A guy who believes no one died on 9/11

He doesn't seem to believe in any mass shooting; he gives us some pure Alex Jones claiming that Sandy Hook is a hoax.

He goes on about how space exploration -- not just the moon landings -- is a hoax from beginning to end.

And all in a "we're too smart to be fooled by this obvious fraud" tone of writing.

I don't think anyone who was joking could pull this off for so long, and on so many topics.
 
Major Major said:
He doesn't seem to believe in any mass shooting; he gives us some pure Alex Jones claiming that Sandy Hook is a hoax.
Click to expand...

I should have looked. Here's a really good quote: "I want you to disregard disinformation merchants such as Jim Fetzer, Alex Jones, Judy Wood and Dallas Goldbug, who exist to distract and prevent you from discovering the truth about the fake news stories."

[My highlighting.]

It must be wonderful to be the only person in all of humanity who knows The Truth.

:blackcat:
 
He believes that the WTC was empty so no one was in the building at the time and the man who fell to their death was just a trickery for the mainstream media.

Sent from my LM-X410PM using Tapatalk
 
Dave Rogers said:
Like everything else in the truth movement, this is old hat; try googling "vicsims". Then take a shower.

Dave
Click to expand...



I think it's the same guy. He links to Simon Shack's website and video, that's the guy who pretty much invented the vicsims concept.
 
Ok i was wondering this because ive never heard of this concept before. I've heard of cd thermite super thermite no planers, and the laser from space claim.

Sent from my LM-X410PM using Tapatalk
 
It must be tough being a conspiracy theorist. Most of us can build up our knowledge and understanding of the world one step at a time. Those things that we are told that we find questionable we can find some way to test ourselves, by interacting with the world, and so start to understand the difference between trustworthy and untrustworthy sources. We can use logic, reason, and direct oberservation or experiment to interpret knew information, and, having formed an opinion of it's trustworthiness, use that information to judge the next piece of information that we are exposed to.

Conspiracy theorists, on the other hand, are stuck in a sort of Last Tuesdayism style of doubt about everything, wherein no prior data or models of the world are trustworthy (even conditionally or probabilistically), and so they literally know nothing.

Or at least, that seems to be their approach to the actual facts that the rest of us understand. When it comes to the conspiracy narrative that they are promoting, on the other hand, suddenly certainty doesn't even require that built up process of evidence that the rest of us rely on to get at the truth. Instead, guessing, innuendo, and wishing-it-were-so seems to be enough.
 
I made the mistakes of going to Cluesforums once, never going to a site like that again. The CTers in these threads and in various comments threads are more than enough.
 
Safe-Keeper said:
I made the mistakes of going to Cluesforums once, never going to a site like that again. The CTers in these threads and in various comments threads are more than enough.
Click to expand...

I make the mistake of popping in there every few months, it hasn't got any better.
 
A majority of people on this planet have delusions of a similar magnitude: it's called religion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom