flight with the 'divebomber' shot showing the last 12 seconds)

Jet fuel can't melt steel

Edna Cintron couldn't have stood in the impact hole

South Tower shouldn't have collapsed first if it was hit second

Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'

Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5,and penetrated 6 walls of the building.



So, revolution starts now? :rolleyes:
 
NutCracker said:
Is the stupidity hot enough to melt steel? That is the question.
Click to expand...

Normally, the stupid only has to be hot enough to weaken the steel, but in this case it's hot enough to create an uncontrolled fusion reaction.
 
Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'
Click to expand...


Yeah, attempting such maneuvers would result in a crash.

Oh wait...
 
twinstead said:
Normally, the stupid only has to be hot enough to weaken the steel, but in this case it's hot enough to create an uncontrolled fusion reaction.
Click to expand...

Sandia can sell it's Z-machine for scrap metal, then. The same goes for the NIF. ITER need not be completed. Just throw a Truther or 10 in a swimming pool. (But first check they can actually swim.)
 
Mancman said:
A summary of the first half hour:

Aluminium can't penetrate steel

WTC steel was as thick as tank armour

Repeat of September Clues nonsense about nose out and fade to black on chopper 5 footage

Claims the flightpaths of UA175 contradict in different videos - ('proves' this by comparing a shot showing the last second of flight with the 'divebomber' shot showing the last 12 seconds)

Jet fuel can't melt steel

Edna Cintron couldn't have stood in the impact hole

South Tower shouldn't have collapsed first if it was hit second

Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'

Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5,and penetrated 6 walls of the building.



So, revolution starts now? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It looks like he is pretty good at copying and pasting from various “truther” web sites… and charging for it.
Hey, maybe I could write a book.:)
 
Mancman said:
A summary of the first half hour:

Aluminium can't penetrate steel

WTC steel was as thick as tank armour

Repeat of September Clues nonsense about nose out and fade to black on chopper 5 footage

Claims the flightpaths of UA175 contradict in different videos - ('proves' this by comparing a shot showing the last second of flight with the 'divebomber' shot showing the last 12 seconds)

Jet fuel can't melt steel

Edna Cintron couldn't have stood in the impact hole

South Tower shouldn't have collapsed first if it was hit second

Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'

Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5,and penetrated 6 walls of the building.



So, revolution starts now? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Oh. Standard conspiracy fantasy canon then. Got it.

Color me disappointed. Unsurprised, but disappointed. Just another run-of-the-mill truthing, nothing original.
 
Mancman said:
Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5, and penetrated 6 walls of the building.
Click to expand...



Actually, this HushaSonicBoom(tm) sounds new to me. Are there others who have made this assertion?
 
I am a former commissioned officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence, so I understand quite well about nuclear explosions, their properties, effects
Click to expand...

try reading that with a "Checkov" voice.
 
In part 4 he claims that the NYC building codes required the WTC to have an in-built demolition plan. The developers chose a nuclear device in the basement. Khalezov knew about this as early as 1984, and apparently this was mentioned in American newspapers.

The Sears Tower also has this feature. :rolleyes:
 
Mancman said:
In part 4 he claims that the NYC building codes required the WTC to have an in-built demolition plan. The developers chose a nuclear device in the basement. Khalezov knew about this as early as 1984, and apparently this was mentioned in American newspapers.

The Sears Tower also has this feature. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
They allowed nuclear weapons in Manhattan??? Thats believable.
 
Mancman said:
In part 4 he claims that the NYC building codes required the WTC to have an in-built demolition plan. The developers chose a nuclear device in the basement. Khalezov knew about this as early as 1984, and apparently this was mentioned in American newspapers.

The Sears Tower also has this feature. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Oh, yeah. Built in demolitions. That one just came around again last month. And this very myth's been in circulation since at least 2006, when Christophera had to invent it to get around the "prep the buildings" issue (as a flashback, that's a link to the one and only "Realistice" thread... THE epic adventure in the JREF 9/11 CT subforum).

Funny how mere speculation on the part of some truthers suddenly becomes absolute knowledge for others to build on. :rolleyes:
 
Mancman said:
In part 4 he claims that the NYC building codes required the WTC to have an in-built demolition plan. The developers chose a nuclear device in the basement. Khalezov knew about this as early as 1984, and apparently this was mentioned in American newspapers.

The Sears Tower also has this feature. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

No way dude, Chicago has been a "Nuclear Free Zone" since 1986.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom