Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
First post. Universalseed.org!!! LOL

edit: Beaten. Dammit!!!
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Surely there've been bigger threads than this series... right?
Click to expand...
Don't think so. I reckon these threads even outdo the "Carlos Swett Affair" (which was also related to 9/11 of course).

Hmm, I wonder where Carlos/latinjral is now? What if he were to post his "paranormal hat" video over at the Loose Change forum?
Might be worth a laugh ...
 
I was going to suggest that the old thread be ended and an new, generic 9/11 thread begun, but I guess that'll have to wait for another 5,000 posts.
 
Gravy said:
I was going to suggest that the old thread be ended and an new, generic 9/11 thread begun, but I guess that'll have to wait for another 5,000 posts.
Click to expand...
I wonder whether its time for a conspiracy theory subforum. Strictly speaking this thread should be dozens of smaller threads but General Skepticism and the Paranormal isn't quite the place.
 
Good suggestion, try floating the idea in Community or Forum Management and see what the feedback is.
 
The first three threads contain 11,405 posts.

So trailing behind three word story, and barely half of Top Ten List Challenge.

Pretty impressive for a "3%" thread, though!
 
Bindamel said:
The first three threads contain 11,405 posts.

So trailing behind three word story, and barely half of Top Ten List Challenge.

Pretty impressive for a "3%" thread, though!
Click to expand...
and behind The REAL Spawn of "The Thread That Will Not Die"! (currently at 15,921) - but I wasn't thinking of fun threads. I still reckon that Loose Change Parts 1 to IV is the longest on a substantive issue.
 
How do you determine when a new thread should be started? Is there a limit on each size?

-Andrew
 
The thread that wil not die is also years old. How old it this trail? Six months?
 
Darat said:
Are you suggesting that this consipracy theory will never die.... Nooooooo!!
Click to expand...


Good CTs don't die... they just fade away...

(to be brought back up as supporting evidence for the NEXT CT - see JFK)

-Andrew
 
gumboot said:
How do you determine when a new thread should be started? Is there a limit on each size?

-Andrew
Click to expand...

The first "close and split" came about because there was a "natural point" in the discussion where a break seemed sensible - since then it's normally been when someone has reminded me (thanks Regnad Kcin) that once again the beast has grown rather large.
 
Darat said:
The first "close and split" came about because there was a "natural point" in the discussion where a break seemed sensible - since then it's normally been when someone has reminded me (thanks Regnad Kcin) that once again the beast has grown rather large.
Click to expand...


Gotcha... keep up the good work...:cool:

:kiwibird:
-Andrew

P.S. I always rather liked your avatar by the way...
 
Something to annoy Chuck Sheen with.

lolsheepfn1.jpg
 
Yep. I wonder how people will defend Alex Jones outright lying.
 
Universal Seed?

Dang! I thought it was Universal Screed! the Drive-in of Delusion!
 
I've been IP banned, suspended, locked out, whatever over at LC, but I can ready the archives of the Loosers Speak thread. I've seen a lot of comments about the laughing at box-cutters and "firemen are stupid", etc...

Could someone bring up Dylan's insinuation that Bernard Brown sent his son to his death and then admitted to never having talked to Mr. Brown to confirm? I think that's one of the most disgusting and contemptable displays to date.
 
realitybites said:
I've been IP banned, suspended, locked out, whatever over at LC, but I can ready the archives of the Loosers Speak thread. I've seen a lot of comments about the laughing at box-cutters and "firemen are stupid", etc...

Could someone bring up Dylan's insinuation that Bernard Brown sent his son to his death and then admitted to never having talked to Mr. Brown to confirm? I think that's one of the most disgusting and contemptable displays to date.
Click to expand...
I brought it up this morning. Not a single comment about it from the Loosers yet. The thread is in a Northwoods/Gladio derail at the moment.
 
Speaking of boxcutters,

There was a link at the end of the last thread to a picture of the boxcutters used. THey aren't the little bitty "1/4" triangle of blade" things or the "razor-blade holder" things. They're the extendible blade utility knives, as I suspected earlier, razor sharp and with a blade that can extend to about 4 or 5 inches (link is at this post).
 
Well, I didn't get banned, but have recieved a Warning for saying this about the LC Forum:

The truth is, you're pip-squeeks; a bacterium on the mite on the pimple on the buttocks of the Internet.
Click to expand...

I guess I get points for creativity in my insults...

Pressing on.
 
Huntsman said:
Speaking of boxcutters,

There was a link at the end of the last thread to a picture of the boxcutters used. THey aren't the little bitty "1/4" triangle of blade" things or the "razor-blade holder" things. They're the extendible blade utility knives, as I suspected earlier, razor sharp and with a blade that can extend to about 4 or 5 inches (link is at this post).
Click to expand...
Don't you know you can snap those blades off with the smallest flick of a finger? [/CT Who Has Never Handled a Tool in His Life mode]
 
And the jackasses are commenting on my youtube.

"markyX you need to come up with more evidence proving the government story. it doesn't do anything but show more "info" from other sources. sorry man keep trying"

"I don't understand what the whole thing about Mark being Gay had to do with 9/11 or debunking anything.."

Little do they realize that the video wasn't meant to debunk all myths.
 
Last edited:
chipmunk stew said:
Don't you know you can snap those blades off with the smallest flick of a finger? [/CT Who Has Never Handled a Tool in His Life mode]
Click to expand...

They do break easy, but IMO that makes em more dangerous. Still rather face a knife.

These things will break the blade off after a stab (or a chance to, anyway), and typically carry a half-dozen to a dozen blades in the handle.
 
Huntsman said:
They do break easy, but IMO that makes em more dangerous. Still rather face a knife.

These things will break the blade off after a stab (or a chance to, anyway), and typically carry a half-dozen to a dozen blades in the handle.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'm sure it's no fun continuing a fight for your life with a broken-off shard of metal embedded in your neck.
 
MarkyX

I watched all of your Video. Very impressive. It is gut wrenching at times, but I think if people see this after watching LC, tehy may be less taken back by his rap video, sound byte approach to the subject.

(Hats off)
 
I too was warned (currently at 100%) for the following "foul and offensive" stetments:

"Lesbians are the best flossers"

and

"Jane, you ignorant slut."
 
I've learned not to underestimate box cutters.
eva6.jpg


But seriously, I try not to underestimate anything sharp, especially in the hands of someone trained for violence.

I remember someone posting a link to a news story about boxcutters being used to deadly effect in a crime. Anyone know it off hand?
 
good lord, its amazing how i will occassionally pop into these threads to see what is being discussed and things that seem so easily dismissed are still debated.
so the old boxcutter debate still has fuel.
and to make the same argument i am sure you have all seen, before 9/11 people assumed it was better to obey terrorists who claimed they would blow up the plane regardless of what they were armed with, it just wasnt worth it. the fact that these terrorists managed to slit a few throats was probably even more than they needed to do. and once they realized they were gonna die anyway, flight 93 rebelled. seems like this all makes sense (waiting for CTist to say it makes too much sense) . there is no history of hijacking that would lead me to believe peope wouldve resisted the hijackers differently than they did.
this is why i only pop in occassionally- there are almost never any new insights. just retreading the same old crap.
 
Last edited:
Huntsman said:
They do break easy, but IMO that makes em more dangerous. Still rather face a knife.

These things will break the blade off after a stab (or a chance to, anyway), and typically carry a half-dozen to a dozen blades in the handle.
Click to expand...

MarkyX's video has a picture of a boxcutter that I assume was found in the wreckage? It used blades like these:

http://www.homedepot.com/prel80/HDU...BV_EngineID=ccgiaddihieemgicgelceffdfgidgim.0

These are the single bladed type that you can flip the blade around for two uses.

The knives were the only threat the hijackers had, however they apparently told the passengers they had a bomb on board too. The CT'ers are all ready to put their lives on the line against a boxcutter, but would they still do it if they believed there was a bomb on board too? Obviously the passengers of the last plane knew they would be dead either way so they did do it, but the first planes didn't know.
 
That is just a normal boxcutter.

I merely show it after the article to show that "Yeah, that little knife can cause problems"
 
Last edited:
ah, just saw the knife from the evidence in the trial. Yeah, those are the multi-blade types. I imagine they had different types to get on board. Or the one MarkyX had pictures of came from within the WTC or Pentagon and not the plane.

eta: heh, cross-posted.
 
kevin said:
The knives were the only threat the hijackers had, however they apparently told the passengers they had a bomb on board too.
Click to expand...

I'm not up on this as much as many of you, but I'm almost sure I read somewhere that in one of the cell phone calls from one of the planes, some form of gas or Mace-like substance was also mentioned. No?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom