Split Thread The FDR is not a part of the plane

ULTIMA1

Banned
U
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
3,314
BenBurch said:
Because the last time I worked on a FDR it was QUITE material and absolutely uniquely identifiable.
Click to expand...

Last time i checked the FDR is not a part from the plane.

Why do you keep dodging the question about the so called mountain of evidence?

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ULTIMA1 said:
Last time i checked the FDR is not a part from the plane.

Why do you keep dodging the question about the so called mountain of evidence?
Click to expand...

OK, you're in need of medical help if you actually think that, and if you don't, you are lying. An FDR is absolutely a part of the plane. It is quite securely bolted to the plane, it is serial number registered to the plane, and it takes its power from the plane.

Welcome to my ignore file.
 
The thing thats strange is that HI and ULTIMA actually believe they are being clever here, and have thrown us eebil debunkers for a loop. But when we attempt to use their own arguments against them, they can't seem to stop and think about why they cannot find anything like what they are describing for other crashes. It's like they are completely oblivious to their own hypocrisy. I knew truthers were irony-impaired and logic-impaired, but most typically change subjects when their hypocrisy is pointed out. HI and ULTIMA march ever onward.....


ULTIMA1 said:
Last time i checked the FDR is not a part from the plane.
Click to expand...


Yikes. Either you mangled your English again, or you have no idea what an FDR is...which is it?
 
Last edited:
apathoid said:
Yikes. Either you mangled your English again, or you have no idea what an FDR is...which is it?
Click to expand...

The FDR is added to track systems it is not a part of the plane.

Let the record show you still cannot pot any physical evidnece that AA77 hit the Pentagon.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
The FDR is added to track systems it is not a part of the plane.
Click to expand...

By this logic, no airplane parts can be said to be part of AA77.

Found the engines? "The engines were added to provide power they are not part of the plane."

Found the wings? "The wings were added to provide lift they are not part of the plane."

Found the airframe? "The airframe was added to have something to attach the wings and engines to it is not part of the plane."
 
aggle-rithm said:
"The engines were added to provide power they are not part of the plane."

Found the wings? "The wings were added to provide lift they are not part of the plane."

Found the airframe? "The airframe was added to have something to attach the wings and engines to it is not part of the plane."
Click to expand...

These do have to do with the flying of the plane, the FDR does not.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
These do have to do with the flying of the plane, the FDR does not.
Click to expand...

the FDR is bolted into the plane, making it part of the plane
it's in the tail cause that is the most survivable part of the aircraft, or least damaged (typically when pilots are trying to avoid a crash)

they are serial numbered and assigned to an airframe, which makes it identifiable to an aircraft

so you're telling us that if two 757's crash in mid-air and both FDRs were recovered, the NTSB would have no way to figure out which box came from which aircraft?

sounds silly... doesn't it?
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
These do have to do with the flying of the plane, the FDR does not.
Click to expand...


Are you this daft? Neither does a galley, a seat, and oxygen bottle, a megaphone, a ceiling light, a video monitor, a floor board, a lavatory tank, etc, etc, etc........yet they are all airplane parts. Why? They are attatched to the airplane!!!
 
aggle-rithm said:
Whatever. Your delusional beliefs are merely a source of amusement for me.

But I grow bored. Amuse me!
Click to expand...

Show me the information that states the FDR is used in the flying of the plane or concede you know nothing about what you are talking about.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
These do have to do with the flying of the plane, the FDR does not.
Click to expand...

So are you saying that only the parts of an airplane that help the plane fly are a part of the airplane, so when a plane crashes any part that doesn't add to the flight of the plane is no longer a part of the plane and/or is no longer real at all?:confused:
 
apathoid said:
Are you this daft? Neither does a galley, a seat, and oxygen bottle, a megaphone, a ceiling light, a video monitor, a floor board, a lavatory tank, etc, etc, etc........yet they are all airplane parts. Why? They are attatched to the airplane!!!
Click to expand...

We are talking about the FDR. Please be adult enough to stay on topic.
 
So let's get this straight. Anything that is not electromechanically part of the thrust or control systems of the aircraft is not considered part of the plane? Those items won't be serialized to the particular plane?

Is this what you are saying?

ETA: I take that back. Let's be fair here - this isn't what he said.
 
Last edited:
apathoid said:
Stundie thread, here I come! That's gold Jerry, gold!!!!
Click to expand...

Reheat said:
That ought to be the winner of the year for Stundies!
Click to expand...

apathoid said:
Stundied!

You may want to start working on your acceptance speech ULTIMA. That was a beauty! Thanks!
Click to expand...

AJM8125 said:
Is there any such thing as "The Lifetime Stundie Achievement Award? Dammit, there should be!.
Click to expand...

I guess we shouldn't laugh. Through our efforts, ultima has now managed to spam yet another thread without even posting in it. How many nominations is it now? 5? 6? and the month ain't even over yet.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Show me the information that states the FDR is used in the flying of the plane or concede you know nothing about what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

[ULTIMA1]
Show where it has been claimed by anyone that the FDR is used in flying of the plane or concede that you are lying.
[/ULTIMA1]
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Show me the information that states the FDR is used in the flying of the plane or concede you know nothing about what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

No one has said that.

I know you're smarter than this, please stop trying to defend you stupid claims by putting words in our mouthes.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
We are talking about the FDR. Please be adult enough to stay on topic.
Click to expand...

EpicFail02.jpg
 
TokenMac said:
No one has said that.

I know you're smarter than this, please stop trying to defend you stupid claims by putting words in our mouthes.
Click to expand...

QUOTE=EventHorizon;4744887]This is hysterical. Two posts after he himself put words in other people's mouths. [/QUOTE]


So you agree that the FDR is not a part of the plane that has to do with the working of the plane.
 
Last edited:
Next time I have to change an airplane part that I don't want to(like a 90 lb. galley chiller), I'm gonna tell my supervisor that I work on airplanes and since the part has "nothing to do with the flying of the plane"; it's not an airplane part. That'll go over precisely like a fart in church.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
So you agree that the FDR is not a part of the plane that has to do with the working of the plane.
Click to expand...

No more than the communications/VOR equipment/transponder, etc.

They don't physically assist in the motion of keeping the fuselage in the air, but they are just as necessary for a plane to navigate today's airspace - the FDR is a much needed safety measure that allows us to glean lessons learned from aircraft tragedies.

ETA: Turn signals and brake lights don't physically assist the motion of your car. But try driving from one side of town to the other without them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom